
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Vol 4, Issue 7 775-782, Copyright © 1995 by American Association for Cancer Research
ARTICLES |
SS Mirvish, AC Grandjean, KJ Reimers, BJ Connelly, SC Chen, J Gallagher, S Rosinsky, G Nie, H Tuatoo and S Payne
Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68198, USA.
The N-nitrosoproline (NPRO) test measures the potential for intragastric formation of carcinogenic nitrosamines in humans. Nitrate and L-proline are administered to volunteers. Noncarcinogenic NPRO is produced by an acid-catalyzed reaction of proline (a model for ingested amines) with nitrate-derived nitrite in the stomach. It is then absorbed and excreted in the urine, which is analyzed for NPRO. We studied the effect of certain dietary and other factors on the levels of urinary NPRO. For (generally) 5 days, healthy adult subjects (mostly men) followed a diet low in preformed NPRO, nitrate, proline, and (on days 4 and 5) ascorbic acid. The tests were conducted on days 4 and 5. In the standard test, the subjects took 400 mg nitrate at 11 a.m., and at noon they ate a standard 700-calorie meal containing 500 mg proline. (In previous tests, proline was given 1 h after or between meals.) Urines were collected for 24 h, and samples were analyzed for NPRO by published methods. This standard test yielded 26 +/- 2 (mean +/- SE) nmol NPRO compared with 5 +/- 1 nmol NPRO when proline alone was taken. In variations of the standard test, NPRO yield was not significantly affected by the subjects' gender, the time at which the standard meal was eaten, the size of the meal, or the drinking of extra water after the meal. Doses of 100 and 200 mg nitrate had lesser effects on NPRO yield than did the dose of 400 mg nitrate. Nitrate (400 mg) produced the most NPRO when it was given 1 h before the meal. Fasting increased NPRO yield by 3-4 times compared to giving proline with a meal. One g of ASC given 5 or 2 h before, with, or 1 or 2 h after the meal with proline inhibited NPRO formation by mean values of 0, 71, 71, 67, and 19%, respectively. Chewing gum or tobacco for 2-3 h after the test meal did not increase NPRO formation or salivary nitrate levels, but salivary nitrite was not taken, chewing tobacco appeared to increase salivary nitrite and nitrate levels. The weak carcinogen N-nitrososarcosine (NSAR) was also detected in some tests, and the standard group showed 21 +/- 3 nmol NSAR. A high NSAR result (44 +/- 7 nmol) for women undergoing the standard test should be reexamined. We discuss applying these results to the conduct of future NPRO tests, as well as their implications for reducing the potential production of carcinogenic nitrosamines in the stomach.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E Combet, S Paterson, K Iijima, J Winter, W Mullen, A Crozier, T Preston, and K E L McColl Fat transforms ascorbic acid from inhibiting to promoting acid-catalysed N-nitrosation Gut, December 1, 2007; 56(12): 1678 - 1684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Iijima, J. Grant, K. McElroy, V. Fyfe, T. Preston, and K. E. L. McColl Novel mechanism of nitrosative stress from dietary nitrate with relevance to gastro-oesophageal junction cancers Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2003; 24(12): 1951 - 1960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Hecht Human urinary carcinogen metabolites: biomarkers for investigating tobacco and cancer Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2002; 23(6): 907 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |