This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Breslow, R. A. Articles by Graubard, B. I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Breslow, R. A. Articles by Graubard, B. I.

Long-term Recreational Physical Activity and Breast Cancer in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study

Epidemiology and Health Services Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30341 [R. A. B.]; Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences [R. B-B.] and Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics [B. I. G.], National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892; and Merck Pharmaceuticals, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey 08889 [K. M.]

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Our purpose was to study the association between long-term recreational physical activity and breast cancer in the Epidemiological Follow-up Study (NHEFS) of the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I, 1971–1975). The analytic cohort included 6160 women who were free of breast cancer at the first NHEFS follow-up in 1982–1984 and had interview data on recreational physical activity (low, moderate, and high) in 1982–1984 and 10 years earlier, in 1971–1975. We created categories of long-term (1982–1984 + 1971–1975) recreational physical activity: (a) consistently low; (b) moderate/inconsistent; and (c) consistently high. Data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression models. A total of 138 women developed breast cancer between 1982–1984 and 1992. In women 50 years of age in 1982–1984, consistently high (versus consistently low) recreational physical activity was associated with a 67% reduction in breast cancer risk (n = 96 cases; relative risk, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.14–0.82; P for trend = 0.03); in women <50 years of age (n = 42 cases), there was no association. Associations were not modified by body mass index or by weight gain as an adult. High recreational physical activity over the long-term may reduce breast cancer risk in women 50 years of age; in this sample, it did so regardless of weight history.

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Physical activity is a modifiable behavior with the potential to reduce the risk of breast cancer (1) . Whereas some prospective studies have reported significant inverse associations (2, 3, 4) , others have reported null findings for various groups (3 , 5, 6, 7) . Few have considered recreational physical activity measured over the long-term (2 , 4) or effect modification by BMI (2, 3, 4) , which may, in part, explain inconsistencies. Our purpose was to examine the association between long-term recreational physical activity and breast cancer, accounting for effect modification by BMI, in the Epidemiological Follow-up Study (NHEFS) of the First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I, 1971–1975).

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Data.
The NHEFS, a prospective cohort study arising from NHANES I, is a nationally representative, cross-sectional, in-person interview and medical examination survey of the civilian, noninstitutionalized population of the United States conducted by the NCHS (8) . The NHEFS cohort includes all participants in NHANES I, who were ages 24–75 years when interviewed in 1971–1975; participants were reinterviewed in 1982–1984 and have been followed for vital and health outcomes through 1992. Methodology of the NHEFS has been described by Cox et al. (9) .

Analytic Cohort.
We formed an analytic cohort using 1982–1984 as baseline. There was a single inclusion criterion: participants had to have complete data on recreational physical activity in both 1982–1984 and about 10 years earlier, at their NHANES I interview in 1971–1975. A total of 6445 women were interviewed in 1982–1984, including 138 who later developed breast cancer (median follow-up, 9.2 years; median age at diagnosis, 62 years); the 6160 women meeting the inclusion criteria formed our analytic cohort; all 138 cases of breast cancer were in this group.

Most cases of breast cancer were confirmed by computer matching; we used NCHS data tapes to compare diagnoses of breast cancer self-reported by participants with diagnoses reported in health care facility documents. Additionally, microfiche documents archived at the NCHS (Hyattsville, MD) were hand-searched by two authors, K. M. and R. B-B., to confirm diagnoses for which a computer match could not be made. To further confirm the accuracy of self-reported diagnoses of breast cancer, the microfiche documents were hand-searched for a random sample of 20 cases with information on diagnosis (including date) from self-reports and health care facility reports; there was 100% agreement between the two sources of information.

Questions on recreational physical activity in 1982–1984 and about 10 years earlier, in 1971–1975 were similar. In 1982–1984, NHEFS participants were asked: "In things you do for recreation, for example, sports, hiking, dancing, etc., do you get much exercise, moderate exercise, or little or no exercise?" In 1971–1975, NHANES I participants were asked: "Do you get much exercise in things you do for recreation (sports, or hiking, or anything like that), or hardly any exercise, or in between?" We categorized responses as low, moderate, and high and created summary categories to describe long-term recreational physical activity (i.e., activity in 1982–1984 + 10 years earlier in 1971–1975). The summary categories, which were created to closely resemble those used in an earlier analysis by Thune et al. (2) , were as follows : (a) consistently low, low at both times; (b) consistently high, high at both times or moderate at one time and high at the other; and (c) moderate/inconsistent, all other combinations.

Data on Other Risk Factors.
In 1982–1984, weight was measured, and interview data were collected on live births, menstrual status, history of breast cancer in first-degree female relatives, use of hormone replacement therapy, and selfreported weight at age 25 years. In 1971–1975, height and weight were measured, and interview data were collected on education and age at menarche. BMI was calculated as kg/m².

We created the variable "adult weight change" (weight change from age 25 years to age at the 1982–1984 interview), which was categorized as follows: (a) lost 5.0 kg; (b) stable ± 4.99 kg; (c) gained 5.0–9.99 kg; (d) gained 10.0–19.99 kg; and (e) gained 20.0 kg. In selected analyses in which we excluded the lost 5 kg category (because weight may have been lost due to disease), we refer to this variable as "adult weight gain."

Statistical Analysis.
Data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression models. The response variable was age at breast cancer diagnosis or age at death, if breast cancer was the cause, and no other records were available (n = 1) (10) . Women who did not develop breast cancer were censored at their last interview or date of death. To adjust for birth cohort effects, the baseline hazard was stratified by 5-year intervals of birth year.

We performed analyses using models variously adjusted for BMI in 1982–1984, BMI in 1971–1975, BMI at age 25 years, adult weight change, adult weight gain, and breast cancer risk factors (education, age at menarche, parity, menstrual status, and family history of breast cancer), stratified by age in 1982–1984 (<50 years and 50 years). The following interactions were considered: (a) BMI in 1982–1984 and long-term recreational physical activity; (b) adult weight gain and long-term recreational physical activity; and (c) hormone replacement therapy and weight gain. Tests of trend were performed using ordinal scores for categories of recreational physical activity and adult weight change.

The NHEFS has a complex design that involves sample weighting, stratification, and clustering (11) . To account for the sample weighting, we included the following sample design variables (i.e., variables used by NCHS to derive sample weights) in our final models: (a) age (<65 versus 65 years); (b) poverty census enumeration district (residence versus nonresidence); (c) family income (<$3,000, $3,000-$6,999, $7,000-$9,999, $10,000-$14,999, and $15,000+); and (d) race [black versus nonblack (Hispanics were included with whites; Ref. 12 )]. Analyses were performed using SAS version 6.12 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). All significance tests were two-tailed (5% level of significance).

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Demographics and Physical Activity Distribution.
In 1982–1984, 15.3% of the analytic cohort were <40 years old, 26.7% were 40–49 years old, 21.5% were 50–59 years old, 14.3% were 60–69 years old, and 22.2% were 70 years old. Most (85%) were white.

Levels of recreational physical activity (low, moderate, and high) were in the same categories in 1982–1984 and 10 years earlier (1971–1975) in 49% of the women; only 7% shifted between extreme categories (low to high or high to low). Consistently high recreational physical activity was more likely among women who were younger, had higher education, who ever took hormone replacement therapy, who weighed less, or who gained less weight as adults than their counterparts.

Recreational Physical Activity and Breast Cancer.
Results were similar in adjusted and unadjusted models.

In women 50 years of age (n = 96 cases), consistently high recreational physical activity was associated with a significant reduction in breast cancer risk (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14–0.82; P for trend = 0.026; Table 1 ). Exclusion of women diagnosed within 1 year of their 1982–1984 interview resulted in a similar RR (0.37) and wider CI (0.15–0.91; P = 0.048). Table 2 presents results from models stratified by BMI in 1982–1984 and stratified by adult weight gain. Whereas there was some variation in RRs across strata, the CIs were wide. On formal testing using models that included interaction between physical activity and BMI in 1982–1984 or between physical activity and adult weight gain, it was determined that neither interaction was statistically significant (data not shown).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 2 RR of breast cancer in women 50 years of age according to combined levels of recreational physical activity in 1982–1984 and about 10 years earlier, in 1971–75, stratified by median BMI in 1982–1984 and by adult weight gain: NHEFS

Additional Analyses.
We separately examined data on recreational physical activity from 1982–1984 and 1971–1975 in our analytic cohort. Using 1982–1984 data, the RRs for breast cancer according to level of recreational physical activity were as follows: (a) for all women, 1.00 (low = referent), 0.88 (0.61–1.27), and 0.71 (0.39–1.28), P = 0.393; and (b) for women 50 years of age in 1982–1984, 1.00, 0.82 (0.53–1.27), and 0.86 (0.44–1.69), P = 0.519. Using 1971–1975 data, the RRs for breast cancer were as follows: (a) for all women, 1.00, 0.98 (0.68–1.41), and 0.75 (0.43–1.31), P = 0.395; and (b) for women 50 years of age in 1971–1975, 1.00, 0.86 (0.56–1.31), and 0.39 (0.17–0.91), P = 0.036.

We next examined data from 1971–1975 including all women (n = 315 cases) with information about recreational physical activity in 1971–1975 (i.e., we did not exclude women without data on physical activity in 1982–1984 as done for our analytic cohort). The RRs of breast cancer were as follows: (a) for all women, 1.00, 0.96 (0.75–1.22), and 0.78 (0.54–1.13), P = 0.239; and (b) for women 50 years of age in 1971–1975 (n = 166 cases), 1.00, 0.93 (0.67–1.28), and 0.44 (0.23–0.84), P = 0.030.

Some of our analyses generated RR for adult weight gain (included as a confounder; Table 3 ). The RR of breast cancer for all women appears to be elevated in women who gained 10 kg and was nearly statistically significant for women 50 years of age.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

A previous study using data from the 1971–1975 NHEFS with follow-up only through 1982–1984 found a suggestive but not statistically significant association between recreational physical activity and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women [RR, 1.7 (referent = high activity; Ref. 5 )]. We recalculated that RR using low activity as the referent to facilitate comparison with our results (recalculated RR, 0.59). When we performed a similar analysis with follow-up for an additional 10 years, through 1992, our RR was 0.44 and was statistically significant.

The major strength of our study was prospective data collection in a sample national in scope. The major limitations were relatively small numbers of breast cancer cases, crude assessment of recreational physical activity (low, moderate, and high), and inability to capture patterns between assessments. Due to small numbers of cases, we were unable to examine outcomes for alternative combinations of recreational physical activity categories, for example, inconsistent activity, a potentially prevalent pattern. In older women, among whom we had the greatest number of cases, results using the NHEFS three-category physical activity variable were comparable with results from larger studies having more detailed assessments of recreational physical activity. Similar congruence has been observed in other NHEFS studies using this variable (14, 15, 16) , including one (14) that demonstrated significant correlation between physical activity and physiological measures related to fitness. Limited assessments of physical activity in surveys other than the NHEFS have been found to correlate with physiological parameters and to successfully rank-order participants (17) .

The results of our study contribute to the consistency of the evidence linking long-term recreational physical activity to reduced risk of breast cancer in older women.

	Acknowledgments

 
We thank Lisa Kahle of Information Management Systems for assistance with data management and Drs. Matthew McKenna and Donald Blackman for comments and suggestions.

	Footnotes

 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

¹ To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Centers for Disease Control, Division of Cancer Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, MS K-55, Atlanta, GA 30341. Phone: (770) 488-3086; Fax: (770) 488-4639; E-mail: zyd1{at}cdc.gov

² The abbreviations used are: BMI, body mass index; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; NHEFS, NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study; RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval; NCHS, National Center for Health Statistics.

Received 11/17/00; revised 4/13/01; accepted 5/ 7/01.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Gammon M. D., John E. M., Britton J. A. Recreational and occupational physical activities and risk of breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 90: 100-117, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Thune I., Brenn T., Lund E., Gaard M. Physical activity and the risk of breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med., 336: 1269-1275, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Sesso H. D., Paffenbarger R. S. J., Lee I. M. Physical activity and breast cancer risk in the College Alumni Health Study (United States). Cancer Causes Control, 9: 433-439, 1998.[Medline]
4. Rockhill B., Willett W. C., Hunter D. J., Manson J. E., Hankinson S. E., Colditz G. A. A prospective study of recreational physical activity and breast cancer risk. Arch. Intern. Med., 159: 2290-2296, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Albanes D., Blair A., Taylor P. R. Physical activity and risk of cancer in the NHANES I population. Am. J. Public Health, 79: 744-750, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Paffenbarger R. S. J., Lee I. M., Wing A. L. The influence of physical activity on the incidence of site-specific cancers in college alumni. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 322: 7-15, 1992.[Medline]
7. Rockhill B., Willett W. C., Hunter D. J., Manson J. E., Hankinson S. E., Spiegelman D., Colditz G. A. Physical activity and breast cancer risk in a cohort of young women. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 90: 1155-1160, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Cohen B. B. Plan and Operation of the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study, 1982–84 United States Department of Health and Human Services, USPHS, National Center for Health Statistics Hyattsville, MD 1987.
9. Cox C. S., Mussolino M. E., Rothwell S. T., Lane M. A., Golden C. D., Madans J. H., Feldman J. J. Plan and operation of the NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study, 1992. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat., 1: 1-23, 1997.
10. Korn E. L., Graubard B. I., Midthune D. Time-to-event analysis of longitudinal follow-up of a survey: choice of the time scale. Am. J. Epidemiol., 145: 72-80, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Massey J. T., Moore T. F., Parsons V. L., Tadrros W. Design and Estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1985–94. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 2, No. 119. United States Department of Health and Human Services Publ. No. 89-1384 (USPHS) National Center for Health Statistics Hyattsville, MD 1989.
12. Korn E. L., Graubard B. I. Epidemiologic studies utilizing surveys: accounting for the sampling design. Am. J. Public Health, 81: 1166-1173, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Carpenter C. L., Ross R. K., Paganini-Hill A., Bernstein L. Lifetime exercise activity and breast cancer risk among post-menopausal women. Br. J. Cancer, 80: 1852-1858, 1999.[Medline]
14. Farmer M. E., Locke B. Z., Moscicki E. K., Dannenberg A. L., Larson D. B., Radloff L. S. Physical activity and depressive symptoms: the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Am. J. Epidemiol., 128: 1340-1351, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Farmer M. E., Harris T., Madans J. H., Wallace R. B., Cornoni-Huntley J., White L. R. Anthropometric indicators and hip fracture. The NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc., 37: 9-16, 1989.[Medline]
16. Gillum R. F., Mussolino M. E., Ingram D. D. Physical activity and stroke incidence in women and men. The NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Am. J. Epidemiol., 143: 860-869, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. LaPorte R. E., Montoye H. J., Caspersen C. J. Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects. Public Health Rep., 100: 131-146, 1985.[Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. S. Maruti, W. C. Willett, D. Feskanich, B. Rosner, and G. A. Colditz A Prospective Study of Age-Specific Physical Activity and Premenopausal Breast Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, May 21, 2008; 100(10): 728 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. L. Sprague, A. Trentham-Dietz, P. A. Newcomb, L. Titus-Ernstoff, J. M. Hampton, and K. M. Egan Lifetime Recreational and Occupational Physical Activity and Risk of In situ and Invasive Breast Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2007; 16(2): 236 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. H. Lahmann, C. Friedenreich, A. J. Schuit, S. Salvini, N. E. Allen, T. J. Key, K.-T. Khaw, S. Bingham, P. H.M. Peeters, E. Monninkhof, et al. Physical Activity and Breast Cancer Risk: The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2007; 16(1): 36 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. H. Marcus, D. M. Williams, P. M. Dubbert, J. F. Sallis, A. C. King, A. K. Yancey, B. A. Franklin, D. Buchner, S. R. Daniels, and R. P. Claytor Physical Activity Intervention Studies: What We Know and What We Need to Know: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity); Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; and the Interdisciplinary Working Group on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Circulation, December 12, 2006; 114(24): 2739 - 2752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Adams, C. E. Matthews, J. R. Hebert, C. G. Moore, J. E. Cunningham, X.-O. Shu, J. Fulton, Y. Gao, and W. Zheng Association of physical activity with hormone receptor status: the shanghai breast cancer study. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2006; 15(6): 1170 - 1178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Tehard, C. M. Friedenreich, J.-M. Oppert, and F. Clavel-Chapelon Effect of Physical Activity on Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer: Results from the E3N Cohort Study Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2006; 15(1): 57 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R Akabas and K. R Dolins Micronutrient requirements of physically active women: what can we learn from iron? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2005; 81(5): 1246S - 1251S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Margolis, L. Mucci, T. Braaten, M. Kumle, Y. Trolle Lagerros, H.-O. Adami, E. Lund, and E. Weiderpass Physical Activity in Different Periods of Life and the Risk of Breast Cancer: The Norwegian-Swedish Women's Lifestyle and Health Cohort Study Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2005; 14(1): 27 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. John, P. L. Horn-Ross, and J. Koo Lifetime Physical Activity and Breast Cancer Risk in a Multiethnic Population: The San Francisco Bay Area Breast Cancer Study Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2003; 12(11): 1143 - 1152. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. McTiernan, C. Kooperberg, E. White, S. Wilcox, R. Coates, L. L. Adams-Campbell, N. Woods, and J. Ockene Recreational Physical Activity and the Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women: The Women's Health Initiative Cohort Study JAMA, September 10, 2003; 290(10): 1331 - 1336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. D. Thompson, D. Buchner, I. L. Pina, G. J. Balady, M. A. Williams, B. H. Marcus, K. Berra, S. N. Blair, F. Costa, B. Franklin, et al. Exercise and Physical Activity in the Prevention and Treatment of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Statement From the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity) Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., August 1, 2003; 23(8): e42 - 49. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. McTiernan Behavioral Risk Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Risk Be Modified? Oncologist, August 1, 2003; 8(4): 326 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. D. Thompson, D. Buchner, I. L. Pina, G. J. Balady, M. A. Williams, B. H. Marcus, K. Berra, S. N. Blair, F. Costa, B. Franklin, et al. Exercise and Physical Activity in the Prevention and Treatment of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Statement From the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity) Circulation, June 24, 2003; 107(24): 3109 - 3116. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Friedenreich and M. R. Orenstein Physical Activity and Cancer Prevention: Etiologic Evidence and Biological Mechanisms J. Nutr., November 1, 2002; 132(11): 3456S - 3464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Breslow, R. A. Articles by Graubard, B. I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Breslow, R. A. Articles by Graubard, B. I.