CEBP CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kristal, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kristal, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, D. S.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Vol 4, Issue 4 347-352, Copyright © 1995 by American Association for Cancer Research


ARTICLES

A pilot study of DNA aneuploidy in colorectal adenomas and risk of adenoma recurrence

AR Kristal, MS Baker, MJ Flaherty, Z Feng, TJ Ylvisaker, AD Feld and DS Levine
Cancer Prevention Research Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98104, USA.

This case-control study examined whether DNA aneuploidy in colorectal adenomas is a risk factor for subsequent adenoma recurrence. Cases (recurrent polyp formers) were defined as persons with diagnoses of new adenomas at 2 colonoscopies following the index (first) adenoma diagnosis; controls were persons with no new adenomas at a follow-up at least 1 year after the index diagnosis. Cases (n = 22) and up to 3 controls (n = 29) were matched for factors known to be associated with polyp recurrence or aneuploidy: (a) age; (b) histology; (c) number of index polyps; and (d) size of largest index polyp. The largest adenoma from the index colonoscopy was removed from the paraffin block and analyzed for DNA content abnormalities by flow cytometry. On the basis of the observed distribution of aneuploidy in case-control sets, the point estimate for the relative odds of recurrence given aneuploidy in the index polyp was infinity (P < 0.035), and the lower bound for the 95% confidence interval was 2.02. We conclude that in this convenience sample, DNA aneuploidy increased the risk of recurrent colorectal adenomas. Larger, preferably prospective studies are needed before DNA content flow cytometric analysis of colorectal adenomas can be recommended as a routine clinical practice, but these results do suggest that polyp ploidy should be assessed in research studies using adenomas as end points or intermediate end point markers.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1995 by the American Association for Cancer Research.