
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Departments of 1 Epidemiology, 2 Immunology and Infectious Diseases, and 3 Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health; 4 Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; 5 Department of Internal Medicine II, University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan; and 6 Digestive Disease and Life-style related Disease Health Research Human and Environmental Science, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Science, Kagoshima, Japan
Requests for reprints: Robert Y. Suruki, GlaxoSmithKline, P. O. Box 13398, Five Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. Phone: 919-483-7620; Fax: 919-315-8747. E-mail: suruki{at}post.harvard.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The great majority of HCV-infected individuals fail to eliminate the virus and progress onto chronic HCV infection (6-9). Explanations for this phenomenon include the presence of HCV quasispecies, the development of mutations in key areas of the viral genome, and the direct interference by the virus of the host immune response (10-12). A strong cell-mediated immune response is thought to lead to clearance of HCV, whereas an elevated humoral response or an only moderately increased cell-mediated response pattern has been reported in patients with chronic infection (7, 8, 13-16). The tension between the continued replication of the virus and a persistent attempt by a less than optimal immune response to eliminate HCV-infected cells within chronically infected persons is implicated in hepatocyte damage and, in some instances, progression to HCC. This continuous inflammation and hepatocyte regeneration in the setting of chronic hepatitis and progression to cirrhosis is thought to lead to an accumulation of chromosomal damage and possibly to initiate hepatic carcinogenesis (17).
The immune response to virus infection consists of two major components: the innate and adaptive response. The innate response is the first to respond to invading pathogens and involves natural killer cells, complement, cytokines, and apoptosis (18). Natural killer cells rely on antigen-independent mechanisms to inhibit viral replication (19, 20). In contrast, the adaptive response requires recognition of a specific viral epitope and is divided into two effector types: cell-mediated type 1 response and humoral type 2 response (18). The function of these two effector responses is tightly regulated within immunocompetent persons; however, dysregulation of type 1 and/or type 2 response can occur in cases of infectious, neoplastic, and inflammatory diseases (21).
The type 1/type 2 cytokine balance in sera, liver tissue, and culture supernatant of lymphocytes has been studied extensively in HCV-infected patients, but inconsistent results have failed to provide definitive information about the role of cytokines in HCV disease pathology (13-15, 22-29). Nevertheless, data from several studies suggest that a dysregulation of the host immune status may be important in the progression of HCV-related liver disease (14, 22-25). A shift to a type 1 cytokine profile in patients with chronic hepatitis C is correlated with liver disease activity and progression (14). Similarly, an elevation of soluble CD30 (sCD30), a marker of type 2 response, has also been reported to be correlated with liver disease progression and severity in HCV-infected patients (25).
Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-
is a mediator of innate inflammation and cellular immune response produced primarily by activated monocytes and Kupffer cells and plays a role in initiating fibrogenesis through binding to specific cellular receptors [TNF-receptors (TNF-R); ref. 26]. After cellular stimulation, extracellular domains of these receptors can be proteolytically cleaved, resulting in two soluble forms: soluble TNF-R1 (sTNF-R1) and sTNF-R2. High concentration of sTNF-R2 has been observed for prolonged periods in the circulation of patients with various inflammatory diseases, including HCV infection, making sTNF-R2 an ideal serum biomarker to characterize the type 1 immune response (27-30). Activation of the immune response in chronic hepatitis has also been shown by means of using circulating levels of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 (31, 32). Soluble ICAM-1 (sICAM-1) is an important adhesion molecule that is thought to be involved in liver inflammation. sCD30 is a member of the TNF/nerve growth receptor family and is preferentially expressed and secreted by human CD4 T cells producing type 2 cytokines (33, 34). Elevated levels of sCD30 have been detected in patients with conditions attributed to type 2 cytokine immunity, such as systemic lupus erythematosus and Omenn's syndrome, as well as in patients with HCV-associated liver disease (25, 35, 36).
We undertook the present study to elucidate the role of host immune status in the incidence of HCV-associated HCC in a prospective community-based cohort of HCV-infected persons in Japan. Given their extremely short half-life and the potential effects of freeze/thaw cycles (37), direct measurement of cytokines is not feasible in a community-based study using archived frozen serum samples. Serum proteins that are less labile and documented to be correlated with type 1 and type 2 response, particularly with respect to HCV infection, represent a more feasible alternative (28-32, 35, 36). For these reasons, we selected sTNF-R2 and sICAM-1 as markers of a type 1 cytokine milieu and sCD30 as a surrogate marker of a type 2 cytokine environment. Using prediagnostic serum levels of these serologic immune markers, we hypothesized that host immune dysregulation suggesting an up-regulated type 1 (cell mediated) and/or type 2 (humoral) response against HCV in a community-based setting increases HCC incidence. The propensity of HCV to cause clinically inapparent disease underlines the importance of assessing the informativeness of these biomarkers in identifying chronically infected subjects who may be predisposed to develop HCC.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A total of 70 incident HCC cases has been identified among the study population of HCV-seropositive Town C residents (n = 1,311; mean age, 62 years) between 1994 and 2004. Of these, 39 cases occurred between the years 1996 and 2004 and had a prediagnostic serum sample obtained at least 1 year before the HCC diagnosis, for measuring the selected immune markers, and had evidence of chronic HCV infection, defined as having at least one HCV RNA or HCV core antigen-positive result between 1995 and 2004. For 32 of the 39 cases, the diagnosis was determined based on information collected via biopsy and/or imaging analysis using magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography scan, angiography, or ultrasonographic tomography. An additional seven HCC cases were identified by means of death certificate information; for these cases, the year of death was used as the year of diagnosis.
We used incidence density sampling to select controls from the set of subjects at risk at the time of diagnosis of each HCC case (39). Subjects with evidence of chronic HCV infection, at least 1 year of follow-up, and an available sample were eligible for inclusion in the risk set (n = 676; mean age, 64 years). Three controls were randomly selected from the risk set for comparison with the index HCC case. A risk set was defined by the gender, age (±1 year) at first available sample, and length of follow-up (equal or greater than case) of the case. A total of 117 controls was matched to the 39 cases. Due to the matching criteria, the number of potential subjects within a risk set was relatively small; thus, the controls were made up of 99 unique individuals and included 15 controls that were selected more than once.
Laboratory Methods
Specimens were tested for HCV RNA using a reverse transcription-PCR assay (Amplicore HCV, Nippon Roche, Tokyo, Japan). Between 1995 and 2001, HCV core antigen level was measured by a fluorescent enzyme immunoassay (Immunocheck F-HCV Core Antigen, Kokusai Shiyaku, Kobe, Japan); starting in 2002, an immunoradiometric assay replaced the fluorescent enzyme immunoassay to measure HCV core antigen (Ortho HCV Ag IRMA Test, Ortho-Clinical Diagnostic, K.K., Tokyo, Japan). HCV serotype was determined by an enzyme immunoassay (Immunocheck F-HCV Grouping, International Reagents Co., Kobe, Japan). When the serologic group could not be clearly classified by this assay, HCV genotypes were determined by the reverse transcription-PCR method (40). Genotypes 1a and 1b were defined as serologic HCV group 1 and genotypes 2a and 2b as group 2. The above serum testing was completed by a commercial laboratory in Japan.
Serum immune marker testing of archived baseline specimens was completed by the General Clinical Research Center Core Laboratory at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Boston, MA). The samples were sent in randomly ordered batches, and laboratory personnel were blinded to the case-control status of the specimens. The levels of sTNF-R2 and sICAM-1 were measured by means of ELISA (Quantikine and Paramter, respectively, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN); these assays have an interassay variability that ranges from 6% to 10% according to the manufacturer. Levels of sCD30 were also determined by means of an ELISA (ZyQuick sCD30 ELISA kit, Zymed Laboratories, Inc., San Francisco, CA), with an interassay variability ranging from 9.4% to 17.5%.
Statistical Analysis
Cases and controls were compared by medians for continuous variables and by contingency tables for qualitative data. The association between biomarker levels and the risk of HCC was analyzed using conditional logistic regression, which accounts for the matching within the risk sets. With risk set sampling, the odds ratio (OR) derived from the conditional logistic regression analysis directly estimates the hazard ratio (39, 41). Because serum immune marker levels were skewed and no cutoff levels for an elevated value have previously been determined, the serologic biomarkers were modeled as dichotomous variables using the median value among the controls. We also evaluated alcohol consumption (none, occasional, or daily) at baseline and HCV serotype (serotype 1 versus serotype 2) as potential confounders in multivariable regression models. Alcohol consumption was determined based on responses to a questionnaire administered by the public health nurses at the first liver disease screening program examination attended by the resident. The "daily" drinkers were further categorized into high (>60 g alcohol per day) and low (
60 g alcohol per day) groups. In instances where data from the public health nurses' questionnaire were not available, "never" drinkers could be identified using the study-related questionnaire obtained beginning in 2001 and were thus included in the "none" category (n = 7). To evaluate the potential effect of reverse causation (i.e., preclinical HCC causing the elevation of serum immune markers), the analyses also were restricted to HCC cases diagnosed >2 years after their first available prediagnostic sample. All P values are two tailed, and P values of <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. All analyses were done with the use of Statistical Analysis System software version 8.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
There were seven HCC cases that were diagnosed within 2 years of their first available prediagnostic sample. To evaluate the potential effect of reverse causation, we removed these seven cases from the analysis and found that the observed associations remained unchanged: ORsTNF-R2, 6.0 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.0-17.9]; ORsICAM-1, 2.2 (95% CI, 1.0-5.0); and ORsCD30, 2.3 (95% CI, 1.0-5.5).
Evaluation of the independent effect of each serum immune marker after adjusting for the other two markers showed that only sTNF-R2 was significantly associated with HCC incidence. Subjects with an elevated sTNF-R2 level experienced a HCC risk that was
6.5 times greater than that of subjects with a lower sTNF-R2 level following adjustment for all markers (OR, 6.4; 95% CI, 2.0-20.6), whereas an association with increased HCC risk was no longer observed for sICAM-1 and sCD30 (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.6-3.1 and OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.4-2.6, respectively). These associations were not substantially different after multivariable adjustment for alcohol consumption and HCV serotype or when restricted to those HCC cases diagnosed >2 years after their first available prediagnostic sample (data not shown).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In its function as a receptor for the proinflammatory cytokine TNF-
, sTNF-R2 has been shown in many studies to be directly associated with HCV-related chronic hepatitis and histologic fibrosis (27, 28, 42). Itoh et al. (43) reported high correlations between sTNF-R2 and several liver disease markers (e.g., alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and
-glutamyl transpeptidase) as well as with Knodell's histologic activity index score in HCV chronically infected subjects. It has also been suggested that, at low concentrations, as observed during chronic HCV infection (13), TNF-
preferentially binds TNF-R2 over TNF-R1 (42). Furthermore, studies in murine models have shown that the binding of TNF-R2 initiates signals for the proliferation of thymocytes and cytotoxic T cells (44). Thus, the binding of TNF-R2 by TNF-
could contribute to a persistent low-level immune response that exacerbates ongoing liver injury.
ICAMs, which are readily expressed on the surface of hepatocytes, also seem to play a major role in HCV-associated chronic inflammation and persistent liver damage. Although sICAM-1 is secreted by various cell types, circulating levels have been suggested to parallel the level of liver inflammation (31, 45-47). For example, circulating levels of sICAM-1 have been reported to increase in patients who are progressing from chronic hepatitis to cirrhosis and HCC and are strongly correlated with indices of hepatic injury, including alanine aminotransferase (48, 49). In addition, Hamazaki et al. (50) observed a strong correlation between sICAM-1 serum level and tumor size in HCC patients. In the present prospective evaluation to examine the effects of prediagnostic levels of sICAM-1 on HCV-associated HCC risk, we found that subjects with elevated levels of prediagnostic sICAM-1 experienced a greater risk of HCC compared with individuals with lower levels. This finding is consistent with our hypothesis that an activated type 1 or cell-mediated immune response during chronic HCV infection increases the risk for developing HCC.
High levels of circulating sCD30 levels were also positively associated with increased HCC risk. Patients who fail to eliminate the virus and progress to chronic HCV infection have been found to have peripheral evidence of a strong type 2 immune response (25). The present findings agree with that of Gramenzi et al. (51) who recently reported that a predominant type 2 profile was associated with more severe liver disease. However, Gramenzi et al. also reported that a shift to a type 1 cytokine profile of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was associated with a more favorable clinical outcome, which is not consistent with the present findings. In fact, the current findings suggest that, in addition to an elevated sCD30 level, elevated type 1 immune markers may also contribute to a general dysregulation of the host immune status before HCC diagnosis, which ultimately predisposes the subject to increased immunopathogenesis of the liver.
It is of interest to note that simultaneous adjustment for all three immune markers revealed that only sTNF-R2 was significantly associated with increased incidence of HCC. That sTNF-R2 is independently associated with HCC after adjusting for sICAM-1 and sCD30 may reflect the significance of the immune response that is triggered by the binding of TNF-
to sTNF-R2 (44, 52). Because elevated levels of TNF-
are found in chronic HCV infection (26), it is possible that the cytotoxic T cells recruited by the TNF-
signaling system are more important in exacerbating ongoing liver injury. Given the correlation of sICAM-1 and sCD30 with sTNF-R2, as well as the stronger association of sTNF-R2 with HCC risk, it is not surprising that the association of sICAM-1 and sCD30 with HCC incidence became closer to the null with simultaneous adjustment for all three immune markers. Alternatively, the observed association between sTNF-R2 and HCC may be attributed to the bias resulting from imprecise measurement of correlated exposures (53). In the present study, sCD30 was measured with the greatest imprecision, whereas sTNF-R2 was measured with the smallest variability.
Unique to this study is the use of prediagnostic serum samples to measure the levels of sTNF-R2, sICAM-1, and sCD30. Therefore, the possibility that the tumor caused the elevation of circulating serum immune markers is unlikely. We also excluded HCC cases diagnosed within 2 years of the serum sample tested to minimize the possibility of reverse causation and found the associations with the immune markers to be unchanged. In addition, the community-based setting of the study provides a novel perspective in determining the natural history of HCV-induced HCC. The present findings show that prediagnostic serum levels of select immune biomarkers can be useful in predicting HCC incidence within a nonpatient population.
The present study has some limitations. Although information on alcohol consumption was obtained, the lack of quantitative data for all subjects may have resulted in residual confounding (i.e., 15 subjects were missing information on alcohol consumption). Nevertheless, because alcohol consumption is reportedly inversely associated with type 1 immune markers (54, 55), any residual confounding would be expected to result in an underestimation of the true relation between elevated type 1 markers and HCC incidence. In addition, although smoking was not adjusted for due to unavailable data, confounding by smoking was presumed to be minimal; Kuper et al. (56) found a significant dose-response, positive association between smoking and HCC risk only among HCV-negative subjects and concluded that smoking was less important as a risk factor for HCC among HCV-positive subjects. It is also important to consider that the immune marker data were obtained from the peripheral blood compartment, which may only partially reflect immune events occurring within the infected liver. However, Sobue et al. (14) reported a correlation in the helper T-cell type 1 and type 2 ratio between the peripheral blood and the liver and that the immune response of peripheral blood shifted toward a type 1 cytokine profile as liver damage progressed.
In summary, the observed association between elevated serum type 1 and type 2 immune markers and HCC risk supports the hypothesis that subjects with a dysregulated immune response experience greater hepatocyte damage, including hepatocarcinogenesis, as a result of HCV-induced immunopathogenesis. The association of sTNF-R2 and HCC risk after adjustment for sICAM-1 and sCD30 suggests a greater role for an activated type 1 response, although further study is required. The present findings also show that prediagnostic serum levels of sTNF-R2, sICAM-1, and sCD30 can be useful in predicting HCC incidence within a community-based study population. This finding needs to be confirmed in other population studies.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 6/12/06; revised 9/13/06; accepted 10/ 9/06.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
levels in patients with hepatitis B-associated chronic liver disease. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 2000;18:10914.[Medline]
system in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Dig Dis Sci 1997;42:248794.[CrossRef][Medline]
receptors in patients with hepatitis C-associated mixed cryoglobulinaemia. Clin Exp Immunol 2002;127:12330.[Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |