
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Departments of 1 Genetics and Complex Diseases and 2 Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts and 3 Section of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire
Requests for reprints: Karl T. Kelsey, Department of Genetics and Complex Diseases, Harvard School of Public Health, Building 1, Room 607, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115. Phone: 617-432-3313; Fax: 617-432-0107. E-mail: kelsey{at}hsph.harvard.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human XRCC1 maps to chromosome 19q13.2 (6) and is composed of 17 exons (7). An exon 10 variant at codon 399 (8) leads to an Arg-to-Gln amino acid change and has been associated with several phenotypic alterations including higher levels of aflatoxin B1-DNA adducts, glycophorin A mutations (9), and polyphenol DNA adducts (10) in human tissues. Among current smokers, those with the homozygote variant genotype (Gln/Gln) had an increased frequency of sister chromatid exchanges in peripheral blood lymphocytes compared with the heterozygote or homozygote wild-type individuals (10). Several previous epidemiologic studies reported altered cancer risks associated with the Arg399Gln XRCC1 polymorphism; in particular, two reports from hospital-based studies observed a lower prevalence of the homozygous variant genotype among bladder cancer cases than controls (11, 12), and a third hospital-based study (13) noted this trend among heavy smokers. However, a recent hospital-based study from Sweden found no association with the XRCC1 Arg399Gln genotype, but data were not consistently available on smoking history; thus, gene-environment interactions were not examined (14). Therefore, we investigated the possible role of the Arg399Gln XRCC1 polymorphism and its potential interaction with cigarette smoking on the risks of bladder cancer in a population-based study.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A total of 459 bladder cancer cases and 665 controls were interviewed; 85% of cases and 70% of controls were confirmed to be eligible for the study. Reasons for nonparticipation included physician's denial to contact their patient (10 cases); deceased (63 cases and 18 controls); no answer after 40 attempts distributed over days, evenings, and weekends (3 cases and 17 controls); refusal (75 cases and 261 controls); and mentally incompetent or too ill to take part (8 cases and 29 controls). We compared study participants and nonparticipants with regard to age, sex, and residence in an urban area. Both groups seem to be similar with regard to these factors. We shared a control group with a study of nonmelanoma skin cancer conducted covering a diagnostic period from July 1, 1993 to June 30, 1995 (15). We selected additional controls for bladder cancer cases diagnosed between July 1, 1995 and June 30, 1997 frequency matched to these cases on age (25 to 34, 35 to 44, 45 to 54, 55 to 64, 65 to 69, or 70 to 74 years) and gender.
Potential subjects were informed about the aims and requirements of the study, and informed consent for participation was obtained in accordance with institutional guidance at Dartmouth Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health. For >95% of participants, the interview was conducted in-person, usually at the subject's home; if a subject refused an in-person interview, it was conducted by telephone. Interviewers were masked to the study hypotheses and the case-control status of the participant. All interviewers underwent extensive training, and interviews were tape recorded for quality control purposes. Data were gathered regarding residence, occupational history, drinking water supply, demographic information, tobacco smoking, use of hair dyes, medical and family history of cancer, coffee consumption, and socioeconomic status.
A standardized histopathology review was conducted by the study pathologist, and from this review, we excluded 11 subjects who were initially reported to the cancer registry as having bladder cancer. Of the remaining cases, blood samples were available on 355 (79%) cases. A total of 558 (84%) controls provided a blood sample. Fourteen samples had missing data for XRCC1 genotype due to PCR failure after duplicate attempts, leaving 355 cases and 544 controls for the analysis. Non-Hispanic Whites comprised 96.7% (n = 868) of the population studied; <1% of subjects reported their race/ethnicity as Hispanic (n = 5), Black (n = 1), American Indian (n = 7), or Asian (n = 1), and
2% identified themselves as in the Other race/ethnicity category (n = 15) or refused to answer the question (n = 2).
XRCC1 Genotyping
Using the QIAamp Blood Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), we extracted genomic DNA from whole blood. XRCC1 genotype was assayed using PCR followed by RFLP. The reaction for PCR was completed in a 50 µl reaction volume containing 0.3 ng DNA, 0.2 mmol/L of each primer (sense 5'-CCAAGTACAGCCAGGTCCTA-3' and antisense 5'-AGTCTGACTCCCCTCCGGAT-3'), 1.25 units Taq DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer, Branchburg, NJ), 1.25 mmol/L deoxynucleotide triphosphates, 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8.3, 25°C), 50 mmol/L KCl, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, and 0.001% (w/v) gelatin. PCR cycle conditions were holding at 94°C for 5 minutes and 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C, annealing at 60°C, and extension at 72°C for 1 minute. After amplification, PCR products were digested with MspI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) as described by the supplier. Each digested sample was electrophoresed in agarose gel in Tris-borate EDTA buffer. The gel was stained with ethidium bromide, visualized on a transilluminator under UV light, and photographed. For quality control purposes, laboratory personnel were blinded to case-control status, and both negative and positive controls (including every 10th sample as a masked duplicate) were included.
Statistical Analysis
Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using logistic regression with XRCC1 genotype as the primary risk factor of interest. We classified XRCC1 genotype as homozygous wild-type (Arg/Arg), heterozygous (Arg/Gln), and homozygous variant (Gln/Gln) with the Arg/Arg genotype as the reference group. Additionally, we computed the ORs for the homozygous variant genotype using one or two wild-type alleles as the reference group (Arg/Arg and Arg/Gln) to permit comparison with an earlier study (12). We tested the interaction between genotype and smoking status (never or ever) and number of pack-years smoked (never smoked, 1 to 34 pack-years, or
35 pack-years) using a likelihood ratio test comparing the models with and without interaction terms (16). We conducted these analyses for all bladder cancers combined and restricted to transitional cell carcinomas. We further did analyses of the association between XRCC1 genotype and invasiveness (noninvasive versus invasive tumors) using polycotomous logistic regression, excluding in situ tumors (17). Lastly, we examined whether XRCC1 genotype was especially associated with early age at onset of bladder cancer (
1 decade before the median, i.e., age <50 years) or later age at onset (age
50 years) using polycotomous logistic regression and computed the hazard ratio for XRCC1 by age at bladder cancer diagnosis using a Cox proportional hazard model (18). We considered age (continuous in years), gender (female or male), highest level of education attained (high school or less, college, or graduate school), and first-degree family history of bladder cancer (yes or no) as potentially confounding factors in our analyses.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
2 = 4.66, 1 df, P = 0.03). The prevalence of the homozygote variant genotype was 16% for controls and 10% for cases (Table 2). The OR (95% CI) for bladder cancer among homozygote variants was 0.8 (0.5-1.2; Table 2) compared with those who were homozygous wild-type and 0.6 (0.4-1.0; Table 2) compared with those with one or more wild-type allele. Adjustment for potentially confounding factors (i.e., family history or level of education) did not appreciably affect the ORs. We examined potential interaction between XRCC1 genotype and smoking status (never versus ever) but found no evidence of an interaction (never smokers OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.6; ever smokers OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-1.0; P for interaction = 0.62; Table 2). We did not find any indication of an interaction when we examined smoking history as the number of pack-years smoked (P for interaction = 0.96; Table 2).
|
50 years (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3-0.9; Table 3); however, the hazard ratio for age at diagnosis did not differ by XRCC1 genotype (hazard ratio 1.1, 95% CI 0.8-1.6 for Gln/Gln versus Arg/Arg and Arg/Gln). There did not seem to be any significant differences in the ORs by tumor type (e.g., invasive or noninvasive; Table 3). In addition, we did not detect differences in the ORs when we restricted the analysis to transitional cell carcinomas (data not shown).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies of the phenotype of the Arg399Gln variant suggest that the Gln399 allele results in higher levels of DNA adducts (10), mutations (9), and sister chromatid exchanges (10) and, in theory, could lead to an increased incidence of malignancy. However, the reduced cancer risk found in ours and other studies is consistent with the hypothesis that the variant XRCC1 protein, and its consequent diminished DNA repair, could enhance damage-related apoptosis in individual cells (19). Seedhouse et al. (20) investigated the association of XRCC1 polymorphisms on secondary (treatment-related) leukemia and observed a similar inverse association of cancer risk with the XRCC1 polymorphism, citing the enhancement of apoptosis as a possible mechanism. In this case, therapy results in dramatically enhanced DNA damage to surrounding normal cells, giving rise to high secondary cancer risks. The XRCC1 homozygous variant genotype was most strongly associated with protection from secondary leukemia (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.88), with greater protection for therapy-associated disease than for primary disease (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.3-1.08). In the study of Duell et al. (10), there was evidence that the association of DNA adduct formation and the Gln/Gln genotype increased with age. These results support our finding that the inverse relationship with the variant genotype was present largely among those diagnosed at age
50 years. However, using a survival analytic approach, there was no evidence that the association varied by age at diagnosis, making our findings inconclusive.
The absence of a detectable interaction with tobacco smoking is somewhat surprising. If true, it implies that the phenotypically relevant DNA damage that serves as the essential substrate for the XRCC1 Gln allele is not more prevalent in smokers (given that the kinetics of DNA repair are stable and approximately linear) and thus may be due to other factors. The exposure and damage of cellular DNA as well as the DNA damage response are complex phenomena, and our data indicate that there is a need to more fully understand the relationship among polymorphic DNA repair genes, carcinogen exposure, and cancer risk.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 7/21/03; revised 3/17/04; accepted 3/25/04.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Arizono, Y. Osada, and Y. Kuroda DNA Repair Gene hOGG1 Codon 326 and XRCC1 Codon 399 Polymorphisms and Bladder Cancer Risk in a Japanese Population Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 38(3): 186 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Huang, C. P. Dinney, X. Lin, J. Lin, H. B. Grossman, and X. Wu High-Order Interactions among Genetic Variants in DNA Base Excision Repair Pathway Genes and Smoking in Bladder Cancer Susceptibility Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2007; 16(1): 84 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Andrew, H. H. Nelson, K. T. Kelsey, J. H. Moore, A. C. Meng, D. P. Casella, T. D. Tosteson, A. R. Schned, and M. R. Karagas Concordance of multiple analytical approaches demonstrates a complex relationship between DNA repair gene SNPs, smoking and bladder cancer susceptibility Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2006; 27(5): 1030 - 1037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Hung, J. Hall, P. Brennan, and P. Boffetta Genetic Polymorphisms in the Base Excision Repair Pathway and Cancer Risk: A HuGE Review Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2005; 162(10): 925 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Matullo, S. Guarrera, C. Sacerdote, S. Polidoro, L. Davico, S. Gamberini, M. Karagas, G. Casetta, L. Rolle, A. Piazza, et al. Polymorphisms/Haplotypes in DNA Repair Genes and Smoking: A Bladder Cancer Case-Control Study Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2005; 14(11): 2569 - 2578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-F. Dekairelle, B. Tombal, J.-P. Cosyns, and J.-L. Gala Assessment of the Transcriptional Activity of p53 Improves the Prediction of Recurrence in Superficial Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 11(13): 4724 - 4732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-T. Jeon, J. W. Kim, N.-H. Park, Y.-S. Song, S.-B. Kang, and H.-P. Lee DNA repair gene XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism is associated with increased risk of uterine leiomyoma Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1586 - 1589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Brem and J. Hall XRCC1 is required for DNA single-strand break repair in human cells Nucleic Acids Res., May 2, 2005; 33(8): 2512 - 2520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |