CEBP CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaluzny, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ford, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaluzny, A. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ford, L.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Vol 3, Issue 3 261-269, Copyright © 1994 by American Association for Cancer Research


ARTICLES

Using a community cancer treatment trials network for cancer prevention and control research: challenges and opportunities

AD Kaluzny, LM Lacey, R Warnecke, JP Morrissey, E Sondik and L Ford
Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7590.

Using data collected as part of a larger evaluation of the National Cancer Institute-funded Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP), this paper examines the degree to which selected community, interorganizational, and structural characteristics associated with accrual to cancer treatment protocols share equal importance in accruing patients to cancer prevention and control research protocols. Analysis reveals that there are similarities in the factors that prove to be effective for accrual to both types of protocols; however, the two are not isomorphic. CCOP structure was an important predictor of treatment accrual but was not significant for cancer control accrual. Variables measuring the community health resources available to the CCOP were not significant for either treatment or cancer prevention and control research accrual when CCOP structure and interaction with participating research bases were considered. Only CCOP interaction with participating research bases was a significant predictor of both treatment and cancer prevention and control research accrual. The policy implications of these findings are discussed.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1994 by the American Association for Cancer Research.