
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, 2 Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Dermatology, Section of Hematology and Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba; 3 Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; 4 Medical Oncology, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and 5 School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Requests for reprints: Alain Demers, CancerCare Manitoba, Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, 675 McDermot Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3E 0V9. Phone: 204-787-2146; Fax: 204-786-0628. E-mail: alain.demers{at}cancercare.mb.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In a meta-analysis published in 2000, Marcil and Stern (5) estimated that the average proportion of patients developing a subsequent basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) within 3 years was 44% and 18%, respectively. This risk of a subsequent NMSC was strongly associated with the number of previously diagnosed NMSC.
A few studies, largely European, have examined the risk of developing any cancer following a diagnosis of NMSC. Patients with a history of NMSC were reported to have a greater risk of being diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, leukemia, and cancers of the lung, salivary glands, mouth and throat, lip, and breast (6-8). Increased risk for other cancer sites has also been reported but not as consistently. Men were also found at greater risk of a second primary than women.
Two European (9, 10) studies and one from the United States (11) compared the outcome of cancer patients with and without a history of NMSC. All three investigations reported a significantly increased risk of dying of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among patients with a NMSC history. Two of the studies that assessed multiple causes of death reported an increased risk of dying from cutaneous melanoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, leukemia, and cancers of the colon, salivary glands, pharynx, lung, breast, prostate, testis, and bladder (9, 11).
NMSC is most often treated using surgery or local destructive methods. Because systemic therapy is rarely indicated, NMSC provides a unique opportunity for studying the risk of second primary in patients with a history of cancer. Existing studies suggest that the incidence of few types of cancer is increased following a NMSC, whereas the increase of others may be specific to various regions or simply due to chance. The present study examines the incidence of second invasive primaries (other than NMSC) among patients with a history of BCC or SCC, as well as the risk of death in these patients. It is the first North American population-based investigation reporting on the topic.
| Materials and Method |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Due to the workload created for the registry by the high incidence of NMSC in Manitoba, when someone is reported with a second NMSC of the same morphology, the ICD code of the first NMSC is changed to 173.8 (neoplasm of contiguous or overlapping sites of skin whose point of origin cannot be determined). Subsequent skin cancers with different morphology are coded individually. Thus, site-specific statistics are not presented.
Incident and Death Cases
Individuals whose first reported invasive cancer was a BCC or a SCC (ICD-9 173) diagnosed in Manitoba between January 1, 1956 and December 31, 2000 were identified and followed-up until the diagnosis of a second primary (ICD-9 140-208, excluding 173), 90 years of age, death, or December 31, 2000, whichever occurred first. BCC included ICD-O codes 8090.3 to 8093.3, and SCC included ICD-O codes 8052.3, 8070.3 to 8076.3, and 8084.3. Patients who were diagnosed with a BCC and a SCC were assigned to both groups. Second primaries occurring from 1 day after the NMSC diagnosis were included in the study.
NMSC cases had to survive for at least 1 week after diagnosis to be included in the mortality analysis. Cancers diagnosed at autopsy or through death certificate only were not included. Survival time was censored at the age of 90 to partially control for people with missing death date. Tumor morphology was available for all NSMC.
Analyses
Standardized incidence and mortality ratios were used as measures of relative risk. The expected number of cases was calculated by applying the Manitoba cancer site, age (in 5-year age categories), and sex-specific rates to the cancer site, age, and sex-specific person-time accumulated by the people with a first primary NMSC. Standardized mortality ratios were based on death rates from all causes. Rates were compared between people with NMSC and a specific cancer versus people with this same specific cancer but without antedated NMSC. Risk of a second primary cancer or death were determined for various time periods, from the diagnosis of the NMSC (<1, 1-4, and
5 years). Confidence intervals were calculated assuming a Poisson distribution (13). Analyses were done using SAS v9.1.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
The overall risk of a second primary cancer in females with a BCC was increased, although it was not for those with a SCC history (Table 3). The risk of lip cancer, lung cancer, cutaneous melanoma, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma was increased in women with a BCC or SCC. In addition, the risk of breast cancer was increased in BCC patients, whereas leukemia was increased in SCC patients. The risk of stomach, gallbladder, pancreas, and cervical cancers was lower in BCC patients, and the risk of myeloma was lower in SCC patients.
|
To have an indication if NMSC patients were under closer medical surveillance than patients being diagnosed with a cancer for the first time, the stage of breast cancer tumors diagnosed between 1995 and 2000 in the two groups was compared. The stage at diagnosis was similar in both groups (women with a NMSC: 149 cases: stage 0, 0.4%; stage I, 61%; stage II, 32%; stage III, 4%; stage IV, 4%; women without a NMSC: 3,325 cases: stage 0, 0; stage I, 63%; stage II, 31%; stage III, 2%; stage IV, 4%; P = 0.77). We also examined if women with a NMSC were diagnosed more often with in situ cervical cancer than those without a history of NMSC. Based on 29 cases following all forms of NMSC, there was not a significantly different risk (standardized incidence ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.15).
Males and females with a BCC or SCC history had a greater risk of death following their second primary cancer compared with people who developed the same cancer but as their first primary (Table 4). Males with a history of BCC or SCC were at greater risk of dying following cancers of the mouth/pharynx, esophageal, and kidney/bladder. Males with a BCC history were, in addition, at greater risk of death following colon, liver/gallbladder/pancreas, lung, and no-specific-site cancers, as well as leukemia. Males with a SCC history also had a greater risk of death following lip cancer, larynx cancer, brain/nervous system cancer, and Hodgkin's lymphoma. Males with a history of BCC were at lower risk of death from prostate cancer.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
If people were leaving the province, the risk of a second primary would seem to decrease with time simply due to these lost-to-follow-up subjects. Due to incomplete coverage of registration with Manitoba Health, no censoring for emigration was undertaken. However, accurate follow-up of people is available from 1984 in Manitoba. Of the 17,371 people diagnosed with NMSC between 1984 and 2000, 97.0% (16,844) were still registered with Manitoba Health or had died at the end of 2001. A further 354 (2.0%) moved to other Canadian provinces, and 143 were lost to follow-up. Failure to follow patients in this relatively old group of people does not seem to be a source of a large potential bias.
The risk of a second primary cancer was previously reported to be greater than expected in younger patients with a history of BCC or a SCC but not in older patients (6-8, 15). This observation was reported with other first primaries than NMSC as well (16-18). Similar results were found in the present study. To our knowledge, there is no clear explanation for this observation, but hypotheses, including genetic susceptibility and/or higher exposure to risk factors in younger age, have been suggested.
The risk of death in cancer patients with and without a history of NMSC has seldom been investigated. One study found that the risk of dying following non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, colon, breast, and prostate cancer (the only five cancer sites investigated in that study) was higher in patients with a SCC history (9). A second study found that risk of death following cutaneous melanoma, salivary glands, pharynx, lung, prostate, testis, and bladder cancer, as well as non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and leukemia was increased in patients with a history of NMSC (any morphology; ref. 11). Finally, a third one found that the risk of death following non-Hodgkin's lymphoma but not from colon cancer (the only two sites investigated) was greater in patients with a history NMSC (any morphology; ref. 10). It is difficult to compare the present study with previous ones because of the differences in study design or the number of cancer sites investigated, although the results seem comparable. One exception is prostate cancer, for which the risk of death, in our study, was reduced in patients with a BCC history.
An association between NMSC and a second primary could be the result of many factors, including adverse toxic effects of treatments, shared etiologic factors, random effects, false associations resulting from confounding variables, or biased ascertainment of new primaries as a result of increase surveillance in patients with a history of NMSC (19). It is unlikely, however, that the use of toxic drugs or radiation has a significant contribution in the risk of second primary because NMSC are usually treated with local procedures with limited systemic effect (20, 21). The predominant risk factor for NMSC is sun exposure. Cumulative sunlight exposure during adulthood is associated with an increased risk of SCC, whereas intense and short exposure is associated with BCC. Exposure to UV radiation is a well-established etiologic factor involved in the genesis of NMSC and cutaneous melanoma (22) and a potential one for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Exposure to UV light has been linked to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma through immune system suppression (23), although the relationship is weak. It was also hypothesized that risk factors, including smoking, ionizing radiation, and genetic predisposition, could be involved in the etiology of NMSC and other cancers. However, the concomitant contribution of these factors in the etiology of several cancers remains speculative.
It can not be excluded that chance alone played a role in the significance or nonsignificance of the present results, particularly for cancer sites with a small number of cases or deaths.
Similar to other studies based on cancer registries, the present one lacks information on potential etiologic and confounding factors. However, the studies from the United States that investigated the risk of second primary (3, 4, 24, 25) and the risk of death (11) in people with a NMSC history collected information on a wide range of individual characteristics that allowed for an assessment of potential confounders. They unanimously found that accounting for other risk factors in the analyses had little effect on the risk of cancer in patients with and without a history of NMSC. Thus, it is unlikely that the inclusion of confounding factors in the present analyses would have resulted in dramatically different results.
Patients are usually closely followed after a cancer diagnosis and could be subject to a surveillance bias leading to the diagnosis of a second primary. To estimate if NMSC patients were subject to such a bias, we examined the tumor stage of breast cancer cases with and without a history of NMSC, as well as the risk of being diagnosed with an in situ cervical cancer following a NMSC diagnosis. We hypothesized that if NMSC patients were subject to a surveillance bias, they were more likely to be diagnosed at an early stage and/or would have a higher risk of being diagnosed with an in situ cancer. Our results do not support that the long-term closer follow-up of NMSC patients may have been subjected to contribute to an earlier diagnosis of second primaries. However, we can not exclude that a diagnosis of NMSC may have contributed to higher rates of second primary within the few first months after a NMSC diagnosis. It is unlikely that this general conclusion could apply for tumors, such as cutaneous melanoma or lip cancer, as the same screening procedure is used for NMSC and these cancers.
The present study has limitations regarding the assessment of people's history of NMSC. Not all cases of NMSC are reported to the Manitoba Cancer Registry, because tissue is not always submitted for pathologic evaluation when skin lesions are removed. As cancers following NMSC were completely recorded, this has no effect on the estimation of risk. In addition, it was not possible to assess the effect of multiple BCC or SCC on the risk of a second primary or the risk of a previous NMSC on the risk of a subsequent one. Karagas et al. (24) examined this and found that patients with multiple BCCs had a nonsignificant increased risk of a second primary compared with those with only one previous BCC.
The present findings provide insight into disease etiology and have implication for clinical follow-up and management of NMSC patients. They suggest that NMSC may share at least some risk factors with cutaneous melanoma, mouth and pharynx cancers, lung cancer, breast cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and leukemia. To date, the most consistent explanation for this link is exposure to UV radiation, through intense and/or cumulative exposure or its immunosuppressive effect. However, further research needs to be conducted to clarify the complex underlying mechanisms. The present results also raise questions regarding medical follow-up protocols for individuals with a history of NMSC. Because the risk of second primary is modestly higher in people with a NMSC history and because the relationship between NMSC and other cancer is mostly speculative, special follow-up, beyond the generally accepted periodic examination of the skin, is not usually recommended. The present study supports this recommendation but indicates that special attention should be given to the early detection of cutaneous melanoma, head and neck cancers, lung cancer, breast cancer, and leukemia.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received 5/25/05; revised 8/10/05; accepted 8/29/05.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Soerjomataram, W. J. Louwman, V. E. P. P. Lemmens, J. W. W. Coebergh, and E. de Vries Are Patients with Skin Cancer at Lower Risk of Developing Colorectal or Breast Cancer? Am. J. Epidemiol., June 15, 2008; 167(12): 1421 - 1429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |