
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Departments of Epidemiology and Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Divisions of 2 Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and 3 Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland; and 4 Departments of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Requests for reprints: Philip E. Castle, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services, Room 5004, EPS MSC 7234, 6120 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-7234. Phone: 301-435-3976; Fax: 301-402-0916. E-mail: castlep{at}mail.nih.gov
Background: We were interested in comparing the performance of Linear Array (LA; Roche Molecular Systems) to Hybrid Capture 2 (hc2; Digene) for the detection of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical precancer.
Methods: LA and hc2 results were compared on baseline specimens collected from women with an atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) Pap referred into ASCUS and Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study (n = 3,488). hc2 was conducted at the time of the study on liquid cytology specimens. LA was conducted retrospectively on aliquots from a second, stored cervical specimen masked to the hc2 results and clinical data. Paired LA and hc2 results (n = 3,289; 94%) were compared for the detection of carcinogenic HPV (HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68) and 2-year cumulative cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade
3 as diagnosed by the quality-control pathology review.
Results: LA was more likely to test positive for carcinogenic HPV than hc2 (55% versus 53%; P = 0.001). For 2-year cumulative
CIN3, LA and hc2 had similar sensitivities (93.3% versus 92.6%, respectively; P = 1), and LA was marginally less specific than hc2 (48.1% versus 50.6%, respectively; P = 0.05). LA and hc2 had similar negative predictive values (98.70% versus 98.64% respectively; P = 0.4), and LA had a slightly lower positive predictive value than hc2 (14.6% versus 15.1%, respectively; P < 0.0001).
Conclusion: We observed that LA and hc2 performed similarly in the detection of carcinogenic HPV and identification of CIN3 among women with an ASCUS Pap. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(5):1248–54)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Q. Feng, S. Cherne, R. L. Winer, A. Balasubramanian, S.-K. Lee, S. E. Hawes, N. B. Kiviat, and L. A. Koutsky Development and Evaluation of a Liquid Bead Microarray Assay for Genotyping Genital Human Papillomaviruses J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 2009; 47(3): 547 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Castle, C. Porras, W. G. Quint, A. C. Rodriguez, M. Schiffman, P. E. Gravitt, P. Gonzalez, H. A. Katki, S. Silva, E. Freer, et al. Comparison of Two PCR-Based Human Papillomavirus Genotyping Methods J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 2008; 46(10): 3437 - 3445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |