
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 10, 391-395, April 2001
© 2001 American Association for Cancer Research
Effects of Novel Phenylretinamides on Cell Growth and Apoptosis in Bladder Cancer1
John L. Clifford2,
Anita L. Sabichi,
Changchun Zou,
Xiulan Yang,
Vernon E. Steele,
Gary J. Kelloff,
Reuben Lotan and
Scott M. Lippman
Departments of Clinical Cancer Prevention [J. L. C., A. L. S., C. Z., X. Y. S. M. L.] and Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology [R. L.], The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, and National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 [V. E. S., G. J. K.]
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Superficial bladder cancer is a major target for chemoprevention. Retinoids are important modulators of epithelial differentiation and proliferation and are effective in the treatment and prevention of several epithelial cancers. One class of compounds, the retinamides, is structurally similar to other retinoids but have the added feature of being potent apoptosis inducers. Among these, fenretinide (N-[4-hydroxyphenyl]retinamide), or 4HPR, has promise for bladder cancer chemoprevention and is currently under Phase III study in this setting. In addition to 4HPR, there are several new structurally related phenylretinamides bearing hydroxyl, carboxyl, or methoxyl residues on carbons 2, 3, and 4 of the terminal phenylamine ring [designated N-(2-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide, N-(3-hydroxyphenyl)retin amide, N-(2-carboxyphenyl)retin- amide, N-(3-carboxyphenyl)retin amide, N-(4-carboxy- phenyl)retinamide, and N-(4-methoxyphenyl)retinamide, respectively]. The objective of this study was to compare the growth inhibitory and apoptotic effects of these phenylretinamides with 4HPR in human bladder transitional cell cancer-derived cell lines of varying histological grade (RT4, grade 1; UM-UC9 and UM-UC10, grade 3; and UM-UC14, grade 4) by cell counting, cell cycle fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis and a dual stain apoptosis assay. All of the seven phenylretinamides reduced cell number, altered the cell cycle distribution, and induced apoptosis when administered at a concentration of 10 µM, which is within the pharmacologically achievable range. Although the relative potencies of the phenylretinamides varied depending on the cell line, N-(3-hydroxy phenyl)retin- amide was the most active with significantly greater growth inhibition than 4HPR in all of the four cell lines. These in vitro findings warrant further study of these novel phenylretinamides, which may have potential as preventive or therapeutic agents in transitional cell cancer.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
TCC3
of the bladder is predicted to result in 53,200 new cancer cases for 2000 (1)
. Approximately 70% of TCC cases are superficial, low grade, noninvasive papillary tumors (2
, 3)
. However, of these cases as many as 80% will recur. Patients require frequent reexamination involving cystoscopy, often followed by transurethral resection or, in some cases, cystectomy for invasive cancer (2)
. It is hypothesized that bladder cancer cells, like other cancer cell types, may have undergone a defect in the differentiation process, which results in dysregulated proliferation and the ability to invade and metastasize (3)
. Unfortunately, the urothelial differentiation process is not well delineated, making it difficult to assess changes in differentiation during malignant progression. As with other epithelial tissues, retinoids are likely to play a role in urothelial differentiation.
Retinoids are a class of chemical compounds that include active metabolites of vitamin A (retinol), as well as a diverse array of synthetic derivatives. Retinoids have been shown to modulate a wide variety of cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation, homeostasis, malignant transformation, and apoptosis (4)
. Retinoids also act pharmacologically to restore regulation of differentiation and growth in certain premalignant and malignant cells in vitro and in vivo. It is now well established that retinoids exert their effects primarily through nuclear retinoid receptor proteins. Retinoid receptors comprise two families of ligand-dependent, DNA-binding transcriptional transactivators, RARs and retinoid X receptors, both members of the nuclear steroid hormone receptor superfamily (4
, 5)
. Fenretinide, or 4HPR, is one of the most promising retinoids for chemoprevention (6, 7, 8)
. It has a favorable toxicity profile, potent apoptosis-induction activity, biological activity in several preclinical systems, including ATRA-resistant and 9-cis retinoic acid-resistant neoplastic cells, and significant clinical chemopreventive activity in randomized trials for breast cancer and oral carcinogenesis (9
, 10)
. Like other retinoids, 4HPR can up-regulate the expression of one of the RARs, RARß (11
, 12)
, and activate transcription of retinoic acid response elements by RARs (13
, 14) . Also, RARß expression was associated with the antiproliferative action of 4HPR in ovarian cancer cells (12)
. However, the ability of 4HPR to induce apoptosis in cells that are resistant to ATRA suggests that this activity may not involve retinoid receptors in some cell types (15, 16, 17, 18, 19)
.
Several retinoid analogues have shown chemopreventive activity in rat and murine bladder carcinogenesis models, presumably by restoring the normal differentiation state of premalignant and malignant cells (20
, 21)
. Whereas mixed clinical results have been obtained for TCC therapy, some success has been achieved with retinoids in TCC chemoprevention. Currently, there is an National Cancer Institute-sponsored multicenter Phase III trial of 4HPR in the prevention of superficial bladder cancer (2)
. Recently, several new retinamides bearing hydroxy, carboxy, or methoxy substitutions on the terminal phenylamine ring in human TCC cell lines have been isolated. With the exception of 4CPR, which has been used extensively in Phase II clinical trials in China, there have been few studies aimed at determining their activity (22)
. Recently, these retinamides have been compared with a panel of potential chemopreventive agents for the growth inhibition of human oral epithelial cells (23)
. Among the phenylretinamides, 2CPR showed the greatest selectivity for growth inhibition of premalignant and malignant cells (23)
. The objective of this study was to compare the biological activity of several of these novel phenylretinamides with 4HPR in cultured TCC cells.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Cell Culture and Retinamides.
UM-UC (24
, 25)
and RT4 cells were cultured in 50% DMEM low glucose/50% F12 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum at 37°C in the humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air. ATRA and 4HPR were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. 2HPR, 3HPR, 2CPR, 3CPR, 4CPR, and 4 MPR were obtained from the National Cancer Institute. Stock solutions were made in DMSO at a concentration of 10 mM and diluted to the appropriate concentrations in culture media.
Cell Counting Assay.
Cells were plated at identical densities in triplicate culture wells of a 24-well plate, treated the following day with retinoids along with addition of fresh media, trypsinized after 72 h of treatment, resuspended to appropriate dilutions, and counted on a Coultronics Particle Counter (Coultronics, Inc.). The percentage growth inhibition by retinoids was calculated using the equation: (1 - R/C) x 100, where R and C represent the number of cells in retinoid-treated and control culture, respectively.
Cell Cycle Determination.
The cell cycle profile of untreated and retinamide-treated cells was determined by cell cycle flow cytometry based on cellular DNA content using an Epics Profile II cell sorter (Coulter Electronics, Inc.), equipped with a 15-W argon laser at a wavelength of 488 nm and an emission wavelength of 575 nm. Subconfluent cultures of untreated cells or cells treated for 3 days with 10 µM of the indicated retinamides or 1 µM ATRA were trypsinized, resuspended, combined with their supernatants, and fixed in 70% ethanol at 4°C. After two washes in PBS, the cells and subcellular particles were incubated in 1 mg/ml RNase A (59 Kunitz units/mg; Sigma Chemical Co.) for 30 min at 37°C, centrifuged, and resuspended in PBS at a concentration of approximately 106 cells/ml. PI was added to a final concentration of 50 µg/ml immediately before sample analysis. The percentage of cells in the different phases of the cell cycle was determined from the raw data using the Epics (R) Elite Flow Cytometry software.
Apoptosis/Cell Death Assays.
The quantitation of apoptosis and necrosis was performed using a modified PI and DAPI double staining assay essentially as described previously (19)
. Cells were plated at a density of 4 x 105 cells/10-cm dish and allowed to attach overnight before treatment with 10 µM 4HPR for 3 days. PI was added to the growth medium to a final concentration of 20 µg/ml 1 h before the end of the assay. The cells were trypsinized and combined with the culture supernatant, followed by resuspension in growth medium containing 5 µM DAPI dye and incubated at 37°C for 15 min. Approximately 3 x 104 cells were attached to slides using a Cytospin centrifuge (Shandon and Lipshaw, Inc.) and observed visually for quantitation of apoptosis and necrosis. Cells exhibiting the DNA condensation characteristic of apoptosing cells, as revealed by DAPI staining but which did not stain intensely with PI, were scored as apoptotic. Necrotic cells were scored as those staining substantially above background levels with PI. The percentage of apoptotic cells was calculated for at least 150 cells/sample, in three or more separate fields. Cytospun cells were photographed on a fluorescence microscope, sequentially using filters for both DAPI dye and PI, at a magnification of 400x.
 |
Results
|
|---|
To determine whether 4HPR and the new phenylretinamides (Fig. 1)
could inhibit the growth of TCC cells, we conducted cell-counting assays for a range of concentrations and treatment times. The extent of reduction in cell number is expressed as a percentage of growth inhibition compared with untreated controls. A significant percentage growth inhibition required 3 days of continuous treatment at a concentration of at least 1 µM (Fig. 2)
. At a concentration of
0.1 µM, none of the phenylretinamides studied had significant effects on cell growth or apoptosis (data not shown). The growth inhibition varied between the four cell lines, which were derived from tumors of varying histological grade: RT4, grade 1; UM-UC14, grade 2; and UM-UC9 and UM-UC10, grade 3. No correlation between grade and sensitivity to the phenylretinamides was observed.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Structure of retinamides. The numbers R2, R3, and R4 represent chemical groups at the ortho, meta, and para ring positions, respectively. OH, COOH, and CH3O represent the hydroxy, carboxy, or methoxy groups, respectively. The chemical names corresponding to ring positions occupied by chemical groups are shown.
|
|
To determine the relative contribution of cell cycle alterations to the observed growth inhibitory effects, the cell cycle profile of the TCC cell lines was determined after a 3-day treatment with a 10 µM concentration of the same phenylretinamides (Table 1
; 4HPR results are highlighted in bold for comparison). One anticipated effect of retinoids on the cell cycle is a G1-G0 arrest, as evidenced by an increase in the percentage of cells in the G1-G0 phase. This could account for the observed growth inhibition. A comparison of the change in percentage of G1-G0 from controls to treated cells (Table 1
, column 3, % G1-G0) with the percentage growth inhibition for each treatment (Table 1
, column 6, % Growth Inh) indicates that G1-G0 arrest alone cannot account for the growth inhibition. Whereas the increased percentage of G1-G0 observed for many of the treatments is likely to contribute to growth inhibition, particularly for the 3HPR and 4CPR treatments for all of the four cell lines, the high growth inhibition for other treatments in the absence of elevated G1-G0 (e.g., 2HPR treatment for UM-UC9 and UM-UC10 cells) strongly suggests that these phenylretinamides also induce cell death. Treatment with 3HPR and 4HPR resulted in a mild increase in percentage of G1-G0 for all of the four cell lines, whereas 2HPR only increased the percentage of G1-G0 for UM-UC14 and RT4 cells. 4CPR treatment caused the greatest increase in percentage of G1-G0 for all of the four cell lines (Table 1
, column 3). An interesting exception to the other phenylretinamides was the decrease in percentage of G1-G0 for 2CPR treatment with concomitant increase in percentage S phase for UM-UC9, UM-UC10, and UM-UC14 cells. This potentially indicates a block in the S phase to G2 phase transition. Cells were also treated with 1 µM ATRA, a dose that can activate the retinoid receptor-mediated signaling pathway in many cell types, for comparison. This produced little or no effect on growth inhibition or cell cycle distribution for any of the cells, indicating a relative lack sensitivity to retinoids (data not shown).
To better characterize the cell cycle alterations caused by the phenylretinamides, we have examined the expression of several cell cycle regulatory proteins, including Rb, p27, and p16, by Western blotting in the UM-UC9 and UM-UC10 cells. Thus far, we have observed no correlation between the expression of these proteins and the sensitivity to growth inhibition by any of the phenylretinamides and have observed no alterations in their expression upon phenylretinamide treatment (data not shown). We have also determined the level of Rb phosphorylation on serine 795 (with a phosphoserine 795 specific antibody) and see no alteration in response to phenylretinamide treatment (data not shown).
It has been shown previously (26)
that 4HPR induces apoptosis in TCC cell lines, including UM-UC9 cells. We have also shown that the cell growth inhibitory effect of 4HPR in the F9 murine embryonal carcinoma cell line involves apoptosis induction, which was also accompanied by the induction of necrosis (19)
. To determine whether the new phenylretinamides also induce apoptosis and/or necrosis in this system, we have conducted a dual stain procedure with the fluorescent DNA-binding dyes DAPI and PI, which are membrane permeable and impermeable, respectively. Cells undergoing apoptosis exhibit a distinct morphological alteration characterized by condensation and fragmentation of nuclear DNA, which can be readily detected by intense staining with DAPI above the level normally seen for noncondensed DNA (Fig. 3A)
. Treatment of all of the four cell lines for 3 days with 10 µM phenylretinamides but not 10 µM ATRA resulted in the appearance of apoptosing cells (Fig. 3B
and data not shown). The quantitation of phenylretinamide-induced apoptosis is shown for the UM-UC9 cells and is representative of the results observed for the other cell lines. In contrast to apoptosing cells, necrotic cells lose membrane integrity and leak their contents into the surroundings. Such cells are able to take up PI, which results in an intense red staining of DNA (Fig. 3A)
. Whereas some necrosis was observed in the phenylretinamide-treated cultures, it was very rare and contributed little to the percentage of dying cells. It should be noted that apoptosis is a rapid process, taking as little as 4 h to complete (27)
. In this cell culture system, most cells that have undergone apoptosis disintegrate, disperse into the media, and can no longer be counted. Although the percentage of cells captured in the process of apoptosing never exceeded 10% at the time of cell harvest, this amount could easily account for a dramatic percentage growth inhibition over time.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. All of the retinamides induce apoptosis in TCC cells. All of the four TCC cell lines were treated with 10 µM of the indicated retinamides or ATRA for 3 days and cytospun onto slides, and apoptosis was quantitated as described in "Materials and Methods." A, example of cytospun cells stained with DAPI and PI. Identical fields were photographed with filters revealing the blue fluorescence of DAPI and red PI fluorescence and merged electronically. Small arrow, DAPI-stained cells containing nuclei with features characteristic of apoptosis. A necrotic cell, which stains intensely with the membrane impermeable PI, is indicated by the large arrow. B, the percentage of UM-UC9 cells scoring positive for an apoptotic morphology after a 3-day treatment with the indicated retinamides is shown. Error bars indicate SE for triplicate fields of greater than 100 cells. The Ps (two-sided Students t test) comparing controls with treated samples were 0.05, except for 2HPR and 4CPR treatments, which had a P of 0.142 and 0.073, respectively.
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
4HPR is less toxic than other retinoids and shows promise as a cancer chemopreventive drug (28
, 29)
. It is currently being tested in a number of chemoprevention trials for breast, prostate, cervical, skin, ovary, and lung cancer, as well as transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder (28)
. Although 4HPR has been extensively studied in both clinical and laboratory settings, the activity of other phenylretinamides has not been as well studied. We determined the effects of seven phenylretinamides (including 4HPR) on cell growth and apoptosis in four TCC cell lines. The novel phenylretinamide 3HPR was the most active compound, with significantly greater growth inhibition than 4HPR in all of the four cell lines (Fig. 2)
. These data provide incentive to further explore the development of these novel phenylretinamides as preventive agents in TCC.
Through the use of retinoid receptor-null F9 cells, we have demonstrated previously (19)
that 4HPR can have dual functions as both a differentiating agent and apoptosis inducer, which are mediated through retinoid receptor-dependent and -independent mechanisms, respectively. This led us to propose that the cancer therapeutic and chemopreventive efficacy of 4HPR in cancer patients might be because of its dual role as both an apoptotic agent and as a differentiating agent (retinoid). Tumor cells that can escape apoptotic effects at initial stages of exposure to high doses of 4HPR would then be subject to differentiating effects of lower doses of 4HPR. A similar mechanism may apply to the new phenylretinamides, and preliminary data using the same retinoid receptor-null F9 cell system indicate that several of them can also act as both retinoid receptor-dependent cytotoxic and retinoid receptor-independent differentiating agents (data not shown). It remains to be determined whether 4HPR and the new phenylretinamides exert their effects on TCC cells through retinoid receptor-dependent or -independent mechanisms. The relative insensitivity of TCC cells to apoptosis induction by ATRA treatment, however, suggests that these cells may be more sensitive to retinoid receptor-independent actions of phenylretinamides (Fig. 3B)
. We also note that there was no correlation between the grade of tumor from which the cell lines were derived and the overall response to retinamides. We speculate that either the sensitivity to growth inhibition induced by the retinamides does not vary with tumor grade or the characteristics associated with tumor grade may have been lost during the derivation and passaging of the cell lines. Future studies are aimed at comparing the efficacy of the new phenylretinamides with 4HPR for chemoprevention in animal models.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
We thank Dr. David Menter, Dr. Timothy Walch, and the other members of the laboratory for helpful discussions and advice.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 Supported in part by National Cancer Institute CA77150, CA45809, and CA16672. S. M. L. holds the Margaret and Ben Love Professorship in Clinical Cancer Care. 
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, Box 236, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030. Phone: (713) 792-0627; Fax: (713) 792-0628; E-mail: jclifford{at}mdanderson.org 
3 The abbreviations used are: TCC, transitional cell carcinoma; RAR, retinoic acid receptor; 4HPR, N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide; 2CPR, N-(2-carboxyphenyl)retinamide; 3CPR, N-(3-carboxyphenyl)retinamide; 4CPR, N-(4-carboxyphenyl)retinamide; 2HPR, N-(2-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide; 3HPR, N-(3-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide; 4MPR, N-(4-methoxyphenyl)retinamide; ATRA, all-trans retinoic acid; PI, propidium iodide; DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. 
Received 8/ 9/00;
revised 1/19/01;
accepted 1/30/01.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Greenlee R. T., Murray T., Bolden S., Wingo P. A. Cancer Statistics 2000. CA Cancer J. Clin., 50: 7-33, 2000.[Abstract]
-
Sabichi A., Lerner S. P., Grossman H. B., Lippman S. M. Retinoids in the chemoprevention of bladder cancer. Curr. Opin. Oncol., 10: 479-484, 1998.[Medline]
-
Liebert M., Gebhardt D., Wood C., Chen I-L., Ellard J., Amancio D., Grossman H. B. Urothelial differentiation and bladder cancer Baskin L. Hayward G. eds. . Advances in Bladder Research, : 437-448, Plenum Publishing Corp. New York 1999.
-
Chambon P. A decade of molecular biology of retinoic acid receptors. FASEB J., 10: 940-954, 1996.[Abstract]
-
Mangelsdorf D. J., Evans R. M. The RXR heterodimers and orphan receptors. Cell, 83: 841-850, 1995.[Medline]
-
Lippman S. M., Benner S. E., Hong W. K. Cancer chemoprevention. J. Clin. Oncol., 12: 851-873, 1994.[Abstract]
-
Kelloff G. J., Crowell J. A., Boone C. W., Steele V. E., Lubet R. A., Greenwald P., Alberts D. S., Covey J. M., Doody L. A., Knapp G. G., et al Clinical development plan: N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) 6retinamide. J. Cell. Biochem., 20 (Suppl.): 176s-196s, 1994.
-
Costa A., Formelli F., Chiesa F., Decensi A., De Palo G., Veronesi U. Prospects of chemoprevention of human cancers with the synthetic retinoid fenretinide. Cancer Res., 54 (Suppl.): 2032s-2037s, 1994.
-
Chiesa F., Tradati N., Marazza M., Rossi N., Boracchi P., Mariani L., Formelli F., Giardini R., Costa A., De Palo G., et al Fenretinide (4-HPR) in chemoprevention of oral leukoplakia. J. Cell. Biochem., 17F (Suppl.): 255-261, 1993.
-
Veronesi U., De Palo G., Marubini E., Costa A., Formelli F., Mariani L., Decensi A., Camerini T., Del Turco M. R., DiMauro M. G., Muraca M. G., Del Vecchio M., Pinto C., DAiuto G., Boni C., Campa T., Magni A., Miceli R., Perloff M., Malone W. F., Sporn M. B. Randomized trial of fenretinide to prevent second breast malignancy in women with early breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 91: 1847-1856, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Swisshelm K., Ryan K., Lee X., Tsou H. C., Peacocke M., Sager R. Down-regulation of retinoic acid receptor ß in mammary carcinoma cell lines and its up-regulation in senescing normal mammary epithelial cells. Cell Growth Differ., 5: 133-141, 1994.[Abstract]
-
Sabichi A. L., Hendricks D. T., Bober M. A., Birrer M. J. Retinoic acid receptor ß expression and growth inhibition of gynecologic cancer cells by the synthetic retinoid N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) retinamide. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 90: 597-605, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kazmi S. M. I., Plante R. K., Visconti V., Lau C. Y. Comparison of N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) retinamide and all-trans retinoic acid in the regulation of retinoid receptor-mediated gene expression in human breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Res., 56: 1056-1062, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fanjul A. N., Delia D., Pierotti M. A., Rideout D., Qiu J., Pfahl M. 4-hydroxyphenyl retinamide is a highly selective activator of retinoid receptors. J. Biol. Chem., 271: 22441-22446, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dmitrovsky E. N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) retinamide activation of a distinct pathway signaling apoptosis. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 89: 1179-1181, 1997.[Free Full Text]
-
Delia D., Aiello A., Lombardi L., Pelicci P. G., Grignani F., Grignani F., Formelli F., Menard S., Costa A., Veronesi U., Pierotti M. A. N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) retinamide induces apoptosis of malignant hemopoietic cell lines including those unresponsive to retinoic acid. Cancer Res., 53: 6036-6041, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sheikh M. S., Shao Z-M., Li X-S., Ordonez J. V., Conley B. A., Wu S., Dawson M. I., Han Q-X., Chao W., Quick T., Niles R. M., Fontana J. A. N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) retinamide (4-HPR)-mediated biological actions involve retinoid receptor-independent pathways in human breast carcinoma. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 16: 2477-2486, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Oridate N., Lotan D., Xu X-C., Hong W. K., Lotan R. Differential induction of apoptosis by all-trans-retinoic acid and N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Clin. Cancer Res., 2: 855-863, 1996.[Abstract]
-
Clifford J. L., Menter D. G., Wang M., Lotan R., Lippman S. M. Retinoid receptor-dependent and -independent effects of N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide in F9 embryonal carcinoma cells. Cancer Res., 59: 14-18, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sporn M. B., Squire R. A., Brown C. C., Smith J. M., Wenk M. L., Springer S. 13-cis-retinoic acid: inhibition of bladder carcinogenesis in the rat. Science (Washington DC), 195: 487-489, 1977.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Moon R. C., Detrisac C. J., Thomas C. F., Kelloff G. J. Chemoprevention of experimental bladder cancer. J. Cell. Biochem., 161: 134-138, 1992.
-
Rui H. Research and development of cancer chemopreventive agents in China. J. Cell. Biochem., 27 (Suppl.): 7s-11s, 1997.
-
DAmbrosio S. M., Gibson-DAmbrosio R., Milo G. E., Casto B., Kelloff G. J., Steele V. E. Differential response of normal, premalignant, and malignant human oral epithelial cells to growth inhibition by chemopreventive agents. Anticancer Res., 20: 2273-2280, 2000.[Medline]
-
Liebert M., Wedemeyer G. A., Stein J. A., Washington R.W., Jr., Flint A., Ren L. Q., Grossman H. B. Identification by monoclonal antibodies of an antigen shed by human bladder cancer cells. Cancer Res., 49: 6720-6726, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Grossman H. B., Wedemeyer G., Ren L. UM-UC-1 and UM-UC-2: characterization of two new human transitional cell carcinoma lines. J. Urol., 132: 834-837, 1984.[Medline]
-
Zou C., Zou C. C., Wang L-E., Liebert M., Grossman H. B., Lotan R., Wei Q. Combined effect of chemopreventive agent N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) retinamide (4-HPR) and
-radiation on bladder cancer cell lines. Int. J. Oncol., 13: 1037-1041, 1998.[Medline]
-
Bursch W., Paffe S., Putz B., Barthel G., Schulte-Hermann R. Determination of the length of the histological stages of apoptosis in normal liver and in altered hepatic foci of rats. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 11: 847-853, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lippman S. M., Lee J. J., Sabichi A. Cancer chemoprevention: progress and promise. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. (Bethesda), 90: 1514-1528, 1998.[Free Full Text]
-
Formelli F., Clerici M., Campa T., Di Mauro M. G., Magni A., Mascotti G., Moglia D., De Palo G., Costa A., Veronesi U. Five-year administration of fenretinide: pharmacokinetics and effects of plasma retinol concentrations. J. Clin. Oncol., 11: 2036-2042, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L. Sabichi, S. P. Lerner, E. N. Atkinson, H. B. Grossman, N. P. Caraway, C. P. Dinney, D. F. Penson, S. Matin, A. Kamat, L. L. Pisters, et al.
Phase III Prevention Trial of Fenretinide in Patients with Resected Non Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
January 1, 2008;
14(1):
224 - 229.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Xu, S. Cheepala, E. McCauley, K. Coombes, L. Xiao, S. M. Fischer, and J. L. Clifford
Chemoprevention of Skin Carcinogenesis by Phenylretinamides: Retinoid Receptor-Independent Tumor Suppression
Clin. Cancer Res.,
February 1, 2006;
12(3):
969 - 979.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A.-M. Simeone, C.-X. Deng, G. J. Kelloff, V. E. Steele, M. M. Johnson, and A. M. Tari
N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)retinamide is more potent than other phenylretinamides in inhibiting the growth of BRCA1-mutated breast cancer cells
Carcinogenesis,
May 1, 2005;
26(5):
1000 - 1007.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-H. Park, L. Liu, I.-H. Kim, J.-H. Kim, K.-R. You, and D.-G. Kim
Identification of the Genes Involved in Enhanced Fenretinide-Induced Apoptosis by Parthenolide in Human Hepatoma Cells
Cancer Res.,
April 1, 2005;
65(7):
2804 - 2814.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Boorjian, S. K. Tickoo, N. P. Mongan, H. Yu, D. Bok, R. R. Rando, D. M. Nanus, D. S. Scherr, and L. J. Gudas
Reduced Lecithin: Retinol Acyltransferase Expression Correlates with Increased Pathologic Tumor Stage in Bladder Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
May 15, 2004;
10(10):
3429 - 3437.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L. Sabichi, M. R. Modiano, J. J. Lee, Y.-M. Peng, M.-J. Xu, H. Villar, W. S. Dalton, and S. M. Lippman
Breast Tissue Accumulation of Retinamides in a Randomized Short-term Study of Fenretinide
Clin. Cancer Res.,
July 1, 2003;
9(7):
2400 - 2405.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Karashima, P. Sweeney, A. Kamat, S. Huang, S. J. Kim, M. Bar-Eli, D. J. McConkey, and C. P. N. Dinney
Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Mediates Angiogenesis and Metastasis of Human Bladder Cancer through the Regulation of Interleukin-8
Clin. Cancer Res.,
July 1, 2003;
9(7):
2786 - 2797.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Clifford, X. Yang, E. Walch, M. Wang, and S. M. Lippman
Dominant Negative Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 2 (STAT2) Protein: Stable Expression Blocks Interferon {alpha} Action in Skin Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
May 1, 2003;
2(5):
453 - 459.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A.-M. Simeone, S. Ekmekcioglu, L. D. Broemeling, E. A. Grimm, and A. M. Tari
A Novel Mechanism by Which N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)retinamide Inhibits Breast Cancer Cell Growth: The Production of Nitric Oxide
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
October 1, 2002;
1(12):
1009 - 1017.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Lippman and W. Ki Hong
Cancer Prevention by Delay : Commentary re: J. A. O'Shaughnessy et al., Treatment and Prevention of Intraepithelial Neoplasia: An Important Target for Accelerated New Agent Development. Clin. Cancer Res., 8: 314-346, 2002.
Clin. Cancer Res.,
February 1, 2002;
8(2):
305 - 313.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|