CEBP CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garewal, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ramsey, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garewal, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ramsey, L.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Vol 3, Issue 8 683-686, Copyright © 1994 by American Association for Cancer Research


ARTICLES

Demonstration of a field defect in gastric intestinal metaplasia by biological marker analysis

HS Garewal, B Fennerty, R Sampliner and L Ramsey
Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson 85723.

Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is a precursor lesion for gastric cancer. It most frequently involves the antrum and the angularis. At endoscopy, it is not possible to visually distinguish GIM from normal stomach. Furthermore, GIM frequently has a patchy distribution with areas of metaplasia coexisting with adjacent areas of other histologies, including normal stomach. In this study we sought to determine whether a "field defect" could be demonstrated in subjects with GIM, involving the entire region of the stomach. The biologic markers tested were ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) activity and bromodeoxyuridine labeling index (LI). Antral biopsies were obtained from 13 subjects with known GIM and 9 controls (no GIM based on multiple biopsies and absence of methylene blue staining). Three adjacent biopsies were obtained for ODC, LI, and histology. Group I consisted of a set of 3 biopsies from the 9 controls. In the 13 subjects with GIM, 2 sets of 3 biopsies were taken with methylene blue guidance in an attempt to obtain both GIM-free (group II) and GIM-containing (group III) tissue. ODC activities were markedly and statistically significantly (P = 0.0001) elevated in groups II and III versus group I; the mean +/- SDs were 0.075 +/- 0.117 for group I, 1.20 +/- 0.83 for group II, and 1.14 +/- 0.76 for group III. Group II versus Group III values were not different (P = 0.979). LI was less discriminatory with more overlap between the groups. The highest LI was in group II, which was significantly different from group I (P = 0.014) and group III (P = 0.006).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. Park, S. Schulz, J. Haaf, J. C. Kairys, and S. A. Waldman
Ectopic Expression of Guanylyl Cyclase C in Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagus and Stomach
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2002; 11(8): 739 - 744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1994 by the American Association for Cancer Research.