CEBP CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearlman, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Dube, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pearlman, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Dube, C. E.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Vol 6, Issue 6 451-457, Copyright © 1997 by American Association for Cancer Research


ARTICLES

Why do women's attitudes toward mammography change over time? Implications for physician-patient communication

DN Pearlman, W Rakowski, MA Clark, B Ehrich, BK Rimer, MG Goldstein, H Woolverton 3rd and CE Dube
Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA.

The present study examines women's decision making about mammography over a 1-year period, using "decisional balance," a summary of women's positive and negative perceptions about mammography derived from the Transtheoretical Model (TTM). Data were from a survey of women ages 50-74 years who completed both the baseline and 1-year follow-up telephone surveys (n = 1144) for an intervention study to increase the use of mammography screening. A shift toward less favorable perceptions about mammography was related to being a smoker and not having a recent clinical breast examination and Pap test. Change in women's attitudes toward mammography was also related to four dimensions of a woman's information environment. Women who rated the opinions of a physician as somewhat or not important, those who reported that at least one family member or friend discouraged them from having a mammogram, and women who felt they lacked enough people in their social network with whom they could discuss health concerns were less likely to express favorable attitudes about mammography over 1 year. In contrast, women who consistently communicated the value of mammography to others expressed more favorable views of screening over the study period. Interventions designed to promote breast cancer screening must recognize that a woman not only reacts to mammography information provided by significant others in her social network but may proactively reach out to others as an advocate of breast cancer screening, thus reinforcing or changing others' opinions or behavior as well as her own.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
J. M. Trauth, B. S. Ling, J. L. Weissfeld, R. E. Schoen, and M. Hayran
Using the Transtheoretical Model to Stage Screening Behavior for Colorectal Cancer
Health Educ Behav, June 1, 2003; 30(3): 322 - 336.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
E Chamot and T V Perneger
Misconceptions about efficacy of mammography screening: a public health dilemma
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, November 1, 2001; 55(11): 799 - 803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1997 by the American Association for Cancer Research.