
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Vol 6, Issue 5 307-314, Copyright © 1997 by American Association for Cancer Research
ARTICLES |
CC Aragaki, S Greenland, N Probst-Hensch and RW Haile
Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Los Angeles School of Public Health 90095-1772, USA.
Data sparseness currently limits gene-environment interaction estimation. To improve effect estimates of gene-environment interactions, we give an overview of one approach, hierarchical modeling, and propose a two-stage hierarchical model. The first stage is a logistic model for the joint effects of the genetic and environmental factors. The second stage regresses the joint effects on genotype-specific enzymatic activity of the environmentally derived substrate. The model is illustrated using a case-control study of adenomas of the large bowel, for which NAT2 genotype and dietary data were collected. The first-stage interactions of dietary components and genotype were regressed on initial conversion rates of dietary heterocyclic amines to aryl nitrenium ions. We fit the hierarchical model by penalized likelihood. Compared to effect estimates from maximum-likelihood logistic regression, hierarchical results are more reasonable and precise. These results lend further support to previous observations that hierarchical regression is preferable to ordinary logistic regression when multiple factors and their interactions are being studied. We propose that hierarchical modeling can act as a bridge between molecular epidemiology studies and laboratory data, combining both efficiently.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Greenland Invited Commentary: Variable Selection versus Shrinkage in the Control of Multiple Confounders Am. J. Epidemiol., March 1, 2008; 167(5): 523 - 529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Hung, P. Brennan, C. Malaveille, S. Porru, F. Donato, P. Boffetta, and J. S. Witte Using Hierarchical Modeling in Genetic Association Studies with Multiple Markers: Application to a Case-Control Study of Bladder Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2004; 13(6): 1013 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Steenland, I. Bray, S. Greenland, and P. Boffetta Empirical Bayes Adjustments for Multiple Results in Hypothesis-generating or Surveillance Studies Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2000; 9(9): 895 - 903. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Millikan NAT1*10 and NAT1*11 Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer Risk Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2000; 9(2): 217 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |