CEBP Meeting Calendar Advances in Breast Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 17, 1682, July 1, 2008. Published Online First June 26, 2008;
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0044
© 2008 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1055-9965.EPI-08-0044v1
17/7/1682    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mucci, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Rubin, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mucci, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Rubin, M. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Risk Assessment
Right arrow Risk Assessment: Hereditary Cancer Syndromes/Cancer Genetics
Right arrow Risk Assessment: Risk Modeling and Prediction

Testing a Multigene Signature of Prostate Cancer Death in the Swedish Watchful Waiting Cohort

Lorelei A. Mucci1,3,4, Yudi Pawitan7, Francesca Demichelis2,4,8,9, Katja Fall7, Jennifer R. Stark1,3, Hans-Olov Adami3,7, Swen-Olof Andersson10, Ove Andrén10, Anna Eisenstein1, Lars Holmberg11,12, Wei Huang2,4,13, Philip W. Kantoff4,5, Robert Kim2, Sven Perner2,4,8,14, Meir J. Stampfer1,3,4, Jan-Erik Johansson10 and Mark A. Rubin2,4,5,6,8

1 Channing Laboratory and 2 Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; 3 Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health; 4 Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Harvard Medical School; 5 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; 6 The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Boston, Massachusetts; 7 Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 8 Department of Pathology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York; 9 Bioinformatics Group, SRA, ITC-irst, Trento, Italy; 10 Department of Urology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden; 11 Regional Oncologic Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; 12 Division of Cancer Studies, Kings College, London, United Kingdom; 13 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin; and 14 Department of Pathology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany

Requests for reprints: Lorelei A. Mucci, Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 181 Longwood Avenue, 3rd Floor, Boston MA 02115. Phone: 617-525-2132; Fax: 617-525-2008. E-mail: lmucci{at}hsph.harvard.edu

Although prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer death, most men die with and not from their disease, underscoring the urgency to distinguish potentially lethal from indolent prostate cancer. We tested the prognostic value of a previously identified multigene signature of prostate cancer progression to predict cancer-specific death. The Örebro Watchful Waiting Cohort included 172 men with localized prostate cancer of whom 40 died of prostate cancer. We quantified protein expression of the markers in tumor tissue by immunohistochemistry and stratified the cohort by quintiles according to risk classification. We accounted for clinical variables (age, Gleason, nuclear grade, and tumor volume) using Cox regression and calculated receiver operator curves to compare discriminatory ability. The hazard ratio of prostate cancer death increased with increasing risk classification by the multigene model, with a 16-fold greater risk comparing highest-risk versus lowest-risk strata, and predicted outcome independent of clinical factors (P = 0.002). The best discrimination came from combining information from the multigene markers and clinical data, which perfectly classified the lowest-risk stratum where no one developed lethal disease; using the two lowest-risk groups as reference, the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) was 11.3 (4.0-32.8) for the highest-risk group and difference in mortality at 15 years was 60% (50-70%). The combined model provided greater discriminatory ability (area under the curve = 0.78) than the clinical model alone (area under the curve = 0.71; P = 0.04). Molecular tumor markers can add to clinical variables to help distinguish lethal and indolent prostate cancer and hold promise to guide treatment decisions. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(7):1682–8)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
P. K. Dhillon, M. Barry, M. J. Stampfer, S. Perner, M. Fiorentino, A. Fornari, J. Ma, J. Fleet, T. Kurth, M. A. Rubin, et al.
Aberrant Cytoplasmic Expression of p63 and Prostate Cancer Mortality
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2009; 18(2): 595 - 600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association for Cancer Research.