CEBP Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loft, S.
Right arrow Articles by Poulsen, H. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loft, S.
Right arrow Articles by Poulsen, H. E.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Vol 4, Issue 5 515-519, Copyright © 1995 by American Association for Cancer Research


ARTICLES

Energy restriction and oxidative DNA damage in humans

S Loft, EJ Velthuis-te Wierik, H van den Berg and HE Poulsen
Department of Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Panum Institute, Denmark.

The cancer-preventive effect of energy restriction in rodents has been related to a decrease in oxidative damage to DNA. We have investigated the effect of energy restriction on the rate of oxidative DNA modification estimated from the urinary excretion of the repair product, 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG), in healthy, normal weight men. Before and after 10 weeks on a diet containing 80 (n = 16) or 100% (n = 8) of the estimated weight-maintaining energy, resting metabolic rate (RMR) was measured and 24-h urine was collected for 8-oxodG determination by HPLC. During the study, the weight loss was 10 and 2.5% of the initial weight, mostly in terms of fat, and the RMR decreased by 13 and 8% in the energy-restricted and control groups, respectively. With the use of t tests there was no significant difference within or between groups with respect to 8-oxodG excretion. However, if RMR was included as a covariate in multifactorial ANOVA, an average relative 17% (2-31%; 95% confidence interval) increase in 8-oxodG excretion in the energy-restricted group was significantly different from the corresponding value of the control group (P < 0.02). In the energy-restricted group the change in 8-oxodG excretion was correlated closely with the decrease in RMR (r = 0.63; P = 0.013). In the present study, 20% energy restriction for 10 weeks did not reduce oxidative DNA damage; we question a beneficial effect on cancer risk in normal weight humans.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. Weindruch and R. S. Sohal
Caloric Intake and Aging
N. Engl. J. Med., October 2, 1997; 337(14): 986 - 994.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1995 by the American Association for Cancer Research.