CEBP  Translational Cancer Medicine 2008: Cancer Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Day, N. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Atkinson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Day, N. E.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 8, 863-866, October 1999
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research

Mammographic Patterns as a Predictive Biomarker of Breast Cancer Risk: Effect of Tamoxifen

Charlotte Atkinson, Ruth Warren, Sheila A. Bingham1 and Nicholas E. Day

Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge CB2 2SR [C. A., N. E. D.]; Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ [R. W.]; and Medical Research Council Dunn Human Nutrition Unit, Cambridge CB2 2DH [S. A. B.], United Kingdom

Mammographic breast density has been shown to be associated with up to a 4- to 6-fold increase in risk of breast cancer, whereas tamoxifen therapy increases disease-free survival and reduces mortality. We have therefore investigated whether these effects are related. To determine the effects of tamoxifen on mammographic density, mammograms from 94 women who had received tamoxifen for breast cancer and 188 women (without breast cancer) who had not received tamoxifen were visually classified according to the criteria of Wolfe. Two controls were age-matched to each case. All of the women were postmenopausal (ages, 50–64 years), neither group was taking hormone replacement therapy, and none of the cases had received chemotherapy. There were significant differences in breast density between cases and controls at the initial mammogram (P = 0.0001) but no significant differences at the follow-up mammogram (P = 0.51). A significant change to a more lucent pattern had occurred among the case group (P = 0.0001). The odds ratio for cancer that was associated with the more dense (P2 and DY) patterns with respect to the more lucent (N1 and P1) patterns was 3.6 (95% confidence interval, 2.11–6.18) at the initial mammogram. This was significantly reduced to 1.5 (95% confidence interval , 1.32–1.70) after treatment with tamoxifen (P = 0.019; {chi}2 = 5.52). The substantial reduction in breast density with tamoxifen provides evidence that tamoxifen has the capacity to favorably alter postmenopausal breast density toward a more lucent pattern, which is associated with reduced risk of breast cancer. Mammographic pattern is, thus, a potential biomarker of breast cancer risk.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. M. Vachon, V. S. Pankratz, C. G. Scott, S. D. Maloney, K. Ghosh, K. R. Brandt, T. Milanese, M. J. Carston, and T. A. Sellers
Longitudinal Trends in Mammographic Percent Density and Breast Cancer Risk
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2007; 16(5): 921 - 928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
K. Kerlikowske, L. Ichikawa, D. L. Miglioretti, D. S. M. Buist, P. M. Vacek, R. Smith-Bindman, B. Yankaskas, P. A. Carney, and R. Ballard-Barbash
Longitudinal Measurement of Clinical Mammographic Breast Density to Improve Estimation of Breast Cancer Risk
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 7, 2007; 99(5): 386 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. E. Olson, C. X. Ma, L. L. Pelleymounter, D. J. Schaid, V. S. Pankratz, R. A. Vierkant, Z. S. Fredericksen, J. N. Ingle, Y. Wu, F. Couch, et al.
A Comprehensive Examination of CYP19 Variation and Breast Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2007; 16(3): 623 - 625.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. M. Vachon, K. R. Brandt, K. Ghosh, C. G. Scott, S. D. Maloney, M. J. Carston, V. S. Pankratz, and T. A. Sellers
Mammographic Breast Density as a General Marker of Breast Cancer Risk
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2007; 16(1): 43 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
S. Rice and S. A Whitehead
Phytoestrogens and breast cancer -promoters or protectors?
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2006; 13(4): 995 - 1015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. R. Palomares, J. R.B. Machia, C. D. Lehman, J. R. Daling, and A. McTiernan
Mammographic density correlation with gail model breast cancer risk estimates and component risk factors.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2006; 15(7): 1324 - 1330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
G. Mitchell, A. C. Antoniou, R. Warren, S. Peock, J. Brown, R. Davies, J. Mattison, M. Cook, I. Warsi, D. G. Evans, et al.
Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers
Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 66(3): 1866 - 1872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. Ziv, J. Tice, R. Smith-Bindman, J. Shepherd, S. Cummings, and K. Kerlikowske
Mammographic Density and Estrogen Receptor Status of Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2004; 13(12): 2090 - 2095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
L. A. Habel, J. J. Dignam, S. R. Land, M. Salane, A. M. Capra, and T. B. Julian
Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer After Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 6, 2004; 96(19): 1467 - 1472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. L. Frankenfeld, A. McTiernan, E. J. Aiello, W. K. Thomas, K. LaCroix, J. Schramm, S. M. Schwartz, V. L. Holt, and J. W. Lampe
Mammographic Density in Relation to Daidzein-Metabolizing Phenotypes in Overweight, Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2004; 13(7): 1156 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. Cuzick, J. Warwick, E. Pinney, R. M. L. Warren, and S. W. Duffy
Tamoxifen and Breast Density in Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 21, 2004; 96(8): 621 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M Jeffreys, R Warren, G Davey Smith, and D Gunnell
Breast density: agreement of measures from film and digital image
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2003; 76(908): 561 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Stone, A. Gunasekara, L. J. Martin, M. Yaffe, S. Minkin, and N. F. Boyd
The Detection of Change in Mammographic Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2003; 12(7): 625 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
E. Ziv, J. Shepherd, R. Smith-Bindman, and K. Kerlikowske
Mammographic Breast Density and Family History of Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 2, 2003; 95(7): 556 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. T. Chlebowski and A. McTiernan
Biological Significance of Interventions That Change Breast Density
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 1, 2003; 95(1): 4 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
G. A. Greendale, B. A. Reboussin, S. Slone, C. Wasilauskas, M. C. Pike, and G. Ursin
Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Change in Mammographic Density
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 1, 2003; 95(1): 30 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. M. Vachon, T. A. Sellers, R. A. Vierkant, F.-F. Wu, and K. R. Brandt
Case-Control Study of Increased Mammographic Breast Density Response to Hormone Replacement Therapy
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2002; 11(11): 1382 - 1388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. J. Fabian, B. F. Kimler, D. A. Brady, M. S. Mayo, C. H. J. Chang, J. A. Ferraro, C. M. Zalles, A. L. Stanton, S. Masood, W. E. Grizzle, et al.
A Phase II Breast Cancer Chemoprevention Trial of Oral {alpha}-Difluoromethylornithine: Breast Tissue, Imaging, and Serum and Urine Biomarkers
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2002; 8(10): 3105 - 3117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
C. J. FABIAN and B. F. KIMLER
Beyond Tamoxifen: New Endpoints for Breast Cancer Chemoprevention, New Drugs for Breast Cancer Prevention
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2001; 952(1): 44 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
K. W. Singletary and S. M. Gapstur
Alcohol and Breast Cancer: Review of Epidemiologic and Experimental Evidence and Potential Mechanisms
JAMA, November 7, 2001; 286(17): 2143 - 2151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
R. Clarke, F. Leonessa, J. N. Welch, and T. C. Skaar
Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology of Antiestrogen Action and Resistance
Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2001; 53(1): 25 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Clemons and P. Goss
Estrogen and the Risk of Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., January 25, 2001; 344(4): 276 - 285.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. K. Chow, D. Venzon, E. C. Jones, A. Premkumar, J. O’Shaughnessy, and J. Zujewski
Effect of Tamoxifen on Mammographic Density
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2000; 9(9): 917 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. Byrne, G. A. Colditz, W. C. Willett, F. E. Speizer, M. Pollak, and S. E. Hankinson
Plasma Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF) I, IGF-binding Protein 3, and Mammographic Density
Cancer Res., July 1, 2000; 60(14): 3744 - 3748.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 1999 by the American Association for Cancer Research.