This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1055-9965.EPI-07-2622v1 17/4/785    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Beebe, T. J. Articles by Rockwood, T. H. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Beebe, T. J. Articles by Rockwood, T. H. Related Collections Early Detection Early Detection: Biomarkers: Discovery, Methodology, Validation

The Effects of Survey Mode and Asking About Future Intentions on Self-Reports of Colorectal Cancer Screening

¹ Department of Health Sciences Research, Survey Research Center, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota and ² Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Requests for reprints: Timothy J. Beebe, Associate Professor of Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905. Phone: 507-538-4606; Fax: 507-284-1180. E-mail: beebe.timothy{at}mayo.edu

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are often ascertained via self-reports but can be subject to overreporting bias. Asking about intention to get screened before asking about past screening may minimize overreporting of cancer screening. In a statewide survey conducted from July through October of 2005, we embedded an experiment that tested the effect of question ordering (asking about future intention to get screened before or after asking about past screening; "future first" and "future second," respectively), crossed with survey mode (mail versus telephone), on CRC screening rates. Weighted analysis focused on 752 respondents who were ages 50 years or older. We found (a) that asking about future intentions to get screened before asking about past screening (future first) statistically significantly lowers reports of past CRC screening [70.9% future second versus 58.0% future first; odds ratio (OR), 1.83; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.08-3.13]; (b) that there was no main effect of survey mode; and (c) that the effect of the ordering of the future intentions item varies by survey mode. In the mailed survey, the odds of reporting past CRC screening were almost thrice greater in the future second condition compared with the future first condition (72.4% versus 49.0%, respectively; OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.22-6.17). In the telephone condition, the odds of reporting were only 28% higher in the future second (69.5%) condition than in the future first condition (63.9%; OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.64-2.57). The results suggest that asking about future intentions to get screened before the actual behavior elicits lower, and arguably more truthful reports of CRC screening but mainly in mailed surveys. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(4):785–90)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. G. Zapka Validation of Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 745 - 747. [Full Text] [PDF]