CEBP CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murray, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ulshen, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murray, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ulshen, M. H.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Vol 4, Issue 7 715-720, Copyright © 1995 by American Association for Cancer Research


ARTICLES

Comparison of rectal mucosal proliferation measured by proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunohistochemistry and whole crypt dissection

SC Murray, RS Sandler, TO Keku, CM Lyles, RC Millikan, SI Bangdiwala, LL Kupper, W Jiang and MH Ulshen
Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27599-7080, USA.

Rectal mucosal proliferation has been promoted as an intermediate marker for risk of colorectal neoplasia. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunohistochemistry has become a standard method to measure cell proliferation. Whole-crypt dissection may provide a technically simpler method for determining proliferation within an entire crypt. We conducted a study to assess the reliability (reproducibility) of whole-crypt dissection in 10 subjects. Reliability of whole-crypt dissection with the subject as the unit of observation was excellent. The intraclass correlation coefficient for subjects was 0.93. Biopsy-to-biopsy reliability was lower (r=0.86) and crypt-to-crypt reliability lower still (r = 0.35). There was poor correlation between measures of proliferation index using the two techniques (Kendall's tau = 0.13; P = 0.08). Compartment analysis based on the percentage of the total number of labeled cells appearing in each crypt quartile also did not demonstrate a significant correlation between the two measures. We conclude that PCNA labeling index and whole-crypt mitotic count are not comparable measures of rectal mucosal proliferation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. S. Sandler, M. S. Cummings, T. O. Keku, A. Terse, and N. Mehta
Disposable versus Reusable Biopsy Forceps for Colorectal Epithelial Cell Proliferation in Humans
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2000; 9(10): 1123 - 1125.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. S. Sandler, J. A. Baron, T. D. Tosteson, J. S. Mandel, and R. W. Haile
Rectal Mucosal Proliferation and Risk of Colorectal Adenomas: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2000; 9(7): 653 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1995 by the American Association for Cancer Research.