
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Division of Environmental Health Sciences, Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032
A major goal in molecular epidemiology is to identify preventable environmental risk factors and susceptible subpopulations. In a hospital-based molecular epidemiological case-control study of breast cancer, we investigated the relationship between DNA damage from exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and susceptibility attributable to inherited deletion of the xenobiotic detoxifying gene, glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1). Prior to breast surgery, women (n = 227) were enrolled and interviewed and donated a blood sample. PAH-DNA adduct levels were measured by immunohistochemistry in breast tissue samples retrieved from pathology blocks, and GSTM1 genotype was determined by PCR using WBC DNA. The GSTM1 analysis included 95 cases and 87 benign breast disease controls. GSTM1 genotype was not associated with breast cancer case-control status (odds ratio = 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.371.44). However, the GSTM1 null genotype predicted PAH-DNA adduct levels in malignant (ß = 0.407; P = 0.003) and nonmalignant (ß = 0.243; P = 0.05) breast tissue from cases. This relationship was not seen in tissue from controls (ß = 0.095; P = 0.341). When tissue from controls was compared with tumor tissue from cases, there was a significant case-control difference in PAH-DNA adduct levels among women who were GSTM1 null. There was no such case-control difference among women who were homozygous or heterozygous for GSTM1. There was an interaction between GSTM1 and case-control status on adduct levels in breast tissue (P = 0.002). The results suggest that genetic susceptibility to the formation of PAH-DNA adducts in breast tissue may play a role in breast cancer development.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Rundle Molecular Epidemiology of Physical Activity and Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2005; 14(1): 227 - 236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Palli, G. Masala, M. Peluso, L. Gaspari, V. Krogh, A. Munnia, S. Panico, C. Saieva, R. Tumino, P. Vineis, et al. The effects of diet on DNA bulky adduct levels are strongly modified by GSTM1 genotype: a study on 634 subjects Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2004; 25(4): 577 - 584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rundle, D. Tang, L. Mooney, S. Grumet, and F. Perera The Interaction between Alcohol Consumption and GSTM1 Genotype on Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon-DNA Adduct Levels in Breast Tissue Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2003; 12(9): 911 - 914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Ahsan and A. G. Rundle Measures of genotype versus gene products: promise and pitfalls in cancer prevention Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2003; 24(9): 1429 - 1434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Faraglia, S. Y. Chen, M. D. Gammon, Y. Zhang, S. L. Teitelbaum, A. I. Neugut, H. Ahsan, G. C. Garbowski, H. Hibshoosh, D. Lin, et al. Evaluation of 4-aminobiphenyl-DNA adducts in human breast cancer: the influence of tobacco smoke Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2003; 24(4): 719 - 725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Palli, G. Masala, P. Vineis, S. Garte, C. Saieva, V. Krogh, S. Panico, R. Tumino, A. Munnia, E. Riboli, et al. Biomarkers of dietary intake of micronutrients modulate DNA adduct levels in healthy adults Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2003; 24(4): 739 - 746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sorensen, H. Autrup, O. Hertel, H. Wallin, L. E. Knudsen, and S. Loft Personal Exposure to PM2.5 and Biomarkers of DNA Damage Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2003; 12(3): 191 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Divi, F. A. Beland, P. P. Fu, L. S. Von Tungeln, B. Schoket, J. E. Camara, M. Ghei, N. Rothman, R. Sinha, and M. C. Poirier Highly sensitive chemiluminescence immunoassay for benzo[a]pyrene-DNA adducts: validation by comparison with other methods, and use in human biomonitoring Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2002; 23(12): 2043 - 2049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M M de Jong, I M Nolte, G J te Meerman, W T A van der Graaf, J C Oosterwijk, J H Kleibeuker, M Schaapveld, and E G E de Vries Genes other than BRCA1 and BRCA2 involved in breast cancer susceptibility J. Med. Genet., April 1, 2002; 39(4): 225 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. F. Firozi, M. L. Bondy, A. A. Sahin, P. Chang, F. Lukmanji, E. S. Singletary, M. M. Hassan, and D. Li Aromatic DNA adducts and polymorphisms of CYP1A1, NAT2, and GSTM1 in breast cancer Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2002; 23(2): 301 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Xiong, M. L. Bondy, D. Li, H. Shen, L.-E Wang, S. E. Singletary, M. R. Spitz, and Q. Wei Sensitivity to Benzo(a)pyrene Diol-Epoxide Associated with Risk of Breast Cancer in Young Women and Modulation by Glutathione S-Transferase Polymorphisms: A Case-Control Study Cancer Res., December 1, 2001; 61(23): 8465 - 8469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |