CEBP CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2008 Conference on Cancer Prevention - Washington, D.C.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cox, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cox, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, D. J.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 13, 1821-1822, November 2004
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research


Null Results in Brief

No Association between GPX1 Pro198Leu and Breast Cancer Risk

David G. Cox1,2, Susan E. Hankinson1,3, Peter Kraft1,2 and David J. Hunter1,2,3

1 Department of Epidemiology and 2 Program in Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, and 3 Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

Requests for reprints: David G. Cox, Epidemiology Department, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115. Fax: 617-432-1722. E-mail: dcox{at}hsph.harvard.edu


    Introduction
 Top
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Conclusions
 References
 
Polymorphisms in the antioxidant selenoprotein glutathione peroxidase (GPX1) have been proposed to be associated with lung cancer (1) and breast cancer (2). In particular, the Leu allele of the Pro198Leu polymorphism has been shown to have lower activity in MCF-7 cell lysates stimulated with sodium selenite (2). This polymorphism was strongly associated with risk of lung cancer (1); a significant association [odds ratio (OR), 1.9; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.02-3.58] in a study of 79 breast cancer cases and 517 controls also has been observed (2). We assessed the association between GPX1 polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in the prospective Nurses' Health Study.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Conclusions
 References
 
Detailed information regarding the design of this nested case-control study (cases, n = 1,323; controls, n = 1,910) has been published previously (3). In brief, 32,826 women who were free of diagnosed breast cancer were followed for incident disease from time of blood sample collection in 1989 and 1990 up to May 31, 2000. The two single nucleotide polymorphisms studied [–1040 G/A (rs3448) and Pro198Leu (rs1050450)] were chosen as haplotype-tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms from the four single nucleotide polymorphisms in the National Cancer Institute's SNP500 database (http://snp500cancer.nci.nih.gov/home.cfm). Briefly, haplotype frequencies from 31 Caucasian samples were generated using the Phase program and haplotype-tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms were chosen using the BEST program (4). GPX1 genotyping analysis was done by the Taqman Allelic Discrimination method (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using primers and probe sequences available from the SNP500 database. Genotype-specific ORs and 95% CIs were calculated using unconditional logistic regression and were adjusted for age, age at menopause, postmenopausal hormone use, body mass index at age 18 years, weight gain since age 18 years, benign breast disease, and family history of breast cancer. ORs in relation to tumor stage and size were calculated in cases only, with <4 nodes involved and tumor size ≤2 cm being the reference categories. In these analyses, we compared carriers of the rare allele with noncarriers. Haplotype frequencies in pooled cases and controls were estimated using PROC HAPLOTYPE and linkage disequilibrium was calculated using PROC ALLELE in the SAS System version 8.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Regression substitution (5) and unconditional logistic regression (adjusted as above) were used for haplotype association testing, with the G-Pro haplotype as the reference category. Power was calculated using STPLAN (http://calculators.stat.ucla.edu/powercalc/).


    Results
 Top
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Conclusions
 References
 
Both polymorphisms were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and significant linkage disequilibrium existed between them (r = 0.4, D' = 1.00; P < 0.001). There was no difference in genotype frequency between our control group and that of Hu et al. (P = 0.26, Fisher's exact test). No association was observed between either GPX1 genotype or the associated haplotypes and breast cancer risk (Table 1). No association was seen between GPX1 alleles and advanced disease [≥4 involved nodes (n = 81) compared with <4 nodes (n = 967) involved: –1040A OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.87-2.16; Leu198 OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.48-1.19]. Additionally, rare GPX1 alleles were not significantly overrepresented among larger tumors [>2 cm (n = 245) compared with ≤2 cm (n = 964): –1040A OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.83-1.44; Leu198 OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.83-1.45]. Lastly, no association was seen with any haplotype and tumor size or progression.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. The relationship between GPX1 genotype and breast cancer risk

 

    Conclusions
 Top
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Conclusions
 References
 
We did not observe an association between either the –1040A or the Leu198 allele in the GPX1 gene and breast cancer risk among Caucasian women. We had >99% power to detect a significant relative risk of 1.9 (as reported by Hu et al.) for homozygous carriers of the Leu allele compared with women homozygous for the Pro allele. It is possible that the association between this allele and breast cancer risk shown by Hu et al. could actually be explained by loss of heterozygosity due to the use of tumor DNA as opposed to peripheral blood from patients in their study. However, no association between the Leu198 allele and tumor progression or size was seen in the present study. Our study is >5 times larger than the study of Hu et al., suggesting that our result is less likely to be influenced by chance fluctuations in the case or control genotype frequency.


    Footnotes
 
Grant support: NIH research grants CA87969 and CA65725 and training grant CA 09001-27 (D.G. Cox).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 2/ 6/04; accepted 4/26/04.


    References
 Top
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Conclusions
 References
 

  1. Ratnasinghe D, Tangrea JA, Andersen MR, et al. Glutathione peroxidase codon 198 polymorphism variant increases lung cancer risk. Cancer Res 2000;60:6381–3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hu YJ, Diamond AM. Role of glutathione peroxidase 1 in breast cancer: loss of heterozygosity and allelic differences in the response to selenium. Cancer Res 2003;63:3347–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. De Vivo I, Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ. A functional polymorphism in the progesterone receptor gene is associated with an increase in breast cancer risk. Cancer Res 2003;63:5236–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Sebastiani P, Lazarus R, Weiss ST, Kunkel LM, Kohane IS, Ramoni MF. Minimal haplotype tagging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:9900–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Stram DO, Leigh Pearce C, Bretsky P, et al. Modeling and E-M estimation of haplotype-specific relative risks from genotype data for a case-control study of unrelated individuals. Hum Hered 2003;55:179–90.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J.-Y. Choi, M. L. Neuhouser, M. Barnett, M. Hudson, A. R. Kristal, M. Thornquist, I. B. King, G. E. Goodman, and C. B. Ambrosone
Polymorphisms in Oxidative Stress-Related Genes Are Not Associated with Prostate Cancer Risk in Heavy Smokers
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2007; 16(6): 1115 - 1120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. C. Mathers and J. E. Hesketh
The Biological Revolution: Understanding the Impact of SNPs on Diet-Cancer Interrelationships
J. Nutr., January 1, 2007; 137(1): 253S - 258S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
G. Ravn-Haren, A. Olsen, A. Tjonneland, L. O. Dragsted, B. A. Nexo, H. Wallin, K. Overvad, O. Raaschou-Nielsen, and U. Vogel
Associations between GPX1 Pro198Leu polymorphism, erythrocyte GPX activity, alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk in a prospective cohort study
Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2006; 27(4): 820 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Cebrian, P. D. Pharoah, S. Ahmed, P. L. Smith, C. Luccarini, R. Luben, K. Redman, H. Munday, D. F. Easton, A. M. Dunning, et al.
Tagging Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Antioxidant Defense Enzymes and Susceptibility to Breast Cancer
Cancer Res., January 15, 2006; 66(2): 1225 - 1233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Ahn, M. D. Gammon, R. M. Santella, M. M. Gaudet, J. A. Britton, S. L. Teitelbaum, M. B. Terry, A. I. Neugut, and C. B. Ambrosone
No Association Between Glutathione Peroxidase Pro198Leu Polymorphism and Breast Cancer Risk
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2005; 14(10): 2459 - 2461.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cox, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cox, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, D. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation