CEBP http://www.cancermicroenvironment.tau.ac.il/welcome2009.html Advances in Breast Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kataoka, N.
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kataoka, N.
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, W.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 15, 1148-1152, June 2006
© 2006 American Association for Cancer Research

Population-Based Case-Control Study of VEGF Gene Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer Risk among Chinese Women

Nobuhiko Kataoka1, Qiuyin Cai1, Wanqing Wen1, Xiao-Ou Shu1, Fan Jin2, Yu-Tang Gao2 and Wei Zheng1

1 Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center and Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee and 2 Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China

Requests for reprints: Wei Zheng, Center for Health Services Research, 1161 21st Avenue South, S1121 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232-2587. Phone: 615-936-0682; Fax: 615-322-1754. E-mail: wei.zheng{at}vanderbilt.edu


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a major angiogenic factor involved in a number of pathologic processes, including neovascularization, a crucial step in the development of solid malignancies. Using data and specimens collected in the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study, a population-based case-control study conducted in urban Shanghai, China from 1996 to 1998, we evaluated the association of VEGF gene polymorphisms with breast cancer risk. Included in this study were 1,093 cases and 1,184 age-matched controls who had completed an in-person interview and donated a blood sample to the study. Polymorphisms in the promoter region (T–460C), 5' untranslated region (C+405G), and 3'untranslated region (C936T) were genotyped using the Taqman allelic discrimination assay. No statistically significant case-control difference was found for the C+405G and T–460C polymorphisms. However, the C936T polymorphism was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. Compared with CC genotype carriers, women who had the TT genotype showed a decreased risk [odds ratio (OR), 0.65; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.41-1.02], and the inverse association was restricted to premenopausal women (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.25-0.79). Six common haplotypes were identified. Compared with the most common haplotype (–460T/405C/936C), the –460T/405G/936T haplotype was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.43-1.04), particularly in premenopausal women (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27-0.81). Our study suggests that the VEGF C936T polymorphism might be a susceptibility factor for breast cancer among Chinese women. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(6):1148–52)


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an endothelial cell-specific mitogen, an angiogenic inducer, and a mediator of vascular permeability (1). New blood vessels (neovascularization) are required by most solid tumors not only to supply metabolic demands but also to provide potential routes for tumor dissemination and metastasis (2). In breast cancer tissue, VEGF mRNA expression is increased compared with adjacent normal breast tissue (3). Moreover, high tissue VEGF levels seem to correlate with poor prognosis and decreased overall survival for breast cancer patients (4). Currently, targeting VEGF pathways is one of the strategies in the treatment of cancer (5).

The human VEGF gene is located on chromosome 6p21.3 and contains eight exons, separated by seven introns, and its coding region spans ~14 kb (6, 7). The promoter region and 5'-untranslated region of the VEGF gene were first screened for polymorphisms by Watson et al. (8). Fifteen novel polymorphisms were identified, and +405GG genotype of C+405G polymorphism was significantly associated with increased peripheral blood mononuclear cell VEGF protein production stimulated by lipopolysaccharide (8). Haplotype analyses of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in these regions showed that carriage of the –460C and +405C alleles significantly alters VEGF promoter activity and responsiveness (9). Renner et al. reported three novel polymorphisms (C702T, C936T, and G1612A) in the 3'-untranslated region and found that carriers of the 936T allele had significantly lower VEGF plasma levels than noncarriers (10).

Several studies have investigated the association of VEGF gene polymorphisms with diseases in which angiogenesis plays a major role in pathogenesis, such as diabetic retinopathy (11), renal cell carcinoma (12), acute renal allograft rejection (13), prostate cancer (14), and malignant melanoma (15). The results, however, were mixed. Thus far, three studies have investigated the association of VEGF polymorphisms with breast cancer risk with inconsistent results. Krippl et al. (16) reported that the T allele of VEGF 936C/T was associated with decreased breast cancer risk. Recently, Jin et al. (17) reported that the VEGF polymorphisms –2578C/A, –1154G/A, and 936C/T were not associated with breast cancer risk. Smith et al. (18) also reported that the –1154G/A polymorphism was not associated with breast cancer risk. We focused this study on the investigation of three functional SNPs: G+450C, C–460T, and C936T. Based on the data reported thus far regarding the functionality of these SNPs, we hypothesized that VEGF –406C, +405G, and 936C alleles might be associated with increased breast cancer risk and evaluated this hypothesis in the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study, a large population-based case-control study conducted among Chinese women in Shanghai.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study Subjects
Subjects included in this study were those recruited from 1996 to 1998 for the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study, a population-based case-control study. Details of the study methodology have been described elsewhere (19). Briefly, cases were identified through the population-based Shanghai Cancer Registry that ascertains virtually all cancer cases diagnosed among residents of urban Shanghai. The controls were randomly selected from the general female population in Shanghai and frequency matched to cases by age (5-year interval). A structured questionnaire was used during an in-person interview to elicit information on demographic features, menstrual and reproductive history, sex hormone use, dietary habits, prior disease history, physical activities, tobacco and alcohol use, weight, and family history of cancer. Menopause was defined as a cessation of the menstrual cycle for 12 months or longer, excluding those periods caused by pregnancy or breast-feeding. In-person interviews were completed for 1,459 (91.1%) of the 1,601 eligible breast cancer cases newly diagnosed in the region during the study period and 1,556 (90.3%) of the 1,724 eligible controls. Of those who completed the in-person interviews, 2,503 [1,193 (81.8%) cases and 1,310 (84.2%) controls] donated blood samples. The buffy coats were stored at –70°C for subsequent DNA isolation. Cancer diagnoses for all patients were confirmed by two senior study pathologists through a review of tumor slides.

DNA Isolation and Genotyping Assays
Genomic DNA was extracted from buffy coat fractions using a Puregene DNA Purification kit (Gentra System, Minneapolis, MN) following the manufacturer's protocol. DNA concentration was measured by PicoGreen dsDNA Quantitation Kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). The allelic discrimination of the VEGF gene polymorphisms was assessed with the ABI PRISM 7900 Sequence Detection Systems (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), using the fluorogenic 5'nuclease assay with Taqman Minor Groove Binder probes. The wild-type Taqman Minor Groove Binder probes were FAM labeled, and the mutant probes were VIC labeled. The final volume for each reaction was 5 µL, consisting of 2.5 µL Taqman Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 0.6 µL of each primer, 0.2 µL of each Taqman probe, and 2.5 ng genomic DNA. The PCR profile was an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 10 minutes and 40 to 55 cycles of 92°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 1 minute. Fluorescent signals were measured at 60°C. Primers and probes for G+405C (rs2010963, Assays-on-Demand), C-460T (rs833061, Assays-by-Design), and T936C (rs3025039, Assays-by-Design) were obtained from Applied Biosystems.

The laboratory staff was blind to the identity of the subjects. Quality control samples were included in the genotyping assays. Each 384-well plate contained four water, eight CEPH 1347-02 DNA, eight blinded quality control samples, and eight unblinded quality control samples. The blinded and unblinded quality control samples were taken from the second tube of study samples included in the study. The concordance for the blinded samples was >97%.

Statistical Analysis
The {chi}2 test was used to evaluate case-control differences in the distribution of allele types and genotypes. Breast cancer risk associated with each VEGF genotype was estimated using logistic regression models conditioned on age to accommodate the age frequency-matched study design. Odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals were used to measure the strength of the association between VEGF gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk (20, 21). Evaluated as potential confounders in the study were those that were independently related to breast cancer risk, such as family history of breast cancer, history of fibroadenoma, menopausal status, physical activity, age at menarche, age at first birth, body mass index, and waist-to-hip ratio. The former five variables were included in the model as categorical variables, whereas the latter four variables were included in the model as continuous variables. Adjusting for these factors, however, did not appreciably change the ORs. Therefore, we only present the age-adjusted ORs. The presence of interaction was assessed using the likelihood ratio test by comparing the model including the main effects only, with that including both the main effects and the possible interactive variables. We employed the software PHASE (version 2.1), which used a Bayesian statistical method (22), to derive haplotypes for the VEGF gene. The association between haplotypes and breast cancer risk was evaluated using logistic regression models. All statistical tests were based on two-tailed probability.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
The distribution of selected demographic characteristics and major risk factors for breast cancer in the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study have been previously reported (19) and is presented briefly in Table 1 . Breast cancer cases and controls were comparable in age and education levels. An elevated risk of breast cancer was observed for all known major breast cancer risk factors, including a prior history of breast fibroadenoma, physical inactivity, higher waist-to-hip ratio, higher body mass index, early onset of menarche, late onset of menopause, and late age at first live birth. Participants in the current study were similar to those of parent study with regard to all abovementioned factors (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Comparison of cases and controls by selected demographic characteristics, major risk factors for breast cancer in the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study

 
Allele frequencies for the individual polymorphisms among controls were similar to those reported previously in other Asian populations (11, 23). Minor alleles (frequency) among controls were C (0.26) in T–460C, C (0.40) in C+405G, and T (0.19) in C936T polymorphisms (Table 1). No statistically significant differences were found in allele distributions between cases and controls. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was observed for all polymorphisms in controls (P > 0.05).

The frequencies of VEGF genotypes by case-control status and the association between VEGF genotypes and breast cancer risk are presented in Table 2 . The homozygous TT genotype of the C936T polymorphism was associated with a decreased breast cancer risk (OR, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-1.02) compared with the CC genotype. The inverse association was confined to premenopausal women (OR, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.79). No statistically significant association was found for the other two SNPs, and no apparent interaction was found for these SNPs in relation to breast cancer risk (data not shown). In addition, no apparent interaction was found for any of these SNPs with estrogen-related factors, such as age at menarche, age at first live birth, body mass index, and waist-to-hip ratio.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. Association of VEGF polymorphisms and breast cancer risk by age at diagnosis and menopausal status (the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study, 1996-1998)

 
Associations of breast cancer risk with VEGF haplotypes are shown in Table 3 . Six common haplotypes were identified to account for >99% of all haplotypes tagged by these three SNPs. Consistent with the genotype analysis, two (CGT and TGT) of three haplotypes that contain the T allele at the C936T were associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women. In particular, an OR of 0.47 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.81) was statistically significant for the –460T/405G/936T haplotype in premenopausal women.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3. Associations between VEGF haplotype and breast cancer risk

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Angiogenesis is essential for tumor growth and plays a critical role in the invasion and metastasis of tumor cells. Angiogenesis is regulated by many growth factors, among which VEGF plays a central role and serves as an important prognostic factor in a variety of tumors, including breast cancers. The association of VEGF gene polymorphisms with disease risk attracts a great deal of attention because VEGF is one of the most potent angiogenic factors and plays a significant role in the development of solid tumors. As mentioned previously, several studies have evaluated the association of VEGF polymorphisms with breast cancer risk (16-18). The results, however, have been inconsistent. In this study, we found that women who carry the TT genotype in the C936T polymorphism had a decreased risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women.

The C936T polymorphism has been reported to be associated with lower VEGF plasma levels (10, 20). Those who are homozygous for TT have lower VEGF production compared with the CC genotype, which, in turn, may decrease the risk of tumor development (10). This laboratory observation supports the finding from our study of an inverse association of the 936T allele with breast cancer risk. Consistent with our study, Krippl et al. have recently reported that carriers of a 936T allele had a decreased risk of breast cancer (16). The 936T allele was also found to be associated with a reduced uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose, used for detection and staging of breast cancer (24). On the other hand, a recently published study showed no association of breast cancer risk with several VEGF SNPs, including the C936T variant (17). The number of subjects with the 936T/T genotype, however, was small in that study that included cases and controls recruited from multiple sources in Poland, Germany, and Sweden.

We found in this study that the association of the VEGF 936TT genotype with breast cancer risk was restricted to premenopausal women who have a much higher estrogen level than postmenopausal women. Estrogen exposure plays a central role in the development and progression of breast cancer (25, 26). Estrogen modulates angiogenesis, under both physiologic and pathologic conditions, mainly via effects on endothelial cells (27). In addition, estrogen has been reported to increase VEGF mRNA expression and protein in breast cancer cells (28) and isolated endometrial cells (29, 30). Recently, a positive correlation between estradiol and VEGF was shown in normal human breast tissue in vivo with microdialysis system (31). These data suggest that VEGF plays a significant role in the development of breast and other hormone-related cancers.

The mechanism by which the VEGF 936T allele leads to lower VEGF plasma levels is currently unknown. Several potential mechanisms have been suggested: (a) the C-to-T transition may lead to the loss of a potential binding site for AP-4, a transcription factor; (b) this polymorphism may be in linkage disequilibrium with another unknown polymorphism elsewhere; and (c) the C-to-T transition may lead to a change of mRNA structure (10).

The rate of type I errors is a major concern in association studies of genetic factors. Wacholder et al. (32) proposed to evaluate type I errors using the false-positive report probability method. For prior probabilities of 0.10 and 0.25, we obtained values for the false-positive report probability of 0.089 and 0.031, respectively, for the positive association of 936TT genotype with breast cancer risk observed in the study. These false-positive report probability values are below the 0.20 level proposed by Wacholder et al.'s criterion (32) as acceptable, providing some assurance for the validity of the positive association observed in this study.

We did not detect statistically significant associations of breast cancer with the two SNPs (C–460T and C+405G) in the promoter region and 5'-untranslated region of the VEGF gene. As mentioned previously, there is evidence suggesting that these two SNPs may be of functional significance (8, 9). Previous studies on the association of polymorphisms in the promoter and 5'-untranslated region with disease susceptibility produced mixed results; some showing an association [diabetic retinopathy (11) and acute renal allograft rejection (13)] and some showing no association [malignant melanoma (15), preterm delivery (33), and prostate cancer (14)]. The contribution of these polymorphisms, therefore, may vary by disease or organ. Intriguingly, we reported very recently that carrying either the –460C or the +405G allele was associated with decreased overall survival, whereas the C936T polymorphism was not related to survival (34). Further investigation to explain this discrepancy may be needed.

The participation rate in this study was high, minimizing the potential selection bias that is common to many case-control studies. Chinese women living in Shanghai are relatively homogenous in ethnic background; >98% of them are in a single ethnic group (Han Chinese). The sample size of this study is large, which provides a stable estimate of the association of breast cancer risk with VEGF gene polymorphisms. The strong methodology of the study, along with biological plausibility of the findings, lends support to the theory that VEGF C936T polymorphisms may play an important role in breast cancer development.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Drs. Qi Dai and Jia-Rong Cheng for their contributions in coordinating data and specimen collection in Shanghai, Qing Wang and Regina Courtney for technique assistance, Bethanie Hull for technical assistance in the preparation of this article, and all of the study participants and research staff of the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study for their support.


   Footnotes
 
Grant support: National Cancer Institute grants R01CA64277 and R01CA90899.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 11/10/05; revised 2/15/06; accepted 3/16/06.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Ferrara N, Gerber HP. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in angiogenesis. Acta Haematol 2001;106:148–56.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Ferrara N, Davis-Smyth T. The biology of vascular endothelial growth factor. Endocr Rev 1997;18:4–25.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Yoshiji H, Gomez DE, Shibuya M, Thorgeirsson UP. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, its receptor, and other angiogenic factors in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 1996;56:2013–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Linderholm B, Tavelin B, Grankvist K, Henriksson R. Vascular endothelial growth factor is of high prognostic value in node-negative breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:3121–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Rosen LS. Clinical experience with angiogenesis signaling inhibitors: focus on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) blockers. Cancer Control 2002;9:36–44.[Medline]
  6. Tischer E, Mitchell R, Hartman T, et al. The human gene for vascular endothelial growth factor. Multiple protein forms are encoded through alternative exon splicing. J Biol Chem 1991;266:11947–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Vincenti V, Cassano C, Rocchi M, Persico G. Assignment of the vascular endothelial growth factor gene to human chromosome 6p21.3. Circulation 1996;93:1493–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Watson CJ, Webb NJ, Bottomley MJ, Brenchley PE. Identification of polymorphisms within the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene: correlation with variation in VEGF protein production. Cytokine 2000;12:1232–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Stevens A, Soden J, Brenchley PE, Ralph S, Ray DW. Haplotype analysis of the polymorphic human vascular endothelial growth factor gene promoter. Cancer Res 2003;63:812–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Renner W, Kotschan S, Hoffmann C, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Pilger E. A common 936 C/T mutation in the gene for vascular endothelial growth factor is associated with vascular endothelial growth factor plasma levels. J Vasc Res 2000;37:443–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Awata T, Inoue K, Kurihara S, et al. A common polymorphism in the 5'-untranslated region of the VEGF gene is associated with diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2002;51:1635–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Abe A, Sato K, Habuchi T, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the 3' untranslated region of vascular endothelial growth factor gene in Japanese population with or without renal cell carcinoma. Tohoku J Exp Med 2002;198:181–90.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Shahbazi M, Fryer AA, Pravica V, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor gene polymorphisms are associated with acute renal allograft rejection. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:260–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. McCarron SL, Edwards S, Evans PR, et al. Influence of cytokine gene polymorphisms on the development of prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2002;62:3369–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Howell WM, Bateman AC, Turner SJ, Collins A, Theaker JM. Influence of vascular endothelial growth factor single nucleotide polymorphisms on tumour development in cutaneous malignant melanoma. Genes Immun 2002;3:229–32.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Krippl P, Langsenlehner U, Renner W, et al. A common 936 C/T gene polymorphism of vascular endothelial growth factor is associated with decreased breast cancer risk. Int J Cancer 2003;106:468–71.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Jin Q, Hemminki K, Enquist K, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor polymorphisms in relation to breast cancer development and prognosis. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:3647–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Smith KC, Bateman AC, Fussell HM, Howell WM. Cytokine gene polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility and prognosis. Eur J Immunogenet 2004;31:167–73.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Gao YT, Shu XO, Dai Q, et al. Association of menstrual and reproductive factors with breast cancer risk: results from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study. Int J Cancer 2000;87:295–300.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Breslow NE, Day NE, editors. Statistical methods in cancer research. The analysis of case-control studies. Vol. 1. Lyon (France): IARC; 1980.
  21. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1998.
  22. Stephens M, Donnelly P. A comparison of bayesian methods for haplotype reconstruction from population genotype data. Am J Hum Genet 2003;73:1162–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Morohashi K, Takada T, Omori K, Suzuki E, Gejyo F. Vascular endothelial growth factor gene polymorphisms in Japanese patients with sarcoidosis. Chest 2003;123:1520–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Wolf G, Aigner RM, Schaffler G, et al. The 936C>T polymorphism of the gene for vascular endothelial growth factor is associated with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004;88:205–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Travis RC, Key TJ. Oestrogen exposure and breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res 2003;5:239–47.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Lapidus RG, Nass SJ, Davidson NE. The loss of estrogen and progesterone receptor gene expression in human breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 1998;3:85–94.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Losordo DW, Isner JM. Estrogen and angiogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2001;21:6–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Garvin S, Dabrosin C. Tamoxifen inhibits secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor in breast cancer in vivo. Cancer Res 2003;63:8742–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Shifren JL, Tseng JF, Zaloudek CJ, et al. Ovarian steroid regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor in the human endometrium: implications for angiogenesis during the menstrual cycle and in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996;81:3112–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Bausero P, Cavaille F, Meduri G, Freitas S, Perrot-Applanat M. Paracrine action of vascular endothelial growth factor in the human endometrium: production and target sites, and hormonal regulation. Angiogenesis 1998;2:167–82.[Medline]
  31. Dabrosin C. Positive correlation between estradiol and vascular endothelial growth factor but not fibroblast growth factor-2 in normal human breast tissue in vivo. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:8036–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Wacholder S, Chanock S, Garcia-Closas M, El Ghormli L, Rothman N. Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: an approach for molecular epidemiology studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:434–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Papazoglou D, Galazios G, Koukourakis MI, Kontomanolis EN, Maltezos E. Association of -634G/C and 936C/T polymorphisms of the vascular endothelial growth factor with spontaneous preterm delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004;83:461–5.[Medline]
  34. Lu H, Shu XO, Cui Y, et al. Association of genetic polymorphisms in the VEGF gene with breast cancer survival. Cancer Res 2005;65:5015–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Med. Genet.Home page
K Y-K Chan, W Liu, J-R Long, S-P Yip, S-Y Chan, X-O Shu, D T-T Chua, A N-Y Cheung, J C-Y Ching, H Cai, et al.
Functional polymorphisms in the BRCA1 promoter influence transcription and are associated with decreased risk for breast cancer in Chinese women
J. Med. Genet., January 1, 2009; 46(1): 32 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
R. Zhai, G. Liu, K. Asomaning, L. Su, M. H. Kulke, R. S. Heist, N. S. Nishioka, T. J. Lynch, J. C. Wain, X. Lin, et al.
Genetic polymorphisms of VEGF, interactions with cigarette smoking exposure and esophageal adenocarcinoma risk
Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2008; 29(12): 2330 - 2334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
R. S. Heist, R. Zhai, G. Liu, W. Zhou, X. Lin, L. Su, K. Asomaning, T. J. Lynch, J. C. Wain, and D. C. Christiani
VEGF Polymorphisms and Survival in Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2008; 26(6): 856 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. Zhai, G. Liu, W. Zhou, L. Su, R. S. Heist, T. J. Lynch, J. C. Wain, K. Asomaning, X. Lin, and D. C. Christiani
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Genotypes, Haplotypes, Gender, and the Risk of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2008; 14(2): 612 - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J EndocrinolHome page
P.-J. Hsiao, M.-Y. Lu, F.-Y. Chiang, S.-J. Shin, Y.-D. Tai, and S.-H. H. Juo
Vascular endothelial growth factor gene polymorphisms in thyroid cancer
J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2007; 195(2): 265 - 270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kataoka, N.
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kataoka, N.
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, W.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online