CEBP http://www.cancermicroenvironment.tau.ac.il/welcome2009.html Advances in Breast Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 17, 3252, November 1, 2008. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0609
© 2008 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pischon, T.
Right arrow Articles by Riboli, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pischon, T.
Right arrow Articles by Riboli, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrow Epidemiology: Classical Epidemiology

Body Size and Risk of Prostate Cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition

Tobias Pischon1, Heiner Boeing1, Steffen Weikert1,2, Naomi Allen3, Tim Key3, Nina Føns Johnsen4, Anne Tjønneland4, Marianne Tang Severinsen5, Kim Overvad5,6, Sabine Rohrmann7, Rudolf Kaaks7, Antonia Trichopoulou8, Gitaki Zoi8, Dimitrios Trichopoulos9, Valeria Pala10, Domenico Palli11, Rosario Tumino12, Carlotta Sacerdote13, H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita14, Anne May14, Jonas Manjer15, Peter Wallström16, Pär Stattin17, Göran Hallmans18, Genevieve Buckland19, Nerea Larrañaga20, María Dolores Chirlaque21, Carmen Martínez22, María L. Redondo Cornejo23, Eva Ardanaz24, Sheila Bingham25, Kay-Tee Khaw26, Sabina Rinaldi27, Nadia Slimani27, Mazda Jenab27 and Elio Riboli28

1 Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany; 2 Department of Urology, Charité -University Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany; 3 Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; 4 Danish Cancer Society, Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Copenhagen, Denmark; Departments of 5 Clinical Epidemiology and 6 Cardiology, Aalborg Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; 7 Division of Clinical Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; 8 Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece; 9 Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; 10 Nutritional Epidemiology Unit, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy; 11 Molecular and Nutritional Epidemiology Unit, CSPO-Scientific Institute of Tuscany, Florence, Italy; 12 Cancer Registry Azienda Ospedaliera "Civile M.P.Arezzo", Ragusa, Italy; 13 Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 14 National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands; 15 Department of Surgery, Malmö University Hospital and 16 Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Departments of 17 Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology and 18 Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Nutritional Research, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; 19 Unit of Nutrition, Environment and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; 20 Public Health Department of Gipuzkoa, Basque Government and CIBERESP, San Sebastian, Spain; 21 Epidemiology Department, Murcia Health Council, CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Barcelona, Spain; 22 Andalusian School of Public Health and CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Granada, Spain; 23 Public Health and Health Planning Directorate, Asturias, Spain; 24 Public Health Institute of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain, and CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Spain; 25 Centre for Nutrition and Cancer and 26 Clinical Gerontology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 27 IARC-WHO, Lyon, France; and the 28 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

Requests for reprints: Tobias Pischon, Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition (DIfE), Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114-116, 14558 Nuthetal, Germany. Phone: 49-33200/88711; Fax: 49-33200/88721. E-mail: pischon{at}dife.de

Background: Body size has been hypothesized to influence the risk of prostate cancer; however, most epidemiologic studies have relied on body mass index (BMI) to assess adiposity, whereas only a few studies have examined whether body fat distribution predicts prostate cancer.

Methods: We examined the association of height, BMI, waist and hip circumference, and waist-hip ratio with prostate cancer risk among 129,502 men without cancer at baseline from 8 countries of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC), using Cox regression, with age as time metric, stratifying by study center and age at recruitment, and adjusting for education, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and physical activity.

Results: During a mean follow-up of 8.5 years, 2,446 men developed prostate cancer. Waist circumference and waist-hip ratio were positively associated with risk of advanced disease. The relative risk of advanced prostate cancer was 1.06 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.1) per 5-cm-higher waist circumference and 1.21 (95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.39) per 0.1-unit-higher waist-hip ratio. When stratified by BMI, waist circumference and waist-hip ratio were positively related to risk of total, advanced, and high-grade prostate cancer among men with lower but not among those with higher BMI (Pinteraction for waist with BMI, 0.25, 0.02, and 0.05, respectively; Pinteraction for waist-hip ratio with BMI, 0.27, 0.22, and 0.14; respectively).

Conclusions: These data suggest that abdominal adiposity may be associated with an increased risk of advanced prostate cancer. This association may be stronger among individuals with lower BMI; however, this finding needs confirmation in future studies. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(11):3252–61)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. D. Fesinmeyer, R. Gulati, S. Zeliadt, N. Weiss, A. R. Kristal, and R. Etzioni
Effect of Population Trends in Body Mass Index on Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the United States
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2009; 18(3): 808 - 815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association for Cancer Research.