Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Vol 7, Issue 8 681-687, Copyright © 1998 by American Association for Cancer Research

ARTICLES

Measuring mammography compliance: lessons learned from a survival analysis of screening behavior

MR Partin, AL Casey-Paal, JS Slater and JE Korn
Minnesota Department of Health, Cancer Control Section, Minneapolis 55440-9441, USA.

Data from a telephone survey of women participating in a federally funded screening program were used to demonstrate the sensitivity of mammography compliance estimates to varying definitions of the time interval within which women are considered compliant with screening guidelines and what constitutes a true screening (as opposed to diagnostic) mammogram. The survival analysis approach used reveals patterns concealed by other approaches to measuring mammography behavior and provides a means for quantifying the impact of various definitional choices on compliance estimates. The results suggest that, although variations in defining and excluding potential diagnostic mammograms lead to differences in compliance measures no greater than 6%, differences as small as 1 month in the screening interval definition used can produce differences in compliance estimates as large as 27%. These results call into question the comparability of estimates across studies and suggest that standard measures would greatly facilitate future efforts in understanding how to promote compliance with mammography screening guidelines.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. R. Partin, J. Grill, S. Noorbaloochi, A. A. Powell, D. J. Burgess, S. W. Vernon, K. Halek, J. M. Griffin, M. van Ryn, and D. A. Fisher Validation of Self-Reported Colorectal Cancer Screening Behavior from a Mixed-Mode Survey of Veterans Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 768 - 776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. W. Vernon, D. J. del Junco, J. A. Tiro, S. P. Coan, C. A. Perz, L. A. Bastian, W. Rakowski, W. Chan, D. R. Lairson, A. McQueen, et al. Promoting Regular Mammography Screening II. Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial in US Women Veterans J Natl Cancer Inst, March 5, 2008; 100(5): 347 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. del Junco, S. W. Vernon, S. P. Coan, J. A. Tiro, L. A. Bastian, L. S. Savas, C. A. Perz, D. R. Lairson, W. Chan, C. Warrick, et al. Promoting Regular Mammography Screening I. A Systematic Assessment of Validity in a Randomized Trial J Natl Cancer Inst, March 5, 2008; 100(5): 333 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Slater, G. A. Henly, C. N. Ha, M. E. Malone, J. A. Nyman, S. Diaz, and P. G. McGovern Effect of Direct Mail as a Population-Based Strategy to Increase Mammography Use among Low-Income Underinsured Women Ages 40 to 64 Years Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2005; 14(10): 2346 - 2352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Partin and J. S. Slater Promoting Repeat Mammography Use: Insights From a Systematic Needs Assessment Health Educ Behav, February 1, 2003; 30(1): 97 - 112. [Abstract] [PDF]