CEBP 09 AM Call for Abstracts w/deadline 2008 Conference on Cancer Prevention - Washington, D.C.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 17, 484-489, March 1, 2008. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0725
© 2008 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Buffler, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davis, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Buffler, P. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cancer Immunology: Immunotherapy
Right arrow Clinical Research

Issues of Diagnostic Review in Brain Tumor Studies: From the Brain Tumor Epidemiology Consortium

Faith G. Davis1, Beatrice S. Malmer2, Ken Aldape4, Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan6, Melissa L. Bondy5, Thomas Brännström3, Janet M. Bruner4, Peter C. Burger7, V. Peter Collins8, Peter D. Inskip9, Carol Kruchko10, Bridget J. McCarthy1,10, Roger E. McLendon11, Siegal Sadetzki12,13, Tarik Tihan14, Margaret R. Wrensch14 and Patricia A. Buffler15

1 Division of Epidemiology/Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; 2 Department of Radiation Sciences and Oncology, Umeå University Hospital; 3 Department of Medical Biosciences-Pathology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Departments of 4 Pathology and 5 Epidemiology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 6 Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio; 7 Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland; 8 Division of Molecular Histopathology, Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 9 Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland; 10 Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, Hinsdale, Illinois; 11 Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; 12 Cancer and Radiation Epidemiology Unit, Gertner Institute, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; 13 Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel; 14 University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and 15 Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California

Requests for reprints: Faith G. Davis, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1603 West Taylor, M/C 923 Chicago, IL 60612. Phone: 312-996-5019; Fax: 312-413-2025. E-mail: fayed{at}uic.edu

Epidemiologists routinely conduct centralized single pathology reviews to minimize interobserver diagnostic variability, but this practice does not facilitate the combination of studies across geographic regions and institutions where diagnostic practices differ. A meeting of neuropathologists and epidemiologists focused on brain tumor classification issues in the context of protocol needs for consortial studies (http://epi.grants.cancer.gov/btec/). It resulted in recommendations relevant to brain tumors and possibly other rare disease studies. Two categories of brain tumors have enough general agreement over time, across regions, and between individual pathologists that one can consider using existing diagnostic data without further review: glioblastomas and meningiomas (as long as uniform guidelines such as those provided by the WHO are used). Prospective studies of these tumors benefit from collection of pathology reports, at a minimum recording the pathology department and classification system used in the diagnosis. Other brain tumors, such as oligodendroglioma, are less distinct and require careful histopathologic review for consistent classification across study centers. Epidemiologic study protocols must consider the study specific aims, diagnostic changes that have taken place over time, and other issues unique to the type(s) of tumor being studied. As diagnostic changes are being made rapidly, there are no readily available answers on disease classification issues. It is essential that epidemiologists and neuropathologists collaborate to develop appropriate study designs and protocols for specific hypothesis and populations. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(3):484–9)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association for Cancer Research.