This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kristal, A. R. Articles by McLerran, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kristal, A. R. Articles by McLerran, D.

Precision and Bias of Food Frequency-based Measures of Fruit and Vegetable Intakes¹

Cancer Prevention Research Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109-1024 [A. R. K., N. C. V., R. E. P., M. L. N., A. L. S., D. M.], and Department of Epidemiology [A. R. K., R. E. P.] and Nutritional Sciences Program [A. R. K., R. E. P., M. L. N.], University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195

Accurate assessment of fruit and vegetable intakes is critical for cancer control research and public health surveillance. This report examines the bias and precision of two commonly used food frequency questionnaire methods to assess fruit and vegetable intakes: (a) the 5 A Day method, based on seven items; and (b) the summation method, based on adding total servings of all fruit and vegetable items on a comprehensive (100+ item) food frequency questionnaire. Data are from three studies in which 24-h dietary recalls, food records, or serum carotenoid concentrations could be used as criterion measures (n = 260, 1031, and 342). Studies differed markedly in distributions of participants’ age, race/ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic status. Mean intakes of total fruit and vegetables based on the 5 A Day method were consistently lower than those from either the summation method (3.11 versus 4.06), 24-h recalls (3.32 versus 4.07), or food records (3.11 versus 3.46; all P < 0.01), and this was due primarily to underestimates of vegetable intake. Correlations of the 5 A Day and summation measures with all criterion measures were similar and were consistently higher for fruit (range, 0.33–0.57) than for vegetables (range, 0.24–0.32). These results, which were consistent across diverse participant samples, suggest that the 5 A Day method yields both biased and imprecise measures of vegetable intake and that research to improve this measure is needed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. R. Saracino, J. Bigler, Y. Schwarz, J.-L. Chang, S. Li, L. Li, E. White, J. D. Potter, and J. W. Lampe Citrus Fruit Intake Is Associated with Lower Serum Bilirubin Concentration among Women with the UGT1A1*28 Polymorphism J. Nutr., March 1, 2009; 139(3): 555 - 560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. S Maruti, C. M Ulrich, and E. White Folate and one-carbon metabolism nutrients from supplements and diet in relation to breast cancer risk Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2009; 89(2): 624 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. De Vet, J. De Nooijer, N. K. De Vries, and J. Brug Do the Transtheoretical Processes of Change Predict Transitions in Stages of Change for Fruit Intake? Health Educ Behav, October 1, 2008; 35(5): 603 - 618. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. S. Maruti, J. W. Lampe, J. D. Potter, A. Ready, and E. White A Prospective Study of Bowel Motility and Related Factors on Breast Cancer Risk Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2008; 17(7): 1746 - 1750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Atkinson, K. M Newton, E. J A. Bowles, M. Yong, and J. W Lampe Demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle factors and dietary intakes in relation to daidzein-metabolizing phenotypes among premenopausal women in the United States Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2008; 87(3): 679 - 687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Hebert, T. G. Hurley, K. E. Peterson, K. Resnicow, F. E. Thompson, A. L. Yaroch, M. Ehlers, D. Midthune, G. C. Williams, G. W. Greene, et al. Social Desirability Trait Influences on Self-Reported Dietary Measures among Diverse Participants in a Multicenter Multiple Risk Factor Trial J. Nutr., January 1, 2008; 138(1): 226S - 234S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. de Vet, J. de Nooijer, N. K. de Vries, and J. Brug Comparing stage of change and behavioral intention to understand fruit intake Health Educ. Res., August 1, 2007; 22(4): 599 - 608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Troen, B. Mitchell, B. Sorensen, M. H. Wener, A. Johnston, B. Wood, J. Selhub, A. McTiernan, Y. Yasui, E. Oral, et al. Unmetabolized Folic Acid in Plasma Is Associated with Reduced Natural Killer Cell Cytotoxicity among Postmenopausal Women J. Nutr., January 1, 2006; 136(1): 189 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Cartmel, D. Bowen, D. Ross, E. Johnson, and S. T. Mayne A Randomized Trial of an Intervention to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Curatively Treated Patients with Early-Stage Head and Neck Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2005; 14(12): 2848 - 2854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Neuhouser, R. E. Patterson, M. D. Thornquist, G. S. Omenn, I. B. King, and G. E. Goodman Fruits and Vegetables Are Associated with Lower Lung Cancer Risk Only in the Placebo Arm of the {beta}-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial (CARET) Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2003; 12(4): 350 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. P. Bogers, P. C. Dagnelie, K. R. Westerterp, A. D. M. Kester, J. D. van Klaveren, A. Bast, and P. A. van den Brandt Using a Correction Factor to Correct for Overreporting in a Food-Frequency Questionnaire Does Not Improve Biomarker-Assessed Validity of Estimates for Fruit and Vegetable Consumption J. Nutr., April 1, 2003; 133(4): 1213 - 1219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. K. Horner, A. R. Kristal, J. Prunty, H. E. Skor, J. D. Potter, and J. W. Lampe Dietary Determinants of Plasma Enterolactone Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2002; 11(1): 121 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text]