CEBP CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2008 Conference on Cancer Prevention - Washington, D.C.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lipkus, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rimer, B. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lipkus, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rimer, B. K.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 9, 973-975, September 2000
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Short Communications

Relationships among Breast Cancer Perceived Absolute Risk, Comparative Risk, and Worries1

Isaac M. Lipkus2, Maggie Kuchibhatla, Colleen M. McBride, Hayden B. Bosworth, Kathryn I. Pollak, Ilene C. Siegler and Barbara K. Rimer

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27701 [I. M. L., M. K., C. M. M., H. B. B., K. I. P., I. C. S.], and National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 [B. K. R.]

When trying to predict breast cancer screening, it may be important to understand the relationships between perceived breast cancer risks and worries about getting breast cancer. This study examines the extent to which women’s worries about breast cancer correlate with perceptions of both absolute (assessment of own) and comparative (self versus other) 10-year and lifetime risks. As part of a larger randomized intervention trial concerning hormone replacement therapy, 581 women participated in a telephone baseline survey to assess their perceptions of breast cancer risks and worries. Worries about getting breast cancer in the next 10 years and in one’s lifetime were related positively to both absolute and comparative 10-year and lifetime risks. The magnitude of these relationships did not differ by time frame. Worry about breast cancer is a function of both how a woman views her own risk and how she compares her risk with that of other women. Some practitioners may encourage women to get screened for breast cancer by using emotional appeals, such as heightening women’s worries about breast cancer by using risk information. Our data suggest that they should give careful consideration how best to combine, if at all, information about absolute and comparative risks. For example, if the motivation to screen is based on a sequential assessment of risk beginning with comparative and then absolute risk, creating communications that heighten perceived risk on both of these risk dimensions may be needed to evoke sufficient worry to initiate breast cancer screening.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
K. A. Robb, A. Miles, J. Campbell, P. Evans, and J. Wardle
Impact of Risk Information on Perceived Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Randomized Trial
J Health Psychol, September 1, 2008; 13(6): 744 - 753.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
T. van der Weijden, B. van Steenkiste, H.E.J.H. Stoffers, D.R.M. Timmermans, and R. Grol
Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in General Practice: Mismatch between Cardiovascular Risk and Patients' Risk Perceptions
Med Decis Making, December 1, 2007; 27(6): 754 - 761.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
W. M. P. Klein and M. E. Stefanek
Cancer Risk Elicitation and Communication: Lessons from the Psychology of Risk Perception
CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2007; 57(3): 147 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
D. P. French, D. Hevey, S. Sutton, A. L. Kinmonth, and T. M. Marteau
Personal and Social Comparison Information about Health Risk: Reaction to Information and Information Search.
J Health Psychol, May 1, 2006; 11(3): 497 - 510.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
L. L. Humphrey, M. Helfand, B. K.S. Chan, and S. H. Woolf
Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med, September 3, 2002; 137(5_Part_1): 347 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. L. Taylor, R. A. Shelby, M. D. Schwartz, J. Ackerman, V. H. LaSalle, E. P. Gelmann, and C. McGuire
The Impact of Item Order on Ratings of Cancer Risk Perception
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2002; 11(7): 654 - 659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
I. M. Lipkus, W. M. P. Klein, and B. K. Rimer
Communicating Breast Cancer Risks to Women Using Different Formats
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2001; 10(8): 895 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2000 by the American Association for Cancer Research.