CEBP Meeting Calendar Frontiers in Basic Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chow, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Zujewski, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chow, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Zujewski, J.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 9, 917-921, September 2000
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research

Effect of Tamoxifen on Mammographic Density

Catherine K. Chow1, David Venzon, Elizabeth C. Jones, Ahalya Premkumar, Joyce O’Shaughnessy and JoAnne Zujewski

Diagnostic Radiology Department, Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center [C. K. C., E. C. J., A. P.], Biostatistics and Data Management Section, Division of Clinical Services, National Cancer Institute [D. V.], and Medicine Branch, Division of Clinical Sciences, National Cancer Institute [J. O., J. Z.], NIH, Bethesda Maryland 20892

There are strong data showing that increased breast cancer risk is associated with increased mammographic density. Tamoxifen has been shown to decrease the risk of invasive breast cancer and decrease breast density. We sought to demonstrate and calculate the extent of change in mammographic density in women who have taken tamoxifen for up to 2 years. We evaluated mammograms from 28 high-risk women who were taking tamoxifen. Four different methods of evaluation were used: (a) two qualitative methods (Wolfe criteria and the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System criteria); (b) one semiquantitative method (mammograms were assigned one of five semiquantitative scores by visual inspection); and (c) one quantitative method (computer-aided calculation of fibroglandular area from digitized mammograms). The Wolfe criteria showed a 0.03 category decrease per year (P = 0.50). The American College of Radiology Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System criteria showed a 0.1 category decrease per year (P = 0.12). Semiquantitative criteria showed a 0.2 category decrease per year (P = 0.039). Digitized scores showed a 4.3% decrease per year (P = 0.0007). In conclusion, tamoxifen causes a decrease in mammographic density with use, an effect that is better quantitated with semiquantitative criteria or digitized images. Density change might become useful as a surrogate end point for the effect of tamoxifen and other chemopreventive measures, although our data do not predict an individual’s degree of risk reduction.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. R. Bakic, A.-K. Carton, D. Kontos, C. Zhang, A. B. Troxel, and A. D. A. Maidment
Breast Percent Density: Estimation on Digital Mammograms and Central Tomosynthesis Projections
Radiology, July 1, 2009; 252(1): 40 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. McTiernan, C.Y. Wang, B. Sorensen, L. Xiao, D. S.M. Buist, E. J. Aiello Bowles, E. White, M. A. Rossing, J. Potter, and N. Urban
No Effect of Aspirin on Mammographic Density in a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2009; 18(5): 1524 - 1530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. J. Heine, M. J. Carston, C. G. Scott, K. R. Brandt, F.-F. Wu, V. S. Pankratz, T. A. Sellers, and C. M. Vachon
An Automated Approach for Estimation of Breast Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2008; 17(11): 3090 - 3097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
Y. Shen, J. P. Costantino, and J. Qin
Tamoxifen Chemoprevention Treatment and Time to First Diagnosis of Estrogen Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 15, 2008; 100(20): 1448 - 1453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Eng-Wong, J. Orzano-Birgani, C. K. Chow, D. Venzon, J. Yao, C. E. Galbo, J. A. Zujewski, and S. Prindiville
Effect of Raloxifene on Mammographic Density and Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Premenopausal Women at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2008; 17(7): 1696 - 1701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. S. Hwang, D. L. Miglioretti, R. Ballard-Barbash, D. L. Weaver, K. Kerlikowske, and for the National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Su
Association between Breast Density and Subsequent Breast Cancer Following Treatment for Ductal Carcinoma In situ
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2007; 16(12): 2587 - 2593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. M. Tamimi, C. Byrne, G. A. Colditz, and S. E. Hankinson
Endogenous Hormone Levels, Mammographic Density, and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 1, 2007; 99(15): 1178 - 1187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
K. Kerlikowske, L. Ichikawa, D. L. Miglioretti, D. S. M. Buist, P. M. Vacek, R. Smith-Bindman, B. Yankaskas, P. A. Carney, and R. Ballard-Barbash
Longitudinal Measurement of Clinical Mammographic Breast Density to Improve Estimation of Breast Cancer Risk
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 7, 2007; 99(5): 386 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. R. Palomares, J. R.B. Machia, C. D. Lehman, J. R. Daling, and A. McTiernan
Mammographic density correlation with gail model breast cancer risk estimates and component risk factors.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2006; 15(7): 1324 - 1330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. M. Tamimi, S. E. Hankinson, G. A. Colditz, and C. Byrne
Endogenous Sex Hormone Levels and Mammographic Density among Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2005; 14(11): 2641 - 2647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
L. A. Habel, J. J. Dignam, S. R. Land, M. Salane, A. M. Capra, and T. B. Julian
Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer After Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 6, 2004; 96(19): 1467 - 1472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. L. Frankenfeld, A. McTiernan, E. J. Aiello, W. K. Thomas, K. LaCroix, J. Schramm, S. M. Schwartz, V. L. Holt, and J. W. Lampe
Mammographic Density in Relation to Daidzein-Metabolizing Phenotypes in Overweight, Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2004; 13(7): 1156 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
E. Ziv, J. Shepherd, R. Smith-Bindman, and K. Kerlikowske
Mammographic Breast Density and Family History of Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 2, 2003; 95(7): 556 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. T. Chlebowski and A. McTiernan
Biological Significance of Interventions That Change Breast Density
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 1, 2003; 95(1): 4 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
G. A. Greendale, B. A. Reboussin, S. Slone, C. Wasilauskas, M. C. Pike, and G. Ursin
Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Change in Mammographic Density
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 1, 2003; 95(1): 30 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. M. Vachon, T. A. Sellers, R. A. Vierkant, F.-F. Wu, and K. R. Brandt
Case-Control Study of Increased Mammographic Breast Density Response to Hormone Replacement Therapy
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2002; 11(11): 1382 - 1388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. Prevrhal, J. A Shepherd, R. Smith-Bindman, S. R. Cummings, and K. Kerlikowske
Accuracy of Mammographic Breast Density Analysis: Results of Formal Operator Training
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2002; 11(11): 1389 - 1393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Shepherd, K. M. Kerlikowske, R. Smith-Bindman, H. K. Genant, and S. R. Cummings
Measurement of Breast Density with Dual X-ray Absorptiometry: Feasibility
Radiology, May 1, 2002; 223(2): 554 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. Messina, C. Gardner, and S. Barnes
Gaining Insight into the Health Effects of Soy but a Long Way Still to Go: Commentary on the Fourth International Symposium on the Role of Soy in Preventing and Treating Chronic Disease
J. Nutr., March 1, 2002; 132(3): 547S - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
K. W. Singletary and S. M. Gapstur
Alcohol and Breast Cancer: Review of Epidemiologic and Experimental Evidence and Potential Mechanisms
JAMA, November 7, 2001; 286(17): 2143 - 2151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2000 by the American Association for Cancer Research.