This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mason, J. B. Articles by Rosenberg, I. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mason, J. B. Articles by Rosenberg, I. H. Related Collections Commentary

A Temporal Association between Folic Acid Fortification and an Increase in Colorectal Cancer Rates May Be Illuminating Important Biological Principles: A Hypothesis

¹ Jean Mayer U.S. Department of Agriculture Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University; ² Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; and ³ Rowett Research Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom

Requests for reprints: Joel B. Mason, Jean Mayer U.S. Department of Agriculture Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111. Phone: 617-556-3194; Fax: 617-556-3234. E-mail: joel.mason{at}tufts.edu

Nationwide fortification of enriched uncooked cereal grains with folic acid began in the United States and Canada in 1996 and 1997, respectively, and became mandatory in 1998. The rationale was to reduce the number of births complicated by neural tube defects. Concurrently, the United States and Canada experienced abrupt reversals of the downward trend in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence that the two countries had enjoyed in the preceding decade: absolute rates of CRC began to increase in 1996 (United States) and 1998 (Canada), peaked in 1998 (United States) and 2000 (Canada), and have continued to exceed the pre-1996/1997 trends by 4 to 6 additional cases per 100,000 individuals. In each country, the increase in CRC incidence from the prefortification trend falls significantly outside of the downward linear fit based on nonparametric 95% confidence intervals. The statistically significant increase in rates is also evident when the data for each country are analyzed separately for men and women. Changes in the rate of colorectal endoscopic procedures do not seem to account for this increase in CRC incidence. These observations alone do not prove causality but are consistent with the known effects of folate on existing neoplasms, as shown in both preclinical and clinical studies. We therefore hypothesize that the institution of folic acid fortification may have been wholly or partly responsible for the observed increase in CRC rates in the mid-1990s. Further work is needed to definitively establish the nature of this relationship. In the meantime, deliberations about the institution or enhancement of fortification programs should be undertaken with these considerations in mind. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(7):1325–9)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A D. Smith, Y.-I. Kim, and H. Refsum Is folic acid good for everyone? Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2008; 87(3): 517 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Wang, A. J. Sasco, C. Fu, H. Xue, G. Guo, Z. Hua, Q. Zhou, Q. Jiang, and B. Xu Aberrant DNA Methylation of P16, MGMT, and hMLH1 Genes in Combination with MTHFR C677T Genetic Polymorphism in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 118 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. P Quinlivan and J. F Gregory III Reassessing folic acid consumption patterns in the United States (1999 2004): potential effect on neural tube defects and overexposure to folate Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2007; 86(6): 1773 - 1779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]