CEBP CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kowalska, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lubinski, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kowalska, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lubinski, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Intervention
Right arrow Clinical Intervention: Biomarkers
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 14, 1302-1306, May 2005
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research

Short Communication

Increased Rates of Chromosome Breakage in BRCA1 Carriers Are Normalized by Oral Selenium Supplementation

Elzbieta Kowalska1, Steven A. Narod2, Tomasz Huzarski1, Stanislaw Zajaczek1, Jowita Huzarska1, Bohdan Gorski1 and Jan Lubinski1

1 Department of Genetics and Pathology, Hereditary Cancer Centre, Pomeranian Academy of Medicine, Szczecin, Poland and 2 Centre for Research on Women's Health, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Requests for reprints: Steven Narod, Centre for Research in Women's Health, 790 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1N8. Phone: 416-351-3675; Fax: 416-351-3766. E-mail: steven.narod{at}sw.ca


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Women who are born with constitutional heterozygous mutations of the BRCA1 gene face greatly increased risks of breast and ovarian cancer. The product of the BRCA1 gene is involved in the repair of double-stranded DNA breaks and it is believed that increased susceptibility to DNA breakage contributes to the cancer phenotype. It is hoped therefore that preventive strategies designed to reduce chromosome damage will also reduce the rate of cancer in these women. To test for increased mutagenicity of cells from BRCA1 carriers, the frequency of chromosome breaks was measured in cultured blood lymphocytes following in vitro exposure to bleomycin in female BRCA1 carriers and was compared with noncarrier relatives. The frequency of chromosome breaks was also measured in BRCA1 carriers following oral selenium supplementation. Carriers of BRCA1 mutations showed significantly greater mean frequencies of induced chromosome breaks per cell than did healthy noncarrier relatives (0.58 versus 0.39; P < 10–4). The frequency of chromosome breaks was greatly reduced following 1 to 3 months of oral selenium supplementation (mean, 0.63 breaks per cell versus 0.40; P < 10–10). The mean level of chromosome breaks in carriers following supplementation was similar to that of the noncarrier controls (0.40 versus 0.39). Oral selenium is a good candidate for chemoprevention in women who carry a mutation in the BRCA1 gene.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Women who carry a mutation of the BRCA1 gene face a lifetime risk of breast cancer of ~80% and a lifetime risk of ovarian cancer of ~40% (1). Men who carry a BRCA1 mutation seem at elevated risk for breast and prostate cancer (2). The BRCA1 gene product is involved in the maintenance of the integrity of the human genome and functions in conjunction with BRCA2 and RAD51 to repair double-stranded DNA breaks through the mechanism of homologous recombination (3). Deficiencies in the ability to repair double-stranded DNA breaks lead to an increase in the formation of gross chromosome rearrangements. Structural chromosomal aberrations seem in excess both in BRCA1-deficient mouse cells (4) and in BRCA1-deficient cancer cells (5). BRCA1 serves multiple functions, including DNA damage response (3), nucleotide excision repair (6), and protection against oxidative stress (7). It is not yet clear to what extent each of these contributes to the cancer susceptibility phenotype of BRCA1 heterozygotes. Nevertheless, it is believed that the chromosomal instability of BRCA1-deficient cells contributes to their tendency to undergo neoplastic transformation (3). Strategies to reduce the frequency of chromosome breaks, therefore, may result in a reduction in the cancer risk. Selenium has several anticancer properties, including protection against oxidative damage and enhancing nucleotide excision repair (8).

One of the most commonly used cytogenetic tests for the assessment of chromosome instability is the in vitro bleomycin assay (9). This is a simple and reproducible assay that measures induced chromosome breaks. Patient lymphocytes are cultured in the presence of bleomycin, a known mutagenic agent that typically induces double-strand breaks (similar to those induced by ionizing radiation). The mean number of chromosomal breaks per cell is then measured after bleomycin exposure. The assay has been used to study susceptibility to various types of cancer (9, 10). Using this technique, we explored the possibility that oral selenium supplementation may reduce the formation of induced chromosome breaks in female BRCA1 carriers.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study Subjects. Female study subjects were recruited from among the attendees of a single familial cancer clinic of the Hereditary Cancer Centre of the Pomeranian Academy of Medicine in Szczecin, Poland. Women were referred to this clinic because of a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. The women who participated in this study had previously been offered and had consented to genetic testing. There were two phases to this study involving two groups of women. The first group of women was recruited for the purpose of comparing the frequencies of chromosome breaks in BRCA1 carriers and noncarriers. Case women were recruited from among those who had been found to be carriers of a deleterious mutation in the BRCA1 gene. Control subjects were recruited from among the family members of the carriers (cases) but who had been determined not to carry the deleterious mutation. It was possible to generate 26 case-control pairs. In 20 instances, the control relative was the sister of the case and in six instances, she was a more distant relative. Only healthy women were invited to participate in this study; women with a past history of breast, ovary, or other forms of cancer were excluded. Each woman provided a blood sample at some time between February 2001 and January 2002.

A second group of BRCA1 carriers was recruited from this clinic for the purpose of studying the effect of selenium supplementation on frequencies of chromosome breaks. Thirty-five women with BRCA1 mutations agreed to participate in this phase of the study. Blood samples were taken before the onset of selenium supplementation, and again at a time from 1 to 3 months following the start of daily selenium supplementation. Because the two studies were conducted at different times and because of the availability of suitable controls, and because of willingness to participate, there was little overlap in the study subjects between the two groups of carrier subjects. Only six carrier women participated in both phases of the study.

Bleomycin Assay. Chromosome sensitivity to bleomycin was measured according to the method of Hsu et al. (9) Bleomycin (Nippon-Kayuka, Tokyo, Japan) was added to the cell culture 5 hours before the end of the culture at a concentration of 0.03 IU/mL. Conventional harvesting and Giemsa staining were made. For each subject, 100 consecutive euploid cells in metaphase were read (cells with overlapping chromosomes were excluded). Each chromatid aberration (excluding gaps) was scored as one breakpoint and each exchange-type aberration was scored as two breakpoints. The total number of breakpoints per 100 cells was recorded for each subject. Reading of coded slides was done blindly by one of us (E.K.) For 20 randomly selected cases, the counts were determined independently by two cytogenetic technicians with good agreement.

Selenium Supplementation. An oral selenium solution was provided to the study subjects which contained 690 µg of pure selenium, in the form of sodium selenite (Na2SeO3) per mL of 70% ethanol. Subjects were requested to consume 0.2 mL of the solution twice daily. Among the BRCA1 carriers (n = 32), this level of supplementation resulted in an increase in the mean serum selenium from 56.7 ± 12.7 to 90.2 ± 17.6 ng/mL (P < 0.001). Selenium levels were not measured in the noncarrier controls.

Statistical Analysis. The mean number of breaks per cell was calculated after inspection of 100 cells. The paired t test was used to compare the pre- and post-supplementation selenium levels and numbers of chromosome breaks. The nonparametric sign test was also used to the mean number of chromosome breaks in cases and controls. The frequency of chromosome breaks was also tested for possible correlation with patient age using the Pearson correlation coefficient. To ensure that there was no significant variation in the frequencies of chromosome breaks associated with the date of testing, a comparison of chromosome breaks was made among carriers with date of testing.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
In the first phase of the study, we compared the frequency of chromosome breaks in a panel of 26 unaffected BRCA1 carriers with a matched group of healthy controls. The most common mutation was the Polish founder mutation 5382 insC (16 carriers), but there were 10 women with other BRCA1 mutations. For each carrier, a single healthy noncarrier relative was available; these control women had been tested for and found not to carry the deleterious mutation identified in the family. Twenty of the controls were sisters of the cases and six were more distant relatives. The mean age of the carriers was 35.3 years (range, 18-58 years) and the mean age of the noncarrier controls was 35.7 years (range, 20-61 years).

The mean number of chromosome breaks per cell was 0.58 for the carriers (range, 0.34-0.73) and was 0.39 for the controls (range, 0.28-0.62; Table 1; P < 0.0001 for difference). For 23 pairs, the value for the carrier exceeded that for the related control; for two pairs, the control value was the higher of the two; and for one pair, the two values were equal (P < 0.0001; sign test). The distribution of chromosome breaks among BRCA1 carriers and noncarriers is presented in Fig. 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Comparison of chromosome breaks (per cell) in BRCA1 carriers and matched controls

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Distribution of chromosome breaks in carriers of BRCA1 mutations and in noncarriers. All 56 carriers are included. The values for carriers are those measured before selenium supplementation.

 
In the second phase of the study, BRCA1 mutation carriers were offered selenium supplementation. Thirty-five carrier women volunteered for this phase of the study (selenium supplementation was not offered to noncarriers). A second blood sample was taken at a time from 1 to 3 months after commencement of selenium and the bleomycin test was repeated. After a mean of 1.5 months of selenium supplementation, the mean serum levels of selenium rose from 56.7 to 90.2 ng/mL (P < 0.001). For 94% of the women, the second selenium level exceed the first, indicating a high level of compliance with the intervention. Before selenium supplementation, the mean number of induced chromosome breaks per cell was 0.63 (range, 0.42-0.81) and after selenium supplementation the mean number of chromosome breaks per cell was reduced from 0.63 to 0.40 (range, 0.27-0.60). In every case, the post-supplementation level of chromosome breaks showed a decline from the baseline level (Table 2) and the mean difference was highly significant (P < 0.001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. Comparison of chromosome breaks (per cell) in BRCA1 carriers before and after selenium supplementation

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
In the first phase of this two-part study, we observed that the lymphocytes from heterozygous carriers of deleterious mutations of the BRCA1 gene show an elevated frequency of chromosome breaks after exposure to bleomycin in vitro compared with noncarriers. In the second part of the study, we have shown that in most cases, these elevated levels can be reduced to normal with oral selenium supplementation. Although our sample size was small, our results were highly significant; in every case, selenium supplementation resulted in a reduced frequency of chromosome breaks.

It is likely that the observed difference between carriers and noncarriers is due to the functional consequences of the BRCA1 mutation; however, alternate explanations must be considered. The cases and controls were matched within families and neither were affected with cancer. The mean (absolute) age difference between the case and her matched control was about 6 years, but the mean ages of the groups differed by <1 year. This difference is relatively small and in our study group there was no significant correlation between the age at testing and the observed number of chromosome breaks; the number of chromosome breaks declined slightly with age (r = –0.16; P = 0.35). Previously, Gu et al. showed that neither age, sex, nor smoking status were significantly correlated with the frequency of bleomycin-induced breaks in 56 healthy individuals (11). Nor could the difference in the pre- and post-supplementation chromosome breaks levels could be accounted for by variation in the assay with the date of testing. The samples for cytogenetic analyses were processed in batches, and each batch contained a mix of pre- and post-supplemented samples. In addition, no trend was observed between the observed frequencies of breaks and date of testing. The median date of testing of the pre-supplementation patients occurred in September 2001 and the median date of testing of the post-supplementation testing occurred in October 2001. The mean number of breaks among the first 18 women tested (pre-supplementation) was 0.60 per cell and among the last 17 women tested was 0.66 breaks per cell. Similarly, after supplementation, the levels for the women in these groups was 0.36 and 0.43, respectively. This argues against the possibility that the assay detected fewer breaks with time.

There were two phases to this study. Ideally, we would have used the same cases and controls in the two phases. However, this was impractical because the first phase was completed before the development of the protocol for the second phase and only six carriers were enrolled in both phases. We did not offer selenium supplementation to controls because we did not feel the intervention was justified in women who were not at increased risk of cancer and who showed normal levels of chromosome breakage.

In this pilot study, we did not measure the relationship between chromosome breaks and breast cancer risk and this will be the subject of a future investigation. In a previous small study (12), the mean number of chromosome breaks per cell was higher in 11 patients with familial breast cancer (0.63) than in 22 healthy controls (0.28; P < 0.001). Unaffected relatives of the cases had an intermediate value (0.37 breaks per cell). These authors propose that familial breast cancer clustering may be due in part to chromosome instability, but BRCA testing was not done. There is little evidence to date to suggest a relationship between indices of genomic instability and the risk of sporadic (nonfamilial) breast cancer cases. In an early study, Hsu et al. found no difference in the frequency of bleomycin-induced chromosome breaks between unselected beast cancer patients and healthy controls (9). However, Scott et al. (13) observed that 21 of 50 unselected breast cancer patients exhibited structural chromosome damage in irradiated lymphocytes compared with 7 of 74 healthy controls (P < 10–4). In a small study, Barrios et al. (14) found the frequency of chromosomal aberrations per cell to be higher in lymphocytes taken from breast cancer patients than from healthy controls. It has been proposed that direct mutagenic effects of estrogen may contribute to breast cancer incidence, but this hypothesis has not been proven (15).

Several other studies have reported a correlation between the level of chromosome breaks and cancer susceptibility. In a cohort study of 3,182 workers exposed to mutagens, the frequency of chromosomal aberrations at baseline predicted subsequent cancer risk (16). Several case-control studies have been conducted in populations where exposure to mutagenic carcinogens is common (e.g., lung cancer and head and neck cancer; refs. 17-22); however, an important etiologic role for mutagens in breast cancer has not yet been clearly defined.

The value of selenium as a chemopreventive agent is based upon the assumption that bleomycin-induced breaks in cell culture are representative of the type of chromosome damage that occurs in vivo, and that genetic instability in BRCA1 carriers is related to carcinogenesis. One of the functions of BRCA1 is to repair double-stranded DNA breaks through homologous recombination, but it is not clear if this is the critical function which, when impaired, leads to carcinogenesis. It has also recently been shown that BRCA1 up-regulates multiple genes involved in the antioxidant response and thereby helps protect cells against oxidative stress (7). Selenium is known to protect against oxidative damage, induces apoptosis, and has also been found to assist in nucleotide excision repair (8). It may be that BRCA1 carriers are particularly sensitive to oxidative stress and that this sensitivity may be mitigated by dietary selenium.

Many studies have evaluated the potential chemopreventive properties of selenium compounds. In a randomized trial designed to evaluate skin cancer prevention, patients who received selenium supplementation experienced declines in the rates of cancer of the prostate, colon, and lung (23). In an update of this prospective study, Duffield-Lillico et al. (24) observed a decrease in the overall cancer rate (relative risk, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.97) but not in the incidence of breast cancer (relative risk, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-6.01). In general, no consistent relationship has been seen between either dietary intake or tissue levels of selenium intake and breast cancer risk in case-control and cohort studies. For example, in the large Nurses' Health Study, there was no correlation between toenail selenium levels and subsequent risk of breast cancer (25). However, this may not necessarily be the case for breast cancers in BRCA1 carriers. It is likely that the risk factors for breast cancer in BRCA1 carriers are different than for sporadic cancer and that DNA stability and repair is more important for hereditary breast cancer than for cancer in noncarriers. It is of interest that the other genes involved in hereditary susceptibility to breast cancer, such as BRCA2, CHEK2, p53, NBS1, ATM, and Rad51 also participate in the DNA damage response pathway (refs. 3, 26-30) and selenium may be a candidate preventive agent in these syndromes as well.

We chose to give selenium as selenium selenite (inorganic selenium). This preparation is easily dissolved, has high bioavailability, and was effective in preventing chemically induced breast cancer in mice (31). Our daily dose of supplemental selenium was 276 µg. This is slightly lower than the recommended upper dose of 400 µg recommended by the WHO in 1996 and is approximately one third of the daily mean marginal level of safe selenium intake (32). Our study was conducted in Poland, where mean serum selenium levels are lower than in other countries in Europe, the United States, and Australia. The mean level before supplementation in our study subjects was 56 ng/mL, which is lower than the level deemed to meet nutritional requirements. Selenium levels in soil and forage crops differ significantly from country to country and it may be that the results of this experiment would be less dramatic in a country where mean selenium levels are higher.

Liu et al. observed that dietary selenium (as sodium selenite) profoundly inhibited rates of mammary carcinogenesis in 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene–treated mice (31). This mouse model may not adequately represent the majority of human sporadic breast cancers (where the role of mutagenic carcinogens is uncertain) but may be relevant for hereditary syndromes in which the breast cancers show genomic instability. Foray et al. (33) reported a diminished capacity of immortalized lymphocytes from BRCA1 carriers to repair double-stranded DNA breaks and an increase in the number of micronuclei. These observations were not confirmed by Nieuwenhuis et al. (34) who found that fibroblasts from BRCA1 carriers did not show a greater frequency of unrepaired double-stranded DNA breaks following exposure to radiation than fibroblasts derived from noncarrier controls. The mechanism by which selenium reduces the frequency of chromosome breaks in BRCA1 carriers is unclear, but it is likely that selenium reduces the frequency of double-stranded breaks, as opposed to correcting the capacity of the cells to repair broken strands of DNA. We did not offer selenium supplementation to healthy controls; future studies of this type may help to resolve this question.

In general, tumor cells from women with BRCA1 mutations will have lost both functional copies of the BRCA1 gene; however, the present study indicates that there may be a subclinical phenotype at the cellular level associated with the loss of a single copy of BRCA1. We did not confirm that that the cells with chromosome breaks in our study have an intact BRCA1 allele; however, because of the high frequency of involved cells observed in both cases and in controls, this is likely to be the case. This data suggests that there may be a mutator phenotype associated with loss of a single copy of BRCA1.

Our study was small and was limited to women with BRCA1 mutations. It is important that these results be replicated before selenium is offered to high-risk patients. Ultimately, it is hoped to show a reduction in breast cancer incidence in BRCA1 carriers associated with selenium supplementation.


   Footnotes
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 11/ 4/03; revised 1/ 4/05; accepted 2/21/05.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, et al. Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. Am J Hum Genet 1998;62:676–89.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Ford D, Easton DF, Bishop DT, Narod SA, Goldgar DE; Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Risks of cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Lancet 1994;343:692–95.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Venkitaraman AR. Cancer susceptibility and the functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cell 2002;108:171–82.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Xu X, Weaver Z, Linke SP, Li C, et al. Centrosome amplification and a defective G2-M cell cycle checkpoint induce genetic instability in BRCA1 exon11 isoform deficient cells. Mol Cell 1999;3:389–95.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Tirkkonen M, Johannsson O, Agnarsson BA, et al. 1997 Distinct somatic genetic changes associated with tumour progression in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ-line mutations. Cancer Res 1997;57:1222–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Hartman AR, Ford JM. BRCA1 induces DNA damage recognition factors and enhances nucleotide excision repair. Nat Genet 2002;32:180–4.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Bai I, Fan S, Meng Q, et al. BRCA1 induces gene expression and resistance to oxidative stress. Cancer Res 2004;64:7893–909.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Seo YR, Kelly MR, Smith ML. Selenomethionine regulation of p53 by a ref1-dependent redox mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2002;99:14548–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Hsu TC, Johnston DA, Cherry LM, et al. Sensitivity to the genotoxic effects of bleomycin in humans; possible relationship to environmental carcinogenesis. Int J Cancer 1989;43:403–9.[Medline]
  10. Hsu TC, Cherry LM, Samaan N. Differential mutagen susceptibility in cultured lymphocytes of normal individuals and cancer patients. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1985;17:307–3.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Gu J, Bondy ML, Sigurdson A, Spitz MR, Hsu TC, Wu X. Three measures of mutagen sensitivity in a cancer-free population. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1999;110:65–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Roy SK, Trivedi AH, Bakshi SR, et al. Bleomycin-induced chromosome damage in lymphocytes indicates inefficient DNA repair capacity in breast cancer families. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2000;19:169–3.[Medline]
  13. Scott D, Spreadborough A, Levine E, Roberts SA. Genetic predisposition in breast cancer. Lancet 1994;344:1444.
  14. Barrios L, Caballin MR, Miro R, et al. Chromosomal instability in breast cancer patients. Hum Genet 1991;88:39–41.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Liehr J. Is estradiol a genotoxic mutagenic carcinogen? Endocrin Rev 2000;156:1841–8.
  16. Hagmar L, Brogger A, Hansteen IL, et al. Cancer risk in humans predicted by increased levels of chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes: Nordic study group on the health risk of chromosome damage. Cancer Res 1994;54:2919–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Schantz SP, Spitz MR, Hsu TC. Mutagen sensitivity in patients with head and neck cancers: a biologic marker for risk of multiple primary malignancies. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82:1773–75.[Free Full Text]
  18. Spitz MR, Fueger JJ, Halabi S, et al. Mutagen sensitivity in upper aerodigestive tract cancer: a case-control analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1990;2:329–33.
  19. Spitz MR, Hoque A, Trizna Z, et al. Mutagen sensitivity as a risk factor for second malignant tumors following malignancies of the upper aerodigestive tract. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994;86:1681–4.[Free Full Text]
  20. Spitz MR, Wu X, Jiang H, Hsu TC. Mutagen sensitivity as a marker of cancer susceptibility. J Cell Biochem 1996;25S:80–4.
  21. Wu X, Gu J, Patt Y, et al. Mutagen sensitivity as a susceptibility marker for human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1998;7:567–70.[Abstract]
  22. Cloos J, Lemans CR, van der Sterre ML, Kuik DJ, Snow GB, Braal BJ. Mutagen sensitivity as a biomarker for second primary tumours after head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000;9:713–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Clark LC, Combs GF, Turnbull BW, et al. Effects of selenium supplementation for cancer prevention in patients with carcinoma of the skin: a randomized control trial. Nutritional Prevention of Cancer Study Group. J Am Med Assoc 1996;276:1957–63.[Abstract]
  24. Duffield-Lillico AJ, Reid ME, Turnbull BW, et al. Baseline characteristics and the effect of selenium supplementation on cancer incidence in a randomized clinical trial: a summary report of the Nutritional Prevention of Cancer Trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:630–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Hunter DJ, Morris JS, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Speizer FE, Willett WC. A prospective study of selenium status and breast cancer risk. J Am Med Assoc 1990;264:1128–31.[Abstract]
  26. CHEK2 Breast Cancer Case-Control Consortium. CHEK2 1100delC and susceptibility to breast cancer: a collaborative analysis involving 10,860 breast cancer cases and 9,065 controls from 10 studies. Am J Hum Genet 2004;74:1175–82.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Malkin D, Li FP, Strong LC, et al. Germ line p53 mutations in a familial syndrome of breast cancer, sarcomas, and other neoplasms. Science 1990;250:1233–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Gorski B, Debniak T, Masojc B, et al. Germline 657del5 mutation in the NBS1 gene in breast cancer patients. Int J Cancer 2003;106:379–81.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Chenevix-Trench G, Spurdle AB, et al. Dominant negative ATM mutations in breast cancer families. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:205–15.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Rodriguez-Lopez, Osorio A, Ribas G, et al. The variant E233G of the RAD51D gene could be low penetrance allele in high-risk breast cancer families without BRCA1 mutations. Int J Cancer 2004;110:845–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Liu JZ, Gilbert K, Parker HM, Haschek WM, Milner JA. Inhibition of 7,12-dimethlybenz(a)anthracene-induced mammary tumors and DNA adducts by dietary selenite. Cancer Res 1991;51:4613–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. WHO. Vitamin and mineral requirement in human nutrition. Geneva: WHO; 2004.
  33. Foray N, Randrianarison V, Marot D, Perricaudet M, Lenoir G, Feunteun J. {gamma}-Rays induced death of human cells carrying mutations of BRCA1 or BRCA2. Oncogene 1999;18:7334–42.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Nieuwenhuis B, Van Assen-Bolt AJ, Van Waarde-Verhage MAWH, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 heterozygosity and repair of X-ray-induced DNA damage. Int J Radiat Biol 2002;78:285–95.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. L. Chao, C. C. Maley, X. Wu, D. C. Farrow, P. C. Galipeau, C. A. Sanchez, T. G. Paulson, P. S. Rabinovitch, B. J. Reid, M. R. Spitz, et al.
Mutagen Sensitivity and Neoplastic Progression in Patients with Barrett's Esophagus: A Prospective Analysis.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2006; 15(10): 1935 - 1940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
S. Beetstra, C. Salisbury, J. Turner, M. Altree, R. McKinnon, G. Suthers, and M. Fenech
Lymphocytes of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ-line mutation carriers, with or without breast cancer, are not abnormally sensitive to the chromosome damaging effect of moderate folate deficiency
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2006; 27(3): 517 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kowalska, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lubinski, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kowalska, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lubinski, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Intervention
Right arrow Clinical Intervention: Biomarkers

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online