CEBP  Translational Cancer Medicine 2008: Cancer Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mandelblatt, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Yabroff, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mandelblatt, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Yabroff, K. R.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 8, 759-767, September 1999
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research

Effectiveness of Interventions Designed to Increase Mammography Use: A Meta-Analysis of Provider-targeted Strategies1

Jeanne S. Mandelblatt2 and K. Robin Yabroff

Department of Medicine, Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D.C. 20007 [J. S. M.]; MEDTAP International, Bethesda, Maryland 20007 [K. R. Y.]; and Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Baltimore, Maryland 21205-2179 [K. R. Y.]

The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of interventions targeted at providers to enhance the use of mammography. We performed a meta-analysis and included United States studies that used a randomized or nonrandomized concurrent control design, had defined outcomes, and presented data that could be abstracted for reanalysis. Interventions were classified as behavioral, cognitive, or sociological and further categorized by the type of control group (active versus usual care). Data were combined using DerSimonian and Laird random effects models to yield summary effect sizes. Thirty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. All types of interventions targeted at providers were effective in increasing mammography rates. Behavioral interventions increased screening by 13.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 7.8–18.4] as compared with usual care and by 6.8% (95% CI, 4.8–8.7) as compared with active controls. Cognitive intervention strategies improved mammography rates by 18.6% (95% CI, 12.8–24.4). Sociological interventions also had a similar magnitude of effect on screening rates (13.1% increase; 95% CI, 6.8–19.3). Interventions targeting both patients and providers were not significantly better at increasing screening than those targeting providers alone, and multiple approaches (e.g., behavioral and cognitive) were generally not more effective than a single approach. All interventions targeted at physicians were effective in increasing screening rates. Decisions to use a particular approach will depend on resources, expertise, feasibility, and cost effectiveness.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. W. Vernon, D. J. del Junco, J. A. Tiro, S. P. Coan, C. A. Perz, L. A. Bastian, W. Rakowski, W. Chan, D. R. Lairson, A. McQueen, et al.
Promoting Regular Mammography Screening II. Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial in US Women Veterans
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 5, 2008; 100(5): 347 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. I. Mishra, R. Bastani, C. M. Crespi, L. C. Chang, P. H. Luce, and C. R. Baquet
Results of a Randomized Trial to Increase Mammogram Usage among Samoan Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2007; 16(12): 2594 - 2604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
M. Sarfaty and R. Wender
How to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in Practice
CA Cancer J Clin, November 1, 2007; 57(6): 354 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
C. M. Masi, D. J. Blackman, and M. E. Peek
Interventions to Enhance Breast Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment among Racial and Ethnic Minority Women
Med Care Res Rev, October 1, 2007; 64(5_suppl): 195S - 242S.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
C. Kunzel, E. Lalla, and I. Lamster
Dentists' Management of the Diabetic Patient: Contrasting Generalists and Specialists
Am J Public Health, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 725 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
E. Paskett, C. Tatum, J. Rushing, R. Michielutte, R. Bell, K. L. Foley, M. Bittoni, S. L. Dickinson, A. S. McAlearney, and K. Reeves
Randomized trial of an intervention to improve mammography utilization among a triracial rural population of women.
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 6, 2006; 98(17): 1226 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. J. Blackman and C. M. Masi
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Breast Cancer Mortality: Are We Doing Enough to Address the Root Causes?
J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2006; 24(14): 2170 - 2178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
S. S. Gorin, A. R. Ashford, R. Lantigua, A. Hossain, M. Desai, A. Troxel, and D. Gemson
Effectiveness of Academic Detailing on Breast Cancer Screening among Primary Care Physicians in an Underserved Community
J Am Board Fam Med, March 1, 2006; 19(2): 110 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
J. G. Zapka, E. Puleo, S. Taplin, L. I. Solberg, J. Mouchawar, C. Somkin, A. M. Geiger, and M. U. Yood
Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: Clinicians' Views on Health Plan Guidelines and Implementation Efforts
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, November 1, 2005; 2005(35): 46 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
E. Kobetz, K. Vatalaro, A. Moore, and J. A. Earp
Taking the Transtheoretical Model Into the Field: A Curriculum for Lay Health Advisors
Health Promot Pract, July 1, 2005; 6(3): 329 - 337.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
K. Kawamoto, C. A Houlihan, E A. Balas, and D. F Lobach
Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success
BMJ, April 2, 2005; 330(7494): 765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
G. G. Kimmick, B. L. Peterson, A. B. Kornblith, J. Mandelblatt, J. L. Johnson, J. Wheeler, R. Heinze, H. J. Cohen, and H. B. Muss
Improving Accrual of Older Persons to Cancer Treatment Trials: A Randomized Trial Comparing an Educational Intervention With Standard Information: CALGB 360001
J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2005; 23(10): 2201 - 2207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
K. R. Yabroff, C. N. Klabunde, R. Myers, and M. L. Brown
Physician Recommendations for Follow-Up of Positive Fecal Occult Blood Tests
Med Care Res Rev, February 1, 2005; 62(1): 79 - 110.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. H. Taplin, L. Ichikawa, M. U. Yood, M. M. Manos, A. M. Geiger, S. Weinmann, J. Gilbert, J. Mouchawar, W. A. Leyden, R. Altaras, et al.
Reason for Late-Stage Breast Cancer: Absence of Screening or Detection, or Breakdown in Follow-up?
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 20, 2004; 96(20): 1518 - 1527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
J. Lipscomb, M. S. Donaldson, N. K. Arora, M. L. Brown, S. B. Clauser, A. L. Potosky, B. B. Reeve, J. H. Rowland, C. F. Snyder, and S. H. Taplin
Cancer Outcomes Research
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2004; 2004(33): 178 - 197.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. W. Vernon, H. Meissner, C. Klabunde, B. K. Rimer, D. J. Ahnen, R. Bastani, M. T. Mandelson, M. R. Nadel, S. Sheinfeld-Gorin, and J. Zapka
Measures for Ascertaining Use of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Behavioral, Health Services, and Epidemiologic Research
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2004; 13(6): 898 - 905.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. H. Taplin, L. Ichikawa, D. S. M. Buist, D. Seger, and E. White
Evaluating Organized Breast Cancer Screening Implementation: The Prevention of Late-Stage Disease?
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2004; 13(2): 225 - 234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
K. R. Yabroff, P. Mangan, and J. Mandelblatt
Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Papanicolaou Smear Use
J Am Board Fam Med, May 1, 2003; 16(3): 188 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. G. Zapka, S. H. Taplin, L. I. Solberg, and M. M. Manos
A Framework for Improving the Quality of Cancer Care: The Case of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2003; 12(1): 4 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
J. A. Earp, E. Eng, M. S. O'Malley, M. Altpeter, G. Rauscher, L. Mayne, H. F. Mathews, K. S. Lynch, and B. Qaqish
Increasing Use of Mammography Among Older, Rural African American Women: Results From a Community Trial
Am J Public Health, April 1, 2002; 92(4): 646 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Legler, H. I. Meissner, C. Coyne, N. Breen, V. Chollette, and B. K. Rimer
The Effectiveness of Interventions To Promote Mammography among Women with Historically Lower Rates of Screening
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2002; 11(1): 59 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 1999 by the American Association for Cancer Research.