This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Littman, A. J. Articles by Vaughan, T. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Littman, A. J. Articles by Vaughan, T. L.

Chlamydia pneumoniae Infection and Risk of Lung Cancer

¹ Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; ² Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; ³ Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, WA; ⁴ Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; ⁵ Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA

Requests for reprints: Alyson J. Littman, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, M4-B402, P.O. Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109-1024. Phone: 206-667-7707; Fax: 206-667-4787. E-mail: alittman{at}fhcrc.org

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae may be associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. We conducted a matched case-control study (508 pairs) nested within a large prospective study to investigate whether IgA antibody titers to C. pneumoniae measured by the microimmunofluorescence test are associated with lung cancer risk after controlling for confounders. Individuals with antibody titers 16 had 1.2 times the risk of lung cancer (95% confidence interval, 0.9-1.6) compared to those with lower titers. There was a significant trend (P = 0.007) of increasing odds ratios with increasing IgA titers primarily due to an odds ratio of 2.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-6.7) associated with titers 256. Lung cancer risk associated with IgA titers 16 was stronger among former smokers. To better understand predictors of IgA seropositivity, we also examined demographic, lifestyle, dietary, and medical correlates of IgA titers 16 among controls. Those with race not classified as White or Black were more likely to have IgA titers 16; there were no significant differences in seropositivity by smoking behaviors. In summary, the adjusted odds ratio for lung cancer associated with IgA titers 16 was compatible with a weakly positive association, although nondifferential measurement error of antibody titers may have resulted in a conservative bias. Future studies using precise measures of chronic C. pneumoniae status are needed to better determine the role of this organism in the etiology of lung cancer.

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
There is accumulating evidence that infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae may be associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (1-6). Prospective and retrospective studies have reported 50% to 100% increased risks of lung cancer among those with elevated IgA antibody titers to this organism. Chronic inflammation and its sequelae may be part of the causal pathway.

We conducted a nested case-control study to further investigate this association while controlling for major lung cancer risk factors. Additional objectives were to identify possible modifying factors of the C. pneumoniae-lung cancer association and to describe histology-specific and site-specific associations. We used IgA antibody titers to C. pneumoniae as our exposure measure because IgA antibodies have a short half-life and thus have been proposed as a serologic marker of chronic or persistent C. pneumoniae infection (7, 8). To better understand the predictors of IgA antibody detection, we also examined the demographic, lifestyle, dietary, and medical correlates of IgA titers 16 among controls.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Study Population
The present report is based on a case-control study nested within the ß-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial (CARET), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled prevention trial that evaluated whether supplementation with ß-carotene and vitamin A would reduce the risk of lung cancer among two high-risk groups: heavy smokers and persons with occupational exposure to asbestos. The design and findings of the study have been published elsewhere (9-11). Briefly, CARET was initiated with a pilot phase in 1985 and expanded 10-fold at six study centers throughout the United States (the "efficacy" study). CARET randomized 14,254 heavy smokers and 4,060 asbestos-exposed workers. Eligibility criteria for heavy smokers included being between ages 50 and 69 years and a current or former smoker (quit within the previous 6 years) with 20 pack-years of cigarette smoking history. Eligible asbestos-exposed participants were men ages 45 to 69 years, who were current or former cigarette smokers who quit within the previous 15 years. In addition, they had to have occupational exposure to asbestos beginning at least 15 years prior to recruitment into the trial and either 5 years of work in a high-risk trade or chest X-ray findings consistent with asbestos exposure. Subjects were randomized to receive a standard daily regimen of either 30 mg ß-carotene plus 25,000 IU of retinyl palmitate or placebo. In January 1996, the active intervention was terminated prematurely because the group receiving retinyl palmitate and ß-carotene had a 28% excess lung cancer incidence and 17% excess overall mortality rate compared with the group receiving a placebo.

Data Collected at Baseline and Follow-up
At baseline, information on demographic factors, general health, health history, smoking history, and usual diet was collected. Participants identified the age when they started smoking, any period(s) of time when they did not smoke cigarettes and their duration(s), and average number of cigarettes they smoked. Pack-years of smoking were calculated as average number of cigarettes smoked per day divided by 20 multiplied by the number of years smoked. To assess usual dietary intake over the preceding year, we used a 110-item semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire that was developed at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and is similar to the National Cancer Institute/Block Food Frequency Questionnaire (12).

Blood was collected from pilot participants every year and from efficacy participants at their first visit and every 2 years after randomization. Serum was separated by centrifugation and stored for a maximum of 2 weeks in brown glass freezer vials at –20°C prior to long-term storage at the –70°C at CARET Serum Bank (10).

Sources of initial reports of outcomes were received from participants or their next of kin at yearly or biannual contacts as well as from cancer registries, state boards of health, and the National Death Index. The CARET Internal End Points Committee reviewed all initial reports of lung cancer and obtained clinical records and pathology reports from the diagnosing physician/hospital. The committee used this information to determine the primary site, histology, date of histologic diagnosis, and relationship of the cancer to death if the patient had died (9).

Selection of Cases and Controls
In the present study, we selected 520 of the 836 confirmed lung cancer cases diagnosed through June 2000. To maximize the power to detect associations in important subgroups (i.e., women and those diagnosed at younger ages), we selected all women (n = 264) and all men ages <60 years at diagnosis (n = 84). About 30% of men over age 60 years (n = 172) were randomly selected after stratifying on 5-year age groups. One control subject without lung cancer was selected for each case from among those who were alive and being followed at the time of the case's diagnosis. The control subject was matched to the case for year of randomization, age at randomization (within 5-year age groups), gender, pilot or efficacy study, exposure cohort (heavy smoker or asbestos–exposed), and smoking status (current or former at baseline). Nine case-control pairs were omitted for the following reasons: insufficient blood sample available (n = 4), sample lost (n = 2), only a postdiagnosis blood sample available (n = 2), and missing information on smoking frequency or duration (n = 1). Furthermore, three pairs were concordant on all factors and were dropped from conditional logistic regression models, leaving 508 pairs. Participants with implausibly high or low energy intakes (<800 or >5,000 kcal/d for men and <600 or >4,000 kcal/d for women; n = 128; ref. 13) were excluded from the analyses on diet.

Serologic Testing
Serum collected at baseline or, for those without baseline serum available (n = 70), at the earliest time available prior to lung cancer diagnosis in the cases and a matched time in the controls was used to evaluate C. pneumoniae IgA and IgG antibody titers using the microimmunofluorescence test (14). Purified C. pneumoniae elementary bodies (strain AR39, Washington Research Foundation, Seattle, WA) were used as the antigen. Details of the test technique are described elsewhere (14). Only even fluorescence of the elementary bodies in the antigen dots was considered to be positive. After screening at a dilution of 1:16, the highest dilution demonstrating definite fluorescence was recorded as the titer (expressed as a reciprocal of the serum dilution). The antibody determinations of each case and matched control were tested simultaneously in the same titration series (batch) in a blinded fashion. By convention, C. pneumoniae titers (IgA or IgG) 16 were considered seropositive, which is consistent with the cutoff used in other studies (1, 2, 5, 6).

Statistical Analysis
We used conditional logistic regression, which takes into account the matched design, to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of lung cancer in relation to IgA and IgG antibody titers. The other characteristics listed in Table 1 were evaluated for confounding and were included in models if they changed the ß coefficient for dichotomous IgA by >10%. Ultimately, all models were adjusted for education (college graduate or not), body mass index (continuous), years smoked (log transformed), and cigarettes smoked per day (continuous). Although we were concerned that storage time could potentially affect antibody titers, because participants were matched on randomization year, they were also effectively matched on the time between blood draw and microimmunofluorescence test.

We used unconditional logistic regression to identify correlates of IgA seropositivity among controls (identified as the "correlates of IgA seropositivity study"). In these analyses, seropositivity was our outcome variable. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race, pilot or efficacy study, and time between blood draw and microimmunofluorescence test.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Case-Control Study
Table 1 gives distributions of various characteristics among cases and controls. Cases were matched to controls on 5-year age group, sex, exposure cohort, pilot or efficacy study, and smoking status at baseline and thus did not vary by these characteristics (Table 1). The median age of cases and controls was 59 years, and about half were women. Those who developed lung cancer were less likely to be college graduates and more likely to have been randomized to the intervention, to have a body mass index <25 kg/m², and to have a history of chronic bronchitis or emphysema. As expected, those who developed lung cancer had a heavier smoking history (cigarettes per day, years smoked, and pack-years). Cases tended to have a higher energy intake and percentage energy from fat but to consume fewer servings of fruits and vegetables compared with controls (data not shown). The most common histologic type was adenocarcinoma (26%) followed by squamous cell carcinoma (20%) and small cell carcinoma (18%); 51% of cancers arose in the upper lobe of the lung.

Table 2 provides the distributions of IgA and IgG antibody titers among cases and controls and their corresponding adjusted ORs and 95% CIs. Compared with controls, cases were more likely to have IgA titers 16 (55.4% versus 51.3%) and 256 (5.1% versus 2.5%). Those with antibody titers 16 had 1.2 times the risk of lung cancer (95% CI, 0.9-1.6) compared with those with lower titers. There was a significant trend (P = 0.007) of increasing ORs with increasing IgA titers primarily due to an OR of 2.8 (95% CI, 1.1-6.7) associated with titers 256. Because a history of chronic bronchitis or emphysema could be a confounder or in the causal pathway, we conducted analyses both with (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.7), and without adjustment for it (Table 2). For IgG, the proportions of cases and controls with titers 16 were similar (63.8% and 64.2%, respectively), although cases were more likely to have IgG titers 256 than controls (21.7% versus 16.1%; Table 2). To determine the association between high IgG titers and lung cancer risk, independent of IgA titers, we also conducted analyses adjusting for IgA titers. In these analyses, results were attenuated and there was no longer evidence for a stronger association with high titers (OR, 1.1 for IgG 256 versus IgG <16).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 4. Proportion of controls with C. pneumoniae IgA titers 16 and corresponding OR and 95% CI

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

In comparison, our results for IgA seropositivity were generally weaker and compatible with there being no association. As expected, we observed no association with IgG seropositivity. ORs were statistically significantly elevated for IgA titers 256, suggesting that higher titers may be a better predictor of lung cancer risk than lower antibody titers. However, because we did not design the study to investigate this categorization, it needs replication in other studies. Furthermore, it is unclear biologically how higher titers may be related to severity or chronicity of infection.

In analyses limited to controls, we did not observe any differences in IgA seropositivity by smoking behaviors, except perhaps time since quitting, contrary to previous study findings (16, 17). This may be due to homogeneity of study participants in terms of their smoking, misclassification of smoking or C. pneumoniae seropositivity, or because there truly is no association.

Of the three studies that investigated histology-specific results (2, 5, 6), one study reported a stronger association with squamous cell and small cell carcinomas combined (6), whereas the others did not observe a statistically significant difference by histologic type (2, 5). We observed a stronger association for squamous cell and to a lesser extent, for small cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas. Several studies have observed a stronger association between C. pneumoniae infection and lung cancer among those diagnosed at younger ages (<60 years; refs. 1, 5, 6); we found little support for that notion.

Prospective studies such as ours should minimize any influence of disease itself on titer levels, reduce selection bias, and generally include better adjustment of potential confounding factors. In case-control studies where blood was sampled after diagnosis (1, 3-5), it is possible that lung cancer caused an elevation in C. pneumoniae titers. It is therefore unclear whether lung cancer cases were more susceptible to chronic infection with C. pneumoniae or whether chronic infection contributed to an increased risk of lung cancer. Serum was collected before diagnosis in our study. When we successively excluded cases that had blood drawn 1 to 5 years before diagnosis, results remained the same, suggesting that C. pneumoniae infection preceded disease onset.

Another issue in case-control studies is the short survival of persons diagnosed with lung cancer. To the extent that C. pneumoniae infection is related to length of survival after lung cancer diagnosis, results of studies that exclude those who died shortly after diagnosis, or were too sick to participate, may be biased. However, we are aware of no data that suggest such a relationship.

Because both age and smoking are strongly associated with lung cancer and possibly positively associated with C. pneumoniae IgA and IgG titers (16, 17), they are potentially important confounders. Inadequate control for these factors could result in a bias away from the null. In several case-control studies that found particularly strong associations (3, 4), controls were more likely to be younger and former or never smokers than cases, and investigators did not control for any measures of smoking. In our study, confounding due to cigarette smoking was addressed both in the design phase by restricting the study to heavy smokers (see eligibility criteria in Materials and Methods) and by matching on smoking status at baseline, and in the analysis phase by adjusting for daily number of cigarettes smoked and years of smoking. However, because there was little association between cigarette smoking and IgA seropositivity in our study, there was likely little confounding due to cigarette smoking.

Definition of "chronic" infection varied in each of the studies. For example, one study used a combined measure of IgA 16 and immune complexes (6), whereas others used IgA 64 (4) and/or IgG 512 (1, 3). Furthermore, it was unclear if the criteria were chosen a priori or based on the data. Data-driven determination of cut points could result in a bias away from the null. Conversely, nondifferential misclassification of IgA antibody titers could result in a bias toward the null. We can use information on the reliability of C. pneumoniae antibodies to determine how misclassification of C. pneumoniae titers might attenuate relative risks. For example, if the true relative risk for the association between lung cancer and IgA titers 16 were 2.0, reliability of the magnitude observed in our reliability study ( = 0.39; ref. 18) would result in an attenuated relative risk of at most or 1.5 (19). Thus, because of nondifferential misclassification, our results may underestimate the true association. It is unlikely, however, that the present study would have more misclassification and consequently a greater degree of attenuation due to misclassification than other studies.

A relationship between C. pneumoniae infection and lung cancer is biologically plausible. Although it is not known how infection with C. pneumoniae might induce or lead to the progression of lung cancer, chronic inflammation may be involved. Agents that cause inflammation, such as infectious agents, may cause prolonged irritation, resulting in cell death and increased mitotic activity. The subsequent cell division that occurs during repair of the damaged tissue may increase the risk of cancer at the affected site (20). For example, multiple studies have linked chronic infection with Helicobacter pylori to an increased risk of gastric adenocarcinoma (21-23). C. pneumoniae may play a similar role in lung cancer development. C. pneumoniae stimulates the release of inflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis factor-, interleukin-1ß, and interleukin-8 (24). Chronic infection generally, and interleukin-8 specifically, may cause genetic damage. Interleukin-8 also acts as a promoter of tumor growth for human non-small cell lung carcinoma through its angiogenic properties. C. pneumoniae can impair or even block apoptosis of infected cells (25) by induction of interleukin-10 (26), resulting in chronic infection and an increased risk of malignant transformation of infected cells.

In summary, we found a more moderate overall association between lung cancer risk and elevated IgA titers than most previous studies. However, a key limitation of all such studies is the relatively modest reliability of the microimmunofluorescence test on which they are based (18) and the resulting conservative bias. Thus, to better understand the role of C. pneumoniae in lung cancer carcinogenesis, it is important that we identify measures of chronic C. pneumoniae infection that are valid and reliable as well as being inexpensive and minimally invasive to obtain. Due to the intracellular nature of C. pneumoniae (which makes it difficult to culture), the inaccessibility of lung tissue for sampling, and the lack of a gold standard for identification of chronic infection, development and evaluation of new measures and their role in lung cancer is challenging. Nevertheless, considering the public health importance of lung cancer, such efforts could be richly rewarded.

	Footnotes

 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 2/25/04; revised 4/20/04; accepted 4/26/04.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Kocazeybek B. Chronic Chlamydophila pneumoniae infection in lung cancer, a risk factor: a case-control study. J Med Microbiol 2003;52:721–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Anttila T, Koskela P, Leinonen M, et al. Chlamydia pneumoniae infection and the risk of female early-onset lung cancer. Int J Cancer 2003;107:681–2.[Medline]
3. Koyi H, Branden E, Gnarpe J, Gnarpe H, Steen B. An association between chronic infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae and lung cancer. A prospective 2-year study. APMIS 2001;109:572–80.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Koyi H, Branden E, Gnarpe J, Gnarpe H, Arnholm B, Hillerdal G. Chlamydia pneumoniae may be associated with lung cancer. Preliminary report on a seroepidemiological study. APMIS 1999;107:828–32.[Medline]
5. Jackson LA, Wang SP, Nazar-Stewart V, Grayston JT, Vaughan TL. Association of Chlamydia pneumoniae immunoglobulin A seropositivity and risk of lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2000;9:1263–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Laurila AL, Anttila T, Laara E, et al. Serological evidence of an association between Chlamydia pneumoniae infection and lung cancer. Int J Cancer 1997;74:31–4.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Mestecky J, McGhee JR. Immunoglobulin A (IgA): molecular and cellular interactions involved in IgA biosynthesis and immune response. Adv Immunol 1987;40:153–245.[Medline]
8. Saikku P, Leinonen M, Tenkanen L, et al. Chronic Chlamydia pneumoniae infection as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in the Helsinki Heart Study. Ann Intern Med 1992;116:273–8.
9. Omenn GS, Goodman G, Thornquist M, et al. Chemoprevention of lung cancer: the ß-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial (CARET) in high-risk smokers and asbestos-exposed workers. IARC Sci Publ 1996:67–85.
10. Thornquist MD, Omenn GS, Goodman GE, et al. Statistical design and monitoring of the Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial (CARET). Control Clin Trials 1993;14:308–24.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Omenn GS, Goodman GE, Thornquist MD, et al. Risk factors for lung cancer and for intervention effects in CARET, the ß-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:1550–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Block G, Woods M, Potosky A, Clifford C. Validation of a self-administered dimmet history questionnaire using multiple diet records. J Clin Epidemiol 1990;43:1327–35.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology. Monographs in epidemiology and biostatistics; 30. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
14. Wang S. The microimmunofluorescence test for Chlamydia pneumoniae infection: technique and interpretation. J Infect Dis 2000;181 Suppl 3:S421–5.[Medline]
15. Leffondre K, Abrahamowicz M, Siemiatycki J, Rachet B. Modeling smoking history: a comparison of different approaches. Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:813–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Karvonen M, Tuomilehto J, Pitkaniemi J, Naukkarinen A, Saikku P. Importance of smoking for Chlamydia pneumoniae seropositivity. Int J Epidemiol 1994;23:1315–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Hahn DL, Golubjatnikov R. Smoking is a potential confounder of the Chlamydia pneumoniae-coronary artery disease association. Arterioscler Thromb 1992;12:945–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Littman AJ, Jackson LA, White E, Thornquist M, Gaydos CA, Vaughan TL. Interlaboratory reliability of microimmunofluorescence test for measurement of Chlamydia pneumoniae-specific immunoglobulin A and G antibody titers. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2004;11:615–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Tavare CJ, Sobel EL, Gilles FH. Misclassification of a prognostic dichotomous variable: sample size and parameter estimate adjustment. Stat Med 1995;14:1307–14.[Medline]
20. Preston-Martin S, Pike MC, Ross RK, Jones PA, Henderson BE. Increased cell division as a cause of human cancer. Cancer Res 1990;50:7415–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Bjorkholm B, Falk P, Engstrand L, Nyren O. Helicobacter pylori: resurrection of the cancer link. J Intern Med 2003;253:102–19.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Sipponen P. Gastric cancer: pathogenesis, risks, and prevention. J Gastroenterol 2002;37 Suppl 13:39–44.[Medline]
23. Cassell GH. Infectious causes of chronic inflammatory diseases and cancer. Emerg Infect Dis 1998;4:475–87.[Medline]
24. Gaydos CA. Growth in vascular cells and cytokine production by Chlamydia pneumoniae. J Infect Dis 2000;181 Suppl 3:S473–8.[Medline]
25. Fan T, Lu H, Hu H, et al. Inhibition of apoptosis in Chlamydia-infected cells: blockade of mitochondrial cytochrome c release and caspase activation. J Exp Med 1998;187:487–96.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Geng Y, Shane RB, Berencsi K, et al. Chlamydia pneumoniae inhibits apoptosis in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells through induction of IL-10. J Immunol 2000;164:5522–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Fritz AG. International classification of diseases for oncology: ICD-O. Geneva: WHO; 2000.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Tezal, M. A. Sullivan, M. E. Reid, J. R. Marshall, A. Hyland, T. Loree, C. Lillis, L. Hauck, J. Wactawski-Wende, and F. A. Scannapieco Chronic Periodontitis and the Risk of Tongue Cancer Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, May 1, 2007; 133(5): 450 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Parimon, J. W. Chien, C. L. Bryson, M. B. McDonell, E. M. Udris, and D. H. Au Inhaled Corticosteroids and Risk of Lung Cancer among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2007; 175(7): 712 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Littman, L. A. Jackson, and T. L. Vaughan Chlamydia pneumoniae and Lung Cancer: Epidemiologic Evidence Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2005; 14(4): 773 - 778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Littman, A. J. Articles by Vaughan, T. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Littman, A. J. Articles by Vaughan, T. L.