This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ronckers, C. M. Articles by Land, C. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ronckers, C. M. Articles by Land, C. E.

Multiple Diagnostic X-rays for Spine Deformities and Risk of Breast Cancer

¹ Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; ² Twin Cities Spine Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and ³ Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

Requests for reprints: Charles E. Land, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, EPS 7046, 6120 Executive Boulevard, MS 7238, Bethesda, MD 20892. Phone: 301-594-7165; Fax: 301-402-0207. E-mail: landc{at}exchange.nih.gov

Background: Ionizing radiation is a well-established human mammary carcinogen. Women historically monitored by radiography at young ages for abnormal spinal curvature are an exposed population suitable for investigating radiation-related risk and its variation by modifying factors. In this historic cohort, 95% of daily dose increments (when exposure to the breast occurred) were under 2.4 cGy, with mean 1.1 cGy.

Methods: A retrospective cohort of 3,010 women, diagnosed with spinal curvature between 1912 and 1965 in 14 U.S. pediatric orthopedic centers and who completed a questionnaire by telephone interview or mail survey in 1992, were studied for risk of breast cancer by radiation dose to the breast (mean, 12 cGy) after adjustment for established breast cancer risk factors.

Results: A borderline-significant radiation dose response (excess relative risk/Gy = 2.86; P = 0.058; one-tailed P = 0.029) was observed during 118,905 woman-years of follow-up (median, 35.5 years) based on 78 cases of invasive breast cancer. The dose response was significantly greater (P = 0.03) for women who reported a family history of breast cancer in first- or second-degree relatives (excess relative risk/Gy = 8.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-28.16). Radiation-related risk did not vary significantly by stage of reproductive development at exposure.

Conclusions: Assuming that repair of radiation-related DNA damage requires at most a few hours, our data argue against existence of a low-dose threshold on the order of 1 to 3 cGy for radiation exposure contributing to breast carcinogenesis. The possibility that a family history of breast cancer may have enhanced a carcinogenic radiation effect requires confirmation in other studies. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(3):605–13)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. P. Little, R. Wakeford, E. J. Tawn, S. D. Bouffler, and A. Berrington de Gonzalez Risks Associated with Low Doses and Low Dose Rates of Ionizing Radiation: Why Linearity May Be (Almost) the Best We Can Do Radiology, April 1, 2009; 251(1): 6 - 12. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Berrington de Gonzalez, C. D. Berg, K. Visvanathan, and M. Robson Estimated Risk of Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer From Mammographic Screening for Young BRCA Mutation Carriers J Natl Cancer Inst, February 4, 2009; 101(3): 205 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]