CEBP Translational Cancer Medicine 2008: Cancer Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Wei, Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Wei, Q.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 14, 1188-1193, May 2005
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research

Polymorphisms of Methionine Synthase and Methionine Synthase Reductase and Risk of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: a Case-Control Analysis

Zhengdong Zhang1, Qiuling Shi1, Zhensheng Liu1, Erich M. Sturgis1,2, Margaret R. Spitz1 and Qingyi Wei1

Departments of 1 Epidemiology and 2 Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

Requests for reprints: Qingyi Wei, Department of Epidemiology, Unit 189, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: 713-792-3020; Fax: 713-792-0807. E-mail: qwei{at}mdanderson.org


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Although tobacco and alcohol use are the major risk factors, folate deficiency has been implicated in the risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). We hypothesized that polymorphisms of methionine synthase (MTR) and methionine synthase reductase (MTRR) in the folate matabolic pathway are associated with SCCHN risk. In a hospital-based case-control study of 721 SCCHN cases and 1,234 controls of non-Hispanic Whites, frequency matched by age, sex, and smoking status, we genotyped the MTR A2756G and MTRR G66A polymorphisms. We found that the MTR variant AG and AG/GG genotypes were associated with a significantly increased SCCHN risk [adjusted odd ratio (OR), 1.31; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.07-1.60 for AG and OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.05-1.56 for AG/GG] compared with the AA genotype. In contrast, the MTRR variant AA genotype was associated with a significantly decreased SCCHN risk (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52-0.90) compared with the 66GG genotype. When the two polymorphisms were evaluated together by the number of risk alleles, the SCCHN risk was significantly increased in a dose-dependent manner (Ptrend = 0.002). The risk of SCCHN was 1.47 (95% CI, 1.08-1.99) for one risk allele, 1.67 (95% CI, 1.23-2.27) for two risk alleles, and 1.74 (95% CI, 1.18-2.54) for three or four risk alleles compared with the wild-type (0 risk allele) genotype. In conclusion, our data provide evidence that support the association between the MTR A2756G and MTRR G66A polymorphisms and SCCHN risk and that these two polymorphisms may have a joint effect on risk of SCCHN.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) includes cancers of the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx. SCCHN is the sixth most frequent incident cancer and the seventh leading cause of cancer-related death in the world, affecting >500,000 individuals each year worldwide (1). In the United States, it was estimated that there were 38,530 newly diagnosed SCCHN cases and 11,060 related deaths in 2004 (2). Although tobacco and alcohol use are the major risk factors in the etiology of SCCHN (3), only a fraction of exposed individuals develops SCCHN, suggesting that there is variation in individual susceptibility to exposure-related carcinogenesis.

Low dietary intake of fruits and vegetables has been implicated in risk of cancers, including SCCHN (4, 5), and folate, one of the constituents in fruits and vegetables, is thought to be one of the protective nutrients (5). An important biological function of folate is to provide methyl groups, which are essential for intercellular methylation reactions and for de novo deoxynucleoside triphosphate synthesis. Therefore, folate deficiency is thought to increase the risk of cancer by causing DNA hypomethylation that may lead to proto-oncogene activation and induction of malignant transformation. Folate deficiency may also induce excessive uracil misincorporation into DNA in place of thymine during DNA synthesis, resulting in catastrophic events that impair DNA repair, and lead to DNA strand breakage and chromosome damage (6, 7). Recently, several studies have implicated folate deficiency in increased risk of SCCHN (8-10). Several enzymes, including methionine synthase (MTR; EC2.1.1.13, Genbank accession no. NT_004836) and methionine synthase reductase (MTRR; EC2.1.1.135, Genbank accession no: NT_023089), are among the key enzymes involved in folate metabolism (11, 12). Functional polymorphisms of these genes may modulate folate metabolism, which may ultimately effect genetic susceptibility to cancer.

The MTR gene is located at 1q43 (13) and the MTR protein is responsible for the remethylation of homocysteine to methionine, which is essential for maintaining adequate intracellular methionine and normal homocysteine concentrations. A common polymorphism in the MTR gene, an A-to-G transition at bp 2756 (MTR A2756G), causes an amino acid substitution from aspartic acid to glycine at codon 919 (D919G; ref. 14). At least three studies to date have reported that individuals with the 2756GG genotype had lower plasma homocysteine (or higher folate) levels than those with the 2756AA genotype (15-17), but another study reported some conflicting data (18). A significantly increased risk of malignant lymphoma (19) and a slightly lowered risk of colorectal cancer (18) for the GG genotypes have been reported, but these findings were also not confirmed in other studies (20-22).

MTRR is on chromosome 5p15.3-p15.2 and catalyzes the regeneration of methylcobalamin, a cofactor for MTR. This reaction plays an important role in maintaining the MTR enzyme in an active state (23). A common polymorphism in the MTRR gene, a G-to-A transition at bp 66 (formerly called MTRR A66G, ref. 23; but now called MTRR G66A, because the G allele was found to be more common than the A allele based on the new data from >1,000 healthy controls), results in an amino acid substitution from methionine to isoleucine at codon 22 (M22I). One study has reported that the 66AA genotype contributes to elevated homocysteine levels compared with the 66GG genotype (24); however, this effect was not observed by others (25, 26). Few studies have investigated the association between the MTRR G66A polymorphism and risk of cancer. Recently, Matsuo et al. reported that individuals with the 66GG genotype had an increased risk of colorectal cancer in a Japanese population (27). Similarly, Le Marchand et al. found a borderline increased risk of colorectal cancer among a subgroup of Caucasian subjects with the 66GG genotype (28).

Our previous studies have revealed that suboptimal DNA repair capacity may be a risk factor for SCCHN (29) and that low dietary folate intake was associated with suboptimal DNA repair capacity (30). Because MTR and MTRR are both involved in folate metabolism and folate is required in DNA synthesis and repair, we hypothesized that the MTR A2756G and MTRR G66A polymorphisms contribute to genetic susceptibility to SCCHN. To test this hypothesis, we genotyped these two polymorphisms in our ongoing hospital-based case-control study of SCCHN.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects
The subject recruitment for the ongoing SCCHN study has been described previously (31). Briefly, 721 newly diagnosed SCCHN cases and 1,234 cancer-free controls were recruited into the study between May 1995 and September 2003. All the cases and 631 of the controls were recruited from The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. These controls were recruited from among visitors who were accompanying the patients but unrelated to the cases. There were an additional 603 controls recruited from a multispecialty physician practice, the Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, which has multiple clinics throughout the Houston, TX, metropolitan area. These additional controls provided only older men who were former and current smokers needed for our frequency matching. Because genotype frequencies can vary between ethnic groups and few minority patients were recruited, only non-Hispanic White patients were included in this analysis. Approximately 95% of eligible patients who were contacted chose to participate. Patients with second SCCHN primary tumors, primary tumors of the nasopharynx or sinonasal tract, primary tumors outside the upper aerodigestive tract, cervical metastases of unknown origin, or histopathologic diagnoses other than squamous cell carcinoma were excluded. The 721 non-Hispanic White patients with primary tumors included in the analysis had cancers of the oral cavity (n = 222; 30.8%), pharynx (n = 363; 50.3%), or larynx (n = 136; 18.9%).

For the controls, we first surveyed the potential control subjects by using a short questionnaire to determine their willingness to participate in research studies and to obtain information about their smoking behavior and demographic factors. Among the willing respondents we contacted for recruitment, the response rate was >80%. We interviewed each eligible subject to obtain data on age, sex, smoking status, and alcohol use. We frequency matched the controls to the cases by age (±5 years), sex, and smoking status. After the subjects signed informed consent forms, each subject donated 30 mL of blood collected into heparinized tubes. A leukocyte cell pellet obtained from a buffy coat was used for DNA extraction with a DNA blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The research protocol was approved by the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and Kelsey-Seybold Clinic institutional review boards.

Genotyping
The PCR-RFLP assay was used to identify the MTR A2756G and MTRR G66A polymorphisms. The primers of the MTR A2756G were forward 5'-TGTTCCAGACAGTTAGATGAAAATC-3' and reverse 5'-GATCCAAAGCCTTTTACACTCCTC-3' (19). The PCR product is digested with HaeIII (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA); and the amplified fragment of 211 bp is cut into fragments of 131 and 80 bp in the presence of the G allele. The primers of the MTRR G66A were forward 5'-GCAAAGGCCATCGCAGAAGACAT-3' and reverse 5'-GTGAAGATCTGCAGAAAATCCATGTA-3' (23). The forward primer contained a mismatch (underlined base C in the primer sequence), which generated an NdeI restriction site when the polymorphic allele was present. The expected PCR product of 66 bp is digested into fragments of 44 and 22 bp by NdeI (New England Biolabs) in presence of the A allele but remains uncut in the presence of the G allele. More than 10% of the samples were randomly selected for repeat assays, and the results were 100% concordant.

Statistical Analysis
We used the {chi}2 test to evaluate differences in the frequency distributions of selected demographic variables, smoking status, alcohol use, and each allele and genotype of the MTR A2756G and MTRR G66A polymorphisms between the cases and controls. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to obtain the crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The multivariate adjustment included age, sex, smoking status, and alcohol use. The genotype data were further stratified by subgroups of age, sex, smoking status, and alcohol use. Considering the potential gene-gene interaction of the MTR A2756G and MTRR G66A polymorphisms on SCCHN risk, we evaluated the association between SCCHN risk and the combined genotypes of these two polymorphisms. Logistic regression was also used to assess potential interaction effects by evaluating departures from the models of additive and multiplicative interactions between smoking or alcohol use and the two polymorphisms. A more-than-additive interaction was suggested when OR11 > OR10 + OR01 – 1, where OR11 = OR when both factors were present, OR10 = OR when only factor 1 was present, and OR01 = OR when only factor 2 was present. A more-than-multiplicative interaction was suggested when OR11 > OR10 x OR01. All tests of statistical significance were two sided using SAS software, version 8.2 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Characteristics of the Study Population
The frequency distributions of selected characteristics of the cases and controls are summarized in Table 1. The mean age was 57.0 years for the cases (±11.9 years; range, 18-90 years) and 57.2 years for the controls (±11.6 years; range, 20-87 years; P = 0.277); the male cases (74.9%) and controls (74.1%) were well matched on sex (P = 0.686). However, the frequency matching on smoking status was imperfect: there were more current smokers (34.8%) and current drinkers (51.2%) among the cases than among the controls (25.4% and 43.7%, respectively), and these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001 for both tobacco and alcohol use). Thus, these variables were further adjusted in the logistic regression analysis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Frequency distributions of selected variables in SCCHN cases and cancer-free controls

 
Associations between the MTR A2756G and MTRR G66A Polymorphisms and SCCHN Risk
The genotype and allele frequencies of MTR A2756G and MTRR G66A polymorphisms and their associations with SCCHN risk are presented in Table 2. The variant MTR 2756G and MTRR 66A allele frequencies were 0.184 and 0.418, respectively, among the cases and 0.158 and 0.462, respectively, among the controls, but these differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.155 for the 2756G allele; P = 0.072 for the 66A allele). The genotype distributions of the MTR A2756G and MTRR G66A among the controls were in agreement with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium ({chi}2 test: P = 0.941 for the MTR A2756G; P = 0.136 for the MTRR G66A; Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. MTR A2756G and MTRR G66A genotype and allele frequencies among the cases and controls and logistic regression analysis for associations with SCCHN risk

 
As shown in Table 2, the genotype frequencies of the MTR A2756G were 65.4%, 32.2%, and 2.4% for the AA, AG, and GG genotypes, respectively, among the cases and 71.0%, 26.5%, and 2.5%, respectively, among the controls, and this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.028). Similarly, the genotype frequencies of the MTRR G66A were 32.0%, 52.2%, and 15.8% for the GG, GA, and AA genotypes, respectively, among the cases and 29.9%, 47.7%, and 22.4%, respectively, among the controls, and this difference was also statistically significant (P = 0.002). For the MTR A2756G polymorphism, the AG and the combined genotypes (AG/GG) were associated with significantly increased risk of SCCHN (adjusted OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.07-1.60 for AG and OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.05-1.56 for AG/GG) compared with the AA genotype. For the MTRR G66A polymorphism, the AA genotype was associated with a significantly reduced risk of SCCHN (adjusted OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52-0.90) compared with the GG genotype. However, the GA and the combined genotypes (GA/AA) of the MTRR G66A were not associated with risk of SCCHN (adjusted OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.82-1.26 for GA and OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.75-1.11 for GA/AA; Table 2).

Stratification Analysis of Association between the MTR A2756G and MTRR G66A Polymorphisms and SCCHN Risk
As shown in Table 3, when we used the MTR 2756AA genotype as the reference, we found that the 2756AG genotype was associated with a significantly increased risk of SCCHN among younger subjects (≤55 years; adjusted OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.05-1.96), women (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.12-2.58), and former drinkers (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.03-2.27). We also observed a borderline significant association between the 2756AG genotype and SCCHN risk among older subjects (>55 years; adjusted OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.98-1.71), men (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.98-1.57), and current drinkers (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.96-1.73). When stratified by tumor site, the 2756AG genotype was associated with a significantly increased risk of SCCHN at the oral cavity site (adjusted OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.16-2.16). However, there was no significant association between the 2756GG genotype and SCCHN risk among all subgroups due to the relatively small observations (accounting for only 1.3-3.4% of the subjects) in each stratum (Table 3). In contrast to the MTR A2756G, the MTRR 66AA, but not the MTRR 66GA, genotype was associated with a significantly decreased risk of SCCHN among older subjects (>55 years; adjusted OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.41-0.90), men (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45-0.86), never smokers (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.96), former smokers (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.30-0.74), and never drinkers (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.93) compared with the MTRR 66GG genotype. The protective association between the MTRR 66AA genotype and pharynx site was also statistically significant (adjusted OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38-0.81; Table 3). There was no statistical evidence for any interactions between the genotypes and other risk factors presented in Table 3 except for smoking status (P < 0.001 for MTR and P = 0.012 for MTRR). However, when former and current smokers were combined as an ever-smoker group compared with never-smoker group, these interactions disappeared (P = 0.758 for MTR and P = 0.743 for MTRR).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3. Associations and stratification analysis between the MTR and MTRR polymorphisms and SCCHN risk

 
Combined Analysis of Association between the MTR A2756G and MTRR G66A Polymorphisms and SCCHN Risk
Based on the number of risk alleles of the MTR 2756G and MTRR 66G (because the MTRR 66A was protective), we grouped the individuals into four genotype groups: the MTR AA and MTRR AA (0 risk allele of either gene); the MTR AA and MTRR GA or MTR AG and MTRR AA (only one risk allele); MTR AA and MTRR GG or MTR AG and MTRR GA or MTR GG and MTRR AA (two risk alleles); and MTR AG and MTRR GG or MTR GG and MTRR GA or MTR GG and MTRR GG (three or four risk alleles). As shown in Table 4, the frequencies of the combined genotypes were 10.5%, 39.0%, 38.3%, and 12.2% for groups with 0, 1, 2, and 3/4 risk alleles, respectively, among the cases and 16.2%, 39.4%, 34.0%, and 10.4%, respectively, among the controls, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.003). When we used the 0 risk allele as the reference, the group 1, 2, and 3/4 risk alleles were associated with a significantly increased risk of SCCHN (adjusted OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.08-1.99 for one risk allele; OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.23-2.27 for two risk alleles; and OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.18-2.54 for three and four risk alleles) in the multivariate logistic regression analysis (Ptrend = 0.002). However, there was no statistical evidence for any interactions between these combined genotypes and other risk factors presented in Table 3.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 4. ORs and 95% CIs for the combined MTR and MTRR genotypes associated with SCCHN risk

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Accumulated evidence suggests a role for folate deficiency in the etiology of SCCHN (8-10), and the MTR and MTRR genes play an important role in folate metabolism (12). Studies have revealed that the polymorphisms of these two genes, MTR A2756G and MTRR G66A, contributed to alteration of plasma levels of homocysteine and folate. At least three studies showed that individuals with the MTR 2756GG genotype had lower levels of plasma homocysteine (or higher levels of folate) than those with the 2756AA genotype (15-17), but one study reported no significant association between the MTR A2756G polymorphism and plasma folate level (18). One study suggested that the MTRR 66AA genotype contributed to a moderate increased total homocysteine level compared with the 66GG genotype (24), which was not confirmed by other studies (25, 26). Therefore, the association between polymorphisms of these two genes and risk of cancer reported by other studies (18, 19, 27, 28) also needs to be further substantiated in larger studies. To the best of our knowledge, the association between these two polymorphisms and risk of SCCHN has not been reported previously.

In the present study, our genotyping data suggest that the rarer (variant) MTR 2756G allele is a risk allele but the rarer (variant) MTRR 66A is a protective allele and that both the MTR A2756G and MTRR G66A polymorphisms had a main effect on SCCHN risk. Further analyses showed that the MTR 2756AG but not the MTR 2756GG (due to small number of subjects) genotype was associated with a significantly increased risk of SCCHN compared with the 2756AA genotype, and this increased risk was more pronounced among younger subjects, women, former smokers, and cancer of the oral cavity. These findings are consistent with published data on malignant lymphoma (19) but not in agreement with the data on colorectal cancer (18). We also found that the MTRR 66AA (but not GA) genotype provided a significant protection against SCCHN (pharyngeal cancer in particular) compared with the 66GG genotype, especially in older men, never or former smokers, and never drinkers. These results were similar to the reported data on colorectal cancer (27, 28).

Le Marchand et al. reported a significant interaction of the MTR A2756G and MTHFR C677T polymorphisms in protection against colorectal cancer (28), suggesting that there might be a gene-gene interaction involved in folate metabolism. Because the MTR and MTRR genes are involved in the same pathway of remethylation of homocysteine to methionine, we thought there would be an interaction of these two genes on SCCHN risk. Indeed, our data showed that the SCCHN risk was significantly increased in a dose-response manner as the number of the risk alleles increased, suggesting that the risk alleles of MTR A2756G and MTRR G66A may have a joint effect in increasing SCCHN risk. Because the interactions among folate-related genes, folate, and related dietary factors in tumorigenesis are complex (12, 32), this possible gene-gene interaction and the mechanisms under which these polymorphisms affect risk of SCCHN warrant further investigations.

To date, studies have shown that the dysfunctional mutations in the MTR gene contribute to an elevation of plasma homocysteine levels as a consequence of altered folate metabolism and that defects in MTR activity may be important in tumorigenesis (33). Under these circumstances, DNA synthesis may be disturbed by a dysfunctional mutation in the MTR and MTRR genes by means of affecting transformation of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate to 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate, leading to altered DNA repair. Therefore, the MTR A2756G and MTRR G66A polymorphisms that may cause folate deficiency could increase risk of SCCHN. However, this hypothesis needs to be investigated in future studies.

The major shortcoming of this study is the lack of data on detailed alcohol and dietary intake as well as serum levels of folate and its precursors or metabolites such as homocysteine, because the effect of genetic variations in folate metabolic genes on cancer risk will depend on alcohol and folate intake status (18). Because our study was hospital-based, there are inherent limitations in our study design that could introduce selection bias, compared with population-based studies. However, the genotype distributions in our study population were similar to reported distributions in other studies. For instance, the frequencies of the AA, AG, and GG genotypes of the MTR A2756G among our 1,234 Texan non-Hispanic White controls were 71.0%, 26.5%, and 2.5%, respectively, compared with 70.9%, 25.8%, and 3.3%, respectively, for 364 Dutch population-based controls (14) and 67.1%, 29.2%, and 3.7%, respectively, for 767 Physicians' Health Study prospective Caucasian controls (15). The frequencies of the AA, AG, and GG genotypes of the MTRR G66A among our 1,234 Texan non-Hispanic White controls were 22.4%, 47.7%, and 29.9%, respectively, compared with 22.9%, 47.5%, and 29.6%, respectively, for 257 Italian Caucasian controls (34) and 21.5%, 50.5%, and 28.0%, respectively, for 205 White Minnesota controls (35). Because the genotype frequencies of the MTR A2756G and MTRR G66A polymorphisms estimated from the hospital-based controls in our study are very close to those of population-based controls, the selection bias in genotype distribution, if any, is unlikely to be substantial.

In conclusion, we found a statistically significant association between the MTR A2756G and MTRR G66A polymorphisms and risk of SCCHN in a relatively large hospital-based case-control study, and these two polymorphisms seemed to jointly contribute to genetic susceptibility to SCCHN. However, there was no statistical evidence that these two polymorphisms interacted with other risk factors in this study population.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Margaret Lung, Peggy Schuber, and Leanel Fairly for their assistance in recruiting the subjects; Li-E Wang, and Hongbing Shen for their technical support; Jianzhong He, John I. Calderon, and Kejin Xu for their laboratory assistance; Joanne Sider and Betty Larson for article preparation; and Katie Matias for scientific editing.


   Footnotes
 
Grant support: NIH grants ES11740 (Q. Wei), CA100264 (Q. Wei), CA 97007 (M.R. Spitz), and CA16672 (The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 7/ 7/04; revised 12/ 2/04; accepted 1/11/05.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000. Int J Cancer 2001;94:153–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, et al. American Cancer Society. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin 2004;54:8–29.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK, Winn DM, et al. Smoking and drinking in relation to oral and pharyngeal cancer. Cancer Res 1988;48:3282–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Block G, Patterson B, Subar A. Fruit, vegetables, and cancer prevention: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Nutr Cancer 1992;18:1–29.[Medline]
  5. Steinmetz KA, Potter JD. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer prevention: a review. J Am Diet Assoc 1996;96:1027–39.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Duthie SJ. Folic acid deficiency and cancer: mechanisms of DNA instability. Br Med Bull 1999;55:578–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Ames BN. DNA damage from micronutrient deficiencies is likely to be a major cause of cancer. Mutat Res 2001;475:7–20.[Medline]
  8. Raval GN, Sainger RN, Rawal RM, et al. Vitamin B(12) and folate status in head and neck cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2002;3:155–62.[Medline]
  9. Almadori G, Bussu F, Galli J, et al. Serum folate and homocysteine levels in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 2002;94:1006–11.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Pelucchi C, Talamini R, Negri E, et al. Folate intake and risk of oral and pharyngeal cancer. Ann Oncol 2003;14:1677–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Leclerc D, Wilson A, Dumas R, et al. Cloning and mapping of a cDNA for methionine synthase reductase, a flavoprotein defective in patients with homocystinuria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:3059–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Sharp L, Little J. Polymorphisms in genes involved in folate metabolism and colorectal neoplasia: a HuGE review. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159:423–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Leclerc D, Campeau E, Goyette P, et al. Human methionine synthase: cDNA cloning and identification of mutations in patients of the cblG complementation group of folate/cobalamin disorders. Hum Mol Genet 1996;5:1867–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. van der Put NM, van der Molen EF, Kluijtmans LA, et al. Sequence analysis of the coding region of human methionine synthase: relevance to hyperhomocysteinaemia in neural-tube defects and vascular disease. QJM 1997;90:511–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Chen J, Stampfer MJ, Ma J, et al. Influence of a methionine synthase (D919G) polymorphism on plasma homocysteine and folate levels and relation to risk of myocardial infarction. Atherosclerosis 2001;154:667–72.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Dekou V, Gudnason V, Hawe E, Miller GJ, Stansbie D, Humphries SE. Gene-environment and gene-gene interaction in the determination of plasma homocysteine levels in healthy middle-aged men. Thromb Haemost 2001;85:67–74.[Medline]
  17. Silaste ML, Rantala M, Sampi M, Alfthan G, Aro A, Kesaniemi YA. Polymorphisms of key enzymes in homocysteine metabolism affect diet responsiveness of plasma homocysteine in healthy women. J Nutr 2001;131:2643–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ma J, Stampfer MJ, Christensen B, et al. A polymorphism of the methionine synthase gene: association with plasma folate, vitamin B12, homocyst(e)ine, and colorectal cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:825–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Matsuo K, Suzuki R, Hamajima N, et al. Association between polymorphisms of folate- and methionine-metabolizing enzymes and susceptibility to malignant lymphoma. Blood 2001;97:3205–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Kimura F, Franke KH, Steinhoff C, et al. Methyl group metabolism gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to prostatic carcinoma. Prostate 2000;45:225–31.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Kimura F, Florl AR, Steinhoff C, et al. Polymorphic methyl group metabolism genes in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Mutat Res 2001;458:49–54.[Medline]
  22. Goode EL, Ulrich CM, Potter JD. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and associations with cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:1513–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Wilson A, Platt R, Wu Q, et al. A common variant in methionine synthase reductase combined with low cobalamin (vitamin B12) increases risk for spina bifida. Mol Genet Metab 1999;67:317–23.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Gaughan DJ, Kluijtmans LA, Barbaux S, et al. The methionine synthase reductase (MTRR) A66G polymorphism is a novel genetic determinant of plasma homocysteine concentrations. Atherosclerosis 2001;157:451–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Geisel J, Zimbelmann I, Schorr H, et al. Genetic defects as important factors for moderate hyperhomocysteinemia. Clin Chem Lab Med 2001;39:698–704.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. O'Leary VB, Parle-McDermott A, Molloy AM, et al. MTRR and MTHFR polymorphism: link to Down syndrome? Am J Med Genet 2002;107:151–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Matsuo K, Hamajima N, Hirai T, et al. Methionine synthase reductase gene A66G polymorphism is associated with risk of colorectal cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2002;3:353–9.[Medline]
  28. Le Marchand L, Donlon T, Hankin JH, Kolonel LN, Wilkens LR, Seifried A. B-vitamin intake, metabolic genes, and colorectal cancer risk (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2002;13:239–48.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Cheng L, Eicher SA, Guo Z, Hong WK, Spitz MR, Wei Q. Reduced DNA repair capacity in head and neck cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1998;7:465–8.[Abstract]
  30. Wei Q, Shen H, Wang LE, et al. Association between low dietary folate intake and suboptimal cellular DNA repair capacity. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003;12:963–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Zhang Z, Shi Q, Wang LE, et al. No association between hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:1081–3.[Free Full Text]
  32. Zijno A, Andreoli C, Leopardi P, et al. Folate status, metabolic genotype, and biomarkers of genotoxicity in healthy subjects. Carcinogenesis 2003;24:1097–103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Li YN, Gulati S, Baker PJ, Brody LC, Banerjee R, Kruger WD. Cloning, mapping and RNA analysis of the human methionine synthase gene. Hum Mol Genet 1996;5:1851–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Gemmati D, Ongaro A, Scapoli GL, et al. Common gene polymorphisms in the metabolic folate and methylation pathway and the risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in adults. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:787–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Kiffmeyer WR, Langer E, Davies SM, Envall J, Robison LL, Ross JA. Genetic polymorphisms in the Hmong population: implications for cancer etiology and survival. Cancer 2004;100:411–7.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
L. E. Kelemen, T. A. Sellers, J. M. Schildkraut, J. M. Cunningham, R. A. Vierkant, V. S. Pankratz, Z. S. Fredericksen, M. K. Gadre, D. N. Rider, M. Liebow, et al.
Genetic Variation in the One-Carbon Transfer Pathway and Ovarian Cancer Risk
Cancer Res., April 1, 2008; 68(7): 2498 - 2506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
K. Chen, Z. Hu, L.-E Wang, E. M. Sturgis, A. K. El-Naggar, W. Zhang, and Q. Wei
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms at the TP53-binding or responsive promoter regions of BAX and BCL2 genes and risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2007; 28(9): 2008 - 2012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
R. J. Hung, M. Hashibe, J. McKay, V. Gaborieau, N. Szeszenia-Dabrowska, D. Zaridze, J. Lissowska, P. Rudnai, E. Fabianova, I. Mates, et al.
Folate-related genes and the risk of tobacco-related cancers in Central Europe
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2007; 28(6): 1334 - 1340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. Hashibe, P. Brennan, S. Benhamou, X. Castellsague, C. Chen, M. P. Curado, L. D. Maso, A. W. Daudt, E. Fabianova, V. Wunsch-Filho, et al.
Alcohol Drinking in Never Users of Tobacco, Cigarette Smoking in Never Drinkers, and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: Pooled Analysis in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 16, 2007; 99(10): 777 - 789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
H. E Gabriel, J. W Crott, H. Ghandour, G. E Dallal, S.-W. Choi, M. K Keyes, H. Jang, Z. Liu, M. Nadeau, A. Johnston, et al.
Chronic cigarette smoking is associated with diminished folate status, altered folate form distribution, and increased genetic damage in the buccal mucosa of healthy adults.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2006; 83(4): 835 - 841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Wei, Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Wei, Q.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation