| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, Breivika N-9037 Norway [I. T. G.]; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294 [E. F.]; and Department of Mammography, Falun Central Hospital, S-791 82 Falun, Sweden [L. T.]
High-risk mammographic patterns may be used as a surrogate end point for breast cancer in etiologic research as well as in prevention studies. Physical activity may be one of the few modifiable risk factors for breast cancer. We examined the relationship between physical activity and mammographic patterns among 2720 Norwegian women, ages 4056 years, who participated in both the Second and Third Tromsø studies. Epidemiologic data were obtained through questionnaires. Two questions from the Second Tromsø study and five questions from the Third elicited information on physical activity. The mammograms were categorized into five groups based on anatomical-mammographic correlations. For analysis, patterns I through III were combined into a low-risk group and patterns IV and V into a high-risk group. Odds ratios that were adjusted for age, education, menopausal status, body mass index, parity, age at menarche, oral contraceptive use, and alcohol intake, with 95% confidence intervals, were estimated using logistic regression. Women who reported moderate physical activity, i.e., more than 2 h/week, were 20% less likely (odds ratio, 0.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.61.1) to have high-risk mammographic patterns compared with those who reported being inactive. This relationship remains consistent when stratified by menopausal status, parity, and tertiles of body mass index. However, all of the associations between various measures of physical activity and high-risk patterns found in this study are weak with confidence intervals that include 1.0. Thus, chance is a reasonable explanation for the weak associations found. The relationship between physical activity and high-risk patterns should be examined further as a means to explore the biologic mechanisms relating physical activity to breast cancer risk.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. B. Terry, D. S.M. Buist, A. Trentham-Dietz, T. M. James-Todd, and Y. Liao Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Change in Mammographic Density: A Cohort Study Using Pharmacy Records on Over 29,000 Postmenopausal Women Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2008; 17(5): 1088 - 1095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Peters, U. Ekelund, M. Leitzmann, D. Easton, R. Warren, R. Luben, S. Bingham, K.-T. Khaw, and N. J. Wareham Physical Activity and Mammographic Breast Density in the EPIC-Norfolk Cohort Study Am. J. Epidemiol., March 1, 2008; 167(5): 579 - 585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Sellers, C. Vachon, V. Pankratz, C. Janney, Z Fredericksen, K. Brandt, Y Huang, F. Couch, L. Kushi, and J. Cerhan Association of Childhood and Adolescent Anthropometric Factors, Physical Activity, and Diet with Adult Mammographic Breast Density Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2007; 166(4): 456 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. W. Reeves, G. L. Gierach, and F. Modugno Recreational Physical Activity and Mammographic Breast Density Characteristics Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2007; 16(5): 934 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Irwin, E. J. Aiello, A. McTiernan, L. Bernstein, F. D. Gilliland, R. N. Baumgartner, K. B. Baumgartner, and R. Ballard-Barbash Physical Activity, Body Mass Index, and Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Survivors J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2007; 25(9): 1061 - 1066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P.M. Suijkerbuijk, F. J.B. Van Duijnhoven, C. H. Van Gils, P. A.H. Van Noord, P. H.M. Peeters, C. M. Friedenreich, and E. M. Monninkhof Physical activity in relation to mammographic density in the dutch prospect-European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition cohort. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2006; 15(3): 456 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Tehard, C. M. Friedenreich, J.-M. Oppert, and F. Clavel-Chapelon Effect of Physical Activity on Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer: Results from the E3N Cohort Study Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2006; 15(1): 57 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Harvey and V. E. Bovbjerg Quantitative Assessment of Mammographic Breast Density: Relationship with Breast Cancer Risk Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 29 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |