
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Short Communications |
Departments of Epidemiology [M. F. L., M. J. S., G. A. C., W. C. W., E. G.] and Nutrition [M. F. L., M. J. S., W. C. W., E. G.], Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115; Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 [M. F. L., M. J. S., J. M., G. A. C., W. C. W., E. G.]; Harvard Center for Cancer Prevention, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 [G. A. C.]; Epidemiology Program, Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 [G. A. C.], and Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics & Urology, University of California, San Francisco, California [J. M. C.]
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite fairly consistent laboratory evidence in support of the hypothesis that NSAIDs inhibit the development of prostate cancer, epidemiological data concerning the relationship between NSAID use and risk of prostate cancer are inconclusive. Five cohort studies (8, 9, 10, 11, 12) and two case-control studies (13 , 14) found inverse associations between NSAID use and prostate cancer risk. Two of these studies (12 , 13) suggest a benefit of aspirin use on fatal or advanced prostate cancer. In contrast, three case-control studies (15, 16, 17) reported moderate positive relationships between NSAID use and prostate cancer risk. Overall, the epidemiological data suggest both an increased likelihood of aspirin users being diagnosed with early-stage prostate cancer as well as a benefit of long-term aspirin use on risk of developing advanced prostate cancer.
Because the relationship between NSAID use and prostate cancer remains unresolved, we examined prospectively the association between regular use of aspirin and subsequent risk of prostate cancer in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, a large cohort of United States men with detailed data on aspirin use, screening behaviors, and clinical staging of cancer outcomes.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Assessment of Aspirin Use.
Regular use of aspirin was assessed in 1986 and every 2 years thereafter by asking participants to report whether they currently took "any of the following medications two or more times per week" and listed "aspirin (e.g., Anacin, Bufferin, Alka-Seltzer)," among other drugs. Starting in 1992, the questionnaire included a more detailed assessment of aspirin use. Respondents were asked to report the average number of days each month aspirin was taken (none, 14, 514, 1521, or 22 or more).
Identification of Cases of Prostate Cancer.
On each biennial questionnaire, participants were asked whether they had been diagnosed with prostate cancer during the prior 2 years. For those who reported prostate cancer, we requested permission to obtain hospital records and pathology reports. For deceased men, we contacted next of kin for this approval. A study physician reviewed all medical records and staged prostate cancers according to information received from medical reports.
Data Analysis.
We calculated person-time of follow-up for each participant from the date of return of the 1986 questionnaire to the date of prostate cancer diagnosis, death, or the end of the study period in 1998, whichever came first. The age-adjusted RR was calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Multivariate RRs were computed using Cox proportional hazards regression modeling.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
We addressed the dose-response relation by evaluating the association between increasing frequency of aspirin use, which was first assessed in 1992, and prostate cancer risk (Table 2)
. For total and advanced prostate cancer, essentially null associations were found for any given level of aspirin use when compared with nonuse of aspirin. For metastatic prostate cancer, a statistically nonsignificant lower risk was seen when we compared extreme categories of frequency of aspirin use (multivariate RR comparing men using aspirin on 22+ days/month with nonusers, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.391.38). No evidence of a linear trend was noted (P for trend = 0.40).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A possible explanation of this finding is that aspirin users undergo screening more frequently, leading to diagnosis of prostate cancer at an earlier stage. However, the inverse relation with metastatic prostate cancer persisted when examinations including PSA values were taken into account. Of note, our group has observed the same pattern for genetic and constitutional features, such as a polymorphism in the androgen receptor gene, plasma insulin-like growth factor I levels, and height, which are nonbehavioral factors that are unlikely to be prone to detection bias.
Our findings are consistent with most previous cohort studies (8, 9, 10 , 12) examining the association between NSAID use and prostate cancer, which found weak inverse and statistically nonsignificant associations (RRs between 0.82 and 0.95) between aspirin or NSAID use and risk of total prostate cancer. Our results are also compatible with those from one case-control study examining regular use of low-dose aspirin (13) , which reported an OR of 0.84 for total prostate cancer and an OR of 0.69 for advanced prostate cancer, suggestive of a stronger benefit of aspirin use on advanced prostate cancer.
One cohort study (11) and one case-control study (14) reported strong inverse associations (ORs between 0.34 and 0.45) between regular daily NSAID intake and risk of total prostate cancer. The former study (11) comprised men with a high level of surveillance for prostate cancer and found a stronger apparent protective effect of NSAIDs among older men (OR, 0.17), suggesting that NSAIDs may prevent the progression of preclinical disease to clinically detectable cancer. In the latter study (14) , controls were healthy men who underwent prostate screening, possibly a group enriched with health-seeking behaviors, thereby biasing the results in favor of a protective effect of NSAIDs. The results for total prostate cancer in these two studies (11 , 14) were markedly different from all other available data (8, 9, 10 , 12 , 13 , 15, 16, 17) .
Three case-control studies (15, 16, 17) found increased risks of total prostate cancer (ORs between 1.28 and 1.60) with greater number of NSAID prescriptions. However, the positive relationships in these studies may have been attributable to detection bias, because men needed to see a doctor to receive a NSAID prescription. Moreover, use of over-the-counter NSAIDs were not taken into consideration (15, 16, 17) , and the exposure definition may have included NSAIDs with little anti-inflammatory activity (16 , 17) .
An inverse association between aspirin use and metastatic prostate cancer is supported by laboratory studies showing that NSAIDs suppress prostate cancer cell growth, apparently through an induction of apoptosis (18)
. The inhibition of prostate cancer metastasis by NSAIDs may involve several pathways, including inhibition of enzymatic degradative processes of prostate tumor cell invasiveness (19)
, down-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor expression (20)
and decreased angiogenesis in prostate cancer cells (21)
, activation of transcription factors such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(22)
, potentially resulting in antiproliferative effects in PC-3 cell lines (23)
, and inhibition of androgen receptor transcriptional activity in LNCaP cells (24)
.
In summary, our results among United States men do not support the hypothesis that regular aspirin use prevents the incidence of total prostate cancer. However, the suggestion of a potential decrease in the risk of metastatic prostate cancer among frequent users of aspirin warrants further study.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 Supported by Research Grants CA55075 and HL35464 from the NIH and Cancer Epidemiology Training Grant 5T32 CA09001-26 (to M. F. L.) from the National Cancer Institute. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115. Phone: (617) 432-4220; Fax: (617) 432-2435; E-mail: michael.leitzmann{at}channing.harvard.edu ![]()
3 Present address: Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 181 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115. ![]()
4 Present address: Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics & Urology, University of California, San Francisco, 333 California Street, Suite 280, San Francisco, CA 94143. ![]()
5 Present address: Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115. ![]()
6 The abbreviations used are: NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; COX, cyclooxygenase; RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; OR, odds ratio. ![]()
Received 1/11/02; revised 5/15/02; accepted 5/29/02.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and
are activated by indomethacin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 3406-3410, 1997.
(troglitazone) has potent antitumor effect against human prostate cancer both in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res., 58: 3344-3352, 1998.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Jayachandran and S. J. Freedland Prevention of Prostate Cancer: What We Know and Where We Are Going American Journal of Men's Health, June 1, 2008; 2(2): 178 - 189. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wang, J. K.L. Colby, P. Yang, S. M. Fischer, R. A. Newman, and R. D. Klein The resistance to the tumor suppressive effects of COX inhibitors and COX-2 gene disruption in TRAMP mice is associated with the loss of COX expression in prostate tissue Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2008; 29(1): 120 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Mazhar, R. Gillmore, and J. Waxman COX and cancer QJM, October 1, 2005; 98(10): 711 - 718. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Jacobs, C. Rodriguez, A. M. Mondul, C. J. Connell, S. J. Henley, E. E. Calle, and M. J. Thun A Large Cohort Study of Aspirin and Other Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Prostate Cancer Incidence J Natl Cancer Inst, July 6, 2005; 97(13): 975 - 980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Platz, S. Rohrmann, J. D. Pearson, M. M. Corrada, D. J. Watson, A. M. De Marzo, P. K. Landis, E. J. Metter, and H. B. Carter Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Risk of Prostate Cancer in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2005; 14(2): 390 - 396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gupta, V. M. Adhami, M. Subbarayan, G. T. MacLennan, J. S. Lewin, U. O. Hafeli, P. Fu, and H. Mukhtar Suppression of Prostate Carcinogenesis by Dietary Supplementation of Celecoxib in Transgenic Adenocarcinoma of the Mouse Prostate Model Cancer Res., May 1, 2004; 64(9): 3334 - 3343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Garcia Rodriguez and A. Gonzalez-Perez Inverse Association between Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Prostate Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2004; 13(4): 649 - 653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |