| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cancer Research United Kingdom Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6HE, United Kingdom [N. E. A., P. N. A., G. K. D., T. J. K.], and International Agency for Research on Cancer, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France [R. K., S. R.]
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
IGF-I and its main binding proteins are known to be sensitive to energy balance and other nutritional factors. Severe energy and protein restriction substantially reduces serum IGF-I concentration in both animals and humans (5) and may be one mechanism through which energy restriction reduces tumor growth (6) . In particular, restriction of protein rich in essential amino acids substantially reduces IGF-I production in vitro (7) and in vivo (8) , suggesting that certain essential amino acids are required to maximize IGF-I production. Independently of the effects of energy and protein restriction, zinc deficiency has also been associated with reduced IGF-I levels in both animals (9, 10, 11, 12) and humans and which are normalized after zinc supplementation (13, 14, 15) .
The effects of habitual diet on serum concentrations of IGF-I and its main binding proteins have not been studied in detail (16, 17, 18) . We reported previously that vegan men had a significant 9% lower serum IGF-I concentration compared with meat-eaters and lacto-ovo-vegetarians (19) , suggesting that nutritional factors specific to a plant-based diet may reduce IGF-I levels. The aim of this study is to examine the role of diet in relation to circulating levels of IGF-I among 292 women meat-eaters, vegetarians, and vegans. The associations between dietary intake and circulating levels of its three main binding proteins (IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2, and IGFBP-3) as well as C-peptide, a marker of pancreatic insulin secretion, and SHBG are also examined. In particular, we wanted to examine the hypotheses that high intakes of energy, protein rich in essential amino acids, and zinc are associated with high levels of IGF-I.
There has been some speculation that cows milk, which naturally contains bovine IGF-I and is identical to human IGF-I, may increase circulating IGF-I levels (20) and thus may affect cancer risk (21) . Indeed, two dietary intervention studies have found a dairy milk supplement to cause a 10% increase in serum IGF-I levels among adults (22) and children (23) . A subsidiary aim of this study was, therefore, to examine whether increasing dairy milk consumption is associated with increasing IGF-I levels.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
20 years and living in the United Kingdom were recruited into the Oxford component of EPIC (24)
. Participants were recruited through collaborating general practitioners, vegetarian and vegan societies, health food magazines, and from friends and relatives of the participants. All participants completed a questionnaire that included details of age, anthropometric, smoking, and other lifestyle factors as well as a detailed semiquantitative FFQ.
A 30-ml nonfasting blood sample was obtained from
30% of volunteers, on average 4 months after completion of the questionnaire. Whole blood was sent through the mail to the laboratory at ambient temperature, where it was immediately processed and stored in 0.5-ml aliquots of serum, plasma, erythrocytes, and buffy coat, using liquid sodium citrate as the anticoagulant for the plasma, erythrocytes, and buffy coat fractions. Samples were temporarily stored at -80°C for between 1 and 5 months until transportation to liquid nitrogen tanks, where they were stored at -196°C until analysis. All dates of blood sample and questionnaire processing, time of day at venipuncture, time since last meal at venipuncture, and medication taken on day of venipuncture were recorded.
This study includes a sample of 292 women recruited into EPIC-Oxford during 1994 and 1997 and comprises roughly equal numbers of women in each of five 10-year age groups from ages 20 to 70 years. To maximize the variation in nutrient intake, equal numbers of meat-eaters, vegetarians, and vegans were selected; vegetarians were defined as those who did not eat meat or fish but did consume dairy products and/or eggs, and vegans were defined as those who did not eat any animal products. Subjects were excluded if they had a self-reported history of cancer or diabetes or were taking oral contraception or hormone replacement therapy at the time of recruitment. Women who were pregnant at the time of questionnaire or blood collection were also excluded. In the FFQ, subjects were asked to state how frequently they ate each of a range of foods over the past year based on nine frequency categories, ranging from never or less than once a month to six or more times a day. These questions covered 130 foods and beverages and also allowed subjects to add food products that were not specified on the questionnaire. Data on milk intake were derived from questions on the FFQ regarding the type (full cream, semi-skimmed, skimmed, Channel Islands, dried milk, soya, and none) and quantity of milk consumed/day (none,
pint,
pint,
pint, 1 pint, and >1 pint).
Estimated daily nutrient intakes were calculated by multiplying the nutrient content of each food of a specific portion size by the frequency of consumption as stated on the FFQ (25) . Average portion sizes were based on those designated by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (26) . A previous validation study found that nutrient intakes estimated from the FFQ were moderately correlated with estimates from 16-day weighed records, with correlations of 0.52 and 0.43 for energy and protein intake, respectively (27) . Information on vitamin or other nutritional supplement usage was obtained either from forms completed on the day of venipuncture or, if this was unavailable, from the dietary questionnaire. The sum of dietary and supplement intake was then used to estimate total dietary zinc intake.
To examine the association between proteins high in essential amino acids and hormone levels, protein intake was divided into animal protein (that derived from meat, fish, dairy, egg and mixed animal, and plant sources), soya protein and other plant protein. Proteins derived from animal sources contain relatively higher amounts of essential amino acids than most plant sources, whereas soya contains a substantially higher quantity than other common plant proteins and is thus an important source of essential amino acids among vegans (28) . The sum of animal plus soya protein was therefore used as an index of protein high in essential amino acids.
Serum aliquots for each subject were sent to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (Lyon, France) for analysis. Each assay batch included equal numbers of meat-eaters, vegetarians, and vegans selected at random and included two quality control samples; all measurements were carried out blinded to the subjects dietary group. Immunoassays were used to measure all peptide hormone concentrations (Diagnostic System Laboratory, Webster, TX), and the protocol for the IGF-I assay included an acid-ethanol extraction step to release IGF-I from its binding proteins. Detection limits for IGF-I, IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2, IGFBP-3, and C-peptide measurements were 0.004 nmol/liter, 0.013 nmol/liter, 1.6 nmol/liter, 1.4 nmol/liter, and 0.04 nmol/liter, respectively. Mean intra-and inter-batch coefficients of variation were 6.3 and 13.4%, respectively, for IGF-I, 3.8 and 16% for IGFBP-1, 8.2 and 16.8% for IGFBP-2, 12.9 and 11.4% for IGFBP-3, 7.2 and 18.3% for C-peptide, and 9.7 and 15.4% for SHBG.
Statistical Analysis.
Serum concentrations of IGF-I, IGFBP-3, IGF-I:IGFBP-3 ratio, IGFBP-1, and SHBG were natural logarithmically transformed, and IGFBP-2 and C-peptide were square root transformed to approximate normal distributions. The associations between diet group and serum peptides were analyzed using ANOVA, and the mean concentrations and their corresponding 95% CIs are presented as back-transformed values. All multivariate analyses presented here are adjusted for age (2024, 2529, 3034, 3539, 4044, 4549, 5054, 5559, 6064 and 6570) and for variables associated with blood collection and analysis: time of day at venipuncture (<09.30, 09.3010.44, 10.4513.29, and 13.30+); time since last meal at venipuncture (<1.15, 1.151.59, 2.003.29, 3.30+ h); days between venipuncture and blood processing (1, 2, 3, and 4+ days); assay batch (1, 2, 3, and 4). Where appropriate, additional adjustment for quartiles of BMI (<20.4, 20.422.0, 22.124.1, 24.2+ kg/m2) was made; inclusion of other lifestyle and reproductive factors did not alter the models for any analytes and were not included in the final analysis. All Ps refer to tests of heterogeneity between the group means, using the F statistic from the ANOVA table, unless otherwise stated. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, except in the analysis of nutrients and hormone concentrations, and all significance tests were two-sided.
Nutrients were natural logarithmically transformed and adjusted for energy intake using the method described by Willett and Stampfer (29) . Briefly, each nutrient was entered as the dependent variable in a regression model, with total energy intake as the independent variable. The residuals from this model were then added to the expected nutrient value for the mean level of energy intake in the sample to arrive at an adjusted nutrient intake. All energy-adjusted nutrients were then subsequently added to the model as continuous variables and were analyzed using Pearsons partial correlation coefficients. All models were additionally adjusted for the natural logarithm of total energy intake; no adjustment was made for diet group. Separate analyses for each dietary variable were conducted because of the intercorrelation of the nutrient variables and because of the multiplicity of comparisons; a P < 0.01 was considered statistically significant. To examine the extent to which each nutrient intake explained the differences in hormone concentration between the diet groups, each nutrient was included in the model as a categorical variable, categorized according to its quartile distribution, together with the natural logarithm of total energy intake. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 7.0 (30) .
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
41.5 g/day) compared with the lowest quartile (<16.2 g/day; test for linear trend; P = 0.001). In contrast, nonsoya plant protein, a marker of protein low in essential amino acids, was negatively correlated with IGF-I (r = -0.17; P = 0.006) and positively correlated with IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 (r = 0.20; P = 0.001 for both IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2). Although soya protein was not correlated with IGF-I concentration in the population as a whole (r = -0.04), soya protein intake was significantly associated with serum IGF-I concentration among vegan women (r = 0.29; P = 0.016).
|
9.78 mg/day) compared with the lowest quartile (<7.24 mg/day; test for linear trend; P = 0.016). Zinc intake was not associated with IGFBP-2 or IGFBP-3 levels. Because IGF-I was highly correlated with IGFBP-3 (Pearsons correlation coefficient, r = 0.56) and IGF-I:IGFBP-3 (Pearsons correlation coefficient, r = 0.79), the IGF-I:IGFBP-3 molar ratio showed similar associations to that of total IGF-I, being significantly positively correlated with animal protein and animal plus soya protein and significantly negatively correlated with nonsoya plant protein (data not shown). No nutrients were significantly associated with IGFBP-3, C-peptide, or SHBG concentrations.
We then examined which of the nutrients that were significantly correlated with IGF-I and IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 concentrations might account for the differences in peptide hormones observed between the diet groups (Table 5)
. For IGF-I, adjustment for animal plus soya protein reduced the range of mean adjusted IGF-I levels between meat-eaters and vegans by 46%, and the differences between diet groups were no longer statistically significant (test for heterogeneity; P = 0.325). Adjustment for nonsoya plant protein reduced the differences between meat-eaters and vegans by 22%, although the differences between diet groups remained statistically significant (test for heterogeneity; P = 0.036). Adjustment for saturated fat or nonstarch polysaccharides did not appreciably alter the differences in IGF-I concentration between the diet groups.
For IGFBP-1, individual adjustments for animal plus soya protein, nonsoya plant protein, saturated fat, and nonstarch polysaccharides were all associated with a reduction in differences in mean values, and the differences between the diet groups were no longer significant (Table 5)
. Saturated fat intake was the nutrient most strongly associated with IGFBP-1 and largely eliminated the difference in mean IGFBP-1 concentration between meat-eaters and vegans, with vegetarians having the lowest values (test for heterogeneity between the diet groups; P = 0.522). Zinc intake did not appreciably alter the differences in IGFBP-I concentration between the diet groups.
The effect of nutrient intake on IGFBP-2 was similar to that observed for IGF-I. Individual adjustment for animal plus soya protein and nonsoya plant protein reduced the differences in IGFBP-2 concentration between meat-eaters and vegans by 86% and 16%, respectively, and the differences between diet groups were no longer significant (tests for heterogeneity; P = 0.600 and 0.154 for animal plus soya protein and nonsoya plant protein, respectively). Adjustment for saturated fat and nonstarch polysaccharides made little difference to the mean IGFBP-2 concentration in each diet group.
Milk Intake and IGF-I Concentration.
Increasing dairy milk intake was not significantly associated with increasing serum IGF-I concentration in meat-eaters or vegetarians (Table 6)
or among both groups combined (data not shown). However, vegan women who consumed
pint or more of soya milk/day had a significant 28% higher IGF-I concentration than vegan women who did not drink soya milk.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The main finding of this study is that total IGF-I levels were significantly 13% lower in vegan women compared with meat-eaters and vegetarians, a finding very similar to that reported in men from this cohort (19)
. Perhaps of equal importance is the finding that IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 concentrations (not measured among men) were
40% higher in vegan women than in meat-eaters and vegetarians. Although the relationship between IGF-I and its binding proteins is not completely understood, it is thought that an increase in IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 concentrations may lead to an increased binding of IGF-I, thus reducing the proportion of IGF-I that is available to enter tissues (33)
.
Overall, these data support the hypothesis that nutritional factors specific to a vegan diet may reduce circulating levels of total and bioavailable IGF-I. Furthermore, these associations do not appear to be because of differences in body weight or other lifestyle characteristics between the diet groups. However, it is difficult to identify which nutrients are of importance because of the high correlations between nutrient intakes and dietary group. As expected, nutrient intakes characteristic of a vegan diet such as a low intake of saturated fat and a high intake of nonstarch polysaccharides and nonsoya plant protein were also associated with a low IGF-I and a high IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 concentration. Nevertheless, there are several known mechanisms through which nutritional components of a vegan diet may reduce IGF-I and increase IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2, the most established of which is the effect of essential amino acid restriction. Vegan diets tends to be low in certain essential amino acids, and dietary restriction of one or more essential amino acids has been shown to reduce IGF-I and increase IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 production in animal (8 , 34) and human feeding studies (35 , 36) . This may be attributable to an indirect effect of protein restriction in reducing growth hormone secretion and, hence, reducing IGF-I and increasing IGFBP-2 production (37) or a more direct effect of amino acid restriction in increasing IGFBP-1 production in hepatocytes (34 , 38) .
Indeed, intake of animal plus soya protein, used as an index of protein high in essential amino acids across all diet groups, was moderately positively correlated with IGF-I and negatively correlated with IGFBP-2 and, to a lesser extent, IGFBP-1. Conversely, a high intake of nonsoya plant protein, which is relatively low in essential amino acids, was moderately negatively correlated with IGF-I and positively correlated with IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2. Furthermore, adjustment for either animal plus soya protein or nonsoya plant protein intake substantially reduced the differences in IGFBP-2 and, to a lesser extent, IGF-I and IGFBP-1 between the diet groups. Finally, the observation that increasing soya milk intake among vegans was associated with an increasing IGF-I concentration further suggests that essential amino acid intake may be an important determinant of IGF-I levels in vegans.
Another mechanism through which a vegan diet may influence IGFBP-1 levels is via an enhanced insulin sensitivity. A diet low in saturated fat and high in dietary fiber and complex carbohydrates may reduce insulin secretion, both directly by reducing the postprandial glycaemic response (39 , 40) , and indirectly by reducing adiposity (41) , causing a large increase in the production of IGFBP-1 within the liver (42) . Low intakes of saturated fat and nonstarch polysaccharides were each significantly correlated with IGFBP-1 concentration (r = -0.22 and -0.21, respectively) and indeed, saturated fat appeared to explain some of the observed difference in IGFBP-1 concentration between the diet groups. However, C-peptide concentration, used as a marker of insulin secretion, was similar among the diet groups, and additional adjustment for BMI had no effect on the association between diet group and IGFBP-1 concentration. It therefore remains unclear whether the differences in IGFBP-1 between the diet groups are attributable to an effect of essential amino acids or to differences in insulin sensitivity.
Previous data on the associations between dietary intake and IGF-I levels are sparse. Consistent with our data, other cross-sectional studies have also found no association between total protein intake and serum age-adjusted IGF-I levels in men (17 , 18) or women (16) . However, these studies have not investigated the effects of different types of protein intake on serum IGF-I and its main binding proteins.
Although it is well established that severe dietary restriction to 5070% of energy requirements reduces circulating IGF-I concentration (43 , 44) , we and others have found no evidence that increasing energy intake, at least in the normal range, is associated with higher IGF-I levels (45) . We also found no evidence that zinc intake is positively associated with IGF-I concentration, despite the wide range of intake. This is in contrast with a cross-sectional study of 119 United States postmenopausal women that found zinc intake to be the strongest nutritional determinant of IGF-I levels, with a correlation coefficient of 0.30 (16) . We did find that zinc intake was positively associated with IGFBP-1 concentration, although it did not explain the differences in IGFBP-1 levels between the diet groups. As this was not an a priori hypothesis and there is no known mechanism through which zinc might stimulate IGFBP-1 production independent of that of IGF-I or the other IGFBPs, this finding should be interpreted with caution and may be because of chance.
We found no evidence to suggest that increasing dairy milk intake is associated with increasing IGF-I levels among meat-eaters and vegetarians. This is in contrast with other studies in which milk intake has been associated with a significant increase in circulating IGF-I levels among healthy middle-aged men and women (22 , 46) . However, there may have been insufficient heterogeneity in milk intake among the milk consumers to detect a significant association.
In summary, these results suggest that total IGF-I concentration is lower among women who adopt a vegan diet. In addition, IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 concentrations are substantially higher in vegan women compared with meat-eaters and vegetarians, suggesting that the amount of bioavailable IGF-I may be lower in vegan women. The nutritional characteristics of the vegan diet that account for these differences are not clear but may be related to vegans lower intake of protein high in essential amino acids. These results suggest that even when total protein intake is not notably low, a low intake of essential amino acids, as typically found in a plant-based diet, may be sufficient to reduce serum IGF-I and increase serum IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 levels. Although these effects are relatively small, they could be of physiological importance as a relatively high circulating IGF-I concentration has been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women (2 , 3) . There are, as yet, very limited data on cancer rates among vegan women (47) and work is needed to investigate whether individuals who follow such a diet may be at lower risk of breast cancer. However, the ecological observation that breast cancer incidence is lower in Asian countries where people follow a predominately plant-based diet lends support to the hypothesis that a plant-based diet may be associated with a lower risk of cancer via its effect on IGF-I availability.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This study was supported by Cancer Research United Kingdom and by the Europe against Cancer Program of the Commission of the European Communities. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Cancer Research United Kingdom Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Gibson Building, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-0-1865-311933; Fax: 44-0-1865-310545; E-mail: naomi.allen{at}cancer.org.uk ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: IGF-I, insulin-like growth factor I; IGFBP, IGF-binding protein; SHBG, sex hormone-binding globulin; EPIC, European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition; FFQ, food-frequency questionnaire; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index. ![]()
4 N. E. Allen, P. N. Appleby, R. Kaaks, S. Rinaldi, G. K. Davey, and T. J. Key. The lifestyle determinants of serum insulin-like growth-factor I (IGF-I) and its main binding proteins in British women, submitted for publication. ![]()
Received 2/ 4/02; revised 5/22/02; accepted 7/ 4/02.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. L Crowe, T. J Key, P. N Appleby, R. C Travis, K. Overvad, M. U Jakobsen, N. F Johnsen, A. Tjonneland, J. Linseisen, S. Rohrmann, et al. Dietary fat intake and risk of prostate cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2008; 87(5): 1405 - 1413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Fontana, S. Klein, and J. O Holloszy Long-term low-protein, low-calorie diet and endurance exercise modulate metabolic factors associated with cancer risk Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2006; 84(6): 1456 - 1462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Tran, C. Diorio, S. Berube, M. Pollak, and J. Brisson Relation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I and IGF-binding protein 3 concentrations with intakes of fruit, vegetables, and antioxidants Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2006; 84(6): 1518 - 1526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. McCarty and K. I. Block Toward a core nutraceutical program for cancer management. Integr Cancer Ther, June 1, 2006; 5(2): 150 - 171. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E Morley, D. R Thomas, and M.-M. G Wilson Cachexia: pathophysiology and clinical relevance. Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2006; 83(4): 735 - 743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C Larsson, K. Wolk, K. Brismar, and A. Wolk Association of diet with serum insulin-like growth factor I in middle-aged and elderly men Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2005; 81(5): 1163 - 1167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sebastian Isoflavones, protein, and bone Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2005; 81(4): 733 - 735. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Voskuil, A. Vrieling, L. J. van't Veer, E. Kampman, and M. A. Rookus The Insulin-like Growth Factor System in Cancer Prevention: Potential of Dietary Intervention Strategies Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2005; 14(1): 195 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. S. Rogers, D. Gunnell, P. M. Emmett, L. R. Glynn, D. B. Dunger, J. M. Holly, and and ALSPAC Study Team Cross-Sectional Associations of Diet and Insulin-Like Growth Factor Levels in 7- to 8-Year-Old Children Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2005; 14(1): 204 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. Nielsen, A. Olsen, J. Christensen, K. Overvad, and A. Tjonneland Dietary Carbohydrate Intake Is Not Associated with the Breast Cancer Incidence Rate Ratio in Postmenopausal Danish Women J. Nutr., January 1, 2005; 135(1): 124 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. McCarty Targeting Multiple Signaling Pathways as a Strategy for Managing Prostate Cancer: Multifocal Signal Modulation Therapy Integr Cancer Ther, December 1, 2004; 3(4): 349 - 380. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Hoppe, T. Rovenna Udam, L. Lauritzen, C. Molgaard, A. Juul, and K. Fleischer Michaelsen Animal protein intake, serum insulin-like growth factor I, and growth in healthy 2.5-y-old Danish children Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2004; 80(2): 447 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F McCarty Insulin and IGF-I as determinants of low 'Western' cancer rates in the rural third world Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2004; 33(4): 908 - 910. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wolk, S. C. Larsson, B. Vessby, A. Wolk, and K. Brismar Metabolic, Anthropometric, and Nutritional Factors as Predictors of Circulating Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-1 Levels in Middle-Aged and Elderly Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2004; 89(4): 1879 - 1884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Sandhu, J. M. Gibson, A. H. Heald, D. B. Dunger, and N. J. Wareham Association between Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I: Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-1 Ratio and Metabolic and Anthropometric Factors in Men and Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2004; 13(1): 166 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. I. Block Multiple Molecular Targets in Oncology and Integrative Care Integr Cancer Ther, September 1, 2003; 2(3): 209 - 211. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Probst-Hensch, H. Wang, V. H. H. Goh, A. Seow, H.-P. Lee, and M. C. Yu Determinants of Circulating Insulin-like Growth Factor I and Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3 Concentrations in a Cohort of Singapore Men and Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2003; 12(8): 739 - 746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Howarth Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I and the Gastrointestinal System: Therapeutic Indications and Safety Implications J. Nutr., July 1, 2003; 133(7): 2109 - 2112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. F. Adams, K. M. Newton, C. Chen, S. S. Emerson, J. D. Potter, E. White, and J. W. Lampe Soy Isoflavones Do Not Modulate Circulating Insulin-Like Growth Factor Concentrations in an Older Population in an Intervention Trial J. Nutr., May 1, 2003; 133(5): 1316 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||