This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Huang, W.-Y. Articles by Hayes, R. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Huang, W.-Y. Articles by Hayes, R. B.

Nucleotide Excision Repair Gene Polymorphisms and Risk of Advanced Colorectal Adenoma: XPC Polymorphisms Modify Smoking-Related Risk

¹ Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and ² Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; ³ Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; ⁴ Core Genotyping Facility, Advanced Technology Center, National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Gaithersburg, Maryland; ⁵ Department of Gastrointestinal Medicine and Nutrition, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and ⁶ Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Requests for reprints: Wen-Yi Huang, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, EPS 8113, MSC 7240, Bethesda, MD 20892. Phone: 301-435-4710; Fax: 301-402-1819. E-mail: huangw{at}mail.nih.gov

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Statistical Analysis Results Discussion References

 
Objectives: Nucleotide excision repair enzymes remove bulky damage caused by environmental agents, including carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons found in cigarette smoke, a risk factor for colorectal adenoma. Among participants randomized to the screening arm of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial, we studied the risk of advanced colorectal adenoma in relation to cigarette smoking and selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the nucleotide excision repair pathway.

Methods: Cases (n = 772) were subjects with left-sided advanced adenoma (>1 cm in size, high-grade dysplasia, or villous characteristics). Controls (n = 777) were screen-negative for left-sided polyps by sigmoidoscopy. DNA was extracted from blood samples and 15 common nonsynonymous SNPs in seven-nucleotide excision repair genes [XPC, RAD23B (hHR23B), CSB (ERCC6), XPD (ERCC2), CCNH, XPF (ERCC4), and XPG (ERCC5)] were genotyped.

Results: None of the studied SNPs were independently associated with advanced adenoma risk. Smoking was related to adenoma risk and XPC polymorphisms (_R492_H, _A499_V, _K939_Q) modified these effects (P_interaction from 0.03-0.003). Although the three XPC variants were in linkage disequilibrium, a multivariate logistic regression tended to show independent protective effects for XPC 499_V (P_trend = 0.06), a finding supported by haplotype analysis (covariate-adjusted global permutation P = 0.03).

Conclusions: Examining a spectrum of polymorphic variants in nucleotide excision repair genes, we found evidence that smoking-associated risks for advanced colorectal adenoma are modified by polymorphisms in XPC, particularly haplotypes containing XPC 499_V. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(2):306–11)

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Statistical Analysis Results Discussion References

 
The recent discovery of a novel autosomal recessive form of familial adenomatous polyposis caused by mutations in the base excision repair gene MYH (1) and the well-documented involvement of mismatch repair in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer suggest the importance of DNA repair mechanisms in colorectal carcinogenesis (2). Based on epidemiologic, molecular, and clinical evidence, colorectal adenomas, particularly those large in size or histologically advanced, are recognized precursor lesions for colorectal cancer (3).

Cigarette smoking is a risk factor for colorectal adenoma and likely also for colon cancer (4). Tobacco products, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, heterocyclic amines, nitrosamines, and aromatic amines, reaching the colorectal mucosa, through direct ingestion or via the circulatory system, result in DNA adducts, leading to mutations and potentially to cancer development (5). There is considerable interindividual variation in the response to genotoxic exposures, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and genetic polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes could influence DNA repair capacity and, in turn, cancer susceptibility (6).

The nucleotide excision repair pathway may have particular importance for smoking-related adenoma risk because this system removes complex bulky adducts, including those caused by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in tobacco smoke (7). Excision repair involves global genome repair and transcription coupled repair, involving DNA damage recognition, DNA unwinding, excision of the damage, synthesis of new DNA, gap repair, and ligation (Fig. 1; ref. 8). Damage recognition is carried out either by the XPC-hHR23B (encoded by RAD23B) protein complex in the global genome repair pathway or by RNA polymerase II, which recruits CSA and CSB (ERCC6) in transcription coupled repair. In the second step, DNA is unwound by the action of TFIIH, a nine-subunit protein complex composed of DNA helicases, XPB and XPD, and a kinase subunit cyclin H (CCNH). Replication protein A (RPA) stabilizes the unwound DNA, and XPA facilitates the assembly of DNA repair factors. The damaged DNA is then removed by XPG (ERCC5) and the XPF (ERCC4)-ERCC1 complex, which make 3' and 5' incisions, respectively, on either side of the damage. Finally, with the help of several replication accessory factors, the DNA gap is filled with new bases synthesized by DNA polymerases and and a DNA ligase seals the nick.

View larger version (32K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Genes involved in the nucleotide excision repair processes.

We studied the risk for advanced colorectal adenoma in relation to 15 common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in seven genes in the nucleotide excision repair pathway—XPC, RAD23B (hHR23B), CSB (ERCC6), XPD, CCNH, XPF, and XPG—among participants in a large colorectal cancer screening trial in the United States. All SNPs are nonsynonymous, leading to amino acid substitution in the protein product.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Statistical Analysis Results Discussion References

 
The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial
The National Cancer Institute Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial, conducted at 10 U.S. screening centers (Birmingham, Alabama; Denver, Colorado; Detroit, Michigan; Honolulu, Hawaii; Marshfield, Wisconsin; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Salt Lake City, Utah; St. Louis, Missouri; and Washington District of Columbia), is designed to determine whether screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy (60 cm sigmoidoscope), chest X-ray, digital rectal exam plus serum prostate-specific antigen, and CA125 plus transvaginal ultrasound can reduce mortality from cancers of the prostate, lung, colorectum, and ovary, respectively (18, 19). Primary recruitment methods involved mailing informational brochures and letters of invitation to age-eligible persons identified on public, commercial, or screening center-specific mailing lists. To be eligible for the trial, subjects must have been 55 and 74 years of age; not undergoing treatment for cancer (excluding nonmelanoma skin) and with no history of cancer at any of the sites involved in the trial; no history of surgical removal of the prostate, colon, or one lung; no current participation in another cancer screening or primary prevention trial; no use of Finasteride in the previous 6 months; no prostate-specific antigen test in the previous 3 years; no colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, or barium enema in the previous 3 years; and the ability to sign the consent form. A total of 77,483 participants (50% men; 87% White) were randomized to the screening arm and a similar number of participants were randomized to the nonscreened arm from 1993 to 2001.

At the baseline, subjects in the screening arm received a flexible sigmoidoscopic visualization of the distal colon (60 cm). If the sigmoidoscopic examination was suspicious for neoplasia (polyp or mass), participants were referred to their primary physicians for subsequent diagnostic follow-up, which generally resulted in a full examination of the colon by colonoscopy and surgery, if needed. Pathology reports regarding the pathologic size and location of each lesion found from colonoscopy or repeat sigmoidoscopy were obtained and coded by trained medical abstractors. Participants provided written informed consent. The study was approved by the institutional review boards of the National Cancer Institute and the 10 screening centers.

Study Population
As described previously (20, 21), a nested case-control study was conducted among participants randomized to the screening arm of the PLCO Trial, who had a successful sigmoidoscopy (insertion to at least 50 cm with >90% of mucosa visible or a suspect lesion identified), completed a risk factor questionnaire, provided a blood sample, and consented to participate in etiologic studies (n = 42,037) between September 1993 and September 1999. Of these participants, we excluded 4,834 with a self-reported history of ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, familial polyposis, colorectal polyps, Gardner's syndrome, or cancer (except basal cell skin cancer). We randomly selected 772 of 1,234 cases with at least one advanced colorectal adenoma (adenoma 1 cm or containing high-grade dysplasia or villous characteristics) in the distal colon (descending colon and sigmoid or rectum) and 777 controls without evidence of a polyp or other suspicious lesion in the distal colon (i.e., a negative sigmoidoscopy screening) at baseline, frequency-matched to the cases by gender and ethnicity.

Questionnaire Data
Participants completed a baseline risk factor questionnaire in which they reported their body size and the use of tobacco, alcohol, selected drugs, and hormones, and a 137-item food frequency questionnaire in which they reported their usual dietary intake over the 12 months before enrollment. Detailed information on smoking history was collected, including ages started and stopped, total years of use, amount usually used, and type of tobacco used (cigarettes, pipes, and cigars). Subjects who did not smoke or only smoked cigarettes for <6 months or only smoked pipes or cigars for <1 year were considered to be nonsmokers. For evaluation of risks in relation to time period of cigarette use, cigarette users were classified as long-term quitters (quit 10 years before enrollment) and current or recent smokers (quit <10 year before enrollment).

Genotype Assay
DNA samples were obtained from stored blood samples using Qiagen standard protocols (QIAamp DNA Blood Midi or Maxi kit: (http://www1.qiagen.com/default.aspx). Fifteen SNPs in seven DNA repair genes, XPC (_R492_H, _A499_V, _K939_Q), RAD23B (hHR23B, _A249_V), CSB (ERCC6, _M1097_V, _R1230_P, _Q1413_R), XPD (ERCC2, _D312_N, _K751_Q), CCNH (_V270_A), XPF (ERCC4, _R379_S, R415Q), and XPG (ERCC5, _M254_V, _C529_S, _D1104_H) were genotyped. All assays were validated and optimized at the National Cancer Institute Core Genotyping Facility as described on the website (http://snp500cancer.nci.nih.gov; ref. 22). Internal laboratory quality controls consisted of Coriell DNA samples containing the homozygous major allele, heterozygous, and homozygous minor allele genotypes for each polymorphism under study with four of each control type and four no template controls in every 384 samples. For external blinded quality controls, we interspersed 10% repeated quality control samples from 40 individuals. The blinded samples showed >99% interassay concordance for all assays. Approximately 8% of individuals were excluded because of insufficient DNA (7%) or fingerprint profile review showing subject-specific ambiguities (1%). Of those remaining, genotype data were successfully obtained for an average of 94% (90-98%) of study subjects.

	Statistical Analysis

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Statistical Analysis Results Discussion References

 
Departures from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium among controls for each self-described ethnic group were assessed by comparing the observed genotype frequencies to the expected frequencies using a ² test or exact test if cell counts were small. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the genotype associations were obtained using unconditional logistic regression, adjusting for gender, race (White, Black, and others), and age (55-59, 60-64, 65-69, and 70-74 years). Trend tests were done using a score of 0, 1, or 2 for each genotype in a logistic regression model. Statistical significance of the multiplicative interaction between DNA repair genotype and smoking was assessed by comparing nested models with and without cross-product terms (assuming linearity for smoking-related risk) using a likelihood ratio statistic. Adenoma risks associated with haplotypes defined by the SNPs within the same gene were assessed using HaploStats (http://www.mayo.edu/hsr/people/schaid.html), which uses the expectation-maximization algorithm to estimate haplotypes. A global score test was used to evaluate overall differences in haplotype frequencies between cases and controls adjusted for covariates (23), and the effect of individual haplotypes on adenoma risk was assessed using the generalized linear model implemented in HaploStats (23, 24). Multiplicative interaction between XPC haplotypes and smoking was assessed by comparing nested models, with and without cross-product terms (assuming linearity for smoking-related risk), using a likelihood ratio statistic.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Statistical Analysis Results Discussion References

 
Cases and controls were similar with regard to the matching factors, gender and race (Table 1). Cases tended to have a higher body mass index (P = 0.3), were older (P < 0.0001), more likely to have reported a first-degree family history of colorectal cancer (P = 0.02), and had less education (P = 0.001). Consistent with results from the entire cohort (25), cigarette smoking was associated with increased risk for advanced adenoma (ever versus never, OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8) with greater risks among current or recent cigarette smokers (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.8-3.2) than long-term quitters (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9-1.4 for quit 10 years). Risk relationships for level (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.2 for >20 cigarettes/d) and pack-years of use (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.3 for 30 pack-years) were weaker, showing the importance of recent exposure in relation to adenoma risk.

The three XPC SNPs were in strong linkage disequilibrium (D' = 1.0 for all pairwise comparisons; specific r² in Fig. 2), yet, including all three SNPs in a logistic regression analysis in current and recent smokers, tended to show statistically independent risk relationships only for the XPC 499 polymorphism (P_trend = 0.06). Haplotype analysis inferred by the expectation-maximization algorithm showed that the three SNPs distributed in four common haplotypes (A, 40%; B, 36%; C, 18%; D, 5%; specifics by smoking subgroups in Table 4). As with the genotypes, haplotype analysis revealed no overall association with adenoma risk (P_{global permutation} = 0.6); however, again, risk differentials were noted among current and recent smokers (P_{global permutation} = 0.03) due largely to lower risks associated with haplotypes C and D, possibly driven by the above described genotype relationship with XPC 499_V.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Pairwise linkage disequilibrium (D') and correlation coefficient (r2) between XPC R492, A499, 939Q and the previously reported intron 9 poly(AT) insertion (+) and intron 11-5A splice acceptor site polymorphisms. The D' and r2 between the XPC K939Q intron 9 and intron 11 polymorphisms were calculated based on previous data among Caucasians (9). The D' and r2 between the XPC R492H, A499V, and K939Q polymorphisms were estimated from this study among Caucasians.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Statistical Analysis Results Discussion References

 
We found no evidence that polymorphisms in seven-nucleotide excision repair genes had an overall effect on colorectal adenoma risk; however, smoking-related risk differentials for this disease varied in relation to carriage of three linked nonsynonymous polymorphisms in XPC (_R492_H, _A499_V, and _K939_Q), with protective effects most clearly associated with XPC 499_V.

XPC, located on chromosome 3p25, is a 33-kb-long gene containing 16 exons, encoding a 940-amino-acid protein involved in DNA damage recognition (15). The XPC SNPs evaluated in this study are located in exons 8 and 15 (9, 26, 27). Although the coding variants lead to amino acid substitution, their functional significance is uncertain; the 939_K allele was associated with reduced repair of single-strand breaks measured by alkaline Comet assay (11), although XPC _A499_V and XPC _K939_Q did not show functional correlations in the post-UV host cell reactivation-based complementation assay.

Two other common polymorphisms in XPC are of interest (Fig. 2). A common biallelic poly(AT) insertion (+) polymorphism in intron 9 has been associated with an increased risk of head and neck cancer (28) and is related to differential removal of UV photoproducts in the host-cell reactivation assay (10). A common C > A SNP 3' of the XPC intron 11 splice acceptor site was related to increased formation of the XPC mRNA non-exon 12 isoform, resulting in diminished DNA repair (9).

These polymorphisms are in strong linkage disequilibrium with the _K939_Q SNP in exon 15 [939_Q variant was correlated with the poly(AT) insertion and –5 A splice acceptor site with D' = 1.0 and r² = 0.9 for both; Fig. 2] in Caucasians (9), and, by the linkage disequilibrium relationships shown here, must also be partially linked to the XPC _R492_H and XPC _A499_V variants (939_Q variant was correlated in our study with the 492_R and 499_A alleles, r² = 0.04 and 0.2, respectively; refs. 13, 15).

The functional data on the XPC poly(AT) insertion (+) and –5 A acceptor site variants (9-11) are of further interest in relation to differential smoking-related risks of colorectal adenoma found in our study, as similar predictive effects were noted for smoking-related head and neck cancer (28) and lung cancer (29), and the tightly linked XPC 939_Q variant was associated with increased bladder cancer risk in one study (30), although not in another study (31).

Subjects in this study came from 10 different screening centers representing a broad population distribution in the United States. The cases and controls were comparable, randomly selected from the same source population, and screened by a standardized procedure (i.e., cases were not screened based on symptoms). The large study population allowed us to confine the analysis to cases with advanced adenoma, a particularly meaningful intermediate outcome with higher potential for malignant transformation. Although this fairly large sample size allowed us to explore genetic interrelationships with smoking-related adenoma risk, we had limited statistical power to make any confident conclusion. Reliable genotype data were ensured by high success and reproducibility rates. Our subjects, however, were largely Caucasians and better educated. As another consideration, in studying prevalent cases identified from the initial baseline screening, we may be oversampling slow-growing adenoma (the so-called length-sampling bias). As the PLCO Trial continues to identify additional prevalent adenomas as well as incident adenomas and colorectal cancers, we will have opportunities to address some of the limitations.

In summary, we found that three linked XPC alleles, 492_R, 499_A, and 939_Q, were associated with increased risk of colorectal adenoma in smokers, potentially related to functional changes due to amino acid substitution or to linkage with other functional polymorphisms in the gene. Our finding on adenoma and supporting data from some functional (9-11) and epidemiologic studies of smoking-related cancers (28-30) suggest a critical role of XPC in repairing DNA damage (e.g., bulky adducts) caused by tobacco carcinogens (e.g., polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, heterocyclic amines, nitrosamines, and aromatic amines). These results for XPC variants, tobacco use, and adenoma, along with the smoking-related adenoma risk modifications by variants of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon metabolism-related genes (e.g., EPHX1, NQO1, CYP1A1, and GSTT1) that we have previously observed in this population (20, 21, 32), support the importance of genetic susceptibility to tobacco-related colorectal carcinogenesis. Although we found no relation between other nucleotide excision repair genes and smoking-related adenoma risk, potential effects by unidentified genetic variants cannot be ruled out. Confirmation in other studies of colorectal tumors and investigations of other genes and variants in this pathway and other major DNA repair pathways are needed to clarify the underlying mechanisms of DNA repair in the development of colorectal cancer.

	Acknowledgments

 
We thank Drs. Christine Berg and Philip Prorok (Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute); the Screening Center investigators and staff or the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial; Tom Riley and staff (Information Management Services, Inc.); Barbara O'Brien and staff (Westat, Inc.); and Drs. Bill Kopp, Wen Shao, and staff (Science Applications International Corporation-Frederick) for their contributions to making this study possible.

	Footnotes

 
Grant support: Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 9/29/05; revised 11/16/05; accepted 12/15/05.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Statistical Analysis Results Discussion References

 

1. Chow E, Thirlwell C, Macrae F, Lipton L. Colorectal cancer and inherited mutations in base-excision repair. Lancet Oncol 2004;5:600–6.[Medline]
2. Baglioni S, Genuardi M. Simple and complex genetics of colorectal cancer susceptibility. Am J Med Genet 2004;129:35–43.
3. Leslie A, Carey FA, Pratt NR, Steele RJ. The colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Br J Surg 2002;89:845–60.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Giovannucci E. An updated review of the epidemiological evidence that cigarette smoking increases risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001;10:725–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Wu X, Zhao H, Suk R, Christiani DC. Genetic susceptibility to tobacco-related cancer. Oncogene 2004;23:6500–23.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Goode EL, Ulrich CM, Potter JD. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and associations with cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:1513–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Pavanello S, Pulliero A, Siwinska E, Mielzynska D, Clonfero E. Reduced nucleotide excision repair and GSTM1-null genotypes influence anti-B(a)PDE-DNA adduct levels in mononuclear white blood cells of highly PAH-exposed coke oven workers. Carcinogenesis 2005;26:169–75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. van Hoffen A, Balajee AS, van Zeeland AA, Mullenders LH. Nucleotide excision repair and its interplay with transcription. Toxicology 2003;193:79–90.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Khan SG, Muniz-Medina V, Shahlavi T, et al. The human XPC DNA repair gene: arrangement, splice site information content and influence of a single nucleotide polymorphism in a splice acceptor site on alternative splicing and function. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:3624–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Qiao Y, Spitz MR, Shen H, et al. Modulation of repair of ultraviolet damage in the host-cell reactivation assay by polymorphic XPC and XPD/ERCC2 genotypes. Carcinogenesis 2002;23:295–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Vodicka P, Kumar R, Stetina R, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and possible links with DNA repair rates, chromosomal aberrations and single-strand breaks in DNA. Carcinogenesis 2004;25:757–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Duell EJ, Wiencke JK, Cheng TJ, et al. Polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes XRCC1 and ERCC2 and biomarkers of DNA damage in human blood mononuclear cells. Carcinogenesis 2000;21:965–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Gozukara EM, Khan SG, Metin A, et al. A stop codon in xeroderma pigmentosum group C families in Turkey and Italy: molecular genetic evidence for a common ancestor. J Invest Dermatol 2001;117:197–204.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Hu Z, Wei Q, Wang X, Shen H. DNA repair gene XPD polymorphism and lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 2004;46:1–10.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Khan SG, Metter EJ, Tarone RE, et al. A new xeroderma pigmentosum group C poly(AT) insertion/deletion polymorphism. Carcinogenesis 2000;21:1821–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Yeh CC, Sung FC, Tang R, Chang-Chieh CR, Hsieh LL. Polymorphisms of the XRCC1, XRCC3, & XPD genes, and colorectal cancer risk: a case-control study in Taiwan. BMC Cancer 2005;5:12.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Mort R, Mo L, McEwan C, Melton DW. Lack of involvement of nucleotide excision repair gene polymorphisms in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2003;89:333–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Hayes RB, Kramer BS. The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial of the National Cancer Institute: history, organization, and status. Control Clin Trials 2000;21:251–72S.
19. Hayes RB, Reding D, Kopp W, et al. Etiologic and early marker studies in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial. Control Clin Trials 2000;21:349–55S.
20. Hou L, Chatterjee N, Huang WY, et al. CYP1A1 Val⁴⁶² and NQO1 Ser¹⁸⁷ polymorphisms, cigarette use, and risk for colorectal adenoma. Carcinogenesis 2005;26:1122–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Huang WY, Chatterjee N, Chanock S, et al. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase polymorphisms and risk for advanced colorectal adenoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:152–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Packer BR, Yeager M, Staats B, et al. SNP500Cancer: a public resource for sequence validation and assay development for genetic variation in candidate genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32(database issue):D528–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Schaid DJ, Rowland CM, Tines DE, Jacobson RM, Poland GA. Score tests for association between traits and haplotypes when linkage phase is ambiguous. Am J Hum Genet 2002;70:425–34.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Lake SL, Lyon H, Tantisira K, et al. Estimation and tests of haplotype-environment interaction when linkage phase is ambiguous. Hum Hered 2003;55:56–65.[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Ji B-T, Weissfeld JL, Chow W-H, Schoen R, Hayes RB. Tobacco smoking and colorectal hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps. AACR 94th Annual Meeting Proceedings 2003;44:302.
26. Blankenburg S, Konig IR, Moessner R, et al. Assessment of 3 xeroderma pigmentosum group C gene polymorphisms and risk of cutaneous melanoma: a case-control study. Carcinogenesis 2005;26:1085–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Blankenburg S, Konig IR, Moessner R, et al. No association between three xeroderma pigmentosum group C and one group G gene polymorphisms and risk of cutaneous melanoma. Eur J Hum Genet 2005;13:253–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Shen H, Sturgis EM, Khan SG, et al. An intronic poly (AT) polymorphism of the DNA repair gene XPC and risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a case-control study. Cancer Res 2001;61:3321–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Marin MS, Lopez-Cima MF, Garcia-Castro L, Pascual T, Marron MG, Tardon A. Poly (AT) polymorphism in intron 11 of the XPC DNA repair gene enhances the risk of lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:1788–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Sanyal S, Festa F, Sakano S, et al. Polymorphisms in DNA repair and metabolic genes in bladder cancer. Carcinogenesis 2004;25:729–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Sak SC, Barrett JH, Paul AB, Bishop DT, Kiltie AE. The polyAT, intronic IVS11-6 and Lys⁹³⁹Gln XPC polymorphisms are not associated with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Br J Cancer 2005;92:2262–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
32. Moore LE, Huang WY, Chatterjee N, et al. GSTM1;GSTT1;and GSTP1 polymorphisms and risk of advanced colorectal adenoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:1823–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. E. Zafereo, E. M. Sturgis, Z. Liu, L.-E Wang, Q. Wei, and G. Li Nucleotide excision repair core gene polymorphisms and risk of second primary malignancy in patients with index squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2009; 30(6): 997 - 1002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Pan, J. Lin, J. G. Izzo, Y. Liu, J. Xing, M. Huang, J. A. Ajani, and X. Wu Genetic susceptibility to esophageal cancer: the role of the nucleotide excision repair pathway Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2009; 30(5): 785 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Zhang, W.-Y. Huang, G. Andreotti, Y.-T. Gao, A. Rashid, J. Chen, L. C. Sakoda, M.-C. Shen, B.-S. Wang, S. Chanock, et al. Variants of DNA Repair Genes and the Risk of Biliary Tract Cancers and Stones: A Population-Based Study in China Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2008; 17(8): 2123 - 2127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Wang, D. Chang, F.-l. Hu, H. Sui, B. Han, D.-d. li, and Y.-s. Zhao DNA Repair Gene XPD Polymorphisms and Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis Based on 56 Case-Control Studies Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2008; 17(3): 507 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Stern, D. V. Conti, K. D. Siegmund, R. Corral, J.-M. Yuan, W.-P. Koh, and M. C. Yu DNA Repair Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Colorectal Cancer and their Role as Modifiers of the Effect of Cigarette Smoking and Alcohol in the Singapore Chinese Health Study Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2007; 16(11): 2363 - 2372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. An, Z. Liu, Z. Hu, G. Li, L.-E Wang, E. M. Sturgis, A. K. El-Naggar, M. R. Spitz, and Q. Wei Potentially Functional Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Core Nucleotide Excision Repair Genes and Risk of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2007; 16(8): 1633 - 1638. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Wang, M. R. Spitz, J. J. Lee, M. Huang, S. M. Lippman, and X. Wu Nucleotide Excision Repair Pathway Genes and Oral Premalignant Lesions Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 13(12): 3753 - 3758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Stern, K. D. Siegmund, D. V. Conti, R. Corral, and R. W. Haile XRCC1, XRCC3, and XPD Polymorphisms as Modifiers of the Effect of Smoking and Alcohol on Colorectal Adenoma Risk Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2006; 15(12): 2384 - 2390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. I. Berndt, E. A. Platz, M. D. Fallin, L. W. Thuita, S. C. Hoffman, and K. J. Helzlsouer Genetic Variation in the Nucleotide Excision Repair Pathway and Colorectal Cancer Risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2006; 15(11): 2263 - 2269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Huang, W.-Y. Articles by Hayes, R. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Huang, W.-Y. Articles by Hayes, R. B.