
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Vol 5, Issue 2 141-142, Copyright © 1996 by American Association for Cancer Research
ARTICLES |
RR Love and PF Engstrom
University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, 53792, USA.
There are increasing numbers of cancer prevention and control investigator trainees. On the basis of experience as research proposal reviewers and on reviews of a large number of current trainees, we offer some perspectives on the discipline and important aspects of optimal training programs. The historical importance of public health activities, the significant differences between prevention and treatment, and the breadth and public interest in prevention all have significant implications for trainees. In training, the need to focus efforts and to have active mentoring are critical. More attention to data analysis and complete development of a specific research proposal are also key elements of high-quality training. Although the need for cancer prevention and control investigators is great, more attention to the quality of their training is warranted.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Chang, D. S.M. Buist, M. Reid, M. B. Terry, and A. Trentham-Dietz The Characteristics and Training of Professionals in Cancer Prevention and Control: A Survey of the American Society for Preventive Oncology Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2004; 13(7): 1094 - 1098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |