CEBP Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention Translational Cancer Medicine 2008: Cancer Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gallagher, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Everson, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gallagher, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Everson, R. B.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Vol 2, Issue 6 581-585, Copyright © 1993 by American Association for Cancer Research


ARTICLES

32P-postlabeling analysis of DNA adducts in human sperm cells from smokers and nonsmokers

JE Gallagher, MF Vine, MM Schramm, J Lewtas, MH George, BS Hulka and RB Everson
Genetic Toxicology Division, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711.

To determine the feasibility of using human sperm cells for DNA 32P-postlabeling analyses, and to evaluate the baseline level and the possible presence of smoking-related DNA adducts in these cells, sperm DNA was isolated from specimens obtained from 12 heavy smokers, 12 light smokers, and 12 nonsmokers. Background levels of radioactivity were minimized by using magnet transfer of 32P-labeled mononucleotides to new polyethyleneimine cellulose plates. Compared with placental tissues, few adducts were observed. Diffuse radioactivity observed in some of the autoradiograms was minimally above background but the level of radioactivity expressed as putative adducts/nucleotide was not related to smoking status. It was not clear, in some cases, whether this radioactivity was associated with chemically bound adducts or was from nonspecifically bound chemicals, radiolabeled enzymes, or other proteins. One major discrete DNA adduct of unknown chemical structure was detected in three of the 36 samples analyzed (one nonsmoker and two smokers). Based on the level of radioactivity associated with various dilutions of a benzo(a)pyrene-derived adduct, our limit of sensitivity was at least 1.2 adducts/10(9) nucleotides. Our study emphasizes the need to more clearly define the significance of background radioactivity associated with DNA adduct maps where the measured adduct levels approximate detection limits defined by visual observance of adduct spots. This point is particularly relevant given that the 32P-postlabeling procedures rely, in part, on visual verification of the presence of DNA adducts.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
D. H. Phillips
Smoking-related DNA and protein adducts in human tissues
Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2002; 23(12): 1979 - 2004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 1993 by the American Association for Cancer Research.