This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1055-9965.EPI-07-2855v1 17/4/758    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Vernon, S. W. Articles by Fernandez, M. E. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vernon, S. W. Articles by Fernandez, M. E. Related Collections Early Detection Early Detection: Biomarkers: Discovery, Methodology, Validation

Reliability and Validity of a Questionnaire to Measure Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors: Does Mode of Survey Administration Matter?

¹ University of Texas-Houston School of Public Health, Division of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, Houston, Texas; ² University of Texas Southwest Medical Center, Division of Behavioral and Communication Sciences, Department of Clinical Services, Dallas, Texas; and ³ Kelsey Research Foundation, Houston, Texas

Requests for reprints: Sally W. Vernon, University of Texas-Houston School of Public Health, Division of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, 7000 Fannin Street, Suite 2560, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: 713-500-9760; Fax: 713-500-9750. E-mail: sally.w.vernon{at}uth.tmc.edu

Valid and reliable self-report measures of cancer screening behaviors are important for evaluating efforts to improve adherence to guidelines. We evaluated test-retest reliability and validity of self-report of the fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy (SIG), colonoscopy (COL), and barium enema (BE) using the National Cancer Institute colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) questionnaire. A secondary objective was to evaluate reliability and validity by mail, telephone, and face-to-face survey administration modes. Consenting men and women, 51 to 74 years old, receiving care at a multispecialty clinic for at least 5 years who had not been diagnosed with colorectal cancer were stratified by prior CRCS status and randomized to survey mode (n = 857). Within survey mode, respondents were randomized to complete a second survey at 2 weeks, 3 months, or 6 months. Comparing self-report with administrative and medical records, concordance estimates were 0.91 for COL, 0.85 for FOBT, 0.85 for SIG, and 0.92 for BE. Overall sensitivity estimates were 0.91 for COL, 0.82 for FOBT, 0.76 for SIG, and 0.56 for BE. Specificity estimates were 0.91 for COL, 0.86 for FOBT, 0.89 for SIG, and 0.97 for BE. Sensitivity and specificity varied little by survey mode for any test. Report-to-records ratio showed overreporting for SIG (1.1), COL (1.15), and FOBT (1.57), and underreporting for BE (0.82). Reliability at all time intervals was highest for COL; there was no consistent pattern according to survey mode. This study provides evidence to support the use of the National Cancer Institute CRCS questionnaire to assess self-report with any of the three survey modes. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(4):758–67)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. M. Jones, S. J. Mongin, D. Lazovich, T. R. Church, and M. W. Yeazel Validity of Four Self-reported Colorectal Cancer Screening Modalities in a General Population: Differences over Time and by Intervention Assignment Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 777 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Zapka Validation of Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 745 - 747. [Full Text] [PDF]