CEBP Meeting Calendar Targets
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1055-9965.EPI-06-0465v1
15/11/2136    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friberg, E.
Right arrow Articles by Wolk, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friberg, E.
Right arrow Articles by Wolk, A.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 15, 2136-2140, November 2006
© 2006 American Association for Cancer Research

Physical Activity and Risk of Endometrial Cancer: A Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study

Emilie Friberg1, Christos S. Mantzoros2 and Alicja Wolk1

1 Division of Nutritional Epidemiology, The National Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden and 2 Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Requests for reprints: Emilie Friberg, Division of Nutritional Epidemiology, The National Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, P.O. Box 210, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden. Phone: 46-8-524-863-30; Fax: 46-8-30-45-71. E-mail: emilie.friberg{at}ki.se


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Physical activity is involved in the regulation of metabolic and hormonal pathways and is one of the factors important for the maintenance of body weight; obesity is a risk factor for endometrial cancer. A connection between physical activity and endometrial cancer risk through hormonal mechanisms, possibly mediated by body weight, is biologically plausible. Only one study has investigated total physical activity, and no previous study has examined leisure time inactivity directly. We investigated the association of total physical activity and different types of physical activity with risk of endometrial cancer in the Swedish Mammography Cohort, a population-based prospective cohort, including 33,723 women and 199 endometrial cancer cases. After adjustments for potential confounders (age, body mass index, parity, history of diabetes, total fruit and vegetable intake, and education), the relative risks for endometrial cancer for the second to fourth quartile of total physical activity compared with the lowest one were 0.80 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.54-1.18], 0.87 (95% CI, 0.59-1.28), and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.53-1.17). High leisure time inactivity (watching TV/sitting ≥5 hours daily) compared with low was associated with increased risk of endometrial cancer (relative risk, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.05-2.61). The associations were not modified by body mass index. Findings from this study suggest that total physical activity is weakly inversely associated with endometrial cancer risk and that leisure time inactivity is statistically significantly associated with increased risk for endometrial cancer. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(11):2136–40)


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Physical activity is involved in the regulation of metabolic and hormonal pathways and is one of the factors important for the maintenance of body weight (1); obesity is a risk factor for endometrial cancer (2). Therefore, connection between physical activity and endometrial cancer risk indirectly through hormonal mechanisms possibly mediated by body weight and/or through direct effects of physical activity is biologically plausible. Several epidemiologic studies have been reported on associations between selected types of physical activity (but not total) and incidence of endometrial cancer (3-17), but several studies have either not controlled for important covariates (10, 16, 17) or were limited by small sample size (8) or used a very crude assessment (one single question) of physical activity (9, 17). Moreover, only two previous studies used a validated instrument to measure physical activity (3, 6). Total physical activity (covering 24 hours) has been investigated in only one prospective cohort (18), and to our knowledge, no previous study has investigated leisure time inactivity directly.

To address whether physical activity is associated with risk of endometrial cancer, we used data from the Swedish Mammography Cohort, a population-based prospective cohort study of ~40,000 women. We first examined the association between self-reported total physical activity and endometrial cancer risk. In addition, we investigated associations with different specific components of physical activity, such as household work, occupational activity, walking/bicycling, leisure time physical activity, and watching TV/sitting (leisure time physical inactivity). Furthermore, we examined whether body weight modified the observed association after adjusting for other potential risk factors.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
From 1987 to 1990, all women who lived in the Uppsala County of central Sweden and were born in 1914 to 1948 (n = 48,517) and all women who lived in the adjacent Västmanland County (n = 41,786) and were born in 1917 to 1948 received an invitation by mail to participate in a mammography screening program. A total of 66,651 (74%) women returned a completed questionnaire on diet, weight, height, parity, and education.

In 1997, a second questionnaire was sent to all 56,030 cohort members who were still living in the study area, and the vast majority of the questionnaires came in during late September to early October; the second questionnaire was extended with information on physical activity, medical history, including diabetes and hypertension, age at menarche, history of oral contraceptive use, age at menopause, postmenopausal hormone use, and lifestyle factors, such as cigarette smoking history, and use of dietary supplements; 39,227 (70%) women returned a completed questionnaire.

Information on physical activity was based on six questions about physical activity/inactivity during the previous year. We asked for duration of specific activities and assigned mean metabolic equivalent (MET) values [multiples of MET (kcal kg–1 h–1)] based on specific activities within corresponding categories in a physical activity compendium (19, 20). For work/occupation, there were six predefined types of work and a question about full-time or part-time employment that allowed us to assign correct work duration. We predefined the following types of occupational activity: mostly sitting (1.3 MET/h), sitting down more than half the time (1.8 MET/h), mostly standing (2.2 MET/h), doing lifts (2.6 MET/h), a lot of lifts (3.0 MET/h), and heavy labor (3.9 MET/h). For household work and walking/bicycling, there were six predefined duration categories for time: home/household work (<1 hour daily to >8 hours daily, 2.5 MET/h) and walking/bicycling (almost never to >1.5 hours daily, 3.6 MET/h). For leisure time activity, there were five predefined duration categories (<1 hour weekly to >5 hours weekly, 5.0 MET/h) and five predefined categories for time spent per day watching TV/sitting (inactive leisure time, <1 hour daily to >6 hours daily, 1.2 MET/h). There was an additional open-ended question about number of hours of sleep per day (0.9 MET/h). We estimated the total activity by adding up the respective products of duration by intensity of specific activities and corrected the self-reported time to 24 hours per day by adding hours (if the total sum was <24 hours) or deleting hours (if the total sum was >24 hours). The correction time was multiplied by the intensity factor 2.0 MET corresponding to the mean intensity of self-care/walking at home and sitting.

The physical activity questions were validated by comparing them with two 1-week-long records of activity done ~6 months apart during two seasons (in late winter-early spring and late summer-early autumn); Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.7 for total physical activity (21), 0.5 for work/occupation, 0.8 for home/household work, 0.4 for walking/bicycling, 0.2 for leisure time activity, and 0.6 for watching TV/reading (22).

Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided with the square of the height in meters (BMI, kg/m2); the validity for self-reported weight and height compared with measurements in Swedish women has been studied and the correlation coefficient was r = 0.9 and 1.0, respectively (23). Education was assessed with six questions ranging from 6 years of basic education to university studies. Diabetes was self-reported on the questionnaire and assessed with the question "have you ever been diagnosed with diabetes." For women with diabetes who were hospitalized, we also obtained information by linkage of the cohort to the Swedish In-patient Register. Cigarette smoking was measured as pack-years of smoking. Total energy, fruit, and vegetable intake were assessed with the use of a self-administered food frequency questionnaire that included food items (including alcoholic beverages) commonly consumed in Sweden. We used age-specific (<53, 53-65, and >65 years) portion sizes that were based on mean values obtained from 213 randomly chosen women from the study area whose food intake for four 1-week periods was weighed and recorded.3 Analyses are limited to 1997 data when we included physical activity in the questionnaire.

Follow-up of the Cohort
We did linkage of the cohort with the National Swedish Cancer Register through June 30, 2003 and with the Regional Cancer Register in the study area through June 30, 2005. The Swedish Cancer Register and the Regional Cancer Register have been estimated to be ~100% complete (24).

Furthermore, by linkage with the nationwide Swedish In-patient Register, we identified women who had a hysterectomy for reasons other than endometrial cancer.

Dates of death or migration from the study area were ascertained through the Swedish Death Register and the National Swedish Population Register, respectively.

Of the 39,227 women who responded to the follow-up questionnaire in 1997, we excluded those diagnosed with cancer (other than nonmelanoma skin cancer) and those having had a hysterectomy before returning the follow-up questionnaire. Furthermore, we excluded women with missing information on physical activity. After these exclusions, 33,723 women ages 50 to 83 years at baseline 1997 remained for this analysis, including 199 incident endometrial (adenocarcinoma) cancer cases.

This study was approved by the Ethics Committees at the Uppsala University Hospital (Uppsala, Sweden) and the Karolinska Institutet (Stockholm, Sweden). Completion of the self-administered questionnaire was considered to imply informed consent to participate in this study.

Statistical Analysis
To estimate the risk of endometrial cancer, we used the Cox proportional hazards method. We calculated person-years of follow-up for each woman from the date of return of the questionnaire in 1997 to the date of an endometrial cancer diagnosis, the date of a hysterectomy, the date of death from any cause, the date of migration out of the study area during June 30, 2003 to June 30, 2005 (because for this time period we only have regional information), or the end of follow-up June 30, 2005, whichever came first. We computed incidence rate ratios by dividing the number of incident cancer cases by the number of person-years of follow-up in each category stratified on age in months. The relative risks (RR) of endometrial cancer [with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI)] were calculated by dividing the incidence rates among women in the three upper quartiles of total physical activity with women in the lowest quartile of total physical activity. We calculated the RR of endometrial cancer (with 95% CI) for different components of physical activity (occupational physical activity, household work, walking/bicycling, and leisure time activity) or inactivity (watching TV/sitting) by dividing the incidence rate among women with a high level of activity or inactivity with women with low level of activity or inactivity. We did age-adjusted (age in months) and multivariable analyses. The main multivariable models simultaneously included such confounders as parity, history of diabetes, education, and total fruit and vegetable intake (as a proxy for healthy behavior), which changed risk estimates of physical activity by 5% to ≥10%. We also did multivariable analysis further adjusted for BMI. In additional multivariable analysis, we further adjusted for other known risk factors as oral contraceptives and postmenopausal hormones, age at menarche and menopause, smoking, and total energy intake. In the analyses on different types of physical activity, the model simultaneously contained all other types of activities. Missing values in a confounder were treated as a separate "missing category" in the model. We conducted analyses stratifying on BMI, and the statistical significance of interactions was tested by adding an interaction term to the Cox model, simultaneously containing the main variable, BMI, and age in months. To test for trend, we assigned the mean value to each exposure category and treated this value as a continuous variable in the model. All analyses were done using Statistical Analysis System software version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
During a mean follow-up time of 7.25 years of 33,723 women in the cohort (244,548 person-years), 199 endometrial cancer cases were diagnosed. The mean age at diagnosis of endometrial cancer was 67.3 (±9.1) years. At baseline, 48.2% of the women were working. Table 1 shows the distribution of known and potential risk factors for endometrial cancer in the cohort by total physical activity in quartiles of MET/h. Women with a low level of total physical activity were older, had higher BMI, larger percentage of them reported history of use of oral contraceptives and postmenopausal hormones, and had lower energy intake and lower consumption of fruit and vegetables and higher frequency of diabetes than women with a higher level of total physical activity. Other characteristics did not vary substantially in respect to total physical activity.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Age standardized baseline characteristics of 33,723 women in the Swedish Mammography Cohort according to quartiles of total physical activity

 
Overall physical activity was inversely, albeit not significantly, associated with endometrial cancer risk in both age-adjusted and multivariate analyses adjusting for several potential confounders, such as parity, education, history of diabetes, and total fruit and vegetable consumption, as well as in multivariate analysis further adjusted for BMI (Table 2 ). Additional adjustment for use of oral contraceptives and postmenopausal hormones, age at menarche and menopause, smoking, and total energy intake did not change the results [RRs for the second, third, and forth quartile of total physical activity compared with the lowest one were 0.79 (95% CI, 0.53-1.18), 0.86 (95% CI, 0.58-1.26), and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.50-1.11), respectively]. We further investigated the associations between specific types of physical activity and endometrial cancer risk. Table 3 shows that leisure time inactivity (i.e., watching TV/sitting ≥5 hours daily) was associated with a statistically significantly 66% increased risk of endometrial cancer. In contrast, walking/bicycling at least 1 hour daily was associated with a nonsignificantly decreased risk. Occupational activity, household work, and leisure time activity were not associated with endometrial cancer risk.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. Rate ratios and 95% CIs of endometrial cancer according to quartiles of total physical activity among 33,723 women in the Swedish Mammography Cohort

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3. Associations of physical activity with rate ratios and 95% CIs of endometrial cancer for 33,723 women in the Swedish Mammography Cohort

 
We also examined whether the observed associations differed according to BMI status by stratifying the cohort into groups with BMI ≤27 kg/m2 and BMI >27 kg/m2. We observed no significant differences between the two groups. For total physical activity and walking/bicycling (both weakly inversely associated with endometrial cancer), the interactions with BMI were Pinteraction = 0.55 and 0.75, respectively. For watching TV/reading (statistically significantly associated with increased risk), Pinteraction was 0.63. Furthermore, we compared the most inactive women (≥5 hours of inactivity at leisure time daily) who simultaneously had a low level (below the median) of all other activities combined (including 21 cases) with the group of physically active women reporting a short time of leisure time inactivity and simultaneously a high level (above the median) of all other activities (including 79 cases) and observed RR = 1.63 (95% CI, 0.97-2.71). Only three cases had a high level of leisure time inactivity combined with a high level of all other activities; therefore, we could not evaluate if leisure time inactivity may be compensated by other activities.

Finally, to eliminate potential effects of early undiagnosed endometrial cancer, we repeated our analysis after excluding endometrial cancer cases diagnosed during the 1st year of follow-up. Results from this analysis did not differ substantially from those for the whole cohort [e.g., multivariable RRs for the second, third, and forth quartile of total physical activity compared with the lowest one were 0.76 (95% CI, 0.50-1.17), 0.77 (95% CI, 0.51-1.19), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.52-1.21), respectively].


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
In this prospective cohort study, we found that leisure time inactivity (watching TV/sitting ≥5 hours daily) was statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of endometrial cancer incidence. Total physical activity and walking/bicycling were associated with a nonsignificant decreased risk. We have not observed associations with occupational, household work, or leisure time activity. The associations were not modified by BMI.

To our knowledge, leisure time inactivity has not been directly investigated previously. However, the observed increased risk of endometrial cancer among women being inactive during leisure time is in an indirect agreement with previous studies showing a statistically significant inverse association with high levels of leisure time physical activities (which might also reflect a low level of inactivity; refs. 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 13, 15, 17). Our results agree with the only other prospective cohort study that investigated total physical activity (covering 24 hours) and risk of endometrial cancer and reported very similar results (RR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6-1.0; ref. 18). The observation for walking/bicycling (mainly for transportation) agrees with three previous studies showing a statistically significant decreased risk of endometrial cancer in women with more walking and bicycling (3, 4, 15). Occupational activity was investigated in 10 studies (3, 5, 7, 11-16). Five of them have shown a statistically significantly reduced risk of endometrial cancer with increasing occupational activity (5, 7, 10, 13, 15), whereas our results for occupational activity agree with five other studies showing no association (3, 11, 12, 14, 16). However, we have to note that <50% of women in our cohort were working at baseline due to old age, and thus, we had small numbers of women in the high occupational activity categories. The apparent lack of an inverse association between leisure time activities in our study may be due to a lower validity of this question than our other physical activity questions and possibly a low validity in previous studies not showing an association (5, 11, 14).

There are several mechanisms that could be potentially involved in the development of endometrial cancer in inactive women. It has been shown that physically active women have lower levels of endogenous estrogen (25, 26). Estrogens have been shown to increase endometrial cancer risk by stimulating proliferation of the endometrial tissue (27) when unopposed by progesterone (28, 29). Physical inactivity is a major determinant of body weight and may shift the body composition toward more body fat and visceral tissue. Obesity induces an excess of circulating bioactive endogenous estrogens in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women due to an increased estrogen production from aromatization of androgen in peripheral fat tissue (30-32) and/or through a decreased production of sex hormone-binding globulin (33). Obesity is also associated with insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia (34-36). Importantly, physical inactivity has been shown to affect insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia (37, 38) not only through obesity but also directly, and physical activity has been shown to promote insulin sensitivity (39, 40). Hyperinsulinemia may increase levels of free estrogen through decreasing concentrations of circulating sex hormone-binding globulin (41, 42), and several epidemiologic studies have observed an increased risk of endometrial cancer in relation to high prediagnostic C-peptide indicating hyperinsulinemia (43). It has also been suggested that hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance are associated with a more aggressive course of endometrial cancer (44). Furthermore, hyperinsulinemia through decreasing levels of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 increases circulating free insulin-like growth factor-I, which, by binding and activating insulin-like growth factor-I receptors in the endometrium, stimulates cell proliferation (45-49). Decreased circulating insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 levels may also have a direct regulatory role in cell growth control and cancer (50, 51). Finally, it has recently been reported that hyperinsulinemia is closely associated with lower circulating levels of an endogenous insulin sensitizer, adiponectin (52). It has been shown that low adiponectin levels are associated with low levels of physical activity (53, 54), higher levels of body fat and visceral tissue (36), higher concentrations of circulating estradiol (55), and increased endometrial cancer risk (56). Importantly, we have recently shown that physical activity increases adiponectin levels independently of body weight changes (57).

Major strengths of our study include its population-based design and the completeness of identification of endometrial cancer cases through the Swedish cancer registries. The prospective nature of the study makes it highly unlikely that the associations we observe were due to recall or selection biases, which might lead to spurious associations in case-control studies. We have used validated questions about physical activity and validity of estimates of total physical activity and specific types of activities, except leisure time activity, were relatively high. Furthermore, we had information on all major potential confounders and were able to take into account the amount of all major types of activities using mutually adjusted models. Although the possibility of uncontrolled or residual confounding cannot be entirely eliminated, we have adjusted for multiple potential confounders and we observed little difference between the age-adjusted and multivariate models. A potential limitation of the study is that we have a relatively narrow range of total physical activity and of the duration of the specific types of activities because we have a relatively active population. Due to low number of women in the lowest activity categories of the specific activities, we were unable to use these categories as reference groups.

In conclusion, our results support the importance of physical activity in the etiology of endometrial cancer, and if confirmed by other studies and in other populations, these data may prove to be of major public health significance given the increasing prevalence of physical inactivity and obesity in Western societies. Interventions to minimize inactivity and increase physical activity may have important implications in terms of prevention of endometrial cancer.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Professor Donna Spiegelman and her group at Harvard School of Public Health (Boston, MA) for contributing statistical programs used in the data analyses.


   Footnotes
 
Grant support: World Cancer Research Fund International, Swedish Cancer Foundation, Swedish Research Council/Longitudinal Studies grant DK58785, and American Diabetes Association Award.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

3 A. Wolk, unpublished data. Back

Received 6/ 6/06; revised 8/15/06; accepted 8/18/06.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Jakicic JM, Otto AD. Physical activity considerations for the treatment and prevention of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82:226–9S.
  2. Kaaks R, Lukanova A, Kurzer MS. Obesity, endogenous hormones, and endometrial cancer risk: a synthetic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:1531–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Matthews CE, Xu WH, Zheng W, et al. Physical activity and risk of endometrial cancer: a report from the Shanghai endometrial cancer study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:779–85.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Schouten LJ, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA. Anthropometry, physical activity, and endometrial cancer risk: results from the Netherlands Cohort Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1635–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Furberg AS, Thune I. Metabolic abnormalities (hypertension, hyperglycemia, and overweight), lifestyle (high energy intake and physical inactivity), and endometrial cancer risk in a Norwegian cohort. Int J Cancer 2003;104:669–76.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Littman AJ, Voigt LF, Beresford SA, Weiss NS. Recreational physical activity and endometrial cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 2001;154:924–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Moradi T, Weiderpass E, Signorello LB, Persson I, Nyren O, Adami HO. Physical activity and postmenopausal endometrial cancer risk (Sweden). Cancer Causes Control 2000;11:829–37.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Salazar-Martinez E, Lazcano-Ponce EC, Lira-Lira GG, et al. Case-control study of diabetes, obesity, physical activity, and risk of endometrial cancer among Mexican women. Cancer Causes Control 2000;11:707–11.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Terry P, Baron JA, Weiderpass E, Yuen J, Lichtenstein P, Nyren O. Lifestyle and endometrial cancer risk: a cohort study from the Swedish Twin Registry. Int J Cancer 1999;82:38–42.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Moradi T, Nyren O, Bergstrom R, et al. Risk for endometrial cancer in relation to occupational physical activity: a nationwide cohort study in Sweden. Int J Cancer 1998;76:665–70.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Goodman MT, Hankin JH, Wilkens LR, et al. Diet, body size, physical activity, and the risk of endometrial cancer. Cancer Res 1997;57:5077–85.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Olson SH, Vena JE, Dorn JP, et al. Exercise, occupational activity, and risk of endometrial cancer. Ann Epidemiol 1997;7:46–53.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Sturgeon SR, Brinton LA, Berman ML, et al. Past and present physical activity and endometrial cancer risk. Br J Cancer 1993;68:584–9.[Medline]
  14. Shu XO, Hatch MC, Zheng W, Gao YT, Brinton LA. Physical activity and risk of endometrial cancer. Epidemiology 1993;4:342–9.[Medline]
  15. Levi F, La Vecchia C, Negri E, Franceschi S. Selected physical activities and the risk of endometrial cancer. Br J Cancer 1993;67:846–51.[Medline]
  16. Zheng W, Shu XO, McLaughlin JK, Chow WH, Gao YT, Blot WJ. Occupational physical activity and the incidence of cancer of the breast, corpus uteri, and ovary in Shanghai. Cancer 1993;71:3620–4.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Hirose K, Tajima K, Hamajima N, et al. Subsite (cervix/endometrium)-specific risk and protective factors in uterus cancer. Jpn J Cancer Res 1996;87:1001–9.[CrossRef]
  18. Colbert LH, Lacey JV, Jr., Schairer C, Albert P, Schatzkin A, Albanes D. Physical activity and risk of endometrial cancer in a prospective cohort study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2003;14:559–67.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32:S498–504.
  20. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leon AS, et al. Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993;25:71–80.
  21. Norman A, Bellocco R, Bergstrom A, Wolk A. Validity and reproducibility of self-reported total physical activity-differences by relative weight. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001;25:682–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Norman A. Physical activity in men and relation to prostate cancer [dissertation]. Stockholm (Sweden): Karolinska Institutet; 2004. pp. 30–2.
  23. Kuskowska-Wolk A, Bergstrom R, Bostrom G. Relationship between questionnaire data and medical records of height, weight, and body mass index. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1992;16:1–9.[Medline]
  24. Mattsson B, Wallgren A. Completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register. Non-notified cancer cases recorded on death certificates in 1978. Acta Radiol Oncol 1984;23:305–13.[Medline]
  25. Friedenreich CM, Orenstein MR. Physical activity and cancer prevention: etiologic evidence and biological mechanisms. J Nutr 2002;132:3456–64S.
  26. Friedenreich CM. Physical activity and cancer prevention: from observational to intervention research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001;10:287–301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Graham JD, Clarke CL. Physiological action of progesterone in target tissues. Endocr Rev 1997;18:502–19.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Ferenczy A, Bertrand G, Gelfand MM. Proliferation kinetics of human endometrium during the normal menstrual cycle. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;133:859–67.[Medline]
  29. Key TJ, Pike MC. The dose-effect relationship between ‘unopposed’ oestrogens and endometrial mitotic rate: its central role in explaining and predicting endometrial cancer risk. Br J Cancer 1988;57:205–12.[Medline]
  30. Edman CD, Aiman EJ, Porter JC, MacDonald PC. Identification of the estrogen product of extraglandular aromatization of plasma androstenedione. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978;130:439–47.[Medline]
  31. MacDonald PC, Edman CD, Hemsell DL, Porter JC, Siiteri PK. Effect of obesity on conversion of plasma androstenedione to estrone in postmenopausal women with and without endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978;130:448–55.[Medline]
  32. Cleland WH, Mendelson CR, Simpson ER. Effects of aging and obesity on aromatase activity of human adipose cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1985;60:174–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Enriori CL, Orsini W, del Carmen Cremona M, Etkin AE, Cardillo LR, Reforzo-Membrives J. Decrease of circulating level of SHBG in postmenopausal obese women as a risk factor in breast cancer: reversible effect of weight loss. Gynecol Oncol 1986;23:77–86.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Bjorntorp P. Metabolic implications of body fat distribution. Diabetes Care 1991;14:1132–43.[Abstract]
  35. Kissebah AH, Vydelingum N, Murray R, et al. Relation of body fat distribution to metabolic complications of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1982;54:254–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Steffes MW, Gross MD, Schreiner PJ, et al. Serum adiponectin in young adults—interactions with central adiposity, circulating levels of glucose, and insulin resistance: the CARDIA study. Ann Epidemiol 2004;14:492–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Manson JE, Nathan DM, Krolewski AS, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Hennekens CH. A prospective study of exercise and incidence of diabetes among US male physicians. JAMA 1992;268:63–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. DeFronzo RA, Bonadonna RC, Ferrannini E. Pathogenesis of NIDDM. A balanced overview. Diabetes Care 1992;15:318–68.[Abstract]
  39. Koivisto VA, Yki-Jarvinen H, DeFronzo RA. Physical training and insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Metab Rev 1986;1:445–81.[Medline]
  40. Goodyear LJ, Kahn BB. Exercise, glucose transport, and insulin sensitivity. Annu Rev Med 1998;49:235–61.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Kazer RR. Insulin resistance, insulin-like growth factor I, and breast cancer: a hypothesis. Int J Cancer 1995;62:403–6.[Medline]
  42. Nestler JE, Powers LP, Matt DW, et al. A direct effect of hyperinsulinemia on serum sex hormone-binding globulin levels in obese women with the polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1991;72:83–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Lukanova A, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Lundin E, et al. Prediagnostic levels of C-peptide, IGF-I, IGFBP-1, -2, and -3 and risk of endometrial cancer. Int J Cancer 2004;108:262–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Berstein LM, Kvatchevskaya JO, Poroshina TE, et al. Insulin resistance, its consequences for the clinical course of the disease, and possibilities of correction in endometrial cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2004;130:687–93.[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Irwin JC, de las Fuentes L, Dsupin BA, Giudice LC. Insulin-like growth factor regulation of human endometrial stromal cell function: coordinate effects on insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1, cell proliferation, and prolactin secretion. Regul Pept 1993;48:165–77.[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Murphy LJ. Growth factors and steroid hormone action in endometrial cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1994;48:419–23.[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Corocleanu M. Hypothesis for endometrial carcinoma carcinogenesis. Preventive prospects. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1993;20:254–8.[Medline]
  48. Thiet MP, Osathanondh R, Yeh J. Localization and timing of appearance of insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I, and their receptors in the human fetal mullerian tract. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:152–6.[Medline]
  49. Ordener C, Cypriani B, Vuillermoz C, Adessi GL. Epidermal growth factor and insulin induce the proliferation of guinea pig endometrial stromal cells in serum-free culture, whereas estradiol and progesterone do not. Biol Reprod 1993;49:1032–44.[Abstract]
  50. Giovannucci E. Insulin-like growth factor-I and binding protein-3 and risk of cancer. Horm Res 1999;51 Suppl 3:34–41.[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Moschos SJ, Mantzoros CS. The role of the IGF system in cancer: from basic to clinical studies and clinical applications. Oncology 2002;63:317–32.[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Diez JJ, Iglesias P. The role of the novel adipocyte-derived hormone adiponectin in human disease. Eur J Endocrinol 2003;148:293–300.[Abstract]
  53. St-Pierre DH, Faraj M, Karelis AD, et al. Lifestyle behaviours and components of energy balance as independent predictors of ghrelin and adiponectin in young non-obese women. Diabetes Metab 2006;32:131–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  54. Bruun JM, Helge JW, Richelsen B, Stallknecht B. Diet and exercise reduce low-grade inflammation and macrophage infiltration in adipose tissue but not in skeletal muscle in severely obese subjects. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2006;290:E961–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Gavrila A, Chan JL, Yiannakouris N, et al. Serum adiponectin levels are inversely associated with overall and central fat distribution but are not directly regulated by acute fasting or leptin administration in humans: cross-sectional and interventional studies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:4823–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Petridou E, Mantzoros C, Dessypris N, et al. Plasma adiponectin concentrations in relation to endometrial cancer: a case-control study in Greece. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:993–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Bluher M, Bullen JW, Jr., Lee JH, et al. Circulating adiponectin and expression of adiponectin receptors in human skeletal muscle: associations with metabolic parameters and insulin resistance and regulation by physical training. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:2310–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
A. Akesson, B. Julin, and A. Wolk
Long-term Dietary Cadmium Intake and Postmenopausal Endometrial Cancer Incidence: A Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study
Cancer Res., August 1, 2008; 68(15): 6435 - 6441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. W. Voskuil, E. M. Monninkhof, S. G. Elias, F. A. Vlems, F. E. van Leeuwen, and Task Force Physical Activity and Cancer
Physical Activity and Endometrial Cancer Risk, a Systematic Review of Current Evidence
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2007; 16(4): 639 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1055-9965.EPI-06-0465v1
15/11/2136    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friberg, E.
Right arrow Articles by Wolk, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friberg, E.
Right arrow Articles by Wolk, A.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online