CEBP http://www.cancermicroenvironment.tau.ac.il/welcome2009.html Frontiers in Basic Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Wei, Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Wei, Q.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 13, 1081-1083, June 2004
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research


Null Results in Brief

No Association between hOGG1 Ser326Cys Polymorphism and Risk of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

Zhengdong Zhang1, Qiuling Shi1, Li-E Wang1, Erich M. Sturgis1,2, Margaret R. Spitz1, Adel K. El-Naggar3, Waun K. Hong4 and Qingyi Wei1

Departments of 1 Epidemiology, 2 Head and Neck Surgery, 3 Pathology, and 4 Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

Requests for reprints:Qingyi Wei, Department of Epidemiology, Unit 189, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: 713-792-3020; Fax: 713-563-0999. E-mail: qwei{at}mdanderson.org


    Introduction
 Top
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is one of the most common cancers in the world (1). In the United States, it is estimated that there was 37,200 newly diagnosed SCCHN cases and 11,000 deaths in 2003 (2). Tobacco smoke and alcohol use are the major risk factors for SCCHN; however, only a fraction of individuals exposed to tobacco smoke or alcohol develop SCCHN, suggesting that there is variation in individual susceptibility to the disease. Therefore, SCCHN is an excellent disease model for the study of gene-environment interaction. One of the genotoxic effects of tobacco is oxidative DNA damage induced by reactive oxygen species, and 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine is one of the most common forms of oxidative DNA damage and is a marker of cellular oxidative stress (3). hOGG1 catalyzes the removal of 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine and cleavage of DNA at the AP site as part of the base excision repair pathway (4). At least 10 polymorphisms of hOGG1 have been identified (5), one of which is a C -> G at bp 1245 (C1245G) in the 1{alpha}-specific exon 7 that causes an amino acid substitution from serine to cysteine in codon 326 (Ser326Cys), potentially resulting in functional alteration (6). Several association studies of this hOGG1 C1245G polymorphism and cancer risk have generated contradicting results (3). Two recent larger breast cancer case-control studies yielded negative results (7, 8), but one recent study on SCCHN was positive (9). To further verify the possible role of the hOGG1 C1245G polymorphism in the etiology of SCCHN, we investigated the association between this polymorphism and the risk of SCCHN in a large hospital-based case-control study of 706 patients with SCCHN and 1,196 cancer-free control subjects.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study Population
All patients at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center who were newly diagnosed with histologically confirmed SCCHN between May 1, 1995 and September 30, 2003 were eligible for this study. The cancer-free control subjects were genetically unrelated to the patients with SCCHN and were recruited from among two populations: they included 558 enrollees in a multispecialty physician practice, the Kelsey Seybold Foundation, which has multiple clinics throughout the Houston metropolitan area (10), and 638 M. D. Anderson Cancer Center visitors accompanying patients to our cancer center outpatient clinics. To check for any selection bias in terms of genotypes, these two control populations were first compared for the distribution of the hOGG1 CC, CG, and GG genotypes, and no difference was found ({chi}2 = 3.863; P = 0.145). Therefore, these controls were combined in the final analysis to increase the study power. These control subjects were frequency matched to the case subjects on age (±5 years), sex, and smoking status (never, ever, and current). Informed consent was obtained, and all subjects agreed to donate 30 mL of blood for biomarker testing and complete a detailed questionnaire eliciting their demographic, exposure to tobacco smoke and alcohol, and family history information. The study was approved by both our institutional review board and the Kelsey Seybold Foundation review board.

Genotyping
We used the published primer sequences and PCR-RFLP method (11) to amplify a 200-bp fragment of genomic DNA. The restriction enzyme Fnu4HI (New England Biolabs, Inc., Beverly, Massachusetts) was used to type the hOGG1 C1245G polymorphism. The variant allele was cut by the enzyme into two 100-bp fragments. The fragments were separated on a 3% agarose gel (Fig. 1). More than 10% of the samples were randomly selected for repeat assays, and the results were 100% concordant.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. PCR-RFLP analysis for the hOGG1 C1245G polymorphism at codon 326 (Ser326Cys) in exon 7. The 200-bp PCR product was digested by Fnu4HI into two 100-bp fragments if it was the G variant allele or undigested if it was the C allele.

 
Statistical Analysis
We calculated crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the hOGG1 C1245G genotypes by using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. All statistical analyses were performed with the Statistical Analysis System software (version 8.2, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).


    Results
 Top
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The 706 cases (75.5% males) with SCCHN included oral cavity [209 (29.6%)], pharynx [325 (46.0%)], and larynx [172 (24.4%)], and the 1,196 cancer-free control subjects (73.2% males) were non-Hispanic whites; there was no significant difference in mean (± SD) age between the cases (56.9 ± 11.8) and the controls (56.7 ± 11.1). The hOGG1 genotype and allele frequencies were not significantly different between cases and controls (Table 1), and the genotypes in the controls were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P = 0.06). The frequencies of the hOGG1 variant GG homozygous genotype and the G allele in the cases were not different from those in the controls (5.5% vs. 5.8%; P = 0.802, respectively; 0.211 vs. 0.220; P = 0.687, respectively).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. SCCHN Risk Associated with hOGG1 Ser326Cys Polymorphism

 
On logistic regression analysis, neither the homozygous GG (adjusted OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.65–1.48) nor the heterozygous CG (adjusted OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.76–1.14) genotypes was associated with SCCHN risk after adjustment for age, sex, and smoking and alcohol status. No significant findings were evident in further stratified analysis, and there was no evidence of any interaction between the hOGG1 genotype and other covariates (data not shown).

Statistical Power
We had 80% power (two-sided test, {alpha} = 0.05) to detect an OR of 1.66 for GG homozygotes (5.8% in the controls), if this variant genotype is a risk genotype, compared with the CC+CG genotype. For both variant genotypes (CG + GG; 38.2% in the controls), the detectable OR was 1.31 compared with the CC genotype. Thus, our study had sufficient power to detect the ORs reported by Elahi et al. (9); i.e., OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.3–13.0 for GG homozygotes and OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.04–2.6 for variant genotypes (CG + GG).


    Discussion
 Top
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present study, we investigated the association between the hOGG1 C1245G (Ser326Cys) polymorphism and SCCHN risk, but we did not find evidence to support such an association. Our findings suggest that this common polymorphism may not play a major role in the etiology of SCCHN. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest molecular epidemiologic study of this kind ever reported to date.

One reason for discrepant results in case-control studies is that the selection of the controls may be biased in terms of biomarkers of interest. The frequencies of the hOGG1 variant GG homozygous genotype (5.8%) and the G allele (0.220) in our study are consistent with those of 434 female white control subjects (4.6% and 0.241, respectively) in a recent Danish population-based nested breast cancer case-control study (7) but are higher than those of 338 white control subjects (1.8% and 0.130, respectively) in an earlier positive U.S. hospital-based orolaryngeal cancer case-control study (9). It is interesting that our cases and the cases of these two studies exhibited similar frequencies of GG homozygous genotype (5.5%, 5.2%, and 5.4%, respectively) and the G allele (0.211, 0.224, and 0.220). Other published case-control studies had much smaller numbers (<300 for each ethnic group) of controls with the frequency of the GG homozygous genotype ranging from ~2% to 9% for white and between 13% and 24% for Asians (3, 12). The reported lowest GG homozygous genotype in control subjects was 1.8% in white (9) and the reported highest was 24.2% in Chinese (12).

Early association studies of Japanese populations suggested a possible role of the common variant of hOGG1 1245G in susceptibility to lung cancer, but the results of the most recent Japanese study of lung adenocarcinoma, the most plausible oxidative damage-induced cell type, did not support such an association (13). In the only published U.S. case-control study of 169 white patients with orolaryngeal cancer and 338 control subjects, Elahi et al. (9) found a significant association between the hOGG1 1245CG or 1245GG variant genotype and risk of orolaryngeal cancer, particularly in smokers and alcohol drinkers. Nevertheless, the positive finding of that study is weakened by the small sample size and the fact that the frequencies of variant alleles and genotypes were the lowest in the controls of that study among published studies and our study.

In conclusion, we did not find evidence to support an association between hOGG1 C1245G polymorphism and SCCHN risk in our study population. The limitation of our study is the hospital-based study design, and we cannot rule out the possibility of selection bias of subjects. Given that many genes are involved in the repair of oxidative damage (3), the role of oxidative damage and repair in SCCHN may be more efficiently investigated by using a phenotypic assay (14) and performing genotype and phenotype correlation analysis and by comprehensive study of the entire repair pathway (15).


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Margaret Lung and Peggy Schuber for their assistance in recruiting the subjects; Jianzhong He, John I. Calderon, and Kejin Xu for their laboratory assistance; Ann Sutton for scientific editing; and Joanne Sider for manuscript preparation.


    Footnotes
 
Grant support: NIH grants CA 86390 and CA 97007 (M.R. Spitz and W.K. Hong), ES 11740 (Q. Wei), and CA 16672 (M.D. Anderson Cancer Center).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 12/ 1/03; accepted 2/ 2/04.


    References
 Top
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 1999;49:33-64, 1.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2003. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc.; 2003. p. 4-5.
  3. Goode EL, Ulrich CM, Potter JD. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and associations with cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers & Prev 2002;11:1513-30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Boiteux S, Radicella JP. The human OGG1 gene: structure, functions, and its implication in the process of carcinogenesis. Arch Biochem Biophys 2000;377:1-8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Xu J, Zheng SL, Turner A, et al. Associations between hOGG1 sequence variants and prostate cancer susceptibility. Cancer Res 2002;62:2253-7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kohno T, Shinmura K, Tosaka M, et al. Genetic polymorphisms and alternative splicing of the hOGG1 gene, that is involved in the repair of 8-hydroxyguanine in damaged DNA. Oncogene 1998;16:3219-25.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Vogel U, Nexo BA, Olsen A, et al. No association between OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers & Prev 2003;12:170-1.[Free Full Text]
  8. Choi JY, Hamajima N, Tajima K, et al. hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and breast cancer risk among Asian women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2003;79:59-62.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Elahi A, Zheng Z, Park J, Eyring K, McCaffrey T, Lazarus P. The human OGG1 DNA repair enzyme and its association with orolaryngeal cancer risk. Carcinogenesis 2002;23:1229-34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Wei Q, Cheng L, Amos CI, et al. Repair of tobacco carcinogen-induced DNA adducts and lung cancer risk: a molecular epidemiologic study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1764-72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Le Marchand L, Donlon T, Lum-Jones A, Seifried A, Wilkens LR. Association of the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism with lung cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers & Prev 2002;11:409-12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Takezaki T, Gao CM, Wu JZ, et al. hOGG1 Ser(326)Cys polymorphism and modification by environmental factors of stomach cancer risk in Chinese. Int J Cancer 2002;99:624-7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Ito H, Hamajima N, Takezaki T, et al. A limited association of OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism for adenocarcinoma of the lung. J Epidemiol 2002;12:258-65.[Medline]
  14. Paz-Elizur T, Krupsky M, Blumenstein S, Elinger D, Schechtman E, Livneh Z. DNA repair activity for oxidative damage and risk of lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:1312-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Dianov GL. Monitoring base excision repair by in vitro assays. Toxicology 2003;193:35-41.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. I. Haddad and D. M. Shin
Recent Advances in Head and Neck Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., September 11, 2008; 359(11): 1143 - 1154.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
J. Hall, M. Hashibe, P. Boffetta, V. Gaborieau, N. Moullan, A. Chabrier, D. Zaridze, O. Shangina, N. Szeszenia-Dabrowska, D. Mates, et al.
The association of sequence variants in DNA repair and cell cycle genes with cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2007; 28(3): 665 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. Paz-Elizur, R. Ben-Yosef, D. Elinger, A. Vexler, M. Krupsky, A. Berrebi, A. Shani, E. Schechtman, L. Freedman, and Z. Livneh
Reduced Repair of the Oxidative 8-Oxoguanine DNA Damage and Risk of Head and Neck Cancer
Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 66(24): 11683 - 11689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
R. J. Hung, J. Hall, P. Brennan, and P. Boffetta
Genetic Polymorphisms in the Base Excision Repair Pathway and Cancer Risk: A HuGE Review
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2005; 162(10): 925 - 942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
Z. Zhang, Q. Shi, Z. Liu, E. M. Sturgis, M. R. Spitz, and Q. Wei
Polymorphisms of Methionine Synthase and Methionine Synthase Reductase and Risk of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: a Case-Control Analysis
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2005; 14(5): 1188 - 1193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Z. Zhang, Q. Shi, E. M. Sturgis, M. R. Spitz, W. K. Hong, and Q. Wei
Thymidylate Synthase 5'- and 3'-Untranslated Region Polymorphisms Associated with Risk and Progression of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2004; 10(23): 7903 - 7910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Wei, Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Wei, Q.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online