
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Arizona Cancer Center, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85724 [H-H. S. C., Y. C., D. S. A., I. H., R. D., F. S.]; Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 [J. A. C.]; College of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854 [C. S. Y.]; and Mitsui Norin Co., Ltd., Shizuoka 426-01, Japan [Y. H.]
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because it is not easy to change an individuals dietary habits, ingesting purified green tea polyphenol products in oral formulations may be more acceptable for chronic use in individuals who do not customarily consume green tea. We have performed a Phase I pharmacokinetic study to determine the systemic availability of tea polyphenols after a single oral dose administration of purified tea polyphenol products and the effects of dose and polyphenol formulation on the pharmacokinetics of EGCG and other tea catechins.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Participants.
Twenty healthy male and female subjects
30 years of age were
recruited to participate in the study. To be eligible, the participants
were required to be able to give informed consent, to have a
performance status of 01 (as determined by the Southwest Oncology
Group Performance Status Criteria), and to have normal liver and renal
function. Individuals with performance status of 01 are fully active
or restricted only in physically strenuous activity. Participants were
excluded if they were pregnant, had had cancers of any types within the
past 5 years, had severe metabolic disorders or other life-threatening
acute or chronic diseases, had weight loss of >10% in the 6 months
preceding study entry, and had a prior history of gastric ulcer. The
study was approved by the University of Arizona Human Subjects
Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Study Design.
All study participants were required to refrain from the ingestion of
tea or tea products for 7 days before the first pharmacokinetic study
and until the end of the second pharmacokinetic study. Study
participants (five subjects/dose level) were randomly assigned to a
dose level (200, 400, 600, or 800 mg based on EGCG content). All
subjects were randomly crossed-over to receive the two polyphenol
formulations at the same dose level, with a 2-week wash-out period. The
diet of the subjects was not standardized or controlled before the
study.
The day before the pharmacokinetic study, study participants were instructed to fast after midnight except for drinking water. On the pharmacokinetic study day, study subjects skipped breakfast and took no over the counter medications, vitamins, or health food products. Study participants came to the clinic in the early morning (68 a.m.) and were provided with one to two bagels for breakfast. Immediately after or during breakfast, study subjects swallowed one of the tea polyphenol formulations at the assigned dose level with a glass of water. Study subjects were allowed unlimited water intake throughout the study day. Other drinks were not allowed. Blood samples (57 ml each) were collected before the administration of the study medication and at time points 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h after drug administration. Study subjects self-collected urine before dosing and at three intervals during the 24-h period after dosing (04, 48, and 824 h). After the 4 h blood collection, a vegetarian or turkey bagel sandwich was provided to the study subjects.
Sample Collection and Processing.
Once collected, blood samples were kept in the refrigerator and
centrifuged at 4°C within 2 h of collection. After
centrifugation, 1 ml of plasma was aliquoted into cryotubes containing
20 µl of ascorbate-EDTA solution [0.4 M
NaH2PO4 buffer containing
20% ascorbic acid and 0.1% EDTA (pH 3.6)]. The samples were stored
at -80°C until analysis. Before each urine collection period, 5 ml
of ascorbate-EDTA solution were added to the urine collection
containers, which were kept in a cooler containing frozen ice-packs. At
the end of the urine collection, urine volume was recorded, and an
aliquot of 15 ml was transferred into a storage tube that contained 20
mg of ascorbic acid and 0.5 mg of EDTA. The pH of the urine samples was
adjusted to 6.8 with 10% NaOH, and an aliquot was stored at -80°C
until analysis.
Tea Polyphenol Concentration Measurements.
EGCG, EC, and EGC concentrations in plasma and urine samples were
determined within 1 month of collection using a previously published
HPLC procedure (7)
. Briefly, for determination of the
unchanged tea polyphenols in plasma, lipid soluble components in plasma
were removed with a methylene chloride extraction. The remaining
aqueous phase was extracted with ethyl acetate. The ethyl acetate
fraction was collected, mixed with a small volume of 0.1% ascorbic
acid, and dried by vacuum centrifugation. The dried sample was
redissolved in an aliquot of 15% acetonitrile aqueous solution. The
reconstituted sample was centrifuged at 16,000 x g for
10 min, and an aliquot of the sample was injected onto HPLC. For
determination of the glucuronic acid/sulfate conjugates of tea
polyphenols in plasma, the samples were mixed with an aliquot of
ascorbate-EDTA solution and a mixture of ß-glucuronidase and
sulfatase (to convert the conjugates to the unchanged form). The
resulting mixture was incubated at 37°C for 45 min. Blank plasma
spiked with polyphenol standards was incubated with a similar mixture
at 37°C for 23 min (half of the incubation time of the sample). The
reaction was stopped by adding methylene chloride and water and
extracted as described for the unchanged polyphenols. Differences
between the polyphenol concentrations determined before and after
enzyme hydrolysis allowed the estimation of the concentrations of the
conjugated polyphenols. The extraction procedures for the urine samples
were similar to those for the plasma samples, except that the urine
samples were not subjected to the clean-up procedures with methylene
chloride. For each analytical run, a standard curve was prepared in the
appropriate matrix and used to determine the tea polyphenol
concentration. Quality control samples were prepared and analyzed along
with the authentic samples. The whole batch of samples was reprocessed
and reanalyzed if the variation of the quality control samples was
greater than 15% of the expected values.
The HPLC system consisted of an ESA Model 540 refrigerated autosampler, an ESA Model 582 two-pump solvent delivery system, an ESA 5600 coulochem electrode array system, and a Supelcosil C18 reversed-phase column (150 x 4.6 mm; particle size, 5 µm; Supelco Inc., Bellefonte, PA). The autosampler and column temperatures were maintained at 6°C and 35°C, respectively. Buffer A consisted of 30 mM NaH2PO4 buffer, acetonitrile, and tetrahydrofuran in a volume ratio of 98.13:1.75:0.12 (pH 3.35). Buffer B consisted of 15 mM NaH2PO4 buffer, acetonitrile, and tetrahydrofuran in a volume ratio of 41.5:58.5:12.5 (pH 3.45). The flow rate was maintained at 1 ml/min. The column was eluted at 96% buffer A and 4% buffer B from 07 min, and then the linear gradient was changed progressively to 17% buffer B at 25 min, 28% buffer B at 31 min, 33% buffer B at 37 min, and 98% buffer B at 38 min. It was maintained at 98% buffer B from 3843 min and finally changed back to 4% buffer B at 44 min for the analysis of the next sample. The eluent was monitored by the coulochem electrode array system with potential settings at -90, -10, 70, and 150 mV, and four chromatograms were obtained simultaneously.
Data Analysis.
The following pharmacokinetic parameters of unchanged EGCG were
estimated using the WINNONLIN program with the model-independent
approach (8)
: time to reach maximum plasma concentration
(Tmax); maximum plasma concentration
(Cmax); AUC; clearance/bioavailability
(CL/F); volume of distribution/bioavailability
(Vd/F); terminal elimination half-life
(t1/2); and terminal elimination rate
constant (
n). The AUC,
Tmax, and
Cmax of total (unchanged and
glucuronic acid/sulfate conjugates) EGC, EC, and EGCG were also
estimated using the WINNONLIN program with the mode-independent
approach. The amount of tea polyphenol excreted into the urine was
estimated by the product of the polyphenol concentration in the urine
and urine volume.
Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared among different dose levels for the same catechin formulation using ANOVA. Bonferronis t test was used for the pairwise multiple comparisons. Pharmacokinetic measurements of EGCG between the two catechin formulations were compared by a paired t test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fig. 4
shows the relationship between the AUC of unchanged EGCG and the tea
polyphenol dose ingested. The AUC of EGCG showed less than proportional
increases at the three lower doses and more than proportional increases
as the dose was increased to 800 mg. This phenomenon is consistent with
that observed for chemicals undergoing extensive presystemic
elimination. Because the presystemic elimination is saturated at higher
doses, the extents of the unchanged form available in the systemic
circulation are increased. In a previous clinical study using
reconstituted green tea beverages (10)
, the
Cmax of EGCG increased approximately
23-fold when the dose of green tea solids was increased from 1.5 to
3.0 grams, but increasing the dose to 4.5 grams did not increase the
Cmax values significantly. These
findings differed from our current observation. In the previous study,
EGCG is not the major component in the green tea solids, with EGC
content similar to that of EGCG. The presence of other tea polyphenols
in significant quantities might affect the absorption and disposition
of EGCG (10)
. Furthermore, the tea polyphenol
concentrations were reported as the sum of unchanged and conjugated
forms in the previous study (10)
, although the kinetic
disposition of the conjugates can be very different from that of the
parent catechins.
|
It is worth noting that although the EGC or EC content in the Polyphenon E formulation was less than 20% of that of EGCG, the AUCs of total (unchanged and conjugated) EGC or EC were 36170% of total EGCG. If a nonspecific assay were used, we might have concluded that orally administered EGC and EC were more bioavailable than EGCG. However, total EGC or EC consisted mostly of conjugated forms, whereas total EGCG was constituted mostly of the unchanged form. Having specifically determined the unchanged tea polyphenol concentrations and compared the dose-adjusted AUC of the unchanged forms, we found EGCG to be more bioavailable than EGC and EC.
Throughout the study, we recorded all side effects experienced by our study subjects. Both tea polyphenol formulations administered as a single oral dose over the dose range studied were well tolerated by the study participants. The highest dose used was equivalent to consuming up to 8 cups of green tea at once. Some subjects experienced mild headache and fatigue, possibly related to the study products. These adverse events could also have been consequences of the procedures and restrictions that the subjects encountered on the pharmacokinetic study days (such as refraining from beverages containing caffeine).
We conclude that both tea polyphenol formulations administered as a single oral dose over the dose range studied were well tolerated by the study participants. Oral administration of EGCG and Polyphenon E at the same dose level (based on EGCG content) resulted in similar plasma EGCG levels. From the economical standpoint in chemoprevention, these results are encouraging because it would be less expensive to produce the Polyphenon E formulation than the pure EGCG formulation. Orally ingested tea polyphenols undergo extensive and saturable presystemic elimination and have large intersubject variations in systemic availability. Additional studies are needed to address factors affecting the systemic availability of tea polyphenols. Future clinical studies are planned to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacological activity of tea polyphenols after chronic EGCG/Polyphenon E treatment.
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 Supported by Contract N01-CN-85179 from the
National Cancer Institute. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Arizona Cancer Center, The University of Arizona, Tucson,
AZ 85724. Phone: (520) 626-3358; Fax: (520) 626-5348; E-mail: schow{at}azcc.arizona.edu ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: EGCG,
epigallocatechin gallate; EGC, epigallocatechin; EC, epicatechin; HPLC,
high-performance liquid chromatography; AUC, area under the plasma
concentration-time curves. ![]()
Received 7/19/00; revised 11/ 2/00; accepted 11/ 7/00.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. W. Anderson, C. Goodin, Y. Zhang, S. Kim, R. D. Estensen, T. S. Wiedmann, P. Sekar, C. R. Buncher, J. C. Khoury, J. R. Garbow, et al. Effect of dietary green tea extract and aerosolized difluoromethylornithine during lung tumor progression in A/J strain mice Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2008; 29(8): 1594 - 1600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Henning, J. J. Choo, and D. Heber Nongallated Compared with Gallated Flavan-3-ols in Green and Black Tea Are More Bioavailable J. Nutr., August 1, 2008; 138(8): 1529S - 1534S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Auger, W. Mullen, Y. Hara, and A. Crozier Bioavailability of Polyphenon E Flavan-3-ols in Humans with an Ileostomy J. Nutr., August 1, 2008; 138(8): 1535S - 1542S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sasazuki, M. Inoue, T. Miura, M. Iwasaki, S. Tsugane, and for the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospecti Plasma Tea Polyphenols and Gastric Cancer Risk: A Case-Control Study Nested in a Large Population-Based Prospective Study in Japan Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2008; 17(2): 343 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. McKay and J. B. Blumberg Roles for Epigallocatechin Gallate in Cardiovascular Disease and Obesity: An Introduction J. Am. Coll. Nutr., August 1, 2007; 26(4): 362S - 365S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Hill, A. M. Coates, J. D. Buckley, R. Ross, F. Thielecke, and P. R.C. Howe Can EGCG Reduce Abdominal Fat in Obese Subjects? J. Am. Coll. Nutr., August 1, 2007; 26(4): 396S - 402S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Boocock, G. E.S. Faust, K. R. Patel, A. M. Schinas, V. A. Brown, M. P. Ducharme, T. D. Booth, J. A. Crowell, M. Perloff, A. J. Gescher, et al. Phase I Dose Escalation Pharmacokinetic Study in Healthy Volunteers of Resveratrol, a Potential Cancer Chemopreventive Agent Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2007; 16(6): 1246 - 1252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Liang, C. W. Binns, L. Jian, and A. H. Lee Does the Consumption of Green Tea Reduce the Risk of Lung Cancer Among Smokers? Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., March 1, 2007; 4(1): 17 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Lu, J. Liao, G. Yang, K. R. Reuhl, X. Hao, and C. S. Yang Inhibition of Adenoma Progression to Adenocarcinoma in a 4-(Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-Pyridyl)-1-Butanone-Induced Lung Tumorigenesis Model in A/J Mice by Tea Polyphenols and Caffeine Cancer Res., December 1, 2006; 66(23): 11494 - 11501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Henning, W. Aronson, Y. Niu, F. Conde, N. H. Lee, N. P. Seeram, R.-P. Lee, J. Lu, D. M. Harris, A. Moro, et al. Tea Polyphenols and Theaflavins Are Present in Prostate Tissue of Humans and Mice after Green and Black Tea Consumption J. Nutr., July 1, 2006; 136(7): 1839 - 1843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Spinella, L. Rosano, V. Di Castro, S. Decandia, A. Albini, M. R. Nicotra, P. G. Natali, and A. Bagnato Green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibits the endothelin axis and downstream signaling pathways in ovarian carcinoma. Mol. Cancer Ther., June 1, 2006; 5(6): 1483 - 1492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Cabrera, R. Artacho, and R. Gimenez Beneficial effects of green tea--a review. J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2006; 25(2): 79 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Stresemann, B. Brueckner, T. Musch, H. Stopper, and F. Lyko Functional diversity of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors in human cancer cell lines. Cancer Res., March 1, 2006; 66(5): 2794 - 2800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. M. Dorchies, S. Wagner, O. Vuadens, K. Waldhauser, T. M. Buetler, P. Kucera, and U. T. Ruegg Green tea extract and its major polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin gallate improve muscle function in a mouse model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2006; 290(2): C616 - C625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Lambert, M.-J. Lee, L. Diamond, J. Ju, J. Hong, M. Bose, H. L. Newmark, and C. S. Yang DOSE-DEPENDENT LEVELS OF EPIGALLOCATECHIN-3-GALLATE IN HUMAN COLON CANCER CELLS AND MOUSE PLASMA AND TISSUES Drug Metab. Dispos., January 1, 2006; 34(1): 8 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H-H. S. Chow, I. A. Hakim, D. R. Vining, J. A. Crowell, J. Ranger-Moore, W. M. Chew, C. A. Celaya, S. R. Rodney, Y. Hara, and D. S. Alberts Effects of Dosing Condition on the Oral Bioavailability of Green Tea Catechins after Single-Dose Administration of Polyphenon E in Healthy Individuals Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2005; 11(12): 4627 - 4633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Shimizu, A. Deguchi, J. T.E. Lim, H. Moriwaki, L. Kopelovich, and I. B. Weinstein (-)-Epigallocatechin Gallate and Polyphenon E Inhibit Growth and Activation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 Signaling Pathways in Human Colon Cancer Cells Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2005; 11(7): 2735 - 2746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Manach, G. Williamson, C. Morand, A. Scalbert, and C. Remesy Bioavailability and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. I. Review of 97 bioavailability studies Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2005; 81(1): 230S - 242S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Halliwell, J. Rafter, and A. Jenner Health promotion by flavonoids, tocopherols, tocotrienols, and other phenols: direct or indirect effects? Antioxidant or not? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2005; 81(1): 268S - 276S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Aktas, T. Prozorovski, A. Smorodchenko, N. E. Savaskan, R. Lauster, P.-M. Kloetzel, C. Infante-Duarte, S. Brocke, and F. Zipp Green Tea Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Mediates T Cellular NF-{kappa}B Inhibition and Exerts Neuroprotection in Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis J. Immunol., November 1, 2004; 173(9): 5794 - 5800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nagai, A. H. Conney, and B. T. Zhu STRONG INHIBITORY EFFECTS OF COMMON TEA CATECHINS AND BIOFLAVONOIDS ON THE O-METHYLATION OF CATECHOL ESTROGENS CATALYZED BY HUMAN LIVER CYTOSOLIC CATECHOL-O-METHYLTRANSFERASE Drug Metab. Dispos., May 1, 2004; 32(5): 497 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Wheeler, J. D. Catravas, K. Odoms, A. Denenberg, V. Malhotra, and H. R. Wong Epigallocatechin-3-gallate, a Green Tea-Derived Polyphenol, Inhibits IL-1{beta}-Dependent Proinflammatory Signal Transduction in Cultured Respiratory Epithelial Cells J. Nutr., May 1, 2004; 134(5): 1039 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Lambert, M.-J. Lee, H. Lu, X. Meng, J. J. J. Hong, D. N. Seril, M. G. Sturgill, and C. S. Yang Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Is Absorbed but Extensively Glucuronidated Following Oral Administration to Mice,2 J. Nutr., December 1, 2003; 133(12): 4172 - 4177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Vaidyanathan and T. Walle Cellular Uptake and Efflux of the Tea Flavonoid (-)Epicatechin-3-gallate in the Human Intestinal Cell Line Caco-2 J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2003; 307(2): 745 - 752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Lambert and C. S. Yang Mechanisms of Cancer Prevention by Tea Constituents J. Nutr., October 1, 2003; 133(10): 3262S - 3267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. A. Hakim, R. B. Harris, S. Brown, H-H. S. Chow, S. Wiseman, S. Agarwal, and W. Talbot Effect of Increased Tea Consumption on Oxidative DNA Damage among Smokers: A Randomized Controlled Study J. Nutr., October 1, 2003; 133(10): 3303S - 3309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H-H. S. Chow, Y. Cai, I. A. Hakim, J. A. Crowell, F. Shahi, C. A. Brooks, R. T. Dorr, Y. Hara, and D. S. Alberts Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Green Tea Polyphenols after Multiple-Dose Administration of Epigallocatechin Gallate and Polyphenon E in Healthy Individuals Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 9(9): 3312 - 3319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Masuda, M. Suzui, J. T. E. Lim, and I. B. Weinstein Epigallocatechin-3-gallate Inhibits Activation of HER-2/neu and Downstream Signaling Pathways in Human Head and Neck and Breast Carcinoma Cells Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2003; 9(9): 3486 - 3491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Lu, X. Meng, C. Li, S. Sang, C. Patten, S. Sheng, J. Hong, N. Bai, B. Winnik, C.-T. Ho, et al. Glucuronides of Tea Catechins: Enzymology of Biosynthesis and Biological Activities Drug Metab. Dispos., April 1, 2003; 31(4): 452 - 461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Cai, N. D. Anavy, and H-H. S. Chow Contribution of Presystemic Hepatic Extraction to the Low Oral Bioavailability of Green Tea Catechins in Rats Drug Metab. Dispos., November 1, 2002; 30(11): 1246 - 1249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-J. Lee, P. Maliakal, L. Chen, X. Meng, F. Y. Bondoc, S. Prabhu, G. Lambert, S. Mohr, and C. S. Yang Pharmacokinetics of Tea Catechins after Ingestion of Green Tea and (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate by Humans: Formation of Different Metabolites and Individual Variability Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2002; 11(10): 1025 - 1032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Vaidyanathan and T. Walle Glucuronidation and Sulfation of the Tea Flavonoid (-)-Epicatechin by the Human and Rat Enzymes |