
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Short Communication |
1 Departments of Epidemiology, 2 Biostatistics, and 3 Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; 4 Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Womens Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; 5 Harvard Center for Cancer Prevention, Boston, Massachusetts; and 6 Division of Molecular Medicine, City of Hope National Medical Center, Beckman Research Center, Duarte, California
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 test). There was no evidence that women heterozygous (multivariate odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.731.27) or homozygous (multivariate odds ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.322.14) for rare alleles were at an increased risk of breast cancer or that a positive gene-dose effect existed. The results did not vary by menopausal status. Although as a group the rare alleles were not associated with breast cancer, one class of rare alleles between the common alleles of a3 and a4 was associated with a significantly increased risk. These results suggest that there is no overall association between rare alleles of the HRAS1 VNTR and breast cancer. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A meta-analysis of eight studies examining the relationship between this HRAS1 VNTR and breast cancer reported a >2-fold increased risk among rare allele carriers (5) . Based upon this analysis of 694 cases and 937 controls, this polymorphism could explain up to 9.2% of breast cancers, more than BRCA1 or BRCA2 (5 , 6) . However, these earlier studies have suffered from a number of limitations, including technical genotyping problems and the potential for selection bias, warranting additional investigations of this minisatellite and breast cancer (7) . A more recent population-based case-control study, using a similar PCR-based genotyping technique, reported no association between rare alleles and breast cancer among women under the age of 40 years (8) .
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
HRAS1 genotyping was conducted using PCR/automated sequencer-based methods described by Ding et al. (3) . Four common alleles have been previously identified as a1, a2, a3, and a4, having repeats of 30, 46, 68, and 84 units, respectively. The genotyping method used in this study is able to accurately assess repeat lengths to a single unit. Previous methods, relying on restriction enzyme digestion and Southern blotting, are unable to resolve allele lengths with the same accuracy (10) . It is unlikely that older methods could have resolved alleles especially at higher molecular weights, primarily those close in size to the common a3 and a4 alleles. To maintain exposure classifications, which are consistent with and comparable with the previous body of literature, we have categorized alleles that are one repeat unit greater or smaller than the a3 and a4 alleles as common alleles of these two classes, respectively.
Original classification schemes of the HRAS1 alleles combined all rare alleles together, treating them as one homogeneous group, which may not necessarily be the case. The group of rare alleles encompasses a diverse collection of alleles with a wide range of repeat lengths (2696 repeat units). Recent studies have demonstrated that rare alleles of the HRAS1 VNTRs are derived from the nearest common allele (3
, 11
, 12)
and that there is sequence variation with respect to the repeat units (3)
. To assess if these rare alleles confer different risks depending on its progenitor, we have also categorized rare alleles as unique classes based upon their lengths in relation to the common alleles. Table 1
indicates the categories of allele groups and the repeat lengths they encompass.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 goodness of fit, P = 0.89). The frequency of rare alleles among the controls is comparable with the reported frequency (13%) using the same genotyping method in a United States Caucasian population (13)
.
Table 1
describes the risk of breast cancer by HRAS1 allele classes and genotypes (raw data are available on line).7
Overall, the rare alleles were not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (multivariate odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.751.21). There was evidence that the rare allele class between common alleles a3 and a4 was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (multivariate odds ratio, 3.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.148.21). There was no evidence that women heterozygous or homozygous for rare alleles were at an increased risk of breast cancer or that a positive gene-dose effect existed (Table 1)
. The results did not vary by menopausal status. Analyses limited to cases with invasive breast cancer (n = 596) also showed no association between rare alleles and breast cancer (multivariate odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.661.13).
Prior studies have reported that allele frequencies of HRAS1 vary by race and ethnicity (14 , 15) . In this case-control study, 7 women self-reported themselves as African American, 2 as Hispanic, and 2 as Asian with rare allele frequencies of 14.3, 75, and 0%, respectively. Analyses excluding these women did not change the interpretation of the results.
We evaluated the relationship between HRAS1 rare alleles and breast cancer according to established risk factors. There was no significant interaction between rare alleles and body mass index (P = 0.71), parity (P = 0.54), age at first birth (P = 0.40), age at menarche (P = 0.10), age at menopause (P = 0.36), family history of breast cancer (P = 0.59), postmenopausal hormone use (P = 0.11), or benign breast disease (P = 0.73).
It has been suggested that HRAS1 rare alleles may be associated with hormone receptor negativity, primarily among black and younger women (14) . In case-only analyses, we did not find an association between HRAS1 rare alleles and hormone receptor status (data are available on line); in fact, rare alleles were nonsignificantly associated with hormone receptor positivity in premenopausal women.7
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent studies using PCR with polyacrylamide gel methods have been able to resolve alleles to a single repeat unit. Studies using this genotyping method have estimated the frequency of rare alleles among controls to be
12%, nearly two to three times greater than original studies had indicated (8
, 13)
. Earlier studies, relying on Southern blot methods and visual sizing of alleles, were unable to resolve alleles as definitively as the newer automated methods. Firgaira et al. (8)
used similar genotyping methods to the ones used in this study and reported no association of rare alleles with premenopausal breast cancer. Also, a study of rare HRAS1 allele sharing in siblings with breast cancer that uses PCR/acrylamide typing methods shows no evidence of linkage of the HRAS1 locus to breast cancer risk.8
The likely misclassification of alleles in earlier studies may explain the discrepancy in study results between those using newer genotyping techniques and earlier studies. The general lack of evidence for incident breast cancer risk in the present study may also be due to a potential bias of case ascertainment in previous studies with prevalent cases, if rare allele carrier status was associated with longer survival. Alternatively, given that all prevalence studies were conducted at tertiary academic medical centers, rare alleles may be associated with later stage and/or higher grade cancers. Whatever the basis for this discrepancy, however, our results indicate that rare HRAS1 alleles will not serve reliably as a genetic marker for incident breast cancer risk.
| Footnotes |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Requests for reprints: Rulla M. Tamimi, Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Womens Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 181 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115. Phone: (617) 525-0862; Fax: (617) 525-2008; E-mail: rulla.tamimi{at}channing.harvard.edu.
7 Internet address: http://www.channing.harvard.edu/nhs/pub.html#hras2003. ![]()
8 Unpublished data from Dr. Theodore G. Krontiris. ![]()
Received 5/ 1/03; revised 8/ 4/03; accepted 8/ 7/03.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B family of transcriptional regulatory proteins bind the HRAS1 minisatellite DNA sequence. Nucleic Acids Res., 20: 2427-2434, 1992.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. P. A. Ioannidis Common genetic variants for breast cancer: 32 largely refuted candidates and larger prospects. J Natl Cancer Inst, October 4, 2006; 98(19): 1350 - 1353. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Fletcher, L. Gibson, N. Johnson, D. R. Altmann, J. M.P. Holly, A. Ashworth, J. Peto, and I. d. S. Silva Polymorphisms and Circulating Levels in the Insulin-Like Growth Factor System and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2005; 14(1): 2 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |