
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri" Milan, Italy; 2 Istituto di Statistica Medica e Biometria, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; 3 Servizio di Epidemiologia e Biostatistica, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano, Italy; 4 Istituto di Igiene ed Epidemiologia, Università di Udine, Udine, Italy; 5 IARC, Lyon, France; and 6 Servizio di Epidemiologia, Istituto Tumori "Fondazione Pascale", Naples, Italy
Requests for reprints: Claudio Pelucchi, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Via Eritrea 62, 20157 Milano, Italy. Phone: 39-02-390141; Fax: 39-02-33200231. E-mail: pelucchi{at}marionegri.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Various epidemiologic studies investigated the relationship between dietary or serum folate and cancer risk. For colorectal and breast cancers, results showed consistent inverse associations and important interactions between folate, methionine, and/or alcohol intake (3-5). Risks for subjects in the highest level of folate intake were
40% lower in a Canadian cohort study of colorectal cancer as well as in a Chinese case-control study of breast cancer (4, 6). Other cancer sites that have been inversely associated with dietary folate in epidemiologic studies are the ovary, the oral cavity and pharynx (7, 8). However, experimental animal studies on folate and cancer found conflicting results (9).
Folate- and methyl-related nutrient status could interact with folate-related polymorphisms such as the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, which has been in turn related to prostate cancer risk (10-13). Nevertheless, epidemiologic data on the relation between dietary folate intake and prostate cancer are scanty (14), and a study that investigated serum folate found no association with prostate cancer risk (15).
Thus, we considered the relation between intake of folate, as well as its combination with alcohol, methionine, and vitamin B6, and risk of prostate cancer in a case-control study conducted in Italy, a population with high alcohol consumption and infrequent use of supplements and multivitamins (16, 17).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The same questionnaire, structured in 12 sections, was used in all study centers. It included information on socio-demographic factors such as marital status, education and occupation, anthropometric variables, smoking, alcohol, coffee consumption and other lifestyle habits, physical activity, medical history, aspirin use, and history of cancer in relatives.
Information on diet was based on a food frequency questionnaire, tested for reproducibility (19, 20) and validity (21). The food frequency questionnaire was part of the comprehensive questionnaire and was interviewer administered, too. It was aimed at assessing the usual diet during the 2 years preceding diagnosis (for cases) or hospital admission (for controls), and included questions on 78 foods, food groups, or recipes, divided into six sections: (a) bread, cereals, and first courses; (b) second courses (i.e., meat, fish, and other main dishes); (c) side dishes (i.e., vegetables); (d) fruits; (e) sweets, desserts, and soft drinks; (f) milk, hot beverages, and sweeteners. For a few vegetables and fruits, consumption in season and the corresponding duration were elicited. At the end of each section, one or two open questions were used to include foods that were not in the questionnaire but were eaten at least once per week. Energy and nutrient intakes, including folate, methionine, and vitamin B6, were computed from the food frequency questionnaire using an Italian food composition database (22). No information was available on vitamin B12 intake. A separate section investigated alcohol consumption in detail. The Pearson correlation coefficients for reproducibility and validity of information on energy intake were 0.70 and 0.61, respectively (20, 21). Corresponding values for alcohol intake in men, adjusted for energy, age, and center, were 0.71 for reproducibility and 0.55 to 0.68 for validity, according to the period of interview (23). Reproducibility and validity data for folate, methionine, and vitamin B6 intake were not available.
Data Analysis
Odds ratios (OR) of prostate cancer and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for subsequent quintiles of folate intake were derived using unconditional multiple logistic regression models (24), including terms for age (in quinquennia), study center (Pordenone, Milan, Gorizia, Latina, and Naples), education (<7, 7-11,
12 years), body mass index (in quintiles), tobacco smoking (never, ex, and current smokers of <15, 15-24,
25 cigarettes/d), alcohol drinking (in quintiles of consumption, g/d), and family history of prostate cancer in first degree relatives (no/yes). Allowance was also made for nonalcohol energy intake, using the residual method (25). The significance of the trends in risk was assessed by comparing the differences between the deviances of the models, without and with a linear term for each variable of interest, to the
2 distribution with 1 degree of freedom (24). To test for interactions, the differences in 2 x log(likelihood) of the models with and without interaction terms were compared with the
2 distribution with the same number of degrees of freedom as the interaction terms.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
7. Table 3 gives the OR of prostate cancer according to dietary intake of folate in strata of age, intake of alcohol, vitamin B6, and methionine. The risk of prostate cancer for the highest quintile of consumption of folate was somewhat lower in younger men (age <65 years; OR, 0.48), and for subjects with higher alcohol (OR, 0.44), higher vitamin B6 (OR, 0.42), and higher methionine (OR, 0.47) intakes. However, the ORs were not significantly heterogeneous across strata of these selected covariates (all p values for interaction were >0.05).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There are data in support of gene-folate status interactions in the aetiology of human cancer. Dietary folate can interact with proteins encoded by variant genes, such as the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, and reduce the risk of colorectal cancer and other conditions (1). Common variants of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene have been studied also in relation to prostate cancer (11-13). A study analyzed the C677T variant and found a 3.5-fold increased risk of prostate cancer in men with the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase Val/Val genotype, and cancer risk was higher among subjects with lower folate intake (11). Thus, these findings support a role of folate metabolism also in prostatic carcinogenesis, besides colorectal. In this population, however, we had no information on genetic polymorphisms.
Vitamin B6 is a coenzyme of folate in biological reactions for DNA synthesis and methylation. As folate, vitamin B6 deficiency could be associated with chromosome breakage (27). A case-control study of diet and prostate cancer found an OR of 0.70 for a high intake of vitamin B6 from foods and supplements (28).
Methionine is involved together with folate in the production of S-adenosylmethionine, the primary methyl donor in the body. If methionine levels are low, more folate is used as methyltetrahydrofolate to form methionine. This may lower the level of methylenetetrahydrofolate, which is necessary for DNA synthesis (26).
In this study, no association emerged between vitamin B6 or methionine and prostate cancer risk. However, folate intake had a somewhat stronger protective effect in strata of high intake of both methionine and vitamin B6. Even if heterogeneity tests were not significant and these results should therefore be considered as merely indicative, it is noteworthy that the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study found similar outcomes (4).
Alcohol was not a risk factor for prostate cancer in this study (29), nevertheless its consumption may increase folate requirements in the body and cause relative folate deficiencies (3). Alcohol is thought to interfere with folate absorption and to increase folate excretion by the kidney (30, 31). Coherently, in this investigation, the protection conferred on prostate cancer risk by dietary folate was stronger in high alcohol drinkers, although again the ORs across subgroups were not heterogeneous. Companion Italian studies have found potential folate-alcohol interactions also in relation to cancers of the breast and colorectum (5, 32). In fact, the high proportions of regular and heavy drinkers in this population make it an ideal one to study the interrelationship between folate and alcohol consumption and cancer risk.
Other components of fruit and vegetables that are correlated with folate intake may account for the inverse association observed. Soluble fiber, for example, was positively correlated with folate intake (r = 0.56 after controlling for energy intake) and inversely associated with prostate cancer in this study (33). Nevertheless, after further adjustment for soluble fiber, the inverse association of folate was not materially modified. In the Italian male population, vegetables and fruit account for 27.5% of folate intake and cereals for 22.1% (34). The remaining 50% comes from various other food groups. It is therefore unlikely that the protection observed for folate could be ascribed to dietary intake of a specific food group. Furthermore, bread is the food item that provides the highest proportion of folate in Italian males (16.7%; ref. 34), but bread and carbohydrates were directly related with prostate cancer risk in this study (18, 35). This supports therefore a real role of folate on prostate cancer risk.
Aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, if taken in large therapeutic amounts, may interfere with folate metabolism (36, 37). A diagnosis of diabetes most probably implicates a modification of dietary habits. Therefore, we conducted further analyses by excluding subjects with these characteristics. Given the reassuringly similar results, we concluded that the association observed for folate could not be attributed to interferences of these factors.
Use of supplements and multivitamins is still uncommon (i.e., <3%) in Italy (16) and our findings can therefore be attributed to dietary folate only. Information on supplements, however, has not been recorded in the questionnaire.
We tried to minimize typical bias of hospital-based case-control studies (24) by excluding all control patients with diagnoses linked to long-term changes in diet or admitted for chronic conditions. On the other hand, selecting hospital controls should reduce recall bias and improve comparability of information of cases and controls (38, 39). The strengths of this investigation are its large size, the use of a validated and reproducible food frequency questionnaire (19-21, 23), allowing to adjust for total energy intake and several micro- and macronutrients, and the low percentage of refusals of the subjects contacted.
In conclusion, this study found a significant inverse association between dietary folate and prostate cancer risk. The association was confirmed after adjustment for major known risk factors of prostate cancer and for energy intake, and was consistent across age strata. Methionine and vitamin B6 were unrelated to risk of prostatic carcinogenesis. The combined effect of high-folate and low-alcohol intake further decreased prostate cancer risk, up to a 54% risk reduction.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 10/27/04; revised 12/ 3/04; accepted 12/15/04.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
T polymorphism affect cancer risk: intake recommendations. J Nutr 2003;133:374853S.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A D. Smith, Y.-I. Kim, and H. Refsum Is folic acid good for everyone? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2008; 87(3): 517 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Ericson, E. Sonestedt, B. Gullberg, H. Olsson, and E. Wirfalt High folate intake is associated with lower breast cancer incidence in postmenopausal women in the Malmo Diet and Cancer cohort Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2007; 86(2): 434 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. F. Cole, J. A. Baron, R. S. Sandler, R. W. Haile, D. J. Ahnen, R. S. Bresalier, G. McKeown-Eyssen, R. W. Summers, R. I. Rothstein, C. A. Burke, et al. Folic Acid for the Prevention of Colorectal Adenomas: A Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA, June 6, 2007; 297(21): 2351 - 2359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J Weinstein, R. Stolzenberg-Solomon, P. Pietinen, P. R Taylor, J. Virtamo, and D. Albanes Dietary factors of one-carbon metabolism and prostate cancer risk. Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2006; 84(4): 929 - 935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. L. Stevens, C. Rodriguez, A. L. Pavluck, M. L. McCullough, M. J. Thun, and E. E. Calle Folate Nutrition and Prostate Cancer Incidence in a Large Cohort of US Men Am. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2006; 163(11): 989 - 996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Galeone, C. Pelucchi, F. Levi, E. Negri, R. Talamini, S. Franceschi, and C. La Vecchia Folate intake and squamous-cell carcinoma of the oesophagus in Italian and Swiss men Ann. Onc., March 1, 2006; 17(3): 521 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Ross Folate, Cancer, and the Common 4,977 bp Deletion Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2005; 14(9): 2277 - 2277. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |