CEBP CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Einspahr, J.
Right arrow Articles by Grogan, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Einspahr, J.
Right arrow Articles by Grogan, T.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Vol 4, Issue 4 359-366, Copyright © 1995 by American Association for Cancer Research


ARTICLES

Comparison of proliferating cell nuclear antigen versus the more standard measures of rectal mucosal proliferation rates in subjects with a history of colorectal cancer and normal age-matched controls

J Einspahr, D Alberts, T Xie, J Ritchie, D Earnest, L Hixson, M Powell, D Roe and T Grogan
Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, USA.

Measurement of proliferation rates by the more standard in vitro uptake techniques of [3H]thymidine and 5'-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdUrd) labeling indices (LIs) were compared to proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in rectal mucosal biopsies from 16 subjects with resected colorectal cancer and 14 normal age-matched controls. Correlation coefficients for BrdUrd versus PCNA, [3H]thymidine versus PCNA, and BrdUrd versus [3H]thymidine were 0.691, 0.876, and 0.770, respectively. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were detected in total mean LIs between the LI methods for the normal group. In contrast, total PCNA LIs were found to be significantly different in the resected cancer patients when compared to either BrdUrd (P = 0.005) or [3H]thymidine (P < 0.001). A significant difference (P = 0.010) in total PCNA LI but not in total [3H]thymidine or BrdUrd LIs was also observed between normal controls and resected colorectal cancer subjects. Compartmental analysis of the cancer group versus the normals showed a significant difference in compartments 1 and 3 for PCNA LIs only. The reproducibility of two PCNA LI counts was excellent (r = 0.9). In addition, the reliability of mean LIs were > 0.8 with the exception of [3H]thymidine in the normal group (0.7). These study results demonstrate that PCNA LIs in human rectal mucosal biopsies are correlated highly with other more commonly used cellular proliferation measurements; however, PCNA LIs were found to be significantly higher than the other two methods in the resected colorectal cancer subjects.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
G. Cohen, R. Mustafi, A. Chumsangsri, N. Little, J. Nathanson, S. Cerda, S. Jagadeeswaran, U. Dougherty, L. Joseph, J. Hart, et al.
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Is Up-regulated in Human Colonic Aberrant Crypt Foci
Cancer Res., June 1, 2006; 66(11): 5656 - 5664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1995 by the American Association for Cancer Research.