This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lee, M. M. Articles by Hsing, A. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lee, M. M. Articles by Hsing, A. W.

Soy and Isoflavone Consumption in Relation to Prostate Cancer Risk in China¹

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0560 [M. M. L., J. S. C., M. W.]; Northern California Cancer Center, Union City, California 94587 [S. L. G.]; Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305 [S. L. G.]; Department of Epidemiology, Beijing Medical University, Beijing, China 10083 [R-T. W.]; and Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 [A. W. H.]

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
This case-control study in China evaluated the effect of soy food consumption and isoflavones (genistein and daidzein) on the risk of prostate cancer. One hundred and thirty-three cases and 265 age- and residential community-matched controls between the ages of 50 and 89 years were interviewed in person between 1989 and 1992. Usual consumption of soy foods and isoflavones was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire developed in China and a nutrient database developed and validated in Asian-American populations. The age- and total calorie-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of prostate cancer risk comparing the highest tertile of tofu intake to the lowest tertile was 0.58 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.35–0.96]. There were also statistically significant associations comparing the highest quartile of intake of soy foods (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28–0.95) and genistein (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29–0.97) with the lowest quartiles. There was also an indication of a reduced risk associated with intake of daidzein (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.31–1.04 for the highest versus lowest quartile). Our results indicate a reduced risk of prostate cancer associated with consumption of soy foods and isoflavones. These findings should be confirmed in longitudinal follow-up studies in populations with varying risk of prostate cancer.

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Prostate cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer among Chinese-American males, contributing to 16% of the overall cancer burden in this population (1, 2, 3) ; however, very little is known regarding the etiology of prostate cancer. The average annual incidence rate of prostate cancer between 1988 and 1992 among Chinese men in the United States was 15 times higher than that of their counterparts living in Shanghai and Tianjin (45.8 versus 3.2 per 100,000; Ref. 1 ). These observed differences in prostate cancer incidence led to the hypothesis that the Westernization of lifestyle and diet may play a role in prostate cancer etiology.

Recently, researchers have focused on the protective effect of phytoestrogens in the etiology of hormone-dependent cancers, including breast and prostate cancer, and some epidemiological studies have examined the relationship between soy and prostate cancer (4, 5, 6, 7) . This study examined the association between intake of soy-based foods and isoflavones and the risk of prostate cancer in a case-control study conducted in 12 cities in China.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The methods of the study have been published in detail elsewhere (8 , 9) . In brief, case patients were newly diagnosed with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer [International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 code 185] between 1989 and 1992 from 12 cities throughout China. Cases were identified through major teaching hospitals in these cities. For each index case, two control subjects matched to the case by 5-year age group were randomly selected from the registry roster of the residential community of the case by physical examination patient. Control subjects were screened for prostate cancer, and only those with negative results were invited to participate in the study. The overall response rate was 80% (79% for cases and 80% for controls). The final study sample for this report consisted of 133 case patients and 265 control subjects.

Information on demographic characteristics, marital and occupational history, weight and height, dietary habits, physical activity, medical history, and family history of cancer was ascertained from the subjects by face-to-face interviews. The reference period for assessing diet and other lifestyle factors was between 1980 and 1985. The development of the food frequency questionnaire has been described in detail elsewhere (9, 10, 11) .

Combined soy foods was defined as a summation of six food items: soy bean milk; tofu (bean curd); dried/fried bean curd; fermented beans; dry bean milk cream; and fermented bean milk. Daily consumption of all soy items (in grams) and genistein and daidzein (in milligram) was calculated using a nutrient database developed by colleagues (12) . The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the levels of these food items and nutrients between cases and controls. ORs³ and 95% CIs associated with each tertile of tofu and each quartile of combined soy foods, genistein, and daidzein adjusted for age and total calories were modeled by unconditional logistic regression (13) . We included a measure for total fiber in our initial models to assess the possible confounding effect of fruits and vegetables, but left it out in the final models because its inclusion did not change the magnitudes of the ORs for soy foods or isoflavones.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The distributions of age, educational, marital status, socioeconomic index, body mass index, and smoking habits were similar between cases and controls; however, cases were more likely to report ever using alcohol, history of benign prostatic hyperplasia, and prostatitis (Table 1) .

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

Several limitations may affect the results of our study. Misclassifications of soy intake may have occurred due to measurement error associated with the dietary instrument or to the reference period (1980–1985); however, such misclassification was likely nondifferential, which would have biased our results toward null. Differential recall bias is possible because cancer patients, regardless of any dietary changes made after the diagnosis, may recall differently from the controls; however, the information regarding soy foods and prostate cancer was not widespread among the general public in China, and it is unlikely that the case patients would have altered the amount of soy consumed after the cancer diagnosis. If we assumed that case patients had somehow learned that soy may slow the progression of prostate cancer and had increased the consumption of soy after diagnosis of cancer, our results would have been biased toward null. Longitudinal follow-up studies would help to clarify the effects of phytoestrogen on prostate cancer risk without the potential bias of the differential recall. Another limitation is that, depending on which nutrient database is used, the values of phytoestrogen calculated may be different. The nutrient values of the same food may be different in different databases due to the variability in laboratory techniques, food sources, growing methods, and so forth. Lastly, we examined the association between soy foods or isoflavones and the risk of prostate cancer without adjusting for all other possible nutrients; therefore, the reduced risk of prostate cancer may not be entirely attributable to soy foods or isoflavones.

Studies with well-quantified soy product or isoflavone consumption such as ours and the study by Kolonel et al. (6) show that the level of isoflavone is related to its association with reduced prostate cancer risk. If the risk-lowering effect of soy only occurs at a certain level, the studies of homogeneous populations with low levels of soy consumption would not have the capability to detect the protective effect. For example, the study by Strom et al. (7) , which comprised only Caucasian subjects (83 cases and 107 controls), showed a protective trend of genistein and daidzein against prostate cancer, although neither was statistically significant. Similarly, another study by Horn-Ross et al. (20) in non-Asian breast cancer patients (1326 cases and 1657 controls) found that phytoestrogens had little protective effect against breast cancer. In both studies of Western subjects, the mean daily levels of isoflavones (sum of genestein, daidzein formononetin, and biochanin A) were extremely low (<3 mg), even though both studies used recently developed phytoestrogen databases tailored to capture the phytoestrogen levels of the Western diet (12 , 21) . In contrast, a Japanese study reported a mean daily total isoflavone consumption of 47.2 mg (22) . Although our study only measured the mean daily levels of two major isoflavones (genestein and daidzein), the combined total of the two (76 mg) already far exceeded the total isoflavones in the studies with Western subjects. Future studies should include subjects with wide variation in the levels of soy consumption to capture the potential protective effect of soy or isoflavones.

In summary, our results suggested that consumption of soy foods is associated with reduced risk of prostate cancer among men in China. These findings should be confirmed in longitudinal follow-up studies in different populations. Concurrent evaluation of other nutrients is also needed to assess the independent contribution of soy foods to the reduced risk of prostate cancer. In addition to the epidemiological evidence, several biological mechanisms through which soy phytoestrogen reduces the risk of prostate cancer have been proposed, including inhibition of angiogenesis (18) , inhibition or stimulation of regulatory proteins in the cell cycle (23) , and inhibition of signal transduction pathway involving epidermal growth factor (24) . Future studies, especially prospective studies, are needed to confirm the role of isoflavones and the underlying mechanisms involved.

	Acknowledgments

 
We thank the United States-China Urological Research Group for support. Members include Dr. Leland W. K. Chung (Emory University), Dr. John D. McConnell (Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas), Dr. Gary Miller (University of Colorado), Dr. Andrew C. von Eschenbach (National Cancer Institute), Dr. Haiyen E. Zhau (Emory University), Dr. Hebert Lepor (New York University), Dr. Ellen Shapiro (New York University), Dr. Donald S. Coffey (Johns Hopkins University), Dr. Y. L. Kuo (Beijing Urology Institute), and Dr. Chieh-Ping Wu (Chinese Academy Medical School). We also thank Florence Lee and Christine Choy for assistance.

	Footnotes

 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

¹ Supported by the United States-China Urologic Research Group.

² To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, MU 420 West, Box 0560, San Francisco, CA 94143-0560. Phone: (415) 476-0743; Fax: (415) 476-6014; E-mail: mmlee{at}itsa.ucsf.edu

³ The abbreviations used are: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Received 11/25/02; revised 3/21/03; accepted 4/ 9/03.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Prehn A., Lin S., Clarke C., Packel L., Lum R., Lui S., Harper C., Lee M., Glaser S., West D. . Cancer Incidence in Chinese, Japanese, and Filipinos in the US and Asia, 1988–1992, Northern California Cancer Center Union City, CA 1999.
2. Hsing A. W., Tsao L., Devesa S. S. International trends and patterns in prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Int. J. Cancer, 85: 60-67, 2000.[Medline]
3. Hsing A. W., Devesa S. S. Trends and patterns of prostate cancer risk: what do they suggest?. Epidemiol. Rev., 23: 3-13, 2001.[Free Full Text]
4. Severson R. K., Nomura A. M., Grove J. S., Stemmermann G. N. A prospective study of demographics, diet, and prostate cancer among men of Japanese ancestry in Hawaii. Cancer Res., 49: 1857-1860, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Jacobsen B. K., Knutsen S. F., Fraser G. E. Does high soy milk intake reduce prostate cancer incidence? The Adventist Health Study. Cancer Causes Control, 9: 553-557, 1998.[Medline]
6. Kolonel L. N., Hankin J. H., Whittmore A. S., Wu A. H., Gallagher R. P., Wilkens L. R., John E. M., Howe G. R., Dreon D. M., West D. W., Paffenbarger R. S., Jr. Vegetables, fruits, legumes, and prostate cancer: a multiethnic case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 9: 795-804, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Strom S. S., Yamaura Y., Duphorne C. M., Spitz M. R., Babaian R. J., Pillow P. C., Hursting S. D. Phytoestrogen intake and prostate cancer: a case-control study using a new database. Nutr. Cancer, 33: 20-25, 1999.[Medline]
8. Hsing A. W., Wang R. T., Gu F. L., Lee M., Wang T., Leng T. J., Spitz M., Blot W. J. Vasectomy and prostate cancer risk in China. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 3: 285-288, 1994.[Abstract]
9. Lee M. M., Wang R., Hsing A. W., Gu F. L., Wang T., Spitz M. Case control study of diet and prostate cancer in China. Cancer Causes Control, 9: 545-552, 1998.[Medline]
10. Whittemore A. S., Wu-Williams A. H., Lee M., Zheng S., Gallagher R. P., Jiao D. A., Zhou L., Wang X., Chen K., Jung D., The C. Z., Ling C., Xu J. Y., Paffenbarger R. S., Jr., Henderson B. E. Diet, physical activity, and colorectal cancer among Chinese in North America and China. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 82: 915-926, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Wong R. T. A study of gastric cancer in Beijing. Chin. J. Epidemiol., 6: 23-28, 1992.
12. Horn-Ross P. L., Barnes S., Lee M., Coward L., Mandel J. E., Koo J., John E. M., Smith M. Assessing phytoestrogen exposure in epidemiologic studies; development of a database (United States). Cancer Causes Control, 11: 289-298, 2000.[Medline]
13. Hosmer D. W., Lemeshow S. . Applied Logistic Regression, John Wiley & Sons New York 1989.
14. Peterson G., Barnes S. Genistein and biochanin A inhibit the growth of human prostate cancer cells but not epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine autophosphorylation. Prostate, 22: 335-345, 1993.[Medline]
15. Evans B. A., Griffiths K., Morton M. S. Inhibition of 5 -reductase in genital skin fibriblasts and prostate tissue by dietary lignans and isoflavonoids. J. Endocrinol., 147: 295-302, 1995.[Abstract]
16. Aronson W. J., Tymchuk C. N., Elashoff R. M., McBride W. H., Maclean C., Wang H., Heber D. Decreased growth of human prostate LNCap tumors in SCID mice fed a low-fat, soy protein diet with isoflavones. Nutr. Cancer, 35: 130-136, 1999.[Medline]
17. Bylund A., Zhang J. X., Bergh A., Damber J. E., Widmark A., Johansson A., Adlercreutz H., Aman P., Shepherd M. J., Hallmans G. Rye bran and soy protein delay growth and increase apoptosis in human LNCap prostate adenocarcinoma in nude mice. Prostate, 42: 304-314, 2000.[Medline]
18. Zhou J. R., Gugger E. T., Tanaka T., Guo Y., Blackburn G. L., Clinton S. K. Soybeans phytochemicals inhibit the growth of transplantable human prostate carcinoma and tumor angiogenesis in mice. J. Nutr., 129: 1628-1635, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Mentor-Marcel R., Lamartiniere C. A., Eltoum I. E., Greenberg N. M., Elgavish A. Genistein in the diet reduces the incidence of poorly differentiated prostatic adenocarcinoma in transgenic mice (TRAMP). Cancer Res., 61: 6777-6782, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Horn-Ross P. L., John E. M., Lee M., Stewart S. L., Koo J., Sakoda L. C., Shiau A. C., Goldstein J., Davis P., Perez-Stable E. J. Phytoestrogen consumption and breast cancer risk in a multiethnic population. Am. J. Epidemiol., 154: 434-441, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Pillow P. C., Duphorne C. M., Chang A., Contois J. H., Strom S. S., Spitz M. R., Hursting S. D. Development of a database for assessing dietary phytoestrogen intake. Nutr. Cancer, 33: 3-19, 1999.[Medline]
22. Arai Y., Watanabe S., Kimira M., Shimoi K., Mochizuki R., Kinae N. Dietary intakes of flavonols, flavones, and isoflavones by Japanese women and the inverse correlation between quercetin intake and plasma LDL cholesterol concentration. J. Nutr., 130: 2243-2250, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Davis J. N., Singh B., Bhuiyan M., Sarkar F. H. Genistein-induced upregulation of p21WAF1, downregulation of cyclin B, and induction of apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. Nutr. Cancer, 32: 123-131, 1998.[Medline]
24. Dalu A., Haskell J. F., Coward L., Lamartiniere C. A. Genestein, a component of soy, inhibits the expression of the EGF, and ErbB2/Neu receptors in the rat dorsolateral prostate. Prostate, 37: 36-43, 1998.[Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. N. Chau, L. H. El Touny, S. Jagadeesh, and P. P. Banerjee Physiologically achievable concentrations of genistein enhance telomerase activity in prostate cancer cells via the activation of STAT3 Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2007; 28(11): 2282 - 2290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. A. Kirsh, U. Peters, S. T. Mayne, A. F. Subar, N. Chatterjee, C. C. Johnson, and R. B. Hayes Prospective Study of Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Risk of Prostate Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, August 1, 2007; 99(15): 1200 - 1209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Kurahashi, M. Iwasaki, S. Sasazuki, T. Otani, M. Inoue, S. Tsugane, and Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective Study Soy Product and Isoflavone Consumption in Relation to Prostate Cancer in Japanese Men Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2007; 16(3): 538 - 545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Raschke, I. R. Rowland, P. J. Magee, and B. L. Pool-Zobel Genistein protects prostate cells against hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA damage and induces expression of genes involved in the defence against oxidative stress Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2006; 27(11): 2322 - 2330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Chan, P. H. Gann, and E. L. Giovannucci Role of Diet in Prostate Cancer Development and Progression J. Clin. Oncol., November 10, 2005; 23(32): 8152 - 8160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Hedlund, P. D. Maroni, P. G. Ferucci, R. Dayton, S. Barnes, K. Jones, R. Moore, L. G. Ogden, K. Wahala, H. M. Sackett, et al. Long-Term Dietary Habits Affect Soy Isoflavone Metabolism and Accumulation in Prostatic Fluid in Caucasian Men J. Nutr., June 1, 2005; 135(6): 1400 - 1406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Bonham, J. Posakony, I. Coleman, B. Montgomery, J. Simon, and P. S. Nelson Characterization of Chemical Constituents in Scutellaria baicalensis with Antiandrogenic and Growth-Inhibitory Activities toward Prostate Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2005; 11(10): 3905 - 3914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. W. Suttie, G. E. Dinse, A. Nyska, G. J. Moser, T. L. Goldsworthy, and R. R. Maronpot An Investigation of the Effects of Late-Onset Dietary Restriction on Prostate Cancer Development in the TRAMP Mouse Toxicol Pathol, April 1, 2005; 33(3): 386 - 397. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. L. Dillingham, B. L. McVeigh, J. W. Lampe, and A. M. Duncan Soy Protein Isolates of Varying Isoflavone Content Exert Minor Effects on Serum Reproductive Hormones in Healthy Young Men J. Nutr., March 1, 2005; 135(3): 584 - 591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. F. McCarty Targeting Multiple Signaling Pathways as a Strategy for Managing Prostate Cancer: Multifocal Signal Modulation Therapy Integr Cancer Ther, December 1, 2004; 3(4): 349 - 380. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. M.Y. Nomura, J. H. Hankin, J. Lee, and G. N. Stemmermann Cohort Study of Tofu Intake and Prostate Cancer: No Apparent Association Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2004; 13(12): 2277 - 2279. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. H. Sarkar and Y. Li Indole-3-Carbinol and Prostate Cancer J. Nutr., December 1, 2004; 134(12): 3493S - 3498S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Bemis, J. L. Capodice, M. Desai, R. Buttyan, and A. E. Katz A Concentrated Aglycone Isoflavone Preparation (GCP) That Demonstrates Potent Anti-Prostate Cancer Activity In vitro and In vivo Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2004; 10(15): 5282 - 5292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lee, M. M. Articles by Hsing, A. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lee, M. M. Articles by Hsing, A. W.