CEBP Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention Translational Cancer Medicine 2008: Cancer Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rothman, N.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rothman, N.
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, R. B.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Vol 2, Issue 4 299-303, Copyright © 1993 by American Association for Cancer Research


ARTICLES

Misclassification of genetic susceptibility biomarkers: implications for case-control studies and cross-population comparisons

N Rothman, WF Stewart, NE Caporaso and RB Hayes
Environmental Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

Phenotype and genotype markers of genetic susceptibility are of increasing interest in case-control studies of cancer. It is well established that bias to the odds ratio is caused by less-than-perfect assay sensitivity and specificity and varies with risk factor prevalence. As such, the observed variation in odds ratio between studies of genetic markers and cancer risk may be real, or may be attributed, in part, to variation in assay accuracy or in risk factor prevalence (e.g., prevalence differences between racial groups). The latter can be a particular concern when the prevalence of the "at risk" polymorphism in one or more populations is either very high (e.g., > 85%) or very low (e.g., < 15%). For example, even very high sensitivity (e.g., 98%) can produce substantial bias to the odds ratio when the risk factor prevalence is high. Under some prevalence conditions, however, assays with only moderate accuracy are sufficient and result in minimal bias to the odds ratio. Understanding misclassification in the context of marker prevalence may help to explain disparate findings in the literature and should assist investigators in selecting markers that are appropriate for future studies.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
L. Jiao, M. A. Doll, D. W. Hein, M. L. Bondy, M. M. Hassan, J. E. Hixson, J. L. Abbruzzese, and D. Li
Haplotype of N-Acetyltransferase 1 and 2 and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2007; 16(11): 2379 - 2386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. Rabstein, K. Unfried, U. Ranft, T. Illig, M. Kolz, H.-P. Rihs, C. Mambetova, M. Vlad, T. Bruning, and B. Pesch
Variation of the N-Acetyltransferase 2 Gene in a Romanian and a Kyrgyz Population
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2006; 15(1): 138 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
B Thyagarajan, K E Anderson, F Kong, F R Selk, C F Lynch, and M D Gross
New approaches for genotyping paraffin wax embedded breast tissue from patients with cancer: the Iowa women's health study
J. Clin. Pathol., September 1, 2005; 58(9): 955 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. C. Deitz, N. Rothman, T. R. Rebbeck, R. B. Hayes, W.-H. Chow, W. Zheng, D. W. Hein, and M. Garcia-Closas
Impact of Misclassification in Genotype-Exposure Interaction Studies: Example of N-Acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2), Smoking, and Bladder Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2004; 13(9): 1543 - 1546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. J. De Roos, N. Rothman, P. D. Inskip, M. S. Linet, W. R. Shapiro, R. G. Selker, H. A. Fine, P. M. Black, G. S. Pittman, and D. A. Bell
Genetic Polymorphisms in GSTM1, -P1, -T1, and CYP2E1 and the Risk of Adult Brain Tumors
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2003; 12(1): 14 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
F. J. B. van Duijnhoven, O. L. van der Hel, R. B. van der Luijt, H. B. Bueno de Mesquita, P. A. H. van Noord, and P. H. M. Peeters
Quality of NAT2 Genotyping with Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Using DNA Isolated from Frozen Urine
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2002; 11(8): 771 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. W. Hein, M. A. Doll, A. J. Fretland, M. A. Leff, S. J. Webb, G. H. Xiao, U.-S. Devanaboyina, N. A. Nangju, and Y. Feng
Molecular Genetics and Epidemiology of the NAT1 and NAT2 Acetylation Polymorphisms
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2000; 9(1): 29 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. Garcia-Closas, N. Rothman, and J. Lubin
Misclassification in Case-Control Studies of Gene-Environment Interactions: Assessment of Bias and Sample Size
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 1999; 8(12): 1043 - 1050.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. Gross, T. Kruisselbrink, K. Anderson, N. Lang, P. McGovern, R. Delongchamp, and F. Kadlubar
Distribution and Concordance of N-Acetyltransferase Genotype and Phenotype in an American Population
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 1999; 8(8): 683 - 692.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
P. A. SCHULTE and M. WATERS
Using Molecular Epidemiology in Assessing Exposure for Risk Assessment
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., January 1, 1999; 895(1): 101 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 1993 by the American Association for Cancer Research.