CEBP  Translational Cancer Medicine 2008: Cancer Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gram, I. T.
Right arrow Articles by Tabar, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gram, I. T.
Right arrow Articles by Tabar, L.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 8, 117-122, February 1999
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research

Moderate Physical Activity in Relation to Mammographic Patterns1

Inger T. Gram2, Ellen Funkhouser and Laszlo Tabar

Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, Breivika N-9037 Norway [I. T. G.]; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294 [E. F.]; and Department of Mammography, Falun Central Hospital, S-791 82 Falun, Sweden [L. T.]

High-risk mammographic patterns may be used as a surrogate end point for breast cancer in etiologic research as well as in prevention studies. Physical activity may be one of the few modifiable risk factors for breast cancer. We examined the relationship between physical activity and mammographic patterns among 2720 Norwegian women, ages 40–56 years, who participated in both the Second and Third Tromsø studies. Epidemiologic data were obtained through questionnaires. Two questions from the Second Tromsø study and five questions from the Third elicited information on physical activity. The mammograms were categorized into five groups based on anatomical-mammographic correlations. For analysis, patterns I through III were combined into a low-risk group and patterns IV and V into a high-risk group. Odds ratios that were adjusted for age, education, menopausal status, body mass index, parity, age at menarche, oral contraceptive use, and alcohol intake, with 95% confidence intervals, were estimated using logistic regression. Women who reported moderate physical activity, i.e., more than 2 h/week, were 20% less likely (odds ratio, 0.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.6–1.1) to have high-risk mammographic patterns compared with those who reported being inactive. This relationship remains consistent when stratified by menopausal status, parity, and tertiles of body mass index. However, all of the associations between various measures of physical activity and high-risk patterns found in this study are weak with confidence intervals that include 1.0. Thus, chance is a reasonable explanation for the weak associations found. The relationship between physical activity and high-risk patterns should be examined further as a means to explore the biologic mechanisms relating physical activity to breast cancer risk.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. B. Terry, D. S.M. Buist, A. Trentham-Dietz, T. M. James-Todd, and Y. Liao
Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Change in Mammographic Density: A Cohort Study Using Pharmacy Records on Over 29,000 Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2008; 17(5): 1088 - 1095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
T. M. Peters, U. Ekelund, M. Leitzmann, D. Easton, R. Warren, R. Luben, S. Bingham, K.-T. Khaw, and N. J. Wareham
Physical Activity and Mammographic Breast Density in the EPIC-Norfolk Cohort Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., March 1, 2008; 167(5): 579 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
T. Sellers, C. Vachon, V. Pankratz, C. Janney, Z Fredericksen, K. Brandt, Y Huang, F. Couch, L. Kushi, and J. Cerhan
Association of Childhood and Adolescent Anthropometric Factors, Physical Activity, and Diet with Adult Mammographic Breast Density
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2007; 166(4): 456 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. W. Reeves, G. L. Gierach, and F. Modugno
Recreational Physical Activity and Mammographic Breast Density Characteristics
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2007; 16(5): 934 - 942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. L. Irwin, E. J. Aiello, A. McTiernan, L. Bernstein, F. D. Gilliland, R. N. Baumgartner, K. B. Baumgartner, and R. Ballard-Barbash
Physical Activity, Body Mass Index, and Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Survivors
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2007; 25(9): 1061 - 1066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. P.M. Suijkerbuijk, F. J.B. Van Duijnhoven, C. H. Van Gils, P. A.H. Van Noord, P. H.M. Peeters, C. M. Friedenreich, and E. M. Monninkhof
Physical activity in relation to mammographic density in the dutch prospect-European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition cohort.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2006; 15(3): 456 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
B. Tehard, C. M. Friedenreich, J.-M. Oppert, and F. Clavel-Chapelon
Effect of Physical Activity on Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer: Results from the E3N Cohort Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2006; 15(1): 57 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Harvey and V. E. Bovbjerg
Quantitative Assessment of Mammographic Breast Density: Relationship with Breast Cancer Risk
Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 29 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 1999 by the American Association for Cancer Research.