CEBP CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2008 Conference on Cancer Prevention - Washington, D.C.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dai, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dai, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, W.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 13, 2065-2070, 2004
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research

Synergistic Effects of STK15 Gene Polymorphisms and Endogenous Estrogen Exposure in the Risk of Breast Cancer

Qi Dai1, Qiu-Yin Cai1, Xiao-Ou Shu1, Amanda Ewart-Toland3, Wan-Qing Wen1, Allan Balmain3, Yu-Tang Gao2 and Wei Zheng1

1 Department of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; 2 Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, People's Republic of China; and 3 UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cancer Research Institute, San Francisco, California

Requests for reprints: Wei Zheng, Vanderbilt Center for Health Services Research, 1215 21st Avenue South, Medical Center East, Suite 6000, Nashville, TN 37232-8300. Phone: 615-936-0682; Fax: 615-936-1269. E-mail: wei.zheng{at}vanderbilt.edu


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
STK15 is a member of a family of serine/threonine kinases that act as key regulators of chromosome segregation and cytokinesis. Over expression of the STK15 gene leads to centrosome amplification, chromosomal instability, aneuploidy, and transformation. It has been reported that the 91T -> A (Phe -> Ile at codon 31) polymorphism in the STK15 gene affects the function of this gene. We hypothesized that this polymorphism may interact with endogenous estrogen exposure in the risk of breast cancer and evaluated this hypothesis in a population-based, case-control study conducted among Chinese women in Shanghai. Genotyping assays were completed for 1,102 incident cases and 1,186 community controls. Participation and blood donation rates were over 90% and 80%, respectively. Elevated risks of breast cancer were found to be associated with the Phe/Ile [odds ratio (OR), 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.0-1.7] and Ile/Ile (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.9-1.6) genotypes at codon 31 of the STK15 gene, although the ORs were not statistically significant. The risk associated with this polymorphism was modified by factors related to endogenous estrogen exposure, such as high body mass index (BMI), high waist-to-hip ratio, long duration of lifetime menstruation, or long duration of menstruation before first live birth. In particular, a statistically significant interaction was found between BMI and the STK15 Phe31Ile polymorphism (P = 0.02) and a positive association with breast cancer risk for the Ile allele was found only among overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) women with adjusted ORs (95% CIs) of 3.3 (1.4-7.7) and 4.1 (1.7-9.8) associated with the Phe/Ile and Ile/Ile genotypes (Pfor trend <0.01), respectively. The findings from this study are consistent with the evidence from invitro and in vivo experiments, implicating an etiologic role of the STK15 gene in human breast cancer, and provide evidence for the modifying effects of genetic background on human cancer risk.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
STK15 (also known as BTAK, Aurora 2, and AIK1) is a member of the Aurora/Ipl1p family of mitotically regulated serine/threonine kinases that are key regulators of chromosome segregation and cytokinesis (1-3). A wealth of data indicates that overexpression of the STK15 gene leads to centrosome amplification, chromosomal instability, aneuploidy, and transformation (3-7) and has been detected in a variety of human cancers, including breast cancer (4,6,8-12). Breast cancer is a hormone-related cancer, and sex hormones increase breast cancer risk by causing proliferation of breast epithelial cells. Replication errors and genetic damage during cell division, if not corrected, may lead to breast cancer (13, 14). A recent study found that the STK15 gene is expressed predominantly in cells or tissues with proliferative activity (15). Furthermore, it has been shown that the expression level of the STK15 gene is induced substantially after estradiol treatment (16). Therefore, it is conceivable that STK15, a cell cycle regulator, may interact with estrogen, a cell proliferation stimulator, in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. We investigated this hypothesis by evaluating the association between breast cancer risk and a common functional polymorphism (91T->A, Phe31Ile) in the STK15 gene and examine further whether this association may be modified by factors related to estrogen exposure in an epidemiologic study (3).


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study Participants and Data Collection
Included in this study were subjects recruited from 1996 to 1998 in the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study. Detailed study methods have been published elsewhere (17). Relevant committees for the use of human subjects in research approved the study protocol. In brief, this study consisted of 1,459 incident breast cancer cases diagnosed in women ages 25 to 64 years and 1,556 age frequency–matched community controls. Cancer cases were identified through a rapid case ascertainment system, supplemented by the population-based Shanghai Cancer Registry, which has virtually complete ascertainment of all incident cancer cases diagnosed among residents in urban Shanghai (18). A total of 1,602 eligible breast cancer cases were identified during the study period, of which 1,459 (91.1%) cases completed in-person interviews. Cancer diagnoses for all patients were reviewed and confirmed by two senior pathologists. Controls were randomly selected from the general population of Shanghai using the Shanghai Resident Registry, a population registry containing demographic information for all adult residents of urban Shanghai. The inclusion criteria for controls were identical to those for cases with the exception of a breast cancer diagnosis. Of the 1,724 eligible women, 1,556 (90.3%) completed in-person interviews.

A structured questionnaire was used to elicit detailed information on demographic factors, menstrual and reproductive history, hormone use, dietary habits, prior disease history, physical activity, tobacco and alcohol use, weight, and family history of cancer. All participants were measured for their current weight and circumferences of the waist and hips. Of those who completed the in-person interviews, 1,193 cases (82%) and 1,310 controls (84.2%) donated a blood sample. All of the specimens were collected in the morning before any meals. These samples were processed on the same day, typically within 6 hours of sample collection, and stored at –70°C until relevant bioassays were carried out.

Laboratory Genotyping Methods
STK15 genotyping was done using the Taqman 5' Nuclease Assay (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA; ref. 19). The primers and probes were purchased from ABI Assay-by-Design services. The primers and probes for Phe31Ile polymorphism were forward: 5'-TGGAGGTCCAAAACGTGTTCTC-3' and reverse: 5'-CTGCCCACTATTTACAGGTAATGGA-3'; probes were VIC-ACTCAGCAAATTC CTT for the Ileallele and FAM-ACTCAGCAATTTCCTT for the Phe allele. In addition to Phe31Ile polymorphism, we also evaluated a single nucleotide polymorphism at codon 57 using the primers forward: 5'-GGGTCTT GTGTCCTTCAAATTCTTC-3' and reverse: 5'-CGGC TTGTGACTGGAGACA-3'. Probes were VIC-CAG CGCGTTCCTT for the Val allele and FAM-CAGCGCATTCCTT for the Ileallele. PCR was done in a total volume of 5 µL containing 2.5 ng DNA, 1x Taqman Universal PCR Master Mix, 900 nmol/L each primer, and 200 nmol/L each probe. The thermal cycling conditions were as follows:50°C for 2 minutes and 95°C for 10 minutes to activate AmpErase uracil N-glycosylase and AmpliTaq Gold enzyme, respectively, followed by 40 cycles of 92°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 1 minute. The fluorescence level was measured with ABI PRISM 7900HT sequence detector (Applied Biosystems). Allele frequencies were determined by ABI SDS software. Among those who provided a blood sample, genotyping data were obtained from 1,102 (92%) cases and 1,186 (90%) controls for the Phe31Ile polymorphism and 1,102 (92%) cases and1,188 (91%) controls for the Val57Ile polymorphism. The major reasons for incomplete genotyping were insufficient DNA used in the assay and unsuccessful PCR amplification.

The laboratory staff were blind to the identity of the subjects. Quality control samples were included in the genotyping assays. Each 386-well plate of genomic DNA contained multiple controls, including four water blanks, eight samples of CEPH 1347-02, eight unblinded quality control samples, and eight blinded quality control samples. The duplicated blind quality control samples were distributed across separate 384-well plates. STK15 genotypes determined for the duplicated quality control samples were in complete agreement.

Statistical Analysis
{chi}2 statistics were used to evaluate case-control differences in the distribution of genotypes. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and their 95% confidence interval (95% CI) as a measure of the strength of the association. {chi}2 goodness-of-fit test was used for testing STK15 genotypes for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Linkage disequilibrium between Phe31Ile and Val57Ile polymorphisms was tested using R2 values (20). Haplotype frequencies were estimated via expectation-maximization algorithms (21). Tests for trend across tertiles were done in logistic regression models by assigning the score j to the jth level of the variable selected. Stratified analyses by indicators of endogenous estrogen exposure were conducted to evaluate the potential modifying effects of these variables on the association between STK15 genotypes and breast cancer risk. Multiplicative interactions were formally evaluated in logistic regression models by likelihood ratio tests. P < 0.05 (two-sided probability) was interpreted as statistically significant.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Selected demographic characteristics and major risk factors are compared for cases and controls in Table 1. Cases and controls were similar in age. With the exception of a family history of breast cancer, statistically significant associations were observed for all major risk factors of breast cancer. More cases than controls had a family history of breast cancer, although the difference was not statistically significant, due to a low prevalence of positive breast cancer family history in this population. There was no appreciable difference between cases included in the genotyping study and the whole study (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Comparison of cases and controls by selected descriptive characteristics, Shanghai Breast Cancer Study, 1996-1998

 
The allele and genotype distributions for the two common polymorphisms in the STK15 gene are presented in Table 2. The distribution of genotypes for these two polymorphisms is consistent with the Hardy- Weinberg equilibrium for both cases and controls. A nonsignificantly elevated risk was associated with the Ile31 allele. One striking observation was that the frequency of the Ile/Ile genotype in this Chinese population (>40%) was much higher than that reported in a Caucasian population (~6%; ref. 3). There was no apparent difference in allele frequency or genotype of the polymorphism at codon 57. When the two STK15 polymorphisms were analyzed jointly, women with both Ile31 and Ile57 alleles were at an ~40% increased risk of breast cancer (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-2.1) compared with those who were homozygous for both Phe31 and Val57 alleles, although the results remained statistically nonsignificant (data not shown). This positive association for the joint genotype appeared among both premenopausal and postmenopausal women with ORs (95% CIs) of 1.3 (0.8-2.1) and 1.8 (0.9-3.4), respectively. The two polymorphisms are in modest linkage disequilibrium (R2 = 0.30; P < 0.0001). However, none of the four derived common haplotypes was associated with a statistically increased risk of breast cancer (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. STK15 allele and genotype frequencies, unadjusted and adjusted ORs for breast cancer, Shanghai Breast Cancer Study, 1996-1998

 
Table 3 shows a more detailed analysis of the association between the Phe31Ile polymorphism and breast cancer risk, stratified by body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), years of lifetime menstruation, or years of menstruation before first live birth, all of which are indicators of endogenous estrogen exposures. The positive association between Phe/Ile and Ile/Ile genotypes and breast cancer risk was primarily seen among women with a high BMI or WHR, particularly among postmenopausal women. Overweight postmenopausal women had more than a 4-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer, if they carried the Ile/Ile genotype, compared with those with the Phe/Phe genotype (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.7-9.8). This pattern of association suggests an interaction and the tests for multiplicative interaction were statistically significant for BMI (P for interaction = 0.02 both for all subjects combined and postmenopausal women). In addition, among postmenopausal women, the association of the Phe31Ile polymorphism with breast cancer risk was stronger among those with a longer duration of menstruation (P for interaction = 0.15). Similar analyses were done for the polymorphism at codon 57 (data not shown) and no appreciable difference was observed. The number of subjects homozygous for the Ile57 allele, however, was small.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3. Association of the STK15 codon 31 genotype with breast cancer, stratified by selected life-style and reproductive factors, Shanghai Breast Cancer Study, 1996-1998

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
We found that the Ile31 allele of the STK15 gene was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, particularly among overweight postmenopausal women in the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study. This positive association also seems to be modified by other indicators of high or long-term endogenous estrogen exposure. These findings are new and suggest an important role for STK polymorphism in hormone-related cancers, such as breast cancer.

There were few methodologic limitations in this population-based study. The participation rate was high (>90%), minimizing potential selection bias. Although not all study participants (17%) donated a blood sample and not all DNA samples (8%) were successfully genotyped, we found that those participants with genotyping data were comparable for all major known risk factors and demographic characteristics with all subjects. Differential recall biases, another major limitation in most case-control studies, are also not a major concern in this study because the accuracy of genotyping should not be affected by case-control status. Extensive information on anthropometrics and life-style factors were collected in the study for evaluating confounding factors and effect modifiers. In addition, Chinese women living in Shanghai have relatively homogeneous ethnic backgrounds, >98% of them are classified into a single ethnic group (Han Chinese). Therefore, the potential confounding effect of ethnicity for genotyping data is not a major concern.

The STK15 gene is identified in chromosome 20q13.2, and the amplification of 20q is found in a variety of cancers, including hormone-related cancers, such as breast, prostate, ovarian, and colon cancers (22). An increased copy number of 20q13.2 is observed in ~12% to 18% of primary breast tumors and 40% of breast tumor cell lines (6, 23) and is associated with aggressive tumor behavior, cellular immortalization, and genomic instability (3, 7). Berry et al. (24) identified a susceptibility locus in the 20q13 region in a genome-wide search among 162 North American families with three or more members diagnosed with prostate cancer. The most significant evidence for linkage appeared among 46 families without male to male transmission, with an estimated 56% of the families linked (24). Collins et al. (25) evaluated the expression of five candidate genes at 20q13.2, a highly amplified region in breast cancer tissues and breast cancer cell lines. Of the ZNF217, ZNF218, NABC1, PIC1L, and CYP24 genes evaluated, only ZNF217 satisfied their criteria for an oncogene involved in breast cancer. Subsequent investigations showed that CYP24 is also a candidate oncogene in this region (26). In addition to these two candidate genes, immunohistochemical analyses by Tanaka et al. (1) showed that overexpression of the STK15 gene was detected in 94% of invasive ductal adenocarcinomas of the breast.

In an early study conducted by some members of the research group, a series of polymorphisms in the STK15, ZNF217, and CYP24A1 genes were evaluated in relation to breast cancer (3). These studies provided suggestive evidence for linkage of the STK15 Ile31 allele with breast cancer susceptibility in a Caucasian population, but the results did not reach statistical significance at that stage (3). Further studies with additional samples from this Caucasian population are in progress. Subsequently, this Ile31 allele was found to be preferentially amplified in colon cancers and associated with the degree of aneuploidy in human colon tumors (3). Furthermore, the Ile31 allele had a greater potency than the Phe31 allele in inducing cell growth and tumorigenicity in mice (3). These findings, together with those from the current study, suggest that the Ile31 allele may be a genetic susceptibility factor for breast cancer.

Our findings for a potential interaction of Phe31Ile polymorphism with BMI and other indicators of estrogen exposure are interesting. After menopause, adipose tissue is the major site for estrogen synthesis and women with a high BMI have an elevated level of endogenous estrogens (27). Moreover, either body weight (measured by BMI) or central obesity (measured by WHR) has also been linked to an elevated level of insulin and insulin-like growth factors (28, 29). Estrogens were shown to work synergistically with insulin-like growth factors in growth stimulation and might, in turn, promote mammary carcinogenesis (30). As with studies conducted elsewhere, we found in the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study that BMI was associated with an increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer, whereas WHR was related positively to both premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer (31). Our findings also suggest that the association between STK15 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk could be modified by years of lifetime menstruation and years of menstruation before first live birth. These two indicators measure the duration of endogenous estrogen exposure and the latter also measures estrogen exposure during a particularly susceptible period in a woman's life cycle, as the number of undifferentiated/vulnerable breast cells is reduced substantially after the first pregnancy (32, 33). Several human and in vitro studies have supported the potential interaction between STK15 and estrogen exposure. The degree of overexpression of STK15 found in invasive ductal adenocarcinomas of the breast seems to be higher than that in non-hormone-related cancers, such as bladder, pancreatic, and stomach cancers (34-36). These results, however, were derived from different laboratories and need to be confirmed in future studies conducted in the same laboratory under the same conditions. In a very recent study, Hodges et al. (16) found that the expression level of the STK15 gene was induced over three times after estradiol treatment in MCF-7 cell lines, whereas Tanner et al. (37) found in an earlier study that amplification of 20q13 is highly associated with a high S-phase fraction, an indicator of proliferative activity (22). Interestingly, amplification of the STK15 gene is only detected in ~12% to 18% of breast tumors, whereas overexpression is seen in >90% of cases (1). This contrasts with the situation seen in, for example, colon tumors, where the proportion of cases showing STK15 amplification is much higher (4). It is tempting to speculate that, in breast tissue, selection pressure for STK15 amplification may be lower because the gene is already up-regulated by estrogen exposure. Another interesting finding is that the frequency of homozygotes for the risk genotype (Ile/Ile) is 7-fold higher in the Chinese population than in Caucasians (~40% versus 6%, respectively). This is unexpected because Chinese women have a lower incidence rate of breast cancer compared with their counterparts in Western countries (18, 38). Breast cancer, however, has a complex etiology, involving multiple genetic and environmental factors. The fact that breast cancer incidence is not highly elevated in the Chinese women is presumably due to the buffering effects of environmental factors or other polymorphisms in this genetic background. It is well known from animal models that genetic interaction between low-penetrance predisposing alleles play an important role in determining cancer risk (39). Future comparisons of Caucasian and Asian populations may therefore provide a fruitful avenue for the detection of such interactions from studies of cancer risk conferred by combinations of polymorphisms in candidate genes.


   Acknowledgments
 
Drs. Ewart-Toland and Balmain are supported by NIH grants UO1CA84244-05 and P50 CA89520. We thank Dr. F. Jin, J-R.Cheng, and Z-X. Raun of the Shanghai Cancer Institute for their assistance in study management and data collection.


   Footnotes
 
Grant support: National Cancer Institute USPHS grants RO1CA64277 and RO1CA90899.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 5/ 6/04; revised 6/16/04; accepted 6/24/04.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Tanaka T, Kimura M, Matsunaga K, Fukada D, Mori H, Okano Y. Centrosomal kinase AIK1 is overexpressed in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Cancer Res 1999;59:2041–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bischoff JR, Plowman GD. The Aurora/Ipl1p kinase family: regulators of chromosome segregation and cytokinesis. Trends Cell Biol 1999;9:454–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Ewart-Toland A, Briassouli P, de Koning JP, et al. Identification of Stk6/STK15 as a candidate low-penetrance tumor-susceptibility gene in mouse and human. Nat Genet 2003;34:403–12.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Bischoff JR, Anderson L, Zhu Y, et al. A homologue of Drosophila aurora kinase is oncogenic and amplified in human colorectal cancers. EMBO J 1998;17:3052–65.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Zhou H, Kuang J, Zhong L, et al. Tumour amplified kinase STK15/BTAK induces centrosome amplification, aneuploidy and transformation. Nat Genet 1998;20:189–93.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Sen S, Zhou H, White RA. A putative serine/threonine kinase encoding gene BTAK on chromosome 20q13 is amplified and overexpressed in human breast cancer cell lines. Oncogene 1997;14:2195–200.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Miyoshi Y, Iwao K, Egawa C, Noguchi S. Association of centrosomal kinase STK15/BTAK mRNA expression with chromosomal instability in human breast cancers. Int J Cancer 2001;92:370–3.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Kimura M, Kotani S, Hattori T, et al. Cell cycle-dependent expression and spindle pole localization of a novel human protein kinase, Aik, related to Aurora of Drosophila and yeast Ipl1. J Biol Chem 1997;272:13766–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Iwabuchi H, Sakamoto M, Sakunaga H, et al. Genetic analysis of benign, low-grade, and high-grade ovarian tumors. Cancer Res 1995; 55:6172–80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Piper J, et al. Detection and mapping of amplified DNA sequences in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994;91:2156–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Korn WM, Yasutake T, Kuo WL, et al. Chromosome arm 20q gains and other genomic alterations in colorectal cancer metastatic to liver, as analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1999;25:82–90.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Tanner MM, Grenman S, Koul A, et al. Frequent amplification of chromosomal region 20q12-q13 in ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:1833–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Feigelson HS, Henderson BE. Estrogens and breast cancer. Carcinogenesis 1996;17:2279–84.[Free Full Text]
  14. Yager JD. Endogenous estrogens as carcinogens through metabolic activation. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2000;27:67–73.
  15. Hamada M, Yakushijin Y, Ohtsuka M, Fujita S. Aurora2/BTAK/STK15 is involved in cell cycle checkpoint and cell survival of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2003;121:439–47.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Hodges LC, Cook JD, Lobenhofer EK, et al. Tamoxifen functions as a molecular agonist inducing cell cycle-associated genes in breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res 2003;1:300–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Gao YT, Shu XO, Dai Q, et al. Association of menstrual and reproductive factors with breast cancer risk: results from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study. Int J Cancer 2000;87:295–300.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Parkin DM, Whelen SL, Ferlay J, Raymond L. Cancer incidence in five continents. 7th ed. Lyon: IARC; 1997.
  19. Livak KJ. Allelic discrimination using fluorogenic probes and the 5' nuclease assay. Genet Anal 1999;14:143–9.[Medline]
  20. Pritchard JK, Przeworski M. Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data. Am J Hum Genet 2001;69:1–14.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Excoffier L, Slatkin M. Maximum-likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population. Mol Biol Evol 1995; 12:921–7.[Abstract]
  22. Hodgson JG, Chin K, Collins C, Gray JW. Genome amplification of chromosome 20 in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2003;78:337–45.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Muleris M, Almeida A, Gerbault-Seureau M, Malfoy B, Dutrillaux B. Detection of DNA amplification in 17 primary breast carcinomas with homogeneously staining regions by a modified comparative genomic hybridization technique. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1994; 10:160–70.[Medline]
  24. Berry R, Schroeder JJ, French AJ, et al. Evidence for a prostate cancer-susceptibility locus on chromosome 20. Am J Hum Genet 2000;67:82–91.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Collins C, Rommens JM, Kowbel D, et al. Positional cloning of ZNF217 and NABC1: genes amplified at 20q13.2 and overexpressed in breast carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:8703–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Albertson DG, Ylstra B, Segraves R, et al. Quantitative mapping of amplicon structure by array CGH identifies CYP24 as a candidate oncogene. Nat Genet 2000;25:144–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Siiteri PK. Adipose tissue as a source of hormones. Am J Clin Nutr 1987;45:277–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Pasquali R, Antenucci D, Melchionda N, et al. Sex hormones in obese premenopausal women and their relationships to body fat mass and distribution, B cell function and diet composition. J Endocrinol Invest 1987;10:345–50.[Medline]
  29. Seidell JC. Obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes—a worldwide epidemic. Br J Nutr 2000;83:S5–8.
  30. Thorsen T, Lahooti H, Rasmussen M, Aakvaag A. Oestradiol treatment increases the sensitivity of MCF-7 cells for the growth stimulatory effect of IGF-I. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1992;41:537–40.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Shu XO, Jin F, Dai Q, et al. Association of body size and fat distribution with risk of breast cancer among Chinese women. Int J Cancer 2001;94:449–55.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Krieger N. Exposure, susceptibility, and breast cancer risk: a hypothesis regarding exogenous carcinogens, breast tissue development, and social gradients, including black/white differences, in breast cancer incidence. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1989;13:205–23.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Russo J, Russo IH. Development pattern of human breast and susceptibility to carcinogenesis. Eur J Cancer Prev 1993;2:85–100.
  34. Sen S, Zhou H, Zhang RD, et al. Amplification/overexpression of a mitotic kinase gene in human bladder cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1320–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Li D, Zhu J, Firozi PF, et al. Overexpression of oncogenic STK15/BTAK/Aurora A kinase in human pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:991–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Sakakura C, Hagiwara A, Yasuoka R, et al. Tumour-amplified kinase BTAK is amplified and overexpressed in gastric cancers with possible involvement in aneuploid formation. Br J Cancer 2001;84:824–31.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Tanner MM, Tirkkonen M, Kallioniemi A, et al. Amplification of chromosomal region 20q13 in invasive breast cancer: prognostic implications. Clin Cancer Res 1995;1:1455–61.[Abstract]
  38. Parkin D, Pisani P, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide incidence of eighteen major cancers in 1985. Int J Cancer 1993;54:594–606.[Medline]
  39. Balmain A. Cancer as a complex genetic trait: tumor susceptibility in humans and mouse models. Cell 2002;108:145–52.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Nadler, R. L. Camp, C. Schwartz, D. L. Rimm, H. M. Kluger, and Y. Kluger
Expression of Aurora A (but Not Aurora B) Is Predictive of Survival in Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 14(14): 4455 - 4462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
F. J. Couch, O. Sinilnikova, R. A. Vierkant, V. S. Pankratz, Z. S. Fredericksen, D. Stoppa-Lyonnet, I. Coupier, D. Hughes, A. Hardouin, P. Berthet, et al.
AURKA F31I Polymorphism and Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: A Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2007; 16(7): 1416 - 1421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
O. Fletcher, N. Johnson, C. Palles, I. dos Santos Silva, V. McCormack, J. Whittaker, A. Ashworth, and J. Peto
Inconsistent association between the STK15 F31I genetic polymorphism and breast cancer risk.
J Natl Cancer Inst, July 19, 2006; 98(14): 1014 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
A. Ewart-Toland, Q. Dai, Y.-T. Gao, H. Nagase, M. G. Dunlop, S. M. Farrington, R. A. Barnetson, H. Anton-Culver, D. Peel, A. Ziogas, et al.
Aurora-A/STK15 T+91A is a general low penetrance cancer susceptibility gene: a meta-analysis of multiple cancer types
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2005; 26(8): 1368 - 1373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dai, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dai, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, W.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online