
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Short Communications |
Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota 55905 [T. A. S., R. A. V., J. R. C., C. M. V., J. E. O., V. S. P.]; Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611 [S. M. G.]; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California 94611 [L. H. K.]; and Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454 [A. R. F.]
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There are now four large epidemiological studies that suggest that risks associated with intake of alcohol may be greater in women with low intakes of dietary folate. The original report, from the Nurses Health Study (7) , was quickly replicated with analyses of the Canadian National Breast Cancer Screening Trial (8) , a case-control study from Italy (9) , and the Iowa Womens Health Study (10) . The consistency of this interaction lends credence to the possibility that the results are real and not merely a chance observation.
The current report describes an updated analysis of the Iowa Womens Health Study. We reported previously that alcohol is a risk factor for breast cancer (11) , primarily for tumors lacking receptors for ER3 and PR (12) , and corroborated the interaction between low folate intake and alcohol consumption (10) . The current analyses bring together these previous observations to examine the interaction within strata defined by tumor receptors for ER and PR.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Diet and Risk Factor Assessment.
The questionnaire solicited information on factors known or suspected to be relevant to breast cancer risk, including alcohol use, and a 127-item semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire that included use of multivitamins and supplements. Average daily alcohol intake over the previous year was assessed by summing the products of frequency of use of specific beverages by their ethanol content. The reliability and accuracy of the instrument is good (14)
.
Exclusion Criteria.
We excluded women at baseline if they were not postmenopausal (n = 569), had a total or partial mastectomy (n = 1,870), or had any cancer other than skin cancer (n = 2,293). We also excluded women if
30 items on the food frequency questionnaire were left blank or if their responses resulted in extreme energy intake values (<600 or
5,000 kcal/day; n = 2,712). These exclusions left a total of 34,393 women eligible for follow-up.
Follow-Up.
We mailed questionnaires in 1987, 1989, 1992, and 1997 to establish vital status and change of address. We ascertained cancer incidence and ER/PR status through annual record linkage to the Iowa Cancer Registry. We ascertained deaths in Iowa through the Cancer Registry supplemented through linkage with the National Death Index.
Through 14 years of follow-up, we identified 1875 cases of breast cancer (1,633 invasive and 242 in situ) among the cohort at risk. Of these, 1191 (63.5%) were ER+, 225 (12.0%) were ER-, 989 (52.8%) were PR+, and 353 (18.8%) were PR-. A total of 459 tumors (24.5%) were missing ER receptor status, 533 (28.4%) were missing PR receptor status, and 457 (24.4%) were missing both.
Analytic Approach.
We calculated the length of follow-up for each individual from baseline until the date of breast cancer diagnosis, estimated date of move from Iowa, date of death, or December 31, 1999.
We calculated RRs and 95% CIs using Cox proportional hazards regression, with survival modeled as a function of age (15)
. To isolate those at the extreme of low folate intake, we defined four percentile categories: >50th [referent], 31st-50th, 11th-30th, and
10th. We categorized use of alcohol into three levels: never drinkers,
4 grams/day, >4 grams/day. The cutpoint among drinkers was approximately the median of use. Models considered dietary folate alone and folate including supplements. Two sets of regression models were fit to the data: one adjusting only for age and total caloric intake, and one adjusting for additional potential confounding variables.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There are at least two possible mechanisms that could account for the apparent joint effects of alcohol and folate on risk of ER- breast cancers. The first mechanism takes into consideration the direct carcinogenic effect of the primary metabolite of alcohol, acetaldehyde. Recent experimental evidence suggests that non-neoplastic human mammary epithelial cells treated with alcohol at physiologically relevant concentrations have increased rates of benzo(a)pyrene-DNA adduct formation (18) . Rates of DNA adduct formation were even greater when cells were exposed to alcohol before administration of acetaldehyde. This type of genetic damage is independent of receptor-mediated events, and is, therefore, a plausible explanation for an association of alcohol with ER- breast cancers. Because folate is critical to certain DNA repair pathways (19) , it should not be surprising that the association of alcohol with ER- tumors was stronger among women with low intakes of folate.
The second mechanism is based on the observation that folate plays a key role in DNA methylation (20) . Because DNA methylation is a key regulator of gene transcription (21) , low folate intake could contribute to overall methyl deficiency and reduced global DNA methylation (22) . In addition, the primary metabolite of alcohol, acetaldehyde, has been shown to inhibit methionine synthase activity in vitro (23) . In animal models, methyl deficiency results in increased methyltransferase activity and regional hypermethylation (e.g., promotor regions; Ref. 24 ). In breast cancer cells, hypermethylation of the promotor region of the ER gene is associated with reduced expression (25) and, in vitro, demethylation reverses this inhibition (26) .
Limitations of the current study include imprecision in diet assessment and the reliance on only a single assessment at baseline. If study participants adopted significant changes in dietary habits during the course of follow-up, then substantial misclassification may have occurred. However, the likely effect of such misclassification would be to make it more difficult to detect associations. Our ability to generalize to other populations may be somewhat compromised given that our cohort is a predominantly white and consumption of alcohol is low. Data on hormone receptor status were not obtained using a common protocol; some differences in the accuracy of receptor status are possible. However, it is difficult to imagine how accuracy would systematically vary with dietary intakes of folate or alcohol, which would be unknown to the technicians measuring hormone receptors.
A more serious potential limitation is the absence of tumor receptor status on roughly a fifth of the cohort. Most of the tumors missing data on receptor status were either in situ (41.2%) or localized (42.5%). Determination of ER status is not performed on in situ tumors, and it is reasonable to speculate that the women with localized disease did not have receptor status determined on their tumors, either. These tumors are more likely to be ER+ than tumors without missing receptor status. Because the greatest association of alcohol and low folate on risk appears to be evident for ER- tumors, this would not be expected to be a major source of bias. In fact, we performed a sensitivity analysis in which all of the cases with missing ER status were combined with ER+ tumors. The results were not materially changed.
Strengths of the current study include the large numbers of cases, the completeness of follow-up through the statewide registry, assessment of diet before diagnosis of breast cancer, extensive data on vitamin supplements, and the ability to adjust for multiple potential confounding factors.
In summary, the current study suggests that the apparent interaction between alcohol and folate is related primarily to tumors that lack receptors for ER and PR, an observation that should be examined by other investigators. These observations may help inform the underlying mechanism through which consumption of alcohol influences risk of postmenopausal breast cancer.
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 The Iowa Womens Health Study was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute (R01 CA39741; to A. R. F., J. R. C. was supported in part by a National Cancer Institute Preventive Oncology Award (K07 CA64220). ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905. Phone: (507) 284-5535; Fax: (507) 266-2478; E-mail: sellers{at}mayo.edu ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: ER, estrogen; PR, progesterone; RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence interval. ![]()
Received 9/14/01; revised 5/21/02; accepted 6/ 7/02.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Lin, I-M. Lee, N. R Cook, J. Selhub, J. E Manson, J. E Buring, and S. M Zhang Plasma folate, vitamin B-6, vitamin B-12, and risk of breast cancer in women Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2008; 87(3): 734 - 743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Cho, M. Holmes, S. E. Hankinson, and W. C. Willett Nutrients Involved in One-Carbon Metabolism and Risk of Breast Cancer among Premenopausal Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2007; 16(12): 2787 - 2790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Larsson, E. Giovannucci, and A. Wolk Folate and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis J Natl Cancer Inst, January 3, 2007; 99(1): 64 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bardia, L. C. Hartmann, C. M. Vachon, R. A. Vierkant, A. H. Wang, J. E. Olson, T. A. Sellers, and J. R. Cerhan Recreational Physical Activity and Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Based on Hormone Receptor Status Arch Intern Med, December 11, 2006; 166(22): 2478 - 2483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Cho, W. Y. Chen, D. J. Hunter, M. J. Stampfer, G. A. Colditz, S. E. Hankinson, and W. C. Willett Red meat intake and risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women. Arch Intern Med, November 13, 2006; 166(20): 2253 - 2259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Adams, C. E. Matthews, J. R. Hebert, C. G. Moore, J. E. Cunningham, X.-O. Shu, J. Fulton, Y. Gao, and W. Zheng Association of physical activity with hormone receptor status: the shanghai breast cancer study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2006; 15(6): 1170 - 1178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Z Stolzenberg-Solomon, S.-C. Chang, M. F Leitzmann, K. A Johnson, C. Johnson, S. S Buys, R. N Hoover, and R. G Ziegler Folate intake, alcohol use, and postmenopausal breast cancer risk in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2006; 83(4): 895 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M Velie, C. Schairer, A. Flood, J.-P. He, R. Khattree, and A. Schatzkin Empirically derived dietary patterns and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in a large prospective cohort study Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2005; 82(6): 1308 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kotsopoulos, A. Medline, R. Renlund, K.-J. Sohn, R. Martin, S. W. Hwang, S. Lu, M. C. Archer, and Y.-I. Kim Effects of dietary folate on the development and progression of mammary tumors in rats Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2005; 26(9): 1603 - 1612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Zhang, S. E. Hankinson, D. J. Hunter, E. L. Giovannucci, G. A. Colditz, and W. C. Willett Folate Intake and Risk of Breast Cancer Characterized by Hormone Receptor Status Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2005; 14(8): 2004 - 2008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. B. Nichols, A. Trentham-Dietz, R. R. Love, J. M. Hampton, P. T. Hoang Anh, D. C. Allred, S. K. Mohsin, and P. A. Newcomb Differences in Breast Cancer Risk Factors by Tumor Marker Subtypes among Premenopausal Vietnamese and Chinese Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2005; 14(1): 41 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Gorla, N. Hou, S. Acharya, A. Rademaker, S. Khan, V. Staradub, and M. Morrow A Predictive Model for the Development of Hormone-Responsive Breast Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2005; 12(1): 48 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Althuis, J. H. Fergenbaum, M. Garcia-Closas, L. A. Brinton, M. P. Madigan, and M. E. Sherman Etiology of Hormone Receptor-Defined Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2004; 13(10): 1558 - 1568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Gaudet, J. A. Britton, G. C. Kabat, S. Steck-Scott, S. M. Eng, S. L. Teitelbaum, M. B. Terry, A. I. Neugut, and M. D. Gammon Fruits, Vegetables, and Micronutrients in Relation to Breast Cancer Modified by Menopause and Hormone Receptor Status Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2004; 13(9): 1485 - 1494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Borugian, S. B. Sheps, C. Kim-Sing, C. Van Patten, J. D. Potter, B. Dunn, R. P. Gallagher, and T. G. Hislop Insulin, Macronutrient Intake, and Physical Activity: Are Potential Indicators of Insulin Resistance Associated with Mortality from Breast Cancer? Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2004; 13(7): 1163 - 1172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Benz, C. A. Clarke, and D. H. Moore II Geographic Excess of Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2003; 12(12): 1523 - 1527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. McTiernan Behavioral Risk Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Risk Be Modified? Oncologist, August 1, 2003; 8(4): 326 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Olsen, A. Tjonneland, B. L. Thomsen, S. Loft, C. Stripp, K. Overvad, S. Moller, and J. H. Olsen Fruits and Vegetables Intake Differentially Affects Estrogen Receptor Negative and Positive Breast Cancer Incidence Rates J. Nutr., July 1, 2003; 133(7): 2342 - 2347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |