This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Paskett, E. D. Articles by Dignan, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Paskett, E. D. Articles by Dignan, M.

Community-based Interventions to Improve Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: Results of the Forsyth County Cancer Screening (FoCaS) Project¹

Departments of Public Health Sciences [E. D. P., C. M. T., R. D., J. R.], Internal Medicine/Gerontology [R. V.], and Family and Community Medicine [R. M.], Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, and AMC Cancer Research Center, Denver, Colorado 80214 [M. D.]

The FoCaS (Forsyth County Cancer Screening) Project was one of six projects funded by the National Cancer Institute "Public Health Approaches to Breast and Cervical Cancer" initiative. The goal of this project was to improve the use of breast and cervical cancer screening among low-income, predominately African-American, women age 40 and older. Strategies implemented in the intervention city included public health clinic in-reach strategies (chart reminders, exam room prompts, in-service meetings, and patient-directed literature) and community outreach strategies (educational sessions, literature distribution, community events, media, and church programs). Baseline and follow-up data from independent cross-sectional samples in both the intervention and comparison cities were used to evaluate the effects of the intervention program. A total of 248 women were surveyed at baseline, and 302 women were surveyed 3 years later at follow-up. The proportion of women reporting regular use of mammography increased (31 to 56%; P < 0.001) in the intervention city. In the comparison city, a nonsignificant (ns) increase in mammography utilization was observed (33 to 40%; P = ns). Pap smear screening rates also improved in the intervention city (73 to 87%; P = 0.003) but declined in the comparison city (67 to 60%; P = ns). These relationships hold in multivariate models. The results suggest that a multifaceted intervention can improve screening rates in low-income populations. These results have important implications for community-based research and efforts in underserved populations.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. M. Masi, D. J. Blackman, and M. E. Peek Interventions to Enhance Breast Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment among Racial and Ethnic Minority Women Med Care Res Rev, October 1, 2007; 64(5_suppl): 195S - 242S. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Rust and L. A. Cooper How Can Practice-based Research Contribute to the Elimination of Health Disparities? J Am Board Fam Med, March 1, 2007; 20(2): 105 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Paskett, C. Tatum, J. Rushing, R. Michielutte, R. Bell, K. L. Foley, M. Bittoni, S. L. Dickinson, A. S. McAlearney, and K. Reeves Randomized trial of an intervention to improve mammography utilization among a triracial rural population of women. J Natl Cancer Inst, September 6, 2006; 98(17): 1226 - 1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Becker and M. Foxall An analysis of health behavior theories applied to breast-screening behavior for relevance with american Indian women. J Transcult Nurs, July 1, 2006; 17(3): 272 - 279. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. J. Blackman and C. M. Masi Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Breast Cancer Mortality: Are We Doing Enough to Address the Root Causes? J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2006; 24(14): 2170 - 2178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Kobetz, K. Vatalaro, A. Moore, and J. A. Earp Taking the Transtheoretical Model Into the Field: A Curriculum for Lay Health Advisors Health Promot Pract, July 1, 2005; 6(3): 329 - 337. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Behbakht, A. Lynch, S. Teal, K. Degeest, and S. Massad Social and Cultural Barriers to Papanicolaou Test Screening in an Urban Population Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2004; 104(6): 1355 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Eaker, H.-O. Adami, F. Granath, E. Wilander, and P. Sparen A Large Population-Based Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Attendance at Screening for Cervical Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2004; 13(3): 346 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				K. R. Yabroff, P. Mangan, and J. Mandelblatt Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Papanicolaou Smear Use J Am Board Fam Med, May 1, 2003; 16(3): 188 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. I. O. Garner Cervical Cancer: Disparities in Screening, Treatment, and Survival Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2003; 12(3): 242S - 247. [Full Text]

				M. R. Andersen, M. Hager, C. Su, and N. Urban Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of Mammography Promotion by Volunteers in Rural Communities Health Educ Behav, December 1, 2002; 29(6): 755 - 770. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Puschel, B. Thompson, G. D. Coronado, L. C. Lopez, and A. M. Kimball Factors Related to Cancer Screening in Hispanics: A Comparison of the Perceptions of Hispanic Community Members, Health Care Providers, and Representatives of Organizations that Serve Hispanics Health Educ Behav, October 1, 2001; 28(5): 573 - 590. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Michielutte, B. Shelton, E. D. Paskett, C. M. Tatum, and R. Velez Use of an interrupted time-series design to evaluate a cancer screening program Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2000; 15(5): 615 - 623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]